Le Wed, 30 May 2007 00:15:55 +0200
Gaëtan PERRIER [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit:
Bon ça y est j'ai un paquet sans erreur ou warning avec lintian.
Merci à tous pour votre aide et votre patience.
Reste plus qu'à le rendre accessible, mais à chaque jour suffit sa peine.
Si ça intéresse quelqu'un
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 01:22:10PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 29 May 2007, Frank Küster wrote:
To me, the solution is to resurrect these conffiles without
prompting, because prompting doesn't make sense if the only working
answer is yes.
On Wed, 30 May 2007, Josip Rodin wrote:
Anyway, before we get lost in all this prediction stuff, I'm yet to hear
a good reason why we need complete triviality in the access method, as
opposed to the kind of triviality we have had for years now: all that is
necessary to get webwml access is to
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 07:46:34PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
What evidence do you have that serious security bugs won't get fixed in a
stable release because of MIA developers? AFAIK, the burden of providing
security updates largely falls on the shoulders of the security team, even
in
Hi,
On Thu, 24 May 2007 20:26:00 +0200, A Mennucc [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
hi what about http://rerun.lefant.net/checklib/ ?
madcoder mentioned in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/01/msg00822.htmlof the
intention of getting the checklib service up again: any progress?
Most
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 09:06 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007, Josip Rodin wrote:
Anyway, before we get lost in all this prediction stuff, I'm yet to hear
a good reason why we need complete triviality in the access method, as
opposed to the kind of triviality we have had for
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 03:15:59AM -0400, Roberto C. S?nchez wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 07:46:34PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
What evidence do you have that serious security bugs won't get fixed in a
stable release because of MIA developers? AFAIK, the burden of providing
security
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 07:45:17PM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
Anyway, before we get lost in all this prediction stuff, I'm yet to hear
a good reason why we need complete triviality in the access method, as
opposed to the kind of triviality we have had for years now: all that is
necessary to
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 09:06:06AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Because most people don't bother when they want to fix only a small
detail in a web page.
Well, when I want to fix a small detail in some other part of Debian,
I usually send a mail or file a bug, I don't automatically think that
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 11:44:13AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 07:45:17PM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
Anyway, before we get lost in all this prediction stuff, I'm yet to hear
a good reason why we need complete triviality in the access method, as
opposed to the kind of
Hi,
texlive-bin FTBFS two times previously because it's build-deps could not
be satisfied (libpoppler1 was on hold on spontini). Now this seems to
have been fixed, and I'm wondering why I got the mail below? It's not a
binary NMU, just a standard buildd upload, unless the NMUer got the
version
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 01:04:46PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
texlive-bin FTBFS two times previously because it's build-deps could not
be satisfied (libpoppler1 was on hold on spontini). Now this seems to
have been fixed, and I'm wondering why I got the mail below? It's not a
binary NMU,
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, we'll do it only once anyway.
How do you plan to ensure that?
Sorry, no plan, I was just dreaming. Or deliring.
Since old versions of the tetex packages
with the broken postrm are still in the wild, and a user may have already
removed the
Hi,
I am intending to adopt the wmakerconf and wmakerconf-data
debian packages. And I am now the new responsible of these
source packages.
As does not exist a reason to have two source packages nowadays,
i joined wmakerconf source package and wmakerconf-data source
package in only one source
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 11:51:38PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
think it would be a service to our users to grade how well supported
packages are. I have a number of ideas for ways in which this could be
done, but I think a discussion would yield something better that might
eventually be
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 08:15:08PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
The only thing I've ever heard about helping out with the website is that
it's a herculean task that no mere mortal should attempt.
Where did you hear this?
Word of mouth, usually in conjunction with promises that the
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 09:29:01AM +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
But I did the effort of finding the procedure and asking for cvs commit
access to the webwml files. To my surprise I got the access granted
within 24 hours.
