Am Sonntag 17 Februar 2008 schrieb namnd:
In this case, the configuration is as easy as:
interface name=fpt1 type=ppp
ppp type=pppoe options= depend_on=tap1 username=***
password=***/
network id=11 name=FPT1 auto=1/
/interface
The ppp stanza should not contain authentication
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 11:20:48PM +0700, namnd wrote:
* The configuration file is in XML so netupdown can handle sophisticated
configuration. Editing the XML the configuration by hand or by software
will be easy and comfortable.
Forgive me, but yeah right! Have you ever actually edited
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
* The configuration file is in XML so netupdown can handle sophisticated
configuration. Editing the XML the configuration by hand or by software
will be easy and comfortable.
Forgive me, but yeah right! Have you ever actually edited XML by
hand? Try tweaking a
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 11:20:48PM +0700, namnd wrote:
* The configuration file is in XML so netupdown can handle sophisticated
configuration. Editing the XML the configuration by hand or by software
will be easy and comfortable.
Editing XML by hand easy and comfortable?!?
In which world?
Hendrik Sattler wrote:
Am Sonntag 17 Februar 2008 schrieb namnd:
In this case, the configuration is as easy as:
interface name=fpt1 type=ppp
ppp type=pppoe options= depend_on=tap1 username=***
password=***/
network id=11 name=FPT1 auto=1/
/interface
The ppp stanza should not contain
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
It is part of the base system. And people will have to manipulate it
even when the web interface is not available. Think of using globs and
stats. Also think of creative usages of symlinks.
Well, I guess that it is up to me to think (demonstrate fisibility)
here. Otherwise
namnd == namnd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
namnd To be short, I consider my software an evolution of ifupdown, so
the
namnd main part is called netupdown, the purpose of this software is to
namnd use on corporate internet gateway, the main features of the software:
Have you looked
also sprach namnd [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.02.17.1720 +0100]:
My team have been developing a software for my company since 2004,
now I have plan to release it to the public, hopefully in an open
source license if the management board doesn't object. So I need
the peer reviews from the
Hello Martin,
Hello Nam,
I am the author of netconf (http://netconf.alioth.debian.org), which
Brian has already introduced in another post to this thread. I am
very interested in your work because all the issues you highlight in
your mail are core to my motivations for writing netconf.
You are
On lun, 2008-02-18 at 06:49 +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
You are asking us to evaluate the quality of a software based only
on the descriptions you provide.
There was a link to the source code in the initial mail too.
Cheers,
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
also sprach martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.02.18.0843 +0100]:
I really want to look at it, even though I am bad at Perl. Please
try to release it. I am tempted to ask you to show it to me
beforehand under a non-disclosure agreement, but then I might have
difficulty keeping netconf
also sprach namnd [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.02.18.0750 +0100]:
- I have posted a full example of internal state on the first email.
Runtime state contains info about interfaces, about networks running on
those interfaces, routes running on those networks, and multipath routes
using the
12 matches
Mail list logo
