Hi!
I'd like to maintain package radiusd-merit (orphaned in 1.61
version of prospective-packages), if nobody is working on it yet.
Regards,
Roberto Lumbreras
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgp 143BE391
Lander Internet, Madrid-Spain-UE; http://www.lander.es
Who the
You need to enable ms_chap in PPP --- see README.MSCHAP80
Thanks...read it. Is there any reason, besides the libraries that this
hasn't been simply built into our standard ppp package?
Not that I've noticed.
How much bigger does it get if you static link libpam and libdes?
I thought that
'Remco Blaakmeer wrote:'
On Sat, 13 Dec 1997, David Engel wrote:
Definitely not! libc5-dev implies that libc5 is the default
compilation environment installed in /usr/include.
Sorry, I must have been half asleep when I wrote the above. libc5-altdev
doesn't have to conflict with either
'Roberto Lumbreras wrote:'
Hi!
I'd like to maintain package radiusd-merit (orphaned in 1.61
version of prospective-packages), if nobody is working on it yet.
Excellent. Maybe you can find the buffer overflow when shadow support
is included?
--
Christopher J. Fearnley |
On Thu, 11 Dec 1997, Herbert Xu wrote:
Anytime I do insmod sound or run any program which causes kerneld to
have to load the sound module, my whole system freezes for a while --
Thanks for your help. I managed to find another copy of an old .config
file for my kernel compiles, and
Please disregarde the first 10 line of my previous message. (Error with the
mouse).
__
Please do not look directly into laser with remaining eye.
E-Mail: Mark Ciciretti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 14-Dec-97
Time: 21:16:00
--
--
TO
On Sun, 14 Dec 1997, Chris Fearnley wrote:
: I'd like to maintain package radiusd-merit (orphaned in 1.61
: version of prospective-packages), if nobody is working on it yet.
:
: Excellent. Maybe you can find the buffer overflow when shadow support
: is included?
Humm... could you send me more
Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
mdutils-0.35-5(extra)
I have successfully recompiled mdutils for libc6, but will have wait until
another day to u/l it. I have to apply to become a maintainer, and I have
stayed(sp?) up too late as it is.
Adam Heath of Borg-Linux [EMAIL PROTECTED] Join the
I second that. Please do not put symbols in normal packages. I take it
there are more people like me who have problems fitting all the packages
they like to have on the disk. And symbols eat so much disk space.
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Project-Manager| topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
[EMAIL
Yes, that's what I meant.
And no, I don't need it for installation, but for using the up and
running system. Up to now I have to reboot to NT to be able to access
the net. Argh!
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Project-Manager| topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
On Fri 12 Dec 1997, Paul Slootman wrote:
On Thu 11 Dec 1997, Guy Maor wrote:
Andy Guy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It is different becuase the lzw patent holders (HP?) have given a
general license for non-profit use of the patent.
That's true. It's Unisys that holds the patent, btw.
Hi,
I noticed some new updates of packages recently have not complied with
changelog policy[1]. They are packages that I had made non-maintainer
releases of previously, and to which I had added a changelog entry.
It is clear that the actual maintainer, when preparing the new release,
did not
James Troup [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Turbo Fredriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It most certainly is not.
Hmmm? What's missing then, since we are running a perfectly working
1.2.17 system...
Any sane Amiga installation disks; a non-buggy-pseudo-1.3 base set.
And as of
Martin Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It is clear that the actual maintainer, when preparing the new
release, did not downloaded the non-maintainer release beforehand. The
non-maintainer releases were made about 2 months before these current
releases.
While I don't consider these problems that
Rob Browning [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't believe that debhelper address one of Ian's main complaints at
all. If I remeber correctly, that complaint was that when you use
debmake (or debhelper), you end up with debian package source with
non-deterministic behavior. Depending on the
Dear Gurus,
I saw today that Linux kernel 2.0.32 had been released as a Debian
package. Is it safe to upgrade the existing Debian.1.3.r4 to this
kernel? What about all the libc6 stuff? Should I have it installed or
should I better wait until the the next major Debian release arrives?
