SteX [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
6 sicuro che Sarge ci sarà per settembre/ottobre?
Se non lo e`, io mi vergognerei a farmi vedere per promuovere Debian.
Magari si organizza qualcosa per parlare di Ubuntu a quel punto;-)
--
David N. Welton
- http://www.dedasys.com/davidw/
Apache, Linux, Tcl
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 09:53:12AM +0100, David N. Welton wrote:
Comunque, meno male che e` in autunno... un anno fa la gente si
lamentava che woody era troppo vecchia, figurati dovessimo tornarci
sempre con woody.
Inguaribile ottimista :-P Pensa se dovessimo tornarci in autunno sempre
con
Il giorno mer, 16-02-2005 alle 09:53 +0100, David N. Welton ha scritto:
Stefano Canepa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2) che gli piacerebbe che tutte le varie realt del software libero
si coordinassero per fare un mega stand tutti assieme: Debian, ILS,
traduttori GNOME, sviluppatori di altre
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 04:36:35PM +0100, Stefano Canepa wrote:
Scusa l'ignoranza: cos' d-d-a e chi (o cosa) sono gli RMs?
d = Debian
d = developer
a = announce
...i cui archivi sono disponibili su:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce
Ciao,
Enrico che in Debian si coopera cos
giskard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 16 Feb 2005 10:35:59 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David N. Welton) wrote:
SteX [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
6 sicuro che Sarge ci sar_ per settembre/ottobre?
Se non lo e`, io mi vergognerei a farmi vedere per promuovere Debian.
Magari si organizza
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You're using an old (and broken) version of libtool. C.f.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa-packages/2003/09/msg00023.html for
Ryan's boilerplate explanation for fixing this problem.
Thanks a bunch, this is surely the problem, but applying the
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 11:30:00PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 11:22:01PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Can someone with mips and/or libtool expertise examine the build
failure for gnucash below, and see if they can diagnose the problem?
Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You're using an old (and broken) version of libtool. C.f.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa-packages/2003/09/msg00023.html for
Ryan's boilerplate explanation for fixing this problem.
Thanks a
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 07:34:27AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Kevin Mark [Tue, 15 Feb 2005 21:09:03 -0500]:
And I've never read ITO as a tag for orphaning bug. Either one mails
to -devel (or wherever) saying that they intend to give away or orphan
some packages, but this isn't a
Kevin Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 01:11:33PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
h. There are more rules as to when packages migrate from unstable to
testing.
i. You use both meanings of priority (changelog and control)
Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Kevin Mark [Tue, 15 Feb 2005 21:09:03 -0500]:
so, there is no 'bug' to the bts to orphan a package, simply a note to
debian-devel? So folks are expected to troll it to pickup packages?
ok. I will change the ITO to 'read about orphanded package on
* Christian Perrier
| Please find below the alphabetical list of the relevant packages
| (main, then contrib, then non-free).
.. as usual, please include maintainer names with package lists like
this. (And thanks for assembling the list. :)
--
Tollef Fog Heen
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Now, it should be noted, upstream uses autoconf 2.13, and libtool
1.4c. So these errors should not be happening, and seem to imply
problems in the Debian auto* packages.
Both are deprecated, outdated crap. Methinks you have some work to do to
Kevin Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
although, now I am getting confused about the difference between a
debian developer and a debian maintainer. I labeled most items with 'DD'
thinking that's who did stuff. More things to research.
The maintainer is the guy (or entity) who is listed in the
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 08:04:21AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
snip
Hi Martin,
source package: dsc + (diff) + orig.tar.gz
binary package: deb
source upload: changes + list of files therein
I added some of this to my diagram. not 100% yet.
snip
nah, we turn software into debian
|| On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 08:36:59 +0100
|| Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
pr (If only Ubuntu would do an effort to get their home-made packages
pr like xresprobe into Debian. :)
I talked with Daniel Stone about it and I'll maintain it inside of
Debian.
The current lack is it have
|| On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 09:00:37 +0100
|| Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mh On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 23:16:31 +0100, Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mh wrote:
* Torsten Landschoff:
Wanted to do that - but! Does svk handle symlinks? Thinking of
/etc/rc?.d and /etc/alternatives... Wrote my own
[Otavio Salvador]
I talked with Daniel Stone about it and I'll maintain it inside of
Debian.
