Hello,
I am looking to create .deb's for x86-64. I have an AMD64 but run an
i386 OS due to the lack of some 64-bit packages (like flash and
what-not). I have pbuilder all set up to build packages for i386, but I
wonder if it's possible to use it to create x86-64 packages as well.
After all, I do
Hello,
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 04:45:52PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Alexey Feldgendler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.23.1634 +0100]:
It's an idea with the final goal to provide most of what
ifupdown+guessnet+resolvconf do now,
I would personally add ifrename to this list.
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 13:27:26 +0700, Sylvain Le Gall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about creating a DBUS interface - it can be integrated in any
language that support it, and can be integrated in a GUI application.
Introducing dependencies on DBUS into a package essential to system operation
* Sander Marechal [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-08-24 08:05]:
I am looking to create .deb's for x86-64. I have an AMD64 but run an
i386 OS due to the lack of some 64-bit packages (like flash and
what-not). I have pbuilder all set up to build packages for i386, but I
wonder if it's possible to use
also sprach Miles Bader [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.24.0334 +0100]:
Python (and any language that depends on vast amounts of installed
infrastructure) seems a bit dodgy for a core low-level facility.
It's a great language to develop stuff at a moderate speed.
Also note that much of Debian
also sprach Sylvain Le Gall [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.24.0727 +0100]:
What about creating a DBUS interface - it can be integrated in
any language that support it, and can be integrated in a GUI
application.
HAL, DBUS, whatever. I don't pretend to know anything about this
magic stuff, but
also sprach Alexey Feldgendler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.24.0811 +0100]:
Introducing dependencies on DBUS into a package essential to
system operation doesn't sound like a very good idea to me.
Take a p
Take a l
Take a u
Take a g
Take a i
Take a n
and mix and stir with Suggests
--
Please do
hey d-d,
on the heels (or perhaps in the recent footsteps) of the discussion
regarding update-manager and the faults of arbitrarily substituting
strings in pre-translated text...
i have a package (dbconfig-common), which via debconf's register
system shares a set of pre-defined templates between
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 08:43:22AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
Also note that much of Debian started out as Perl. I won't compare
the two, but it's basically the same. And there is python-minimal
and I have heard rumours that it will be in base soon.
What? What? What?
Can you expand on this
also sprach Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.24.0923 +0100]:
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 08:43:22AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
Also note that much of Debian started out as Perl. I won't compare
the two, but it's basically the same. And there is python-minimal
and I have heard
* Goswin von Brederlow:
However, patching rred to apply patches in a single run would be a
good start because all further optimizations will need it.
Why should the number of chunks matter?
If you use the naïve algorithm, it does. But rred implements
something more involved, leading to a
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 10:23:46AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 08:43:22AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
Also note that much of Debian started out as Perl. I won't compare
the two, but it's basically the same. And there is python-minimal
and I have heard rumours
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 09:05:38AM +0200, sean finney wrote:
i have a package (dbconfig-common), which via debconf's register
system shares a set of pre-defined templates between any number of
packages that use it. to customize these questions and make them
as generic as possible for
martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Python (and any language that depends on vast amounts of installed
infrastructure) seems a bit dodgy for a core low-level facility.
It's a great language to develop stuff at a moderate speed.
It may well be (kinda ugly though) -- but that doesn't mean
A package name should be treated as a literal, of course, regardless of
language. While in some languages the particulars of a package name may
trigger inflection of surrounding words, we've been using this form for PHP
debconf templates for years now and I haven't had any complaints from
On 8/24/06, Miles Bader [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Python (and any language that depends on vast amounts of installed
infrastructure) seems a bit dodgy for a core low-level facility.
It's a great language to develop stuff at a moderate speed.
It may
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 11:41:11AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
For instance, in French, translating this:
The configuration of ${pkg} will be changed
Becomes:
La configuration de ${pkg} sera modifiée.
If pkg=mysql, this becomes:
La configuration de mysql sera modifiée.
But, if
also sprach Miles Bader [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.24.0958 +0100]:
It may well be (kinda ugly though) -- but that doesn't mean it's
appropriate for a core system facility, which often needs to work
even when the system is in a degraded state.