Truth be told, you were reasonably lucky to get Matt's ACK and Joey's
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 03:15:31AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
If I already have access and I get an itch, I will scratch it. If I
don't, I will either forget about it or complain. I am unlikely to go
through whatever bureaucracy is set up to request access. Whether or
not this is
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 08:56:29AM -0300, Herbert P Fortes Neto wrote:
I think it is also a good idea to join the wmakerconf and
wmakerconf-data debian packages. I would like to know if there is
a reason to not join wmakerconf debian package and wmakerconf-data
debian package in only one
[Charles Plessy]
Under the current policy, not all fixes to these problems would make it
in a point release, but since the list is likely to grow longer and
longer with time, I am really wondering if there is a better way to
inform the users of that kind of issues, if possible a priori. Among
On 29/05/2007 Ben Hutchings wrote:
There were some discussions on -private (and possibly here?) earlier in
the year about quality vs quantity of packages.
[...]
I don't think we want to start grading maintainers and I believe there's
a consensus that we should not be more selective about
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 02:19:33 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2007 20:26:00 +0200, A Mennucc said:
hi what about http://rerun.lefant.net/checklib/ ?
madcoder mentioned in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/01/msg00822.htmlof the
intention of getting the checklib
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Krzysztof Krzyzaniak (eloy) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: libdata-serializer-perl
Version : 0.41
Upstream Author : Neil Neely [EMAIL PROTECTED].
* URL : http://www.cpan.org/
* License : Perl: Artistic/GPL
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 04:49:27PM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
On 29/05/2007 Ben Hutchings wrote:
There were some discussions on -private (and possibly here?) earlier in
the year about quality vs quantity of packages.
[...]
I don't think we want to start grading maintainers and I
On Wed, 30 May 2007 16:49:27 +0200
Jonas Meurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Publishing the date of last upload is a very useful information here,
especially if you need to choose an application out of several unknown
alternatives.
That information is already available at packages.qa.d.o and
Dear colleagues,
I am starting to write netconf [0], finally. Or rather, I would if
I could settle on a language. If netconf is ever going to replace
ifupdown, it would need to have a low footprint and few
dependencies. This clearly suggests C/C++ as the language of choice.
0.
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 04:33:59PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Very good points, and I believe you have a good point. What about
making an errata wiki page for the etch release on
URL:http://wiki.debian.org/, and add links to the etch bugs in BTS?
It migth form the basis for updating
On Wed, 30 May 2007 17:34:10 +0200
martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I am asking you still: can you think of anything to say against
such an approach? Please don't flame languages or anything of that
sort. The question is just: is it viable for a C++ coder with
a Python proficiency
On Wed, 30 May 2007 17:59:15 +0300, Guillem Jover [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 02:19:33 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2007 20:26:00 +0200, A Mennucc said:
hi what about http://rerun.lefant.net/checklib/ ?
madcoder mentioned in
Hi Manoj,
On Wed, 30 May 2007, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
When checklibs was run, it would report
libbar-dev, libbaz-dev, unneeded; looking at foo
libfoo-dev, libbaz-dev, unneeded; looking at bar
libfoo-dev, libbar-dev, unneeded; looking at baz
End result: Uneedded:
On Wednesday 30 May 2007 09:34, martin f krafft wrote:
But I am asking you still: can you think of anything to say against
such an approach? Please don't flame languages or anything of that
sort. The question is just: is it viable for a C++ coder with
a Python proficiency to mockup a new
also sprach Michael Alan Dorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.05.30.1816 +0200]:
Planning to write the application twice seems to me to presume
more time and continued enthusiasm than is perhaps realistic,
especially since your plans seem fairly ambitious---having to slog
through the last 10% of the
On Wed, 30 May 2007 18:28:43 +0200, Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hi Manoj,
On Wed, 30 May 2007, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
When checklibs was run, it would report libbar-dev, libbaz-dev,
unneeded; looking at foo libfoo-dev, libbaz-dev, unneeded; looking at
bar libfoo-dev,
I've been writing custom utilities and libraries for various systems at
work, and with one particular project recently it's become (more)
important to know exactly which Debian release it's running on (at some
stage or other between version-controlled-code and installed-binary)
so that I don't try
This one time, at band camp, Kris Deugau said:
On RHEL and derived distros, there's usually a file /etc/redhat-release
(sometimes renamed, but usually trivially enough that it can be found
with little trouble) containing both the distro code name and the
version number.