Good. I look forward to getting ddcprobe back in Debian. I send an
email asking about this earlier, but never saw the answer. :(
The current lack is it have some xorg specific issues and then we
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 09:00:37 +0100, Marc Haber
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another topic that needs to be addressed with putting /etc under
version control is file modes and owner/group. cvs doesn't handle that
well at all.
Version management is different from backups, while both share some
On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 22:24 -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 02:04:17AM -0400, Maykel Moya wrote:
I'd recently adquire a little laptop (p3 900, 256 MB RAM). I'm been
thinking to install Ubuntu in it cause Ubuntu is optimized for desktop,
but I'd like to package some stuff
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Martin Schulze wrote:
Quoting Andreas Barth from the release team:
| Actually, we discussed about apt 0.6 within the release team and
| with the maintainers. IIRC, the two blocking issues are:
|
| 1. All the concepts
| - default installation,
| - key
also sprach Peter Palfrader [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.02.16.1337 +0100]:
The following patch makes apt use a directory in etc/apt named
trusted-keys/. Keys are simply placed in that directory if the
user wants to trust them for signing the Release file.
This is a great idea. I have briefly
Javier Setoain wrote:
* Package name: cpufrequtils
Version : 0.2-pre1
Upstream Author : Dominik Brodowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* License : GPL
Description : Tools to access the Linux kernel cpufreq subsystem
I did a package
* Marc Haber:
Also, the repository needs to be protected as /etc itself is, as it
contains passwords and other system confidential data.
Well, typically you wont store such files in the repository because it
makes automatically generated commit messages too sensitive to be sent
by email.
--
Jeroen Debian could promote this two-phase mirroring a bit more
Jeroen maybe, and/or provide nice scripts, that's probably why #6786
Jeroen is still open.
I suppose Debian is promoting one-phase mirroring and two phase
mirroring is roll your own.
If you want me to tell my administrator to do
ke, 2005-02-16 kello 11:00 +0100, Tollef Fog Heen kirjoitti:
.. as usual, please include maintainer names with package lists like
this. (And thanks for assembling the list. :)
I seem to have written a little script for this (attached). I don't see
a similar thing in devscripts. Is that the
Dan Jacobson [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Does http://www.debian.org/mirror/ at least have the
two-phase-mirroring script?
Why don't you go and look? And if you find the information too sparse,
submit a bug report with a patch?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Quoting Tollef Fog Heen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
* Christian Perrier
| Please find below the alphabetical list of the relevant packages
| (main, then contrib, then non-free).
.. as usual, please include maintainer names with package lists like
this. (And thanks for assembling the list. :)
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 02:24:34PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
Javier Setoain wrote:
* Package name: cpufrequtils
Version : 0.2-pre1
Upstream Author : Dominik Brodowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* License : GPL
Description :
Brian Nelson wrote:
Well, you didn't send the mail to the submitter (only to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], which doesn't go to the submitter--you need to
Cc him manually), so he probably never saw it...
I did send him privatly seveal times without getting any response.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann,
martin f krafft asks,
Obviously, for reasons unknown to the mere mortals,
the above only applies to topics of the mere mortals
of Debian, not to certain members of the cabal. Some
vital components of the Debian project are better kept
away from the public, or they could be flooded with
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 09:13:32AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Francesco P. Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Quite difficult if the function is the same. In both cases it uses stderr.
Oh good grief. Add an argument to the function saying where to direct
the output. How hard is
On 02/16/05 07:00, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
* Christian Perrier
| Please find below the alphabetical list of the relevant packages
| (main, then contrib, then non-free).
.. as usual, please include maintainer names with package lists like
this. (And thanks for assembling the list. :)
Adam C.
Hi Lars,
I could today achieve a big step forward. I found a configuration that worked
for
k7 (AMD). I've also created a initrd file (manually) and booted with the Xen
loaded. And here starts my problems. I was not able to boot because the
ide-generic
Linux driver dumps a segmentation fault :(
Rats. Posted to the wrong list. Please do not reply
to parent on -devel, but on -project. Sorry.
pgpmFt12eWFCQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 07:48:51PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
Brian Nelson wrote:
Well, you didn't send the mail to the submitter (only to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], which doesn't go to the submitter--you need to
Cc him manually), so he probably never saw it...
