Re: Debian Bugs: LXDE Desktop is missing

2019-06-23 Thread Marvin Renich
* patrick.dre...@gmx.net [190623 17:24]: > Dear Woman and Man! > > Debian Bugs: LXDE Desktop is missing. > Terminal Comands not functions. > apt-get install lxde-core > apt-get install lxde > apt-get install task-lxde-desktop > How can resolve this? > > With k

Debian Bugs: LXDE Desktop is missing

2019-06-23 Thread patrick . dreier
Dear Woman and Man! Debian Bugs: LXDE Desktop is missing. Terminal Comands not functions. apt-get install lxde-core apt-get install lxde apt-get install task-lxde-desktop How can resolve this? With kind Greetings!

Bug#765849: ITP: debian-parl -- DebianParl desktop for parliamentary work

2014-10-18 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 * Package name: debian-parl Version : 1.0.7 Upstream Author : Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk * URL : https://wiki.debian.org/DebianParl * License

ttf-liberation (Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?)

2007-08-17 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Thursday 09 August 2007 10:03, Christian Perrier wrote: No, we should use the liberation fonts, which are designed to replace the MS fonts. Have their licensing issues been solved? Have those issues been communicated to upstream and what is their reaction? The ITP includes the

Re: Bug#423503: ttf-liberation (Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?)

2007-08-17 Thread Alan Baghumian
Hi, Unfortunately, there was no answer about this licensing issue. Alan Hi, On Thursday 09 August 2007 10:03, Christian Perrier wrote: No, we should use the liberation fonts, which are designed to replace the MS fonts. Have their licensing issues been solved? Have those issues

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-11 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 05:11:07AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: Ben Hutchings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This means that when draining the battery we do not allow the CPU to run at full speed, so CPU-bound tasks take longer. This tends to extend battery life but reduces the processing work

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-11 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Wouter Verhelst] Except that a PowerPC processor (as found in Gustavo's ibook) simply doesn't *have* C states. On my PowerBook G4, I noticed that when I started running this crude hack[0]... -- #!/bin/bash modprobe cpufreq_userspace echo $$ /var/run/mycpufreqd echo userspace

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-11 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 01:07:39PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: [Wouter Verhelst] Except that a PowerPC processor (as found in Gustavo's ibook) simply doesn't *have* C states. On my PowerBook G4, I noticed that when I started running this crude hack[0]... -- #!/bin/bash

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-09 Thread Christian Perrier
No, we should use the liberation fonts, which are designed to replace the MS fonts. Have their licensing issues been solved? signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-09 Thread Christian Perrier
The d-i team is constantly working on simplifying debian-installer. Just compare a sarge install with an etch install.. I guess I'll take a look at their mailing list - I had some simple ideas You're more than welcome (actually you'll see by doing this that Joey Hess saying the D-I team

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-09 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 08:00:00AM +0200, Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, we should use the liberation fonts, which are designed to replace the MS fonts. Have their licensing issues been solved? Which ones ? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-09 Thread Loïc Minier
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007, Tim Hull wrote: Update: it works with libxine1-ffmpeg installed. Evidently totem-xine is installed by default - at least if you install Etch and upgrade to Lenny. Is this by design, or just an issue with Etch to Lenny transitions. I'm going to install totem-gstreamer

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-09 Thread Adam Borowski
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 08:17:13AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 08:00:00AM +0200, Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, we should use the liberation fonts, which are designed to replace the MS fonts. Have their licensing issues been solved? Which ones

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-09 Thread Luis Matos
Qua, 2007-08-08 às 20:30 +0200, Hendrik Sattler escreveu: Additionally, it should be noted that a desktop task has nothing with multimedia (means: surprise, you can use a desktop without music and movies). I think we need to have multiple desktop tasks. One desktop-simple,

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-09 Thread Adam Borowski
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 10:55:13AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 08:17:13AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 08:00:00AM +0200, Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, we should use the liberation fonts, which are designed to replace the

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-09 Thread Michael Banck
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 10:27:40AM +0100, Luis Matos wrote: Qua, 2007-08-08 às 20:30 +0200, Hendrik Sattler escreveu: Additionally, it should be noted that a desktop task has nothing with multimedia (means: surprise, you can use a desktop without music and movies). I think we need to

