❦ 14 February 2022 22:39 +01, Jonas Smedegaard:
> I am trying hard to read good faith into your last sentence above, but
> have quite some difficulty reading as anything but you describing
> unbundling as inevitably leading to disaster.
That's how you should read it.
> Maybe my point was
Quoting Vincent Bernat (2022-02-14 21:35:47)
> ❦ 14 February 2022 10:56 +01, Jonas Smedegaard:
>
> >> I've finally give up and am just using ALL the bundled node
> >> packages:
> >> https://salsa.debian.org/chromium-team/chromium/-/commit/a418d219f0217d6398a01c30035d35c42f7a76f1
> >>
> >
> >>
❦ 14 February 2022 10:56 +01, Jonas Smedegaard:
>> I've finally give up and am just using ALL the bundled node packages:
>> https://salsa.debian.org/chromium-team/chromium/-/commit/a418d219f0217d6398a01c30035d35c42f7a76f1
>>
>
>> It's not ideal, but at least with this we'll match all of the
Quoting Andres Salomon (2022-02-14 08:55:22)
> I've finally give up and am just using ALL the bundled node packages:
> https://salsa.debian.org/chromium-team/chromium/-/commit/a418d219f0217d6398a01c30035d35c42f7a76f1
>
> It's not ideal, but at least with this we'll match all of the node
> stuff
On 2/14/22 02:27, Pirate Praveen wrote:
2022, ഫെബ്രുവരി 13 9:36:11 PM IST, Roger Shimizu ൽ എഴുതി
On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 2:12 AM Andres Salomon wrote:
Yes, that's the error. "String.matchAll is only available from Node.js
12.0 onwards", according to
2022, ഫെബ്രുവരി 13 9:36:11 PM IST, Roger Shimizu ൽ എഴുതി
>On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 2:12 AM Andres Salomon wrote:
>> Yes, that's the error. "String.matchAll is only available from Node.js
>> 12.0 onwards", according to
>> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/58558257/string-matchall-is-undefined
On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 at 01:06:11 +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> I also tried v98 based tree, and result is the same, same build error as
> above.
> My conclusion is that buster cannot get chromiium major version
> updated easily (except flatpak way, of course).
buster's version of flatpak does not
On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 2:12 AM Andres Salomon wrote:
>
> On 2/11/22 06:18, Roger Shimizu wrote:
>
> > Dear Andres,
> >
> > Thanks for your work for chromium!
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 7:33 PM Andres Salomon wrote:
> I saw
>
On 2/11/22 06:18, Roger Shimizu wrote:
Dear Andres,
Thanks for your work for chromium!
On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 7:33 PM Andres Salomon wrote:
I saw
https://salsa.debian.org/dilinger/chromium/-/commit/5c05f430e192961527ec9a64bbaa64401dc14d95
, but buster now also includes LLVM/clang 11 (it was
Dear Andres,
Thanks for your work for chromium!
On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 7:33 PM Andres Salomon wrote:
> > > I saw
> > > https://salsa.debian.org/dilinger/chromium/-/commit/5c05f430e192961527ec9a64bbaa64401dc14d95
> > > , but buster now also includes LLVM/clang 11 (it was introduced to
> > >
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 02:21:48PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
> On 1/10/22 05:01, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 09, 2022 at 11:23:20PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > > Btw, https://salsa.debian.org/dilinger/chromium/-/tree/stable is my branch
> > > with cleaned-up commits. That's what
On 1/10/22 05:01, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
On Sun, Jan 09, 2022 at 11:23:20PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
Btw, https://salsa.debian.org/dilinger/chromium/-/tree/stable is my branch
with cleaned-up commits. That's what I'll use for the NMU, which I'm
preparing now.
If you all agree, you could
On Sun, Jan 09, 2022 at 11:23:20PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
> Btw, https://salsa.debian.org/dilinger/chromium/-/tree/stable is my branch
> with cleaned-up commits. That's what I'll use for the NMU, which I'm
> preparing now.
If you all agree, you could finalize the tree, then I'll build
On Sun, Jan 09, 2022 at 12:56:28AM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
>
> On 1/8/22 15:57, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 02:55:20AM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > > If you want to try with chromium 97; it now builds as an official build,
> > > so
> > > those DCHECKs shouldn't
On 1/9/22 19:06, Andres Salomon wrote:
On 1/9/22 02:27, Andres Salomon wrote:
On 1/9/22 00:56, Andres Salomon wrote:
On 1/8/22 15:57, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 02:55:20AM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
If you want to try with chromium 97; it now builds as an official
On 1/9/22 02:27, Andres Salomon wrote:
On 1/9/22 00:56, Andres Salomon wrote:
On 1/8/22 15:57, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 02:55:20AM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
If you want to try with chromium 97; it now builds as an official
build, so
those DCHECKs shouldn't even be
On 1/9/22 00:56, Andres Salomon wrote:
On 1/8/22 15:57, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 02:55:20AM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
If you want to try with chromium 97; it now builds as an official
build, so
those DCHECKs shouldn't even be compiled in. It also supports wayland
On 1/8/22 15:57, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 02:55:20AM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
If you want to try with chromium 97; it now builds as an official build, so
those DCHECKs shouldn't even be compiled in. It also supports wayland
automatically, in case that's related to
On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 02:55:20AM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
> If you want to try with chromium 97; it now builds as an official build, so
> those DCHECKs shouldn't even be compiled in. It also supports wayland
> automatically, in case that's related to your slowdowns.
>
>
On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 02:55:20AM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
> If you want to try with chromium 97; it now builds as an official build, so
> those DCHECKs shouldn't even be compiled in. It also supports wayland
> automatically, in case that's related to your slowdowns.
>
>
On 1/5/22 13:14, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 01:52:33PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
I suppose I'll see how it goes in the coming few days.
So it's not crashing but it's being unbearably slow in gmail, to the
point that I just wasn't able to type a mail there, while throwing
On 1/5/22 13:14, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 01:52:33PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
I suppose I'll see how it goes in the coming few days.
So it's not crashing but it's being unbearably slow in gmail, to the
point that I just wasn't able to type a mail there, while throwing
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 01:52:33PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> I suppose I'll see how it goes in the coming few days.
So it's not crashing but it's being unbearably slow in gmail, to the