The closest we ship is
Hi,
* Kris Deugau [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-30 23:06]:
[...]
However, there doesn't seem to be any single, consistent,
doesn't-change-for-the-life-of-the-release, programmatically possible
(never mind *easy* just yet...) method to find out if I'm on Debian
sarge, etch, lenny, or some
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 17:34 +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
Dear colleagues,
...
But I am asking you still: can you think of anything to say against
such an approach? Please don't flame languages or anything of that
sort. The question is just: is it viable for a C++ coder with
a Python
Hi.
I believe there is something fundamentally wrong if you *have* to rely
on /etc/debian_version for anything. The number of Debian packages
actually using such file is probably zero (but I could be wrong).
Try using dependencies or run-time tests. Really.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
But I am asking you still: can you think of anything to say against
such an approach? Please don't flame languages or anything of that
sort. The question is just: is it viable for a C++ coder with
a Python proficiency to mockup a new application in Python first?
Planning to write the
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 19:46 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 11:51:38PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
There were some discussions on -private (and possibly here?) earlier in
the year about quality vs quantity of packages.
It should be clear to most developers that our
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 04:46:30PM -0400, Kris Deugau wrote:
However, there doesn't seem to be any single, consistent,
/etc/debian_version ?
Don't know when it was introduced though...
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ... now what?
[EMAIL
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 04:46:30PM -0400, Kris Deugau wrote:
[...]
On RHEL and derived distros, there's usually a file /etc/redhat-release
(sometimes renamed, but usually trivially enough that it can be found
with little trouble) containing both the distro code name and the
version number.
On 30-May-07, 10:24 (CDT), Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is one of many indications. I could cite many others, good or not
so good indicators:
* size of the changelogs ;
Older packages will skew this.
* number of revisions per upstream release ;
As you note, depends
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jan-Pascal van Best [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package name: solr
Version : 1.2.0
Upstream Author : Bill Au, Doug Cutting, Bertrand Delacretaz, Otis
Gospodnetic, Erik Hatcher, Chris Hostetter, Mike Klaas, Ryan McKinley, Yonik
SeeleyName [EMAIL
On Wed, 30 May 2007 22:58:38 +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 18:28:43 +0200, Raphael Hertzog
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
What Guillem said is that checklib also indicated binaries which are
linked against a
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 16:48 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 09:38:16PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 19:46 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 11:51:38PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
There were some discussions on -private (and
Hi,
I am wondering if anyone still uses the re-ordered ubuntu patches
provided by the Utnubu team at
http://utnubu.alioth.debian.org/scottish/
If nobody finds this useful, I’d probably do the alioth admins a favor
if I stop the cronjob.
Greetings,
Joachim
--
Joachim nomeata
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 10:12:38PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
The closest we ship is /etc/debian_version. I use it for several
similar tests at work, you just need to keep a mental map between the
number and the version string. If you can count lsb-release being
installed, that will give you
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 01:58:02AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
What evidence do you have that serious security bugs won't get fixed
in a
stable release because of MIA developers?
Search for years in
On 5/30/07, Joachim Breitner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am wondering if anyone still uses the re-ordered ubuntu patches
provided by the Utnubu team at
http://utnubu.alioth.debian.org/scottish/
If nobody finds this useful, I'd probably do the alioth admins a favor
if I stop the
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 22:12 +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Kris Deugau said:
On RHEL and derived distros, there's usually a file /etc/redhat-release
(sometimes renamed, but usually trivially enough that it can be found
with little trouble) containing both the distro
Ben Hutchings [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
lsb-release has Priority: extra so it's not that likely to be installed.