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-09 Thread Luis Matos
Qui, 2007-08-09 às 14:10 +0200, Michael Banck escreveu: On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 10:27:40AM +0100, Luis Matos wrote: Qua, 2007-08-08 às 20:30 +0200, Hendrik Sattler escreveu: Additionally, it should be noted that a desktop task has nothing with multimedia (means: surprise, you can use a

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-09 Thread Philippe Cloutier
* Simplify installation of out-of-tree kernel modules, possibly by adapting Ubuntu's Restricted Manager to work with m-a. Non-free drivers would *only* be displayed if non-free is in the sources.list. No plans AFAIK. Working on this should not be difficult and should be appreciated, either by

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-09 Thread Tim Hull
Well, when you started this thread I was fearing a quite long flame with everybody jumping at you with if you don't like foo you're free to some and help improving itwhich is definitely what happens too frequently when some users report issues that can't often be pointed to a given

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-09 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 08:00:00AM +0200, Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, we should use the liberation fonts, which are designed to replace the MS fonts. Have their licensing issues been solved? Which ones ? Restrictions of

Re: Simplify installation of non-free? (was: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?)

2007-08-09 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Aug 09, Tim Hull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's actually not just ATI/nVidia - most wireless drivers are at least in part non-free. In my case, it's the madwifi drivers with their binary HAL. There's also the ipw2100/2200/3945/etc with the non-free firmware. Without The firmwares are not

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-09 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Am Mittwoch 08 August 2007 23:02 schrieb Petter Reinholdtsen: [Julian Andres Klode] We should try to use binary packages provided by linux-modules-* or other modules packages by default and fallback to m-a. You might want to check out the recent changes to discover and discover-data. It

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-09 Thread Joey Hess
Luis Matos wrote: having a console tasksel is not enough ... someone was developing a gtk+ front end ... right? DEBIAN_FRONTEND=gnome tasksel ? -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-09 Thread Gustavo Franco
On 8/9/07, Michael Banck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 10:27:40AM +0100, Luis Matos wrote: Qua, 2007-08-08 às 20:30 +0200, Hendrik Sattler escreveu: Additionally, it should be noted that a desktop task has nothing with multimedia (means: surprise, you can use a desktop

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-09 Thread Gustavo Franco
On 8/9/07, Luis Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Qui, 2007-08-09 às 14:10 +0200, Michael Banck escreveu: On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 10:27:40AM +0100, Luis Matos wrote: Qua, 2007-08-08 às 20:30 +0200, Hendrik Sattler escreveu: Additionally, it should be noted that a desktop task has nothing

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-09 Thread Gustavo Franco
On 8/9/07, Hendrik Sattler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am Mittwoch 08 August 2007 23:02 schrieb Petter Reinholdtsen: [Julian Andres Klode] We should try to use binary packages provided by linux-modules-* or other modules packages by default and fallback to m-a. You might want to check

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-09 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Hendrik Sattler] Is discover still installed by default on new installs? Not sure. I suspect it depend on the task being installed. It is currently used to detect which X driver to activate, but that need will go away in the future when X.org manage to configure itself automatically. :) If

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-09 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Gustavo Franco] Petter, couldn't we replace discover1 with discover (2) into the desktop task ? Actually, we (Otavio an me) plan to replace discover1 with discover for Lenny, so that every user with discover1 will upgrade automatically to discover. Is this a list of supported hardware issue,

Re: Simplify installation of non-free? (was: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?)

