Report about packages that need work for Aug 29, 2003
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 59
Number of packages offered up for adoption this week: 1
Total number of orphaned packages: 205
Number of packages orphaned this week: 20
The number in parenthesis after each package name is
A little over one week ago, I posted a survey[1] to the debian-legal
mailing list, requesting the opinion of subscribers regarding one of a
pair of related questions that have been asked with increasing frequency
on that list, and in a few other forums around the Internet.
Does the GNU Free
Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
| Le Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 11:29:12PM -0400, Daniel Déchelotte écrivait:
| et j'aimerais maintenant profiter des corrections de la 0.80.1-8.
| Quelle est la procedure a suivre pour, evidemment, ne pas perdre mes
| bidouilles ?
|
| S'assurer qu'on les
Bonjour,
J'ai commence a modifier wmaker lorsqu'il en etait a la version 0.80.1-6,
et j'aimerais maintenant profiter des corrections de la 0.80.1-8. Quelle est
la procedure a suivre pour, evidemment, ne pas perdre mes bidouilles ?
Questions connexes : si je veux faire une copie de sauvegarde de
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 08:59:04PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 01:51:58PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
It's a bit extreme but I'm sick of deleting such messages, especially in
light of the Blaster worm.
Not extreme at all.
I imagine there are some legitimate
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 14:18, Mathieu Roy wrote:
We've gone through this many times already. Upstream changes should
not be documented in the Debian changelog, even if they fix bugs in
the Debian BTS.
Because users that submitted bugs using the Debian BTS do not deserve
the right to get
On Friday 29 August 2003 09:28, Steve Lamb wrote:
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 00:36:57 -0700
Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, since we're pointing fingers, it's really SMTP that's broken by
design, and all anti-spam programs (including C-R systems) are merely
stopgap measures that try
Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Ean R. Schuessler wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 17:18:37 -0500
Source: kaffe
Binary: kaffe
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:1.1.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 08:25:30PM -0400, Brian Mays wrote:
Thus, the situation is as follows. If someone can point me to an new
upstream source that is fairly similar to the source in the current
Debian package, then I can incorporate these changes into Debian in a
very short time. If,
On Friday 29 August 2003 10:29, wrote:
debian-develHi
Where can I find the source code on sh4 for Debian linux
http://www.m17n.org/linux-sh/debian/ and go from there.
greetings
-- vbi
--
Sterility is inherited. If your parents never had kids, odds are you
wont either.
--
I upgraded sid two days ago, and starting X via gdm does not
set the environment variable I've set in /etc/environment.
Anyone has the same problem ..?
--
Fabio Rafael da Rosa - f 2 r
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian- http://debian.org
Debian-BR - http://debian-br.org
Debian-SP -
[Fabio Rafael da Rosa]
I upgraded sid two days ago, and starting X via gdm does not set the
environment variable I've set in /etc/environment. Anyone has the
same problem ..?
It is probably a PAM configuration problem. You need the following
line in the /etc/pam.d/ file used by gdm:
auth
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 16:31:59 +
benfoley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 29 August 2003 09:28, Steve Lamb wrote:
Oddly enough Spamassassin doesn't exasperate the problem. TDMA does.
exacerbate is probably what you meant here.
Quite so. 1:30am emails before the requisite
on Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 09:20:53AM +1000, Russell Coker ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 07:55, Adam McKenna wrote:
My own inbox supports this statement. 140 responses to Sobig.F mails,
of which 43 are virus or other content-based autoresponders, and 97
being delivery
Ross Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 14:18, Mathieu Roy wrote:
We've gone through this many times already. Upstream changes should
not be documented in the Debian changelog, even if they fix bugs in
the Debian BTS.
Because users that submitted bugs using the Debian
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 09:20:49PM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote:
The virus responses are irresponsible, and have been for almost two years
as the number of sender-spoofing emails has grown.
BTW, amavisd-new has
# Treat envelope sender address as unreliable and don't send sender
# notification
I will be out of the office starting 08/28/2003 and will not return until
09/02/2003.
I will respond to your message when I return.
Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :
Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Ean R. Schuessler wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 17:18:37 -0500
Source: kaffe
Binary: kaffe
Architecture: source i386
Version:
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 07:55, Adam McKenna wrote:
My own inbox supports this statement. 140 responses to Sobig.F mails,
of which 43 are virus or other content-based autoresponders, and 97
being delivery failure messages or other autoresponders (e.g.: ISP help
desk).
How many were
* Adam McKenna
#0, #1, #2 and #11 are basically opinion and rhetoric.
Well. Let's take a look at what Karsten had to say about point #2,
Misplaced burden:
[...] «C-R may place the burden on third parties either inadvertently
(via spoofed sender spam or virus mail), or deliberately
Herbert Xu wrote:
This is bullshit.
We've gone through this many times already. Upstream changes should
not be documented in the Debian changelog, even if they fix bugs in
the Debian BTS.
Fine. Then don't close them with the Debian changelog at all; instead,
use [EMAIL PROTECTED], with an
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 11:37:57AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
If someone is to Joe-Job me then I'd rather that mailing lists bounce the
messages, if it gets bad I could filter out all mailing list messages
temporarily.
Hmm, how about giving tmda its own special header so we can auto-filter
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 09:47, Adam McKenna wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 09:20:53AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
The comparison to mailing list software makes no sense.
Maybe not in the context of viruses, but for the Joe Job problem it does.
If someone is to Joe-Job me then I'd rather that
* GOTO Masanori ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030829 11:05]:
I may need to explain the status glibc:
[...]
The current version is 2.3.2-4. We're working for fixing bugs,
some bugs were resolved.
Sorry, I didn't want to step on your feet. I know that glibc is a
nasty beast, and you're really good at
Quoting Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
[Short version: see the patch below.]
(after a few days w/o answers from Snort's maintainer)
Sander, any comments wrt to this patch? Please at least say wether you are
going to forward this to Snort maintainers or use it in
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 05:01:54PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Fabio Rafael da Rosa]
I upgraded sid two days ago, and starting X via gdm does not set the
environment variable I've set in /etc/environment. Anyone has the
same problem ..?
It is probably a PAM configuration problem.
I do receive a lot of messages and use pine's filtering
features to sort them out to different folders. The same
thing happened with folder IMOBILIARE. I have sorted there
some messages after i've readed them. After i renamed the
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 02:46:48AM +0200, Tore Anderson wrote:
Earlier, you've stated that your time is precious. Well, so is mine.
How dare you assume that the time I spent reviewing *your* callenge mail
and deciding it was junk is less precious than the time you (could have)
spent
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 00:36:57 -0700
Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, since we're pointing fingers, it's really SMTP that's broken by
design, and all anti-spam programs (including C-R systems) are merely
stopgap measures that try to make up for SMTP's shortcomings.
Oddly enough
hello,
Can't reply to your mail at the moment, I will reply as soon when possible.
If you didn't send a message, please control your pc for virusses.
greetings
christophe
Ross Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :
The bug has been fixed is everything I would need to know. I don't
really care if it was a typo, a new library, a rebuild or some magic
incantation with black dribbling candles, the bug has been fixed.
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 17:46, Mathieu Roy
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 04:31:59PM +, benfoley wrote:
On Friday 29 August 2003 09:28, Steve Lamb wrote:
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 00:36:57 -0700
Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, since we're pointing fingers, it's really SMTP that's broken by
design, and all anti-spam programs
Martin Schulze wrote:
Updated alien
The alien changes have been in testing and unstable for a similar
amount of time.
Unfortunately I can't find the source for the above packages.
...? Context error.
I also remember some talk about start-stop-daemon having to be
altered.
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-28
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: module-assistant
Version : 0.1 (currently beeing written)
Upstream Author : myself, nativ package
* URL : http://modass.alioth.debian.org (when it has been approved)
* License
Please contact your system administrator.
The infected file attachment in the scanned document was deleted.
Virus Information:
The attachment your_details.pif contained the virus [EMAIL PROTECTED] and was
deleted.
$B"#5^$0$"$J$?$N6/$$L#J}!*%"%$%(!<%+!<%I$N%b%P%$%k%-%c%C%7%s%0(B
$B"#$*?=$79~$_$+$i?69~$_$^$G:GB.(B20$BJ,!#5^$J=PHq$G$*:$$j$NJ}92$F$kA0$K$^$:Ev
debian-develHi
Where can I find the source code on sh4 for Debian linux
Best Regard!