Let me set this straight: I have no intention to
On Thursday 24 August 2006 09:58, Miles Bader wrote:
martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Python (and any language that depends on vast amounts of installed
infrastructure) seems a bit dodgy for a core low-level facility.
It's a great language to develop stuff at a moderate speed.
Which can probably be worked around as
La configuration du paquet «${pkg}» sera modifiée.
or a similar construction, no?
Absolutely.
I actually changed the fr.po file in dbconfig-common SVN so that
database fo ${pkg} which was translated to base de données de
${pkg} is now base de
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 11:41:11AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
But, if pkg=apache, this becomes:
La configuration de apache sera modifiée.
While it should be:
La configuration d'apache sera modifiée.
True. But then, in most languages this can be worked around by using
different
Hi,
Hope I am not writing to wronga aaddress. I am nice, pretty looking
girl. I am planning on visiting your town this month. Can b
we meet each aother in person? Message me back at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
La configuration du paquet ${pkg} sera modifiée.
Hoorray for the new member of the French l10n team:-)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Goswin von Brederlow:
However, patching rred to apply patches in a single run would be a
good start because all further optimizations will need it.
Why should the number of chunks matter?
If you use the naïve algorithm, it does. But rred
Sander Marechal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am looking to create .deb's for x86-64. I have an AMD64 but run an
i386 OS due to the lack of some 64-bit packages (like flash and
what-not). I have pbuilder all set up to build packages for i386, but I
wonder if it's possible to use it to create
Le mercredi 23 août 2006 à 15:39 +0300, Lars Wirzenius a écrit :
The location is specific to the packaging tool and shouldn't be
mentioned in the policy.
Sure, that's fine: no need to mention it in policy. What was said
earlier in the thread was that the locations should not be referenced
Matthias Julius wrote:
Sander Marechal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am looking to create .deb's for x86-64. I have an AMD64 but run an
i386 OS due to the lack of some 64-bit packages (like flash and
what-not). I have pbuilder all set up to build packages for i386, but I
wonder if it's
Hello!
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 20:51:56 +0200, David Nusinow wrote:
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 03:30:07PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Drew Parsons wrote:
Unfortunately it's happened against, this time with the upload of
xorg-server (xserver-xorg-core) 1:1.1.1-3, accidentally uploaded
to unstable
to, 2006-08-24 kello 16:25 +0200, Josselin Mouette kirjoitti:
Le mercredi 23 août 2006 à 15:39 +0300, Lars Wirzenius a écrit :
The location is specific to the packaging tool and shouldn't be
mentioned in the policy.
Sure, that's fine: no need to mention it in policy. What was said
Package: lintian
Severity: wishlist
* Steve Langasek [Thu, 24 Aug 2006 01:45:26 -0700]:
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 10:23:46AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 08:43:22AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
Also note that much of Debian started out as Perl. I won't compare
On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 16:51 +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
If it's not my fault, however, I think we need a new package in
experimental...
Already uploaded.
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://tungstengraphics.com
Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and
On 10756 March 1977, Sander Marechal wrote:
Nope, I run a K7 kernel now (Ubuntu dapper). Can I simply replace my
kernel and leave the rest of my system in tact? I don't see AMD64 kernel
images in Synaptic. Probably a silly question, but who knows :-)
You need to run dpkg with the right
Sander Marechal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nope, I run a K7 kernel now (Ubuntu dapper). Can I simply replace my
kernel and leave the rest of my system in tact? I don't see AMD64 kernel
images in Synaptic. Probably a silly question, but who knows :-)
Not silly at all. There used to be such a
Am 2006-07-28 12:43:55, schrieb John Goerzen:
I like the fact that a base Debian install is only 100MB. Most of
Debian's competitors are 10 times that.
Ist now over 200 MByte...
It was Woody with 64 MByte but a custom Sarge can striped to 92 MByte
which would be interesting for Servers,
Hello Katrina,
Am 2006-07-28 12:42:01, schrieb Katrina Jackson:
PS. Hardware, Hardware, Hardware, I have to confess, if there was better
hardware support I think most people would be happy. Hardware supported by
Ubuntu 6 months ago, should be supported by Debian by now.