I did send him privatly seveal
clone 242281 -1
reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
retitle -1 Please remove mush from the archive as we do not have permision to
distribute it
thanks
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004, Pawel Wiecek wrote:
On Dec 28, 2:03am, Don Armstrong wrote:
However, waiting for 8
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Now, it should be noted, upstream uses autoconf 2.13, and libtool
1.4c. So these errors should not be happening, and seem to imply
problems in the Debian auto* packages.
Both are
Raphael,
I was able to get Xen running. But you need at least the 2.0.4-4 packages, as
the -3 packages were missing the xen.gz code.
2nd: I tried your kernels but wasn't successful. I assume that it shouldn't be
used for the Domain-0 as Xen seems to expect the kernels in ELF format...
This is
Hi Philipp,
I was able to get Xen running. But you need at least the 2.0.4-4
packages, as the -3 packages were missing the xen.gz code.
yes, I've patches the xen packages (2.0.4-3.1) to get the /boot/xen.gz
file.
2nd: I tried your kernels but wasn't successful.
Yes, they are broken. This was
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 12:39:44PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Now, it should be noted, upstream uses autoconf 2.13, and libtool
1.4c. So these errors should not be happening, and
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Clearly not, or it wouldn't have failed to build on mips and mipsel. There
is nothing perfectly working about that version of libtool, and moreover,
its effects are not limited to the mips architectures -- as the obscenely
long list of library
[Thomas Bushnell BSG]
Perhaps mips is so rare that they wouldn't get bug reports.
Perhaps. URL: http://popcon.debian.org/ reports:
1 0.02% kfreebsd-i386
1 0.02% ppc64
1 0.02% hurd-i386
2 0.04% mipsel
2 0.04% m68k
2 0.04% arm
4 0.07% mips
4 0.07%
2nd: I tried your kernels but wasn't successful.
Yes, they are broken. This was a first try without success.
Ok, I'll have a look at them. I thought it was my mistake ;-)
It seams that you are running a SCSI RAID. Did you compiled all drivers
staticly? Which .config did you used? I've a k7
Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dan Jacobson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well OK, but please be aware of the cases where a kid leaves his
village for a trip to the big city and his single chance to do an
apt-get dist-upgrade.
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Clearly not, or it wouldn't have failed to build on mips and mipsel. There
is nothing perfectly working about that version of libtool, and moreover,
its effects are not limited to the mips architectures -- as the
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 01:02:58PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Clearly not, or it wouldn't have failed to build on mips and mipsel. There
is nothing perfectly working about that version of libtool, and moreover,
its effects are not limited to
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Now, it should be noted, upstream uses autoconf 2.13, and libtool
1.4c. So these errors should not be happening, and seem to imply
Hi all,
I found yesterday that mails were not delivered since about
6:30 in the morning so I investigated a problem and found
that /var/log/exim/paniclog said /var/log/exim/mainlog had
a wrong owner/permission;
2005-02-16 06:33:49 1D1AKL-0005JC-00 Cannot open main log file /var/log/exim/m\
On that scenario does not seem a unreasonable action to delete it without
looking. It just 15 minutes to take it back.
I would take more time google'ing it, than reinstaling it.
But you missed my point.
Even the people here that supports the /.dev mount agrees that is not the
right place
On Feb 17, Lucas de Sousa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I understand that there only a few places to it.
It /will/ be moved to /dev/.old-dev/dev/ at some point in the future
(I need to coordinate this with at least the makedev maintainer), but for
a different reason (#294968).
I do believe that the
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 08:30:13AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Anibal Monsalve Salazar]
http://qa.debian.org/~anibal/debian-NEW.html
It's now redirected to http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
The web page on ftp-master is Ganneff's work. It's updated once
every hour from the authorative
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Considering Debian is the only mainstream desktop distribution with a mips
port, and gnucash upstream has in the past disavowed all responsibility for
compatibility with non-i386 archs, this seems laughably false. Also,
there's the fact that we've
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As for it being complicated, well, I believe you. But you need not be
upstream to change the build system, I have done that three or four times
already. It is not the most gratifying work in the world, at all... but the
result is far
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 04:33:04PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Considering Debian is the only mainstream desktop distribution with a mips
port, and gnucash upstream has in the past disavowed all responsibility for
compatibility with non-i386 archs, this seems laughably false. Also,
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That would be RC bug #295175 in the xfree86-common package. I don't imagine
gnucash would've fared any better under these circumstances without the
libtool update, either.