If so, when
Christian Leutloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
it's nice to have, but brings no advantages. If we change the
autoconfish thing we get the same different binaries as through
changing debhelper/debmake. It's IMHO only a different view but no
substantial change. And debhelper is working NOW - the
Ian,
My main concern is whether we are getting completely clueless people who
are not interested in Linux at all on debian-devel because of the news
gateway. If that is not the case, I dont' have justification to remove it.
I don't see a reason to take it off the gateway because it would
unsettle
Hello!
I'm having trouble with fetchmail and procmail. The trouble is that fetchmail
ignores the 'mda formail -s procmail' line totally and delivers all mail to
port 25. nice. I can't remember, how many times I have checked everything.
This might have a connection with another problem
Vtk would fit in non-free. I think it's worth it to ask them to modify
their license to fit the DFSG, I'll fire off a note. This probably means
changes in diff files only (which Ian hates, but I still think is a good
compromise).
Thanks
Bruce
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING
Christian Leutloff wrote:
I don't believe that debhelper address one of Ian's main complaints at
all. If I remeber correctly, that complaint was that when you use
debmake (or debhelper), you end up with debian package source with
non-deterministic behavior. Depending on the version of
Joey Hess wrote:
With debmake, new functionality was added all the time, and was added into
the same debstd program, changing its behavior, and so different versions
could have widly differing results on the same package.
With debstd, each individual program has a well-defined job, and so
FYI, I'm receiving all of the bug system nags for Christian Linhart for
his abandoned packages (xarchie and bibindex). I guess his account was
eliminated from master and my master account username is the same as his
old one, so the bug system is nagging me.
I don't have a problem with the nags
On Mon, Dec 15, 1997 at 12:20:10AM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
On Sun, Dec 14, 1997 at 10:32:51PM +0100, Remco Blaakmeer wrote:
On Sun, 14 Dec 1997, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
I intend to package xscavenger, a lode runner like game (remember the good
old commodore 64 days?).
AFAIK,
I am wondering that NIS+ is not in the list of packages which are not
yet available in Debian. Did nobody ask for it?
Reference:
http://www-vt.uni-paderborn.de/~kukuk/linux/nisplus.html
--
Rainer Dorsch
Abt. Rechnerarchitektur
e-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Uni StuttgartTel.:
Fabrizio == Fabrizio Polacco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We could let the -dev versions of packages have diversions of the
libraries to unstripped versions, and have the runtime versions
have stripped versions.
Interesting idea. I can't say I'm completely clear on
bruce == bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
bruce There is a new GTK+ release 0.99.0 . This is coordinated
bruce with the upcoming GIMP 0.99.16 release.
I'm packaging this up as we speak, with epoch 1:, to make it libgtk1
version 1:0.99.0.
Hopefully the GTK+ folks will keep with this new
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Mon, 15 Dec 1997, Christopher C Chimelis wrote:
FYI, I'm receiving all of the bug system nags for Christian Linhart for
his abandoned packages (xarchie and bibindex). I guess his account was
eliminated from master and my master account username is the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Mon, 15 Dec 1997, Santiago Vila wrote:
Please, tell Brian White about this.
Will do. Thanks!
Current maintainer for bibindex in
hamm is Debian-QA Group, so you should not receive any message about
that because of bibindex.
Yeah, looking back through
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michel LESPINASSE) wrote on 14.12.97 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
My immediate problem is that I have the hardware clock set to GMT and
my system clock is never getting set to the local timezone.
Do you see /etc/localtime when you type date +%Z ?
If so, then I'd say that you ran
I just can't understand this. I'm the maintainer of libgtk, the GIMP
toolkit, which is the widget set for The GIMP and Gnome and other nice
X programs.
Ever since gtk+971109, however, I've been running into a problem that
nobody who isn't running Debian has been running into.
libgtk *compiles*
A quick followup: Someone on the GIMP IRC network recently reported
the *exact* same problem with certain gtk versions.
But they're running SuSE 4.4.1, very tweaked.
Now I don't think the problem is Debian-specific. (I had hoped it
wasn't :)
--
Brought to you by the letters F and Q and the
Maybe I should submit this as a wishlist to the bug system, but I was
interested in getting some comments first.