I've still doing distribution recognition by grepping
/etc/*-release /etc/release /etc/debian_version.
lsb-release is quite nice when using facter (usually via Puppet), since it
Steve Langasek wrote:
Ok, can you provide an example to support this claim that sarge is worse?
http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/status/release/oldstable
http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/status/release/stable
(You may want to grep for high.)
I'm not saying that what the
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 11:13:32 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 17:59:15 +0300, Guillem Jover said:
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 02:19:33 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Has this been fixed in the latest incantation?
Please fix this by adding an additional mode/view, not
This package contains the 09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0 number.
The package should also contain the '455FE10422CA29C4933F95052B792AB2'
number, which is also a very cool number.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 00:29:29 +0200
Source: gcc-4.1
Binary: gcc-4.1-soft-float libstdc++6-4.1-pic libstdc++6 lib32ffi4
gobjc++-4.1-multilib libobjc1 lib32gfortran1 gfortran-4.1 libgcc1
libstdc++6-4.1-doc lib64gfortran1 gcc-4.1-multilib
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 16:16:44 +0200
Source: prewikka
Binary: prewikka
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.9.11.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pierre Chifflier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Pierre Chifflier [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 15:55:59 +0900
Source: xf86-input-evtouch
Binary: xserver-xorg-input-evtouch
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.8.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 10:32:55 +0200
Source: ocsinventory-agent
Binary: ocsinventory-agent
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.01-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pierre Chifflier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Pierre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 21:29:47 +0400
Source: libtk-img
Binary: libtk-img
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:1.3-release-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sergei Golovan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Sergei Golovan [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 08:42:32 +0200
Source: poppler
Binary: libpoppler-glib-dev poppler-utils libpoppler-qt4-dev libpoppler-qt1
libpoppler1 libpoppler-glib1 libpoppler-qt4-1 libpoppler-dev libpoppler-qt-dev
Architecture: source i386
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 09:31:05 +0200
Source: glashctl
Binary: glashctl
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.4.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Free Ekanayaka [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 09:37:01 +0200
Source: octave-epstk
Binary: octave-epstk
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Octave Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Rafael Laboissiere
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 22:53:01 +0700
Source: mueller
Binary: mueller7-dict mueller7-mova mueller7accent-mova mueller7accent-dict
Architecture: source all
Version: 2002.02.27-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Mikhail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 22:34:36 -0400
Source: libextutils-f77-perl
Binary: libextutils-f77-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.16-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jose Luis Rivas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jose
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 09:35:25 +0900
Source: probcons
Binary: probcons-extra probcons
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.12-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian-Med Packaging Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 15:36:30 +0100
Source: dpkg-cross
Binary: dpkg-cross
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.38
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Embedded Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Neil Williams [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 11:03:00 +0100
Source: pilot-qof
Binary: datafreedom-doc datafreedom-perl pilot-qof datafreedom-qsfxsl
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 0.1.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Neil Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 21:29:02 +0200
Source: scilab
Binary: scilab-bin scilab-doc scilab
Architecture: source all powerpc
Version: 4.1.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Torsten Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 19:48:06 +0200
Source: wxglade
Binary: python-wxglade
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Georges Khaznadar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Georges Khaznadar [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 11:35:29 +0100
Source: deb-gview
Binary: deb-gview
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.1.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 21:35:11 +0700
Source: scim-thai
Binary: scim-thai
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.1.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Theppitak Karoonboonyanan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Theppitak
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 13:02:26 +0200
Source: lshw
Binary: lshw lshw-gtk
Architecture: source i386
Version: 02.10-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ghe Rivero [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ghe Rivero [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 13:37:45 +0200
Source: electricsheep
Binary: electricsheep
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.6.8-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Alexis Sukrieh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Alexis Sukrieh [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 17:15:00 +0100
Source: laptop-mode-tools
Binary: laptop-mode-tools
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.34-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bart Samwel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Bart Samwel [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 15:11:03 -0400