Ah, ok! I'm glad you are up on these things; I would not have guessde
to look
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 05:09:37PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
That would be RC bug #295175 in the xfree86-common package. I don't imagine
gnucash would've fared any better under these circumstances without the
libtool update, either.
Ah, ok! I'm glad you are up on these things; I
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Note that it's not sufficient for the fixed package to reach unstable, the
buildd admins also (and more importantly) need to clean up the build chroots
by manually reconciling the status of the xfree86-common package.
Yeah, I'd like to think it's not
Ok, I am working on getting the correct GPL statement put together so this
game on all the games based on it don't have any restrictions to
distribution. It was never my intention to make it hard to share, just to
make certain my name stayed with the game and future variants of it.
Sheesh, I
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 02:24:34PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
Currently, the priority was not so high to get it uploaded since NEW is
on hold.
Is it? Did I miss the memo?
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
March 5th @ The Brickhouse in St Albans WV
-Brain Trauma
-MoHrG
-Bag Of Hammers
-Psych Ward
-Puddle Of Blood
ALL AGES - $7 at the door - Doors open at 6PM
The Brickhouse is located @ 52 Old Main Plaza, St. Albans,
I do the following (irrelevant output omitted):
8
/usr/src/tmp$ apt-src install foo
/usr/src/tmp$ cd foo-version
/usr/src/tmp/foo-version$ apt-src build foo
E: Not installed
/usr/src/tmp/foo-version$
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 07:44:53AM +0430, Robert Koeneke wrote:
Ok, I am working on getting the correct GPL statement put together so this
game on all the games based on it don't have any restrictions to
distribution. It was never my intention to make it hard to share, just to
make certain
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 10:53:28AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Kevin Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
although, now I am getting confused about the difference between a
debian developer and a debian maintainer. I labeled most items with 'DD'
thinking that's who did stuff. More things to
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 12:54:37 +0100, Olaf Conradi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
You should ask yourself whether you're interested in the history or
not. If you are store them in a repository. If you just want the
latest version put them in a backup.
Handling a directory with _some_ files under version
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 20:50:50 +0100
Source: gnome-themes-extras
Binary: gnome-themes-extras
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.8.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Josselin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 00:41:44 -0800
Source: gnucash
Binary: gnucash-common gnucash
Architecture: source powerpc all
Version: 1.8.10-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Thomas Bushnell, BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 17:52:54 +
Source: skalibs
Binary: skalibs-doc skalibs-dev
Architecture: all source
Version: 0.45-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Gerrit Pape [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Gerrit Pape [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:37:53 +0100
Source: libapache-session-wrapper-perl
Binary: libapache-session-wrapper-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.19-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Krzysztof Krzyzaniak (eloy) [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 01:52:52 -0600
Source: kernel-package
Binary: kernel-package
Architecture: source all
Version: 8.122
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Manoj Srivastava
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 11:35:44 +0100
Source: cvs2svn
Binary: cvs2svn
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.2.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:37:18 +0100
Source: k3d
Binary: k3d-doc k3d-dev k3d
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 0.4.5.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: David Martínez Moreno [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: David
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 23:23:11 +0200
Source: mcs
Binary: mono-gac mono-mcs mono-assemblies-base mono-assemblies-arch mono-jay
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 1.0.5-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian Mono
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 22:58:39 +0200
Source: mono
Binary: libmono-dev libmono0 mono-utils mono-common mono mono-jit
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian Mono Group [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 11:30:01 +
Source: nautilus-cd-burner
Binary: libnautilus-burn-dev libnautilus-burn0 nautilus-cd-burner
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.8.7-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ross Burton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 11:55:13 +0100
Source: supertux
Binary: supertux supertux-data
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 0.1.2-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Gürkan Sengün [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Bartosz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:20:03 +0100
Source: autofs
Binary: autofs-hesiod autofs-ldap autofs
Architecture: source i386
Version: 4.1.3+4.1.4beta2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Steinar H. Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 12:27:06 -0800
Source: kernel-image-2.4.27-sparc
Binary: kernel-image-2.4.27-2-sparc64-smp kernel-headers-2.4.27-2-sparc64-smp