2007-08-09 Thread Darren Salt
I demand that Marco d'Itri may or may not have written... On Aug 09, Tim Hull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's actually not just ATI/nVidia - most wireless drivers are at least in part non-free. In my case, it's the madwifi drivers with their binary HAL. There's also the ipw2100/2200/3945/etc

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-09 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Am Donnerstag 09 August 2007 21:23 schrieb Petter Reinholdtsen: [Hendrik Sattler] Is discover still installed by default on new installs? Not sure. I suspect it depend on the task being installed. It is currently used to detect which X driver to activate, but that need will go away in

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-09 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Hendrik Sattler] As long as automatic doesn't take more time than using manual settings, that's fine. I doubt that they can detect some of the settings (keyboard layout, driver options), though ;) I appreciate the efforts a lot though, especially a better cooperation of kernel drivers and

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-09 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 11:20 -0400, Tim Hull wrote: We already have this on the desktop, from what I can see (there is evidence of a scaling-module-loading-thingummy running on boot) Yes, it loads, but the default scaling

Re: Simplify installation of non-free? (was: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?)

2007-08-09 Thread Ben Goodger
On 09/08/07, Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The objection is making it a priority over supporting free drivers or diverting people working on supporting vendors who provide DFSG free drivers by making it a distribution wide priority. The free drivers are perfectly well supported as

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-09 Thread Gustavo Franco
On 8/9/07, Ben Hutchings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 11:20 -0400, Tim Hull wrote: We already have this on the desktop, from what I can see (there is evidence of a scaling-module-loading-thingummy running on boot) Yes,

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-09 Thread Ben Goodger
On 09/08/07, Luis Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: having a console tasksel is not enough ... someone was developing a gtk+ front end ... right? running tasksel --new-install gets you a debconf window, which is either curses, gtk, qt etc depending on your debconf conf. -- Ben Goodger B.F.

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-09 Thread Michael Biebl
Petter Reinholdtsen schrieb: I get the impression that you are talking about boot time? I am talking about the Debian installer and behavior at install time. discover is not used at boot time, and have not been providing a init.d script since before Etch was released. Kernel module

Re: Simplify installation of non-free? (was: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?)

2007-08-09 Thread Don Armstrong
On Thu, 09 Aug 2007, Ben Goodger wrote: I can outline precisely what needs to be done to make nvidia-glx, for example, bearable[1] (and it does not involve a specialised GUI, god forbid) but am in no position at all to do so :( Sure you are! Outlining exactly what needs to be done and filing

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-09 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 18:37 -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote: On 8/9/07, Ben Hutchings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 11:20 -0400, Tim Hull wrote: We already have this on the desktop, from what I can see (there is evidence of a

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-09 Thread Luis Matos
Qui, 2007-08-09 às 15:24 -0300, Gustavo Franco escreveu: Btw, desktop-c-gtk-devel and desktop-python-gtk-devel makes no sense, IMHO. It's too specific that we will need desktop-$every_language_in_debian-gtk-devel. What a task like desktop-php-devel will contain, vim? For those who like emacs

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-09 Thread Luis Matos
Qui, 2007-08-09 às 10:42 -0700, Joey Hess escreveu: Luis Matos wrote: having a console tasksel is not enough ... someone was developing a gtk+ front end ... right? DEBIAN_FRONTEND=gnome tasksel ? that's a pretty hack ... why does tasksel does not get the debconf option on which front

Re: Simplify installation of non-free? (was: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?)

2007-08-09 Thread David Nusinow
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 10:34:01PM +0100, Ben Goodger wrote: I'm grossly underqualied in that respect, I fear. I can outline precisely what needs to be done to make nvidia-glx, for example, bearable[1] (and it does not involve a specialised GUI, god forbid) but am in no position at

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-09 Thread David Nusinow
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 09:08:00PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: [Gustavo Franco] Btw, it seems that xdebconfigurator already support discover (2) or discover1 but xserver-xorg recommends is on 'discover1 | discover' and in ltsp-client-core we depend on discover1 (not desktop task

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-09 Thread David Nusinow
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 10:45:32PM +0200, Hendrik Sattler wrote: Am Donnerstag 09 August 2007 21:23 schrieb Petter Reinholdtsen: Not sure. I suspect it depend on the task being installed. It is currently used to detect which X driver to activate, but that need will go away in the future

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-09 Thread Matthew Garrett
Ben Hutchings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This means that when draining the battery we do not allow the CPU to run at full speed, so CPU-bound tasks take longer. This tends to extend battery life but reduces the processing work derived from the battery, since other components then take a higher

Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-08 Thread Tim Hull
to work with m-a. Non-free drivers would *only* be displayed if non-free is in the sources.list. Anyway, I'm curious to hear what's going on with respect to Debian on the desktop. I understand that there are things Debian can't do (i.e. include non-free or illegal software), but I feel Debian has

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-08 Thread Ben Goodger
On 08/08/2007, Tim Hull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm a new (though fairly knowledgeable) Debian user and possibly a prospective developer. Anyway, though I do like Debian a lot, one thing is obvious - it lags somewhat behind as a desktop (or laptop) distribution as compared to many

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-08 Thread Tim Hull
We already have this on the desktop, from what I can see (there is evidence of a scaling-module-loading-thingummy running on boot) Yes, it loads, but the default scaling governor is set to userspace. As powernowd isn't included in the desktop task, this effectly means no CPU scaling by

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-08 Thread Josselin Mouette
Nvidia modules can already be installed directly from non-free. AIUI the same can't be done for ATI ones because of licensing issues. Anyway, I'm curious to hear what's going on with respect to Debian on the desktop. I understand that there are things Debian can't do (i.e. include non-free

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-08 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mercredi 08 août 2007 à 11:20 -0400, Tim Hull a écrit : Iceweasel on the default install is like this - debian.org and Gmail are two sites which demonstrate this. Instead of Bitstream Vera Sans (or Serif), parts of these sites use some fugly bitmap font instead (or a fugly TrueType font,

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-08 Thread Tim Hull
I guess that is a bug in iceweasel wrt. the default parameters. Anyway, you should use epiphany instead, which doesn't have this issue in etch :) It's not just etch - this happens on lenny/sid as well. I guess I should file a bug on this - it appears to be fixed in Ubuntu, so maybe

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-08 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Am Mittwoch, den 08.08.2007, 13:24 -0400 schrieb Tim Hull: Regarding drivers, I know there are source packages in non-free (and main, for some free but out-of-tree drivers) and the module-assistant will build these. I was just suggesting a more GUI-oriented approach (like Ubuntu Restricted

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-08 Thread Tim Hull
I just reported an ITP Bug for restricted-manager [1] [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=436722 -- It does need to be modified to work with Debian, though - such that it pulls the drivers using m-a instead of using Ubuntu's restricted-modules package. Just making sure

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-08 Thread Pierre Habouzit
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 07:07:14PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: Le mercredi 08 août 2007 à 10:23 -0400, Tim Hull a écrit : * Making laptop frequency scaling/suspend/etc work out of the box when Laptop task is installed It works out of the box in etch, with the cpufreq applet for the

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-08 Thread Pierre Habouzit
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 01:24:06PM -0400, Tim Hull wrote: Regarding frequency scaling - it didn't work for me (I had to manually enable it, though I didn't need a custom kernel or anything like that). I'll investigate further and possibly file a bug. /etc/default/cpufrequtils is the place to

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-08 Thread Paul van Tilburg
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 07:09:12PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: Le mercredi 08 août 2007 à 11:20 -0400, Tim Hull a écrit : Iceweasel on the default install is like this - debian.org and Gmail are two sites which demonstrate this. Instead of Bitstream Vera Sans (or Serif), parts of

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-08 Thread Pierre Habouzit
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 01:24:06PM -0400, Tim Hull wrote: Regarding drivers, I know there are source packages in non-free (and main, for some free but out-of-tree drivers) and the module-assistant will build these. I was just suggesting a more GUI-oriented approach (like Ubuntu Restricted

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-08 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Am Mittwoch, den 08.08.2007, 13:38 -0400 schrieb Tim Hull: I just reported an ITP Bug for restricted-manager [1] [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=436722 -- It does need to be modified to work with Debian, though - such that it

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-08 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Am Mittwoch, den 08.08.2007, 10:23 -0400 schrieb Tim Hull: adapting Ubuntu's Restricted Manager to work with m-a. Non-free drivers would *only* be displayed if non-free is in the sources.list. We should also give the user the option to activate the component, like we do in gnome-app-install. --

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-08 Thread Daniel Schepler
On Wednesday 08 August 2007 01:24:06 pm Tim Hull wrote: I guess that is a bug in iceweasel wrt. the default parameters. Anyway, you should use epiphany instead, which doesn't have this issue in etch :) It's not just etch - this happens on lenny/sid as well. I guess I should file a bug

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-08 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 01:38:18PM -0400, Tim Hull wrote: I just reported an ITP Bug for restricted-manager [1] [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=436722 Just making sure you know this... You do not have to do this, and I think you have already realized why. --

Out of the box CPU frequency scaling (Was: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?)