Why do you try to
Am 2006-07-28 13:35:30, schrieb Katrina Jackson:
You say Ubuntu has better publicity, which it does. But why is this the
case? I know Mark has more money, but since you have so many programmers,
He is Miliardaire (TV interview and his own words).
and seem so passionate about your OS, why
Joerg Jaspert wrote:
On 10756 March 1977, Sander Marechal wrote:
Nope, I run a K7 kernel now (Ubuntu dapper). Can I simply replace my
kernel and leave the rest of my system in tact? I don't see AMD64 kernel
images in Synaptic. Probably a silly question, but who knows :-)
You need to run
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: weplab
Version : 0.1.5
Upstream Author : Jose Ignacio Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://weplab.sourceforge.net/
*
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 12:05:53PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2006-07-28 12:43:55, schrieb John Goerzen:
I like the fact that a base Debian install is only 100MB. Most of
Debian's competitors are 10 times that.
Ist now over 200 MByte...
No. I've been doing a ton of etch
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Hello Katrina,
Am 2006-07-28 12:42:01, schrieb Katrina Jackson:
PS. Hardware, Hardware, Hardware, I have to confess, if there was better
hardware support I think most people would be happy. Hardware supported by
Ubuntu 6 months ago, should be supported by Debian
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 05:56:07PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
installed, can't be put into the Policy. The Policy editor, and those of
use who don't want to use debhelper, insist that writing policy based on
debhelper tools is not acceptable.
Not just those who don't want to use debhelper.
Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lintian maintainers, would you be willing to add a check to flag as an
error any dependency against python*-minimal, based on the above
explanation by Steve?
We already did for python-minimal. I've expanded that check for the next
release of lintian to
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 06:16:49PM +0200, Bastian Venthur wrote:
which is definitifly a thing of the Kernel (Linux) which depend
on the support of the hardware manufacturer. If you want to
get better hardware support, please contact the manufacturer.
Because, hardware support seems to be
John Goerzen wrote:
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 06:16:49PM +0200, Bastian Venthur wrote:
which is definitifly a thing of the Kernel (Linux) which depend
on the support of the hardware manufacturer. If you want to
get better hardware support, please contact the manufacturer.
Because, hardware
Am Donnerstag 24 August 2006 16:31 schrieb Adam Cécile:
Description : tool designed to break WEP keys
It is legal to ship a tool like that in all countries? Same question goes for
airsnort, I guess.
HS
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 08:43:22 +0100, martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
also sprach Miles Bader [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.24.0334
+0100]:
Python (and any language that depends on vast amounts of installed
infrastructure) seems a bit dodgy for a core low-level facility.
It's a great
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 07:29:22PM +0200, Bastian Venthur wrote:
John Goerzen wrote:
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 06:16:49PM +0200, Bastian Venthur wrote:
which is definitifly a thing of the Kernel (Linux) which depend
on the support of the hardware manufacturer. If you want to
get better
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Enrico Tassi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: luaexpat
Version : 1.0.2
Upstream Author : oberto Ierusalimschy, André Carregal and Tomás
Guisasola as part of the Kepler Project [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL :
Sander Marechal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Quick question: Do I only need the AMD64 linux-image package, or also
the linux-restricted-modules package?
You need corresponding versions of whichever modules package(s) you
currently have installed.
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu,
Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
Sander Marechal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Quick question: Do I only need the AMD64 linux-image package, or also
the linux-restricted-modules package?
You need corresponding versions of whichever modules package(s) you
currently have installed.
Thanks. The kernel
Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
Sander Marechal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't think Debian should do that, but perhaps the process to install
them after the fact could be easier for people who are not full blown
Linux admins?
Are you aware of module-assistant?
Nope, but I was going off
Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
Sander Marechal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't think Debian should do that, but perhaps the process to install
them after the fact could be easier for people who are not full blown
Linux admins?
Are you aware of module-assistant?
module-assistant is cool, if you
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nacho Barrientos Arias [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: gaffitter
Version : 0.4.2
Upstream Author : Douglas A. Augusto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://gaffitter.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Le jeudi 24 août 2006 à 17:56 +0300, Lars Wirzenius a écrit :
Round and round we go.