I think that /etc/ppp/ip-up and /etc/ppp/ip-down should use
'run-parts' against, say, the directories /etc/ppp/ip-{up,down}.d/.
This would allow, for instance, MTA packages to ship
I think this is a very good idea. I know that the ipmasq package would
greatly benefit from this kind of arangement.
Brian
On Mon, 15 Dec 1997, Adam P. Harris wrote:
Maybe I should submit this as a wishlist to the bug system, but I was
interested in getting some comments first.
I think
Adam P. Harris wrote:
Maybe I should submit this as a wishlist to the bug system, but I was
interested in getting some comments first.
I think that /etc/ppp/ip-up and /etc/ppp/ip-down should use
'run-parts' against, say, the directories /etc/ppp/ip-{up,down}.d/.
So do I. I first asked
This would be helpful for my new wvdial package as well -- from a user
interface standpoint, I would like to have a way for pppd to call me back
once we're properly connected.
Avery
On Mon, 15 Dec 1997, Adam P. Harris wrote:
Maybe I should submit this as a wishlist to the bug system, but I
Good evening,
during compiling re-packaging of some libraries on the powerpc I
noticed several problems regarding our libc.
On the powerpc - as on the alpha - there is no libc5 package and will
never be (I guess). As a result compilation of any library that
provides both a libc5 and libc6
Adam == Adam P Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Adam Maybe I should submit this as a wishlist to the bug system,
Adam but I was interested in getting some comments first.
Red Hat 5.0 has a complex network configuration setup... I didn't
have time to look it over in detail, but think
On 15 Dec 1997, Ben Gertzfield wrote:
libgtk *compiles* fine, but when I run a program that uses it, the
fields where you enter text into only display bizarre characters --
which change from version to version. For instance, when trying to get
gtk+971201 to work, I only got blank characters
On Mon, 1 Dec 1997, Brian Bassett wrote:
I just would like to pick everyone's brains and make sure of something. I
think that the following copyright would be acceptable under the DFSG:
---
Copyright (c) 1992-1996 Regents of the University of Michigan.
All rights reserved.
Yann Dirson wrote:
Correction: it works now (probably a compilation option that wasn't
used at the time).
Problem: it's really a mmap image (thus works only for executables,
not libs), and includes the libs symbols:
aha, but shared libs are executable files, so I succeeded building a
It doesn't happen on my laptop running Debian 1.3 or my SGI running IRIX.
I bet it's a GLIBC 2.0 interaction.
Bruce
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
On Mon, Dec 15, 1997 at 06:46:20PM +, Adrian Bridgett wrote:
On Mon, Dec 15, 1997 at 12:20:10AM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
On Sun, Dec 14, 1997 at 10:32:51PM +0100, Remco Blaakmeer wrote:
On Sun, 14 Dec 1997, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
I intend to package xscavenger, a lode runner
Work-Needing and Prospective Packages for Debian GNU/Linux
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
$Id: packages.sgml,v 1.62 1997/12/15 22:51:11 johnie Exp $
1. General Questions
1.1. Before reading this document
You should have read the Debian GNU/Linux FAQ
http://www.debian.org/doc/FAQ/.
1.2. Purpose of this
Hi all,
I recently switched to Debian from RedHat 4.2 and the one thing that I
think that Debian could really use is an administration tool.
Thus, I've decided to try and write such a tool. I've set up a webpage
(http://www.butterfly.ml.org/debadmin/) and a mailing list (instructions
at the
Hello!
Is there an easy way to redirect stderr to memory?
I was thinking about something like:
FILE *stream,*tmpstream;
char *streambuf;
size_t streamsize;
stream=open_memstream(streambuf,streamsize);
tmpstream=stderr;
stderr=stream;
but it doesn't work, because stderr is not a
Add me to the list. I have the room to test both upgrades and fresh
installs.
Mark
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Adam P. Harris writes:
I think that /etc/ppp/ip-up and /etc/ppp/ip-down should use
'run-parts' against, say, the directories /etc/ppp/ip-{up,down}.d/.
This would allow, for instance, MTA packages to ship little scripts to
flush the mail queue when the link comes up, pop-deamons to start
48 matches
Mail list logo
