On 2019-09-12 22:46, Drew Parsons wrote:
https://python3statement.org/ is a site documenting the projects which
are supporting the policy of dropping Python2 to keep Python3 only.
The site is designed for python packages specifically, to have only
Python3 supported by end of 2020.
But it seems
On 2019, സെപ്റ്റംബർ 15 12:57:08 AM IST, Sean Whitton
wrote:
>Hello Pirate,
>
>On Sun 15 Sep 2019 at 12:27AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>
>> That is not going to happen, instead we need to adapt ourselves to
>> this fast paced development and fasttrack.debian.net is a step in
>that
>> directi
On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 5:48 AM Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> On 9/13/19 7:05 AM, Simon Richter wrote:
> >
> > Mandatory Encrypted SNI with no fallback option -- everything else can be
> > circumvented easily.
> >
> > This is a game that we should not play, really. It raises the cost of
> > running a
On September 15, 2019 1:20:38 AM GMT+02:00, Scott Kitterman
wrote:
>> Besides this, there's something else I don't understand. How much
>effort
>> is it to use a free software based platform? It's not as if Github
>was
>> so much nicer than Gitlab (at least not anymore). What is it that
>peop
Your message dated Sat, 14 Sep 2019 18:12:31 +0100
with message-id <626fecb430ba306dc1c1e4671d6cb3e1b7f0037c.ca...@decadent.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Boot and installation support for Secure Boot systems
has caused the Debian Bug report #820036,
regarding Boot and installation support for Secure
On 9/12/19 8:57 AM, Ansgar wrote:
I don't see much value in this requirement (besides additional work).
One should look at the repository anyway whan planning to do changes
(to match the existing style used); one would naturally see how files
are organized. We already had tons of packages shippi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unblock 820036 with 821088
Bug #820036 [general] Boot and installation support for Secure Boot systems
820036 was blocked by: 821307 823003 820052 821084 821054 820129 820041 820038
821055 821088 820008 820010
820036 was not blocking any bugs.
Re
On 9/14/19 9:30 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> We have packaged many core build tools like webpack, rollup, gulp, grunt etc
> which makes it easier to build many JavaScript libraries from source
Thanks a lot for that very useful work!
Thomas
On Saturday, September 14, 2019 7:16:26 PM EDT Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 9/15/19 12:06 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Saturday, September 14, 2019 6:01:24 PM EDT Thomas Goirand wrote:
> >> On 9/14/19 6:59 AM, Balasankar "Balu" C wrote:
> >>> So will the GR be
> >>> "You must not do any sort of
On 9/15/19 12:06 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Saturday, September 14, 2019 6:01:24 PM EDT Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> On 9/14/19 6:59 AM, Balasankar "Balu" C wrote:
>>> So will the GR be
>>> "You must not do any sort of contribution to Debian using non-free
>>> software/hardware"
>>>
>>> or
>>>
>>>
On Thu, 2019-08-01 at 16:22:19 +0100, Sean Whitton wrote:
> On Thu 01 Aug 2019 at 02:35PM +02, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > This argument seems very counter-intuitive. This assumes a
> > Debian-archive-centric world-view, where most of the heavy lifting is
> > delegated to some external service. But th
On Sun, 2019-09-15 at 00:37:00 +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On 2019, സെപ്റ്റംബർ 15 12:35:18 AM IST, Holger Levsen
> wrote:
> > I guess because according to https://trends.debian.net/#vcs-hosting
> > there's *still*, today, almost 1 source packages in unstable which
> > declare they are main
On 15.09.19 00:05, Russ Allbery wrote:
> We have more agreement here, although there are a lot of details hidden in
> what "forcing" really means. But there's a huge space between "don't
> force other people to use non-free software to contribute to Debian" and
> "forbid using non-free software
On Saturday, September 14, 2019 6:01:24 PM EDT Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 9/14/19 6:59 AM, Balasankar "Balu" C wrote:
> > But it shouldn't matter to the project that I do my packaging work in
> > GitLab.com or GitHub.com because as far as Debian is concerned, as long
> > as others can contribute wi
Thomas Goirand writes:
> On 9/14/19 1:03 AM, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Thomas Goirand writes:
>>> Sorry, WHAAAT ? That's shocking to read this from the DPL. Are you
>>> sure you didn't do a mistake in this sentence?
>>> There's absolutely no problem within the Debian project to forbid
>>> using n
On Sat, 2019-09-14 at 13:07:09 +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 13:05:20 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> > On Thu 12 Sep 2019 at 09:35PM +02, Marc Haber wrote:
> > > How about documenting that branches prefixed with "wip" can be force
> > > pushed any time and people pulling from those b
On 9/14/19 6:59 AM, Balasankar "Balu" C wrote:
> But it shouldn't matter to the project that I do my packaging work in
> GitLab.com or GitHub.com because as far as Debian is concerned, as long
> as others can contribute without having an account in that service - I
> should not be forbidden using t
Thomas Goirand wrote:
> As long as you push to Github *for yourself* (ie: not in order to
> share the repository with other people form the Debian community),
> that's fine. But forcing it to others is not acceptable.