kernel-image-2.4.27-2-sparc64 kernel-image-2.4.27-2-sparc32-smp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 20:49:21 -0500
Source: linux-kernel-di-hppa-2.6
Binary: ipv6-modules-2.6.8-2-64-di ide-modules-2.6.8-2-64-di
firewire-core-modules-2.6.8-2-32-di cdrom-modules-2.6.8-2-64-di
ppp-modules-2.6.8-2-32-di
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 18:27:43 -0800
Source: linux-kernel-di-sparc
Binary: scsi-modules-2.4.27-2-sparc64-di cdrom-core-modules-2.4.27-2-sparc64-di
nic-modules-2.4.27-2-sparc32-di scsi-core-modules-2.4.27-2-sparc32-di
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 19:54:23 +0100
Source: linux-kernel-di-mips
Binary: scsi-common-modules-2.4.27-sb1-swarm-bn-di
xfs-modules-2.4.27-sb1-swarm-bn-di reiserfs-modules-2.4.27-sb1-swarm-bn-di
kernel-image-2.4.27-sb1-swarm-bn-di
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:20:23 +
Source: devmapper
Binary: dmsetup libdevmapper-dev libdevmapper1.01-udeb dmsetup-udeb
libdevmapper1.01
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2:1.01.00-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 01:28:21 -0800
Source: strace
Binary: strace strace-udeb
Architecture: source i386
Version: 4.5.9-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Roland McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Roland McGrath [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:25:42 +0100
Source: mpfr
Binary: libmpfr-dev
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 2.1.0-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Steve M. Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Laurent Fousse [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 15:04:08 +0200
Source: memaid-pyqt
Binary: memaid-pyqt
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.2.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jarno Elonen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jarno Elonen [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:31:24 +0100
Source: tpb
Binary: tpb
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.6.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Markus Braun [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Markus Braun [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 15:42:52 +0200
Source: memaid-pyqt
Binary: memaid-pyqt
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.2.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jarno Elonen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jarno Elonen [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 19:52:00 +0100
Source: thttpd
Binary: thttpd-util thttpd
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.23beta1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Daniel Baumann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 15:09:35 +0100
Source: totem
Binary: totem-gstreamer totem-xine totem
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 0.100-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 09:27:37 -0600
Source: pybliographer
Binary: pybliographer
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.2.6.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Chris Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Chris Lawrence
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 16:44:55 +0100
Source: puredata
Binary: puredata
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.38.2+amidi-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Guenter Geiger (Debian/GNU) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Guenter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 16:33:01 +0100
Source: sqlite
Binary: libsqlite0-dev libsqlite0 sqlite sqlite-doc libsqlite-tcl
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.8.16-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Andreas Rottmann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 17:24:04 +0100
Source: swami
Binary: swami
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.9.2-2
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Guenter Geiger (Debian/GNU) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Guenter Geiger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 16:36:43 +0100
Source: usemod-wiki
Binary: usemod-wiki
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christoph Berg [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2004 17:51:05 +0200
Source: tktable
Binary: tktable-dev tktable
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.9-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Lars Steinke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Lars Steinke (Debian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:29:38 +0100
Source: hotplug
Binary: hotplug
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.0.20040329-17
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Fumitoshi UKAI [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Marco d'Itri [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 16:34:26 +
Source: freewrl
Binary: freewrl
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.07-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Stephen Quinney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2005 13:40:13 +0200
Source: moodss
Binary: moodss
Architecture: source i386
Version: 19.6-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Lars Steinke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Lars Steinke (Debian Developer) [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 18:58:19 +0100
Source: zapping
Binary: zapping
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.9.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christian Marillat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christian Marillat [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 18:29:00 +0100
Source: rdiff-backup
Binary: rdiff-backup
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.13.4-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Daniel Baumann [EMAIL
1 - 100 of 165 matches
Mail list logo