Cong Ming
[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
on Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 08:21:22AM -0700, Adam McKenna ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 12:35:25PM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote:
#2, Misplaced burden, is the reason for the 'grave' severity.
People have a right to ask that unkown people that e-mail them confirm
the
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 10:41:54PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
That doesn't help all that much - it's also important see why the bug
has been closed.
Because it is fixed...
whatever it was I was trying to do when I generated the error rather
than by fixing the error handling.
it wont help
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 09:20:49PM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote:
on Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 01:03:37AM -0700, Adam McKenna ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
Also, I don't have any hard data to support this, but it's obvious to
me that the volume of mail generated by virus scanners in response to
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 11:16, Adam McKenna wrote:
When the next address-spoofing virus hits, if I need to update my filters
again, I'll make a better effort to do it ASAP instead of letting it go for
several days.
Why not make your tmda package depend on amavis-new and clamav-freshclam? If
they
reassign 207300 humanity
thanks
On pe, 2003-08-29 at 10:36, Adam McKenna wrote:
Well, since we're pointing fingers, it's really SMTP that's broken by
design, and all anti-spam programs (including C-R systems) are merely
stopgap measures that try to make up for SMTP's shortcomings.
The fact
On Tue, 05 Aug 2003 07:32:57 +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Hi, Peter Mathiasson wrote:
[...] distcc sends the complete preprocessed source code across the
network for each job.
Hmm, OK, but that would just speedup the actual compilation. Granted,
that's the largest chunk, but
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 08:21:22AM -0700, Adam McKenna wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 12:35:25PM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote:
#2, Misplaced burden, is the reason for the 'grave' severity.
People have a right to ask that unkown people that e-mail them confirm the
e-mail.
the point that
TEL13311210700 010-85762212
E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 12:12:58PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 11:16, Adam McKenna wrote:
When the next address-spoofing virus hits, if I need to update my filters
again, I'll make a better effort to do it ASAP instead of letting it go for
several days.
Why not make
Ross Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] a tapoté :
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 14:18, Mathieu Roy wrote:
We've gone through this many times already. Upstream changes should
not be documented in the Debian changelog, even if they fix bugs in
the Debian BTS.
Because users that submitted bugs using
µã»÷ http://hengingv.533.net ½Ì¸øÄúÈçºÎÀûÓÃÍøÂç׬Ǯ
Hello,
I have a package that Replaces: another package. The former package
stored files in a particular directory (/usr/lib/foo); when the package
is removed, it leaves that directory behind, empty. The new package has
a symlink at that location, instead of a directory. dpkg, however, does
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 05:46:54PM +0200, Mike Dornberger wrote:
I'd like to know, why all recently updated and new packages in testing have
a dependancy on glibc = 2.3.2? Wouldn't it be enough if they depend just
on glibc?
Binaries built against glibc 2.3.2 really do depend on glibc 2.3.2
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-29
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: ITP: libdata-formvalidator-perl
Version : 3.12
Upstream Author : Mark Stosberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/Data/
* License : GPL +
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 10:05:21AM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
A proper entry is as follows:
* New upstream release.
* no longer does foo when bar happens. Closes: #12345
* wrapper script rewritten to not use $$ in tempfile names. Closes: #12345
Please, everyone remember, a changelog
I've actually sent him an email but got no answer. I've posted in
debian-devel few days ago and nobody complained that GDM could source
/etc/environment in the init script. That's an one-line patch (already
tagged as patch in bts for more than a year)...
I think that if the maintainer doesn't
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 08:48:13PM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
There's at least one other solution: what if, when a bug tagged
upstream was closed, the mail sent would include the upstream
ChangeLog (hopefully named ChangeLog in the top directory of the
package)?
Can someone familiar with the
The bug has been fixed is everything I would need to know. I don't
really care if it was a typo, a new library, a rebuild or some magic
incantation with black dribbling candles, the bug has been fixed.
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 17:46, Mathieu Roy wrote:
This approach surely don't raise the
Hi,
I'd like to know, why all recently updated and new packages in testing have
a dependancy on glibc = 2.3.2? Wouldn't it be enough if they depend just
on glibc? BTW: Why are all those packages going into testing if they are
uninstallable?