2007-08-08 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Tim Hull] Regarding frequency scaling - it didn't work for me (I had to manually enable it, though I didn't need a custom kernel or anything like that). I'll investigate further and possibly file a bug. This is supposed to be handled automatically by the kernel when the cpufrequtils package

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-08 Thread Tim Hull
At least with debian.org, it appears the CSS specifies a font of Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif, which means if msttcorefonts isn't installed, it falls back to the ugly bitmap Helvetica fonts. Which seems more like a bug in the CSS for a website for free software, than in the web browsers

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-08 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Am Mittwoch 08 August 2007 16:39 schrieb Ben Goodger: On 08/08/2007, Tim Hull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Making laptop frequency scaling/suspend/etc work out of the box when Laptop task is installed We already have this on the desktop, from what I can see (there is evidence of a

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-08 Thread Joey Hess
Tim Hull wrote: * Making laptop frequency scaling/suspend/etc work out of the box when Laptop task is installed I'm sad that this didn't get fixed in time for etch, but afaik it's working fine for lenny. cpufrequtils contains an init script that loads the appropriate governor module.

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-08 Thread Tim Hull
In addition, there is not reliable solution for suspend/hibernate, especially from X. There still some way to go for X and the kernel to get to there. The bundled suspend scripts seem to be improving somewhat, but they need work... Additionally, it should be noted that a desktop task has

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-08 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Julian Andres Klode] We should try to use binary packages provided by linux-modules-* or other modules packages by default and fallback to m-a. You might want to check out the recent changes to discover and discover-data. It already had support for installing hardware specific packages using

Simplify installation of non-free? (was: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?)

2007-08-08 Thread Ben Finney
Ben Goodger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Simplifying the installation of non-free graphics card drivers should also be a priority, though not to the extent Canonical are currently planning. I strongly disagree. The installation of non-free should *not* be a priority for the Debian project, since

Re: Simplify installation of non-free? (was: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?)

2007-08-08 Thread Ben Goodger
On 08/08/2007, Ben Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ben Goodger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Simplifying the installation of non-free graphics card drivers should also be a priority, though not to the extent Canonical are currently planning. I strongly disagree. The installation of non-free

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-08 Thread Tim Hull
Which work? Could you please test with both Etch and testing or even unstable write a report, send to debian-desktop ML - [EMAIL PROTECTED], pointing to some bugs in or out of our bug tracking system (if any) ? I will do this... It seems that we have no support for FAAC in main yet. Could

Re: Simplify installation of non-free? (was: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?)

2007-08-08 Thread Tim Hull
Oh, for the love of god, not more of this... If these (read: nvidia/ati) drivers were DFSG-compliant, they'd be included by default. Since this is not possible, it should be made as easy as possible to install them. The only thing is to ensure that it remains an opt-in, since people must

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-08 Thread Gustavo Franco
On 8/8/07, Tim Hull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (...) It seems that we have no support for FAAC in main yet. Could you point out a package, set of packages or upstream projects that I should look for? I meant faad, sorry. Here's the main lib:

Re: Out of the box CPU frequency scaling (Was: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?)

2007-08-08 Thread manphiz
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: Regarding frequency scaling - it didn't work for me (I had to manually enable it, though I didn't need a custom kernel or anything like that). I'll investigate further and possibly file a bug. As in my case it didn't work because the cpufreq related modules were

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-08 Thread Tim Hull
- driver detection We've driver detection, what's wrong with this feature in your use case scenario? I was talking about driver detection with out-of-tree drivers that must be built with module-assistant. It actually looks like something is in the works, though. - more streamlined live-CD

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-08 Thread Gustavo Franco
On 8/9/07, Tim Hull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - driver detection We've driver detection, what's wrong with this feature in your use case scenario? I was talking about driver detection with out-of-tree drivers that must be built with module-assistant. It actually looks like something is

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-08 Thread Tim Hull
Could you please check that the 'about:plugins' output displays 'mov' support? If not, which desktop environment and gecko 'based' browser you're using ? Do you've the related task installed (eg: gnome-desktop for GNOME, ...) ? My browser (iceweasel) does include .mov as a supported format.

