Hi,
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010, Luk Claes wrote:
I think that having an official rolling release always available would
reduce the pressure of maintainers to always push the latest into the next
stable release precisely because there's an alternative... so it would
rather help concerning this
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 05:17:36PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
I'm not against having a constant useable testing, on the contrary. I
just don't see why we want to choose for working around the problems we
currently have with testing instead of fixing them for everyone.
You seem to be basing your
Hi Raphael
On 09/23/2010 02:30 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010, Luk Claes wrote:
Raphael's article is now published, and is probably a good basis for
discussing CUT on -de...@.
Free link: http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/406301/bd522adc828b3461/
Personally I have the feeling
Hi Luk,
On 26/09/10 at 15:55 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
I think this is completely the wrong question, we'd better ask the
question: Why do freezes have to take that long?
I would be interested in hearing your answer to that question. It would
help to understand the rest of your mail. It seems to
Hey,
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Luk Claes l...@debian.org wrote:
IMHO, what is missing from rolling should be added to testing, not
worked around by introducing another suite:
I believe it's the other way around, actually. To me, adding stuff to
testing is the workaround. Testing is not
On 09/26/2010 04:40 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi Luk,
Hi Lucas
Note that this is my personal opinion and does not represent the opinion
of the Release Team perse.
On 26/09/10 at 15:55 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
I think this is completely the wrong question, we'd better ask the
question: Why do
On 09/26/2010 05:02 PM, Fernando Lemos wrote:
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Luk Claes l...@debian.org wrote:
Why would non-frequent snapshots help more than frequent snapshots?
Because in that case they could really be used and supported for
installing, better user testing, security...
Hi Luk,
thanks for your valuable comments.
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010, Luk Claes wrote:
Of course there are multiple reasons. Though I think one of the most
obvious ones is that we as a project don't do a genuine stable release
often so sometimes delay the freeze willingly or not. Another reason
Hi Raphael
On 09/26/2010 08:40 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010, Luk Claes wrote:
Of course there are multiple reasons. Though I think one of the most
obvious ones is that we as a project don't do a genuine stable release
often so sometimes delay the freeze willingly or not.
On 22/09/10 at 15:01 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hi all,
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
CUT discussions at debconf10 and recent news of the birth of Linux Mint
discussions on CUT have continued after debconf on the CUT mailing. I
wrote a summary of the discussion that
On 09/23/2010 09:00 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Raphael's article is now published, and is probably a good basis for
discussing CUT on -de...@. Free link:
http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/406301/bd522adc828b3461/
It's still looks weired to me to have to read this article there (I
mean, _only_
On 23/09/10 at 10:40 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 09/23/2010 09:00 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Raphael's article is now published, and is probably a good basis for
discussing CUT on -de...@. Free link:
http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/406301/bd522adc828b3461/
It's still looks weired
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 09/23/2010 09:00 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Raphael's article is now published, and is probably a good basis for
discussing CUT on -de...@. Free link:
http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/406301/bd522adc828b3461/
It's still looks weired to me
On 09/23/2010 09:00 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 22/09/10 at 15:01 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hi all,
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
CUT discussions at debconf10 and recent news of the birth of Linux Mint
discussions on CUT have continued after debconf on the CUT mailing.
Hi Luk,
thanks for your comment!
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010, Luk Claes wrote:
Raphael's article is now published, and is probably a good basis for
discussing CUT on -de...@.
Free link: http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/406301/bd522adc828b3461/
Personally I have the feeling that if we would choose
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 14:30:30 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Personally I would like to have snapshots every 2 or 3 months. Colin
Watson pointed out in an LWN comment (http://lwn.net/Articles/406597/):
| There's a good chance that CUT could serve a dual purpose of making it
| easier to prepare
16 matches
Mail list logo