Regards,
Mike Dornberger
PS: Please Cc me, I'm not
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 12:12, Joshua Kwan wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 11:37:57AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
If someone is to Joe-Job me then I'd rather that mailing lists bounce the
messages, if it gets bad I could filter out all mailing list messages
temporarily.
Hmm, how about giving
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Ryan Underwood wrote:
Hello,
I have a package that Replaces: another package. The former package
stored files in a particular directory (/usr/lib/foo); when the package
is removed, it leaves that directory behind, empty. The new package has
a symlink at that
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Glenn Maynard wrote:
If I report segmentation fault in ls, I--as a user of ls, not a
developer--couldn't care less about why it was segfaulting or how the
bug was fixed; I only care that it's been fixed. If a developer wants
to spend their limited time researching how
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 2:08 AM
Subject: debian-devel-digest Digest V2003 #1147
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 09:16:04PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
Of course there are downsides either way, but there is no dispute
that the size of the Debian archive is huge, and mirrors are struggling
to keep up as a result.
Is this so? I havent seen reports in this area for a while.
Greetings
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 09:31:29AM -0400, Joe Drew wrote:
Fine. Then don't close them with the Debian changelog at all; instead,
use [EMAIL PROTECTED], with an explanation that it is fixed in
such-and-such a version. The changelog bug closing facility is only a
convenience.
I'm confused.
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 03:48:13PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
the point that you keep on missing is that TMDA and similar programs send
confirmation emails to innocent third-parties who did *NOT* send an email.
Really?
TMDA and all C-R systems are broken-by-design, just as many stupid
Dear Candidate,
Thank you for getting in touch with Prometric Auto Response System.
We are in receipt of your e-mail. This e-mail contains the following
I. KEY WORDS TO PUT IN THE SUBJECT FIELD OF YOUR E-MAIL TO US.
In order to get a reply from us, you are required to put ONE of the relevant
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 04:34:58PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
It's not about summarizing how the bug was fixed. It's about summarizing the
bug *itself* in the changelog.
The description of the bug is already available(as the title of the bug
report). At the very least this should be placed
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 01:51:58PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
It's a bit extreme but I'm sick of deleting such messages, especially in
light of the Blaster worm.
Not extreme at all.
I imagine there are some legitimate people I might receive emails from,
reply to them and never know it
At Thu, 28 Aug 2003 10:24:15 +0200,
Andreas Barth wrote:
Really? The latest glibc in sarge is from 2003-03-22, and there are
currently 1103 packages waiting for glibc.
I may need to explain the status glibc:
2003-03-22 glibc is 2.3.1-17. The next version of glibc is 2.3.2-2,
which was
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 01:42:53AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
PS Before someone raises the issue of license of viruses. I believe that
anyone who distributes a virus does so with the desire that it be installed
on as many systems as possible and that the implied license permits you to
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 03:48:13PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
the point that you keep on missing is that TMDA and similar programs send
confirmation emails to innocent third-parties who did *NOT* send an email.
TMDA and all C-R systems are broken-by-design, just as many stupid end-user
I'm cc'ing PSG, maybe he'll be interested.
* New upstream release .* (Closes: #1, #2, #3)
to
* New upstream release \1
* fixed BTS summary line of #1 Closes: #1
* fixed BTS summary line of #2 Closes: #2
* fixed BTS summary line of #3 Closes: #3
in changelogs would probably go
Hi,
I've noticed the growth in the debian archive with some concern
over the last few weeks/months. We're now hitting the limit of
the partition that debian is on and it will be quite difficult
technically for us to deal with this in the short term.
We have some new storage which is being
Your email to Crown International has been sent. You should receive a response
within 1 business day. If you need a faster response, feel free to contact us
Toll Free at 1-800-715-4227 during regular business hours.
Thank You,
James P. Cox
President, Crown International
Is this possible?
It would be really cool(tm) if I didn't have to reconfigure every
program on my laptop to use a different proxy server every time I plug
it into a different network.
Just venting my irritation for the day...
--
Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 12:01:42PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
Is this possible?