>
> Thomas Goirand (zigo)
Thomas - what you want to achive?
Right now i'm affr
On 9/13/19 7:05 AM, Simon Richter wrote:
Mandatory Encrypted SNI with no fallback option -- everything else can be
circumvented easily.
This is a game that we should not play, really. It raises the cost of
running a service on the Internet so only big players can afford to do so.
Does it? I h
On 9/14/19 1:03 AM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Thomas Goirand writes:
>
>> Sorry, WHAAAT ? That's shocking to read this from the DPL.
>> Are you sure you didn't do a mistake in this sentence?
>
>> There's absolutely no problem within the Debian project to forbid using
>> non-free software.
>
> I use
On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 01:02:03PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 12:16:43PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > And, despite a massive amount of efforts from you and others, packaged
> > gitlab is not fit for Salsa use. It hasn't also ever been in a stable
> > release of Debian
On 2019, സെപ്റ്റംബർ 14 3:46:43 PM IST, Adam Borowski
wrote:
>On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 09:37:00AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>> I will also support such a GR. I started packaging gitlab so we
>don't
>> have to compromise on ease of use compared to github.
>
>And, despite a massive amount of e
Hello Pirate,
On Sun 15 Sep 2019 at 12:27AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> That is not going to happen, instead we need to adapt ourselves to
> this fast paced development and fasttrack.debian.net is a step in that
> direction.
It's not just a matter of adapting workflows -- without real stable
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 02:57:09PM +0200, Ansgar wrote:
> (Using dgit to upload packages is sadly incompatible with best
> practices around packaging.)
I'm genuinly curious: why do you say so? Which practices does it
violate?
--
cheers,
Holger
--
On 2019, സെപ്റ്റംബർ 15 12:35:18 AM IST, Holger Levsen
wrote:
>On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 11:30:51AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>> On 2019, സെപ്റ്റംബർ 13 1:06:13 AM IST, Marc Haber
> wrote:
>> >alioth.debian.org, anyone? That one went away pretty fast.
>> I wonder why people keep repeating this.
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 11:30:51AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On 2019, സെപ്റ്റംബർ 13 1:06:13 AM IST, Marc Haber
> wrote:
> >alioth.debian.org, anyone? That one went away pretty fast.
> I wonder why people keep repeating this.
I guess because according to https://trends.debian.net/#vcs-hosti
On 2019, സെപ്റ്റംബർ 14 3:46:43 PM IST, Adam Borowski
wrote:
>On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 09:37:00AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>> I will also support such a GR. I started packaging gitlab so we
>don't
>> have to compromise on ease of use compared to github.
>
>And, despite a massive amount of e
On 13/9/19 15:20, Bastian Blank wrote:
> For this I need to use my veto as Salsa admin. With the CI people we
> have to work through too much problems first.
If there are _too much problems_ I think you should, at least,
communicate with us.
Besides two issues[0][1] reported some time ago -which
Hello,
On Sat 14 Sep 2019 at 01:07PM +02, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 13:05:20 -0700, Sean Whitton
> wrote:
>>On Thu 12 Sep 2019 at 09:35PM +02, Marc Haber wrote:
>>> How about documenting that branches prefixed with "wip" can be force
>>> pushed any time and people pulling from thos
Becuase the best privacy solution would be to embed DNS resolver into
mozilla and they query root servers (which manage by ICANN) to find
IPs of TLDs server!
I mean the "users’ privacy" is a opaque general definition, rather
there are the spectrum of techniques which protect us against mass
surveil
On 2019-09-14 10:13:09 +0200 (+0200), Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 10:29:32AM +0530, Balasankar "Balu" C wrote:
> > > What exactly do you propose here? The Salsa admins look like
> > > not accepting more contributors, neither seem open to
> > > suggestions. They just do "their way
On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 12:16:43PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 09:37:00AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> > I will also support such a GR. I started packaging gitlab so we don't
> > have to compromise on ease of use compared to github.
>
> And, despite a massive amount of
On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 13:05:20 -0700, Sean Whitton
wrote:
>On Thu 12 Sep 2019 at 09:35PM +02, Marc Haber wrote:
>> How about documenting that branches prefixed with "wip" can be force
>> pushed any time and people pulling from those branches should be
>> expected to handle that?
>
>This would be use
On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 09:37:00AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> I will also support such a GR. I started packaging gitlab so we don't
> have to compromise on ease of use compared to github.
And, despite a massive amount of efforts from you and others, packaged
gitlab is not fit for Salsa use.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Arnaud Rebillout
* Package name: gotestsum
Version : 0.3.5-1
Upstream Author : https://github.com/gotestyourself/gotestsum/issues/65
* URL : https://github.com/gotestyourself/gotestsum
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming
On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 10:29:32AM +0530, Balasankar "Balu" C wrote:
> > What exactly do you propose here? The Salsa admins look like not
> > accepting more contributors, neither seem open to suggestions. They just
> > do "their way". I've countless times wrote to both them and in public
> > that I
36 matches
Mail list logo