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-08 Thread Tim Hull
My browser (iceweasel) does include .mov as a supported format. All the files I try to play open a player applet, but it does nothing. Trying to open them manually with Totem results in a Video Codec Advanced Video Coding (H264) is not installed error message. I even installed the ffmpeg

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-08 Thread Gustavo Franco
On 8/9/07, Tim Hull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My browser (iceweasel) does include .mov as a supported format. All the files I try to play open a player applet, but it does nothing. Trying to open them manually with Totem results in a Video Codec Advanced Video Coding (H264) is not

Re: Simplify installation of non-free? (was: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?)

2007-08-08 Thread Don Armstrong
On Wed, 08 Aug 2007, Ben Goodger wrote: On 08/08/2007, Ben Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Individual developers can work on non-free to their heart's content, but it should not get any priority from the Debian project. If these (read: nvidia/ati) drivers were DFSG-compliant, they'd be

Re: Debian on the Desktop - plans for Lenny?

2007-08-08 Thread Tim Hull
You're right, but I thought you argued about Etch. Btw, the idea is replace xine with gstreamer as default backend, but we've quite some time until freeze, meanwhile I would recommend you stay tuned for tasksel updates and switch to totem-gstreamer and install the 0.10 plugins, all of them

Generating the Debian menu from .desktop files?

2007-01-18 Thread Charles Plessy
Dear all, I have read some contradicting statements in the discussion about the menu systems, and it is sometimes confusing. I will try to summarise: * The GNOME menu is better because it is cleaner. Although .desktop files apply to each menu system which are following the FreeDesktop

Re: Generating the Debian menu from .desktop files?

2007-01-18 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070118 14:28]: However, I also agree that it is boring and error-generating to maintain menu entries in two separate files in separate formats. The .desktop format has one great advantage: it supports internationalisation. Which the Debian menu support since

Re: Debian and the desktop

2005-12-20 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2005-12-12 17:36:15, schrieb Roberto C. Sanchez: Better yet, we should make WindowMaker the only window manager in Debian. Down with GNOME and KDE! Does it show that I am a WindowMaker fan? :-) :-P FLAMEfvwm is better/FLAME using it since Slink As a Debian Consultant I have customized

Re: Debian menu entries(was Re: Debian and the desktop)

2005-12-19 Thread Linas Zvirblis
Eduardo Silva wrote: As a lurker to debian-devel, I would like to point to all a deficiency in the current KDE way of naming menus, and hope that if Debian menu goes this way, it should improve on it. There is currently a discussion about improving Debian Menu at debian-policy mailing list,

Re: Debian and the desktop

2005-12-19 Thread Simon Richter
Hi, Josselin Mouette wrote: [Permissions on device nodes] Currently, there are two ways of handling this situation: - The Debian way, where this is controlled by Unix groups, and where the default user belongs to these groups. Your message seems to imply the opposite, and I welcome you to

Re: Debian menu entries(was Re: Debian and the desktop)

2005-12-18 Thread Peter Nuttall
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 10:23:54PM -0800, Eduardo Silva wrote: As a lurker to debian-devel, I would like to point to all a deficiency in the current KDE way of naming menus, and hope that if Debian menu goes this way, it should improve on it. The current way KDE names programs is: Type of

Debian menu entries(was Re: Debian and the desktop)

2005-12-17 Thread Eduardo Silva
As a lurker to debian-devel, I would like to point to all a deficiency in the current KDE way of naming menus, and hope that if Debian menu goes this way, it should improve on it. The current way KDE names programs is: Type of Program (Application name) So, for amarok it's: Audio Player (amarok)

debian-menu vs. .desktop

2005-12-16 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Thomas Viehmann wrote: P.S.: Could someone give me a pointer about moving to .desktop and why it is/was considered a bad idea? (Or if it's just a not worth it/noone has time issue...) I believe it was considered a good idea by everyone and the consensus was that it should be done in the long run.