Source: db4.5
Binary: libdb4.5-java libdb4.5++ db4.5-util libdb4.5-java-dev libdb4.5
db4.5-doc libdb4.5++-dev libdb4.5-dev libdb4.5-tcl
Architecture: source all
Version: 4.5.20-4
Distribution:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 12:31:48 +0200
Source: octave-epstk
Binary: octave-epstk
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.2-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Octave Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Rafael Laboissiere
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 14:06:20 +0200
Source: glibc
Binary: libc0.1-prof libc6-dev-amd64 locales-all libc6-i686 libc6-dev-ppc64
libc0.3-pic glibc-doc libc0.3 libc6-dev-mipsn32 libc0.1-i686 libc0.1-i386
libc6-mips64 libc6.1-dev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 17:27:05 +0300
Source: ispell-et
Binary: aspell-et iestonian myspell-et
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 20030606.5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin-Ãric Racine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 17:26:39 +0300
Source: rus-ispell
Binary: irussian myspell-ru aspell-ru
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 0.99g4-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin-Ãric Racine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 08:39:17 +0200
Source: dosemu
Binary: dosemu
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.4.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 15:21:37 +0200
Source: glibc-doc-reference
Binary: glibc-doc-reference
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.6-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Aurelien
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 14:29:39 +0200
Source: backup-manager
Binary: backup-manager backup-manager-doc
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.7.6-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Alexis Sukrieh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 23:43:02 +0200
Source: enet
Binary: libenet-dev libenet1-dev libenet1
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 1.0-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Games Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 15:19:20 +0200
Source: ffmpeg
Binary: libavformat-dev ffmpeg libswscale1d libpostproc-dev libavcodec1d
libpostproc1d libavutil-dev libavcodec-dev libswscale-dev libavutil1d
libavformat1d
Architecture: source i386
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 16:04:23 +0200
Source: xawtv
Binary: xawtv-plugins fbtv radio ttv webcam pia xawtv xawtv-tools scantv
streamer alevtd v4l-conf
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 3.95.dfsg.1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 10:13:50 -0400
Source: zsh-beta
Binary: zsh-beta-static zsh-beta-doc zsh-beta
Architecture: source all
Version: 4.3.4-dev-0+20070530-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 16:33:42 +0200
Source: octave-epstk
Binary: octave-epstk
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.2-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Octave Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Rafael Laboissiere
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 17:22:43 +0200
Source: liblogger-syslog-perl
Binary: liblogger-syslog-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Perl Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 13:54:52 +0200
Source: jed
Binary: jed jed-common xjed
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 1:0.99.19~pre89-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian JED Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jörg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 17:45:54 +0300
Source: ispell-et
Binary: aspell-et iestonian myspell-et
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1:20030606-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin-Ãric Racine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 12:08:07 +0200
Source: gnome-pkg-tools
Binary: gnome-pkg-tools
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.11.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian GNOME Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Norbert
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 15:08:24 +0200
Source: loudmouth
Binary: libloudmouth1-0 libloudmouth1-0-dbg libloudmouth1-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.2.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ross Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 11:06:01 +0200
Source: gossip
Binary: gossip-common gossip
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 0.25-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ross Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Norbert Tretkowski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 03:44:31 -0500
Source: scim-uim
Binary: scim-uim
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.2.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ming Hua [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ming Hua [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 09:52:22 +0100
Source: opencity
Binary: opencity
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.0.4stable-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Games Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Gonéri Le Bouder
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 18:58:55 +0200
Source: spampd
Binary: spampd
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.30-19
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sven Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Sven Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 17:58:37 +0200
Source: texlive-bin
Binary: texlive-extra-utils libkpathsea-dev libkpathsea4 texlive-xetex
texlive-lang-indic texlive-omega texlive-font-utils texlive-metapost
texlive-base-bin texlive-music
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 14:38:39 -0400
Source: debian-archive-keyring
Binary: debian-archive-keyring-udeb debian-archive-keyring
Architecture: source all
Version: 2007.02.19-0.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Michael Vogt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 02:12:09 +0200
Source: libjgraph-java
Binary: libjgraph-java-doc libjgraph-java
Architecture: source all
Version: 5.10.1.0.dfsg-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: gregor herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