The people writing the dh_* snippets insist that the details of how they
work, such as locations in which Python modules should actually be
installed, can't be put into the Policy. The Policy editor, and
Sander Marechal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't think Debian should do that, but perhaps the process to install
them after the fact could be easier for people who are not full blown
Linux admins?
Are you aware of module-assistant?
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at
Sander Marechal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks. The kernel works but I loose the nvidia driver and with it XGL,
so X crashes on startup (I have the XGL server replace the standard X
server, not run on top of it).
Maybe you just need to rebuild the nVidia kernel modules?
Matthias
--
To
Bastian Venthur wrote:
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Hello Katrina,
Am 2006-07-28 12:42:01, schrieb Katrina Jackson:
PS. Hardware, Hardware, Hardware, I have to confess, if there was better
hardware support I think most people would be happy. Hardware supported by
Ubuntu 6 months ago, should
Sander Marechal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
Sander Marechal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't think Debian should do that, but perhaps the process to
install them after the fact could be easier for people who are not
full blown Linux admins?
Are you aware of
Am Donnerstag 24 August 2006 19:19 schrieb Enrico Tassi:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Enrico Tassi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: luaexpat
Somehow, that doesn't match the rest.
HS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
I'm installing a 32 bit chroot, following
http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/356
First, there is a tiny typo under 1.2
-arch should be --arch
Second, it says that I have to put a soft link in /lib to the ld-linux.so.2 in
the chroot. My question is, given that I already have a
Em Quinta 24 Agosto 2006 18:08, Bastian Venthur escreveu:
Hi!
Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
Sander Marechal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't think Debian should do that, but perhaps the process to install
them after the fact could be easier for people who are not full blown
Linux admins?
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 07:26:04PM -0300, Fabricio aybabtu Cannini wrote:
I'm really a noob when it comes to the kernel guts, but i wonder,
can't it be made like updating /boot/grub/menu.lst with a new kernel version ?
Yes, you could in theory compile a kernel module package from another
El día 24/08/2006 a 11:25 Michelle Konzack escribió...
Am 2006-07-28 13:35:30, schrieb Katrina Jackson:
You say Ubuntu has better publicity, which it does. But why is this the
case? I know Mark has more money, but since you have so many programmers,
He is Miliardaire (TV interview and
Em Quinta 24 Agosto 2006 19:37, Steinar H. Gunderson escreveu:
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 07:26:04PM -0300, Fabricio aybabtu Cannini wrote:
I'm really a noob when it comes to the kernel guts, but i wonder,
can't it be made like updating /boot/grub/menu.lst with a new kernel
version ?
Yes,
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: gnome-main-menu
Version : 0.6.2
Upstream Author : Dan Winship, Jim Krehl, JP Rosevear,
Scott Reeves (Novell)
* URL : No website. Included in Gnome CVS
*
Steinar H Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 07:26:04PM -0300, Fabricio aybabtu Cannini wrote:
I'm really a noob when it comes to the kernel guts, but i wonder, can't
it be made like updating /boot/grub/menu.lst with a new kernel version
?
Yes, you could in theory
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package name: keytouch-editor
Version : 2.1.0
Upstream Author : Marvin Raaijmakers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL : http://keytouch.sourceforge.net/index.html
License : GPL
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 23:46:25 +0200, Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Le jeudi 24 août 2006 à 17:56 +0300, Lars Wirzenius a écrit :
Round and round we go.
The people writing the dh_* snippets insist that the details of how
they work, such as locations in which Python modules should
Matthias Julius wrote:
Sander Marechal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So, is it possible to bootstrap an x86-64 OS with pbuilder on an i386
system running on an AMD64?
Yes, this should be possible (if you are running an amd64 kernel). I
would try (not tested):
pbuilder create
Em Tue, 22 Aug 2006 23:47:09 -0300
Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
Drew Parsons [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
e.g.