It would be really cool(tm) if I didn't have to reconfigure every
program on my laptop to use a different proxy server every time I plug
it into a different network.
Just venting my irritation for the day...
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 06:00:51PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote:
A script to convert eg.
* New upstream release .* (Closes: #1, #2, #3)
to
* New upstream release \1
* fixed BTS summary line of #1 Closes: #1
* fixed BTS summary line of #2 Closes: #2
* fixed BTS summary line of #3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 18:49:49 -0400
Source: ncurses-ruby
Binary: libncurses-ruby
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.7.1-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Brian M. Almeida [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Brian M. Almeida
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 09:04:00 +1000
Source: devfsd
Binary: devfsd
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.3.25-16
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 11:40:21 -0400
Source: gimp1.3
Binary: libgimp1.3 gimp1.3 gimp1.3-nonfree gimp1.3-python libgimp1.3-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.3.19-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ari Pollak [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 15:47:49 -0700
Source: microwindows
Binary: microwindows microwindows-fb libmicrowindows-dev libmicrowindows0
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.90-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: David Schleef
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 22:53:19 +0200
Source: wmtv
Binary: wmtv
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.6.5-15
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Nicolas Boullis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Nicolas Boullis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 01:27:13 +0200
Source: loadwatch
Binary: loadwatch
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0+1.1alpha1-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Nicolas Boullis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Nicolas Boullis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 09:29:05 +1000
Source: kcd
Binary: kcd
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.1.3.1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ben Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ben Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 00:53:09 +0200
Source: file-roller
Binary: file-roller
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.3.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 16:43:48 -0700
Source: limewire
Binary: limewire
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.4.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Michael Cardenas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: michael cardenas [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 02:09:32 +0200
Source: gtetrinet
Binary: gtetrinet
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.7.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jordi Mallach [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jordi Mallach [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 00:50:57 +0200
Source: apcalc
Binary: apcalc apcalc-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.11.8.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Buck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Buck [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 02:36:25 +0200
Source: remem
Binary: remembrance-agent
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.11-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Javier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 21:01:49 -0500
Source: quantlib-python
Binary: quantlib-python
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.3.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dirk Eddelbuettel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Dirk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 21:03:06 -0500
Source: quantlib-ruby
Binary: quantlib-ruby
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.3.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dirk Eddelbuettel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Dirk Eddelbuettel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 20:59:24 -0400
Source: spamassassin
Binary: spamassassin spamc
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 2.59pre2.60rc3-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Duncan Findlay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 21:22:02 -0400
Source: circuslinux
Binary: circuslinux
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.3-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christian T. Steigies [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christian T.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 13:17:07 -0500
Source: xfree86
Binary: xlibmesa3-gl xserver-common libxaw7-dbg xlibmesa-glu-dev xbase-clients twm
xlibmesa3-dbg xfonts-scalable xfonts-75dpi libdps1-dbg xmh libxaw6-dbg xfwp xlibs
xlibosmesa3-dbg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 20:22:14 -0700
Source: hermes1
Binary: hermes1-dev hermes1
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.3.3-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: David Schleef [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: David Schleef [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 22:19:42 +0200
Source: pantomime
Binary: pantomime1 pantomime-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.1.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthias Klose
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 15:02:41 +0900
Source: librmail-ruby
Binary: librmail-ruby
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.14-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: akira yamada [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: akira yamada [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 08:28:16 +0200
Source: dpsyco
Binary: dpsyco-doc dpsyco-samba dpsyco-ssh dpsyco dpsyco-cfengine dpsyco-devel
dpsyco-sudo dpsyco-base dpsyco-mysql dpsyco-lib dpsyco-skel dpsyco-patch
Architecture: source all
Version:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 00:54:03 -0600
Source: cl-net-telent-date
Binary: cl-net-telent-date
Architecture: source all
Version: 1:0.4.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Kevin M. Rosenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kevin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 01:05:50 -0600
Source: ctn
Binary: ctn-dev ctn
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.0.6-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Kevin M. Rosenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kevin M. Rosenberg [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 01:32:39 -0600
Source: mailliststat
Binary: mailliststat
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Kevin M. Rosenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Kevin M. Rosenberg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 10:22:54 +0200
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.60-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
1 - 100 of 162 matches
Mail list logo