Re: debian-menu vs. .desktop

2005-12-16 Thread Bill Allombert
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 02:51:13PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: Thomas Viehmann wrote: P.S.: Could someone give me a pointer about moving to .desktop and why it is/was considered a bad idea? (Or if it's just a not worth it/noone has time issue...) I believe it was considered a good idea

Re: Debian and the desktop

2005-12-15 Thread Miles Bader
Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Why try to make kde and gnome look the same? Well I don't know about other people, but for me it's partly a reaction to the branding Gnome and KDE already try to do. I personally run a mostly gnome env because I like some of the apps, but I don't feel any

Re: Debian and the desktop

2005-12-14 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Bill Allombert wrote: ... generic menu entries ... SuSE ... What is needed at this point is a draft policy defining what will be the new layout and what will be the generic titles. KDE seems to use the GenericName .desktop entry. Probably a good starting point would be to cannibalize these,

Re: Debian and the desktop

2005-12-14 Thread Bill Allombert
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 07:02:03PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote: Bill Allombert wrote: ... generic menu entries ... SuSE ... What is needed at this point is a draft policy defining what will be the new layout and what will be the generic titles. KDE seems to use the GenericName

Re: Debian and the desktop

2005-12-14 Thread Linas Zvirblis
David Nusinow wrote: What are you talking about Debian Style? Color scheme, artwork (default wallpaper, login screen, even CD covers). All those little things that would make a user say Yep, that's Debian. Check out the windowmaker package. It has (or had as of a few years ago) a beautiful

Re: Debian and the desktop

2005-12-14 Thread Andreas Schuldei
* Linas Zvirblis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-12-15 00:02:01]: David Nusinow wrote: What are you talking about Debian Style? Color scheme, artwork (default wallpaper, login screen, even CD covers). All those little things that would make a user say Yep, that's Debian. Check out the

Re: Debian and the desktop

2005-12-14 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Hi, thanks for your comments. Bill Allombert wrote: But there are another way: KDE and GNOME provide a non-Debian menu. However there are no clear definition about what should go in this menu. Maybe the policy could be to only put in this menu the applications relevant to Bob User and keep

Re: Debian and the desktop

2005-12-14 Thread Linas Zvirblis
Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: What are you talking about Debian Style? Color scheme, artwork (default wallpaper, login screen, even CD covers). All those little things that would make a user say Yep, that's Debian. The desktop-base package was supposed to address exactly that problem

Re: Debian and the desktop

2005-12-14 Thread Linas Zvirblis
Andreas Schuldei wrote: so where can i have a look at this? could it please be put up somewhere on the web? The package is called wmaker. It is in Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Debian and the desktop

2005-12-14 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2005-12-12, Linas Zvirblis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A user should get the same visual feeling whether he chose GNOME or KDE for his desktop, whether he decided for KDM or GDM etc. This might sound Why try to make kde and gnome look the same? If it is a goal to make all Bob User desktops

Re: Debian and the desktop

2005-12-13 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 12:03:57AM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote: * Joey Hess [Mon, Dec 12 2005, 03:53:02PM]: This kind of disconnect between what an installed Debian system actually does, what some developers think it does, and results like Debian developers passing out Ubuntu CDs instead of

Re: Debian and the desktop

2005-12-13 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Christian Perrier wrote: And, anyway, the KDE/Gnome thing is only one of the points I meant about the usability of our default desktop system, when we target our dear Bob User. This is beyond tasksel, but Bob User would profit immensely from generic menu entries. SuSE does this and I think

Re: Debian and the desktop

2005-12-13 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 10:28:28AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Christian Perrier wrote: And, anyway, the KDE/Gnome thing is only one of the points I meant about the usability of our default desktop system, when we target our dear Bob User. This is beyond tasksel, but Bob User would

  1   2   >