build: test_stable patch build-stamp
instead of
build: patch build-stamp
That would be good to be add in cdbs. I think we might want to have it
more flexible
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:15:32 +0200
Source: capi4hylafax
Binary: capi4hylafax
Architecture: source sparc
Version: 1:01.03.00.99.svn.300-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Lionel Elie Mamane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 14:25:39 +0200
Source: streamripper
Binary: streamripper
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.61.25-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Michael Ablassmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Michael
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:57:29 -0700
Source: gmailfs
Binary: gmailfs
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.7.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sebastien Delafond [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Sebastien Delafond [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:40:25 +0200
Source: mozilla-bonobo
Binary: mozilla-bonobo
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.4.2.1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Andrew Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Loic Minier [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:39:08 -0700
Source: bakery2.4
Binary: libbakery-common libbakery-2.4-dev libbakery-2.4-1
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 2.4.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bradley Bell [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:41:13 +0200
Source: istanbul
Binary: istanbul
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.2.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Luca Bruno [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Luca Bruno [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 17:01:03 +0200
Source: ifupdown
Binary: ifupdown
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.6.7-0.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Mohammed Adnène Trojette
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 10:09:10 +0300
Source: upgrade-system
Binary: upgrade-system
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.1.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin-Ãric Racine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin-Ãric
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 09:01:24 +0300
Source: planner
Binary: planner planner-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.14-10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Martin-Ãric Racine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin-Ãric
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 21:00:42 +0200
Source: gcc-snapshot
Binary: gcc-snapshot
Architecture: amd64 i386 source
Version: 20060823-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian GCC Maintainers debian-gcc@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:01:29 +0200
Source: centericq
Binary: centericq-common centericq-utf8 centericq-fribidi centericq
Architecture: source i386
Version: 4.21.0-14
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Julien Lemoine [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:53:48 +0200
Source: puredata
Binary: puredata
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.40.0~test04-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Guenter Geiger (Debian/GNU) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:46:16 +0200
Source: puredata
Binary: puredata
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.39.2-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Guenter Geiger (Debian/GNU) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Guenter Geiger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 08:52:50 +0200
Source: fkiss
Binary: fkiss
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.34-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Amaya Rodrigo Sastre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Amaya Rodrigo Sastre [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 22:09:37 +0200
Source: tex-common
Binary: tex-common
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.28
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian TeX maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Frank Küster [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:12:00 +0200
Source: dmenu
Binary: dmenu
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2006 14:10:00 +0200
Source: dwm
Binary: dwm
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 09:54:52 +0200
Source: python-uncertainities
Binary: python-uncertainities
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.002-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 12:24:23 +0200
Source: kscope
Binary: kscope
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.4.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian KDE Extras Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Fathi Boudra [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 24 Au 2006 15:41:00 +0200
Source: unionfs
Binary: unionfs-tools unionfs-source unionfs-utils
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 1.3+debian-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 23:20:22 +0900
Source: wl-beta
Binary: wl-beta
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.15.3+0.20060823-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Tatsuya Kinoshita [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Tatsuya Kinoshita
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 22:02:14 +0200
Source: emacs-snapshot
Binary: emacs-snapshot-el emacs-snapshot-bin-common emacs-snapshot-nox
emacs-snapshot emacs-snapshot-common emacs-snapshot-gtk
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1:20060824
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:47:52 +1000
Source: xserver-xorg-input-keyboard
Binary: xserver-xorg-input-kbd
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:1.1.0-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:21:16 +0200
Source: udev
Binary: libvolume-id-dev udev libvolume-id0 udev-udeb
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.098-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 21:00:17 +0200
Source: reniced
Binary: reniced
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 10:57:49 +0200
Source: subtitleeditor
Binary: subtitleeditor
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.10-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Amaya Rodrigo Sastre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Amaya Rodrigo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 18:16:00 +0200
Source: ieee80211
Binary: ieee80211-headers-2.6 ieee80211-modules-2.6-em64t-p4-smp
ieee80211-modules-2.6.17-2-486 ieee80211-headers-2.6.17-2
ieee80211-modules-2.6.17-2-em64t-p4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:30:43 +0100
Source: libcache-simple-timedexpiry-perl
Binary: libcache-simple-timedexpiry-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.25-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stephen Quinney [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:53:59 +0200
Source: evolution-sharp
Binary: libevolution2.0-cil
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.11.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Mono Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jose
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 12:23:29 +0200
Source: net-snmp
Binary: libsnmp9 tkmib snmp libsnmp-perl libsnmp-base libsnmp9-dev snmpd
Architecture: source all sparc
Version: 5.2.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Net-SNMP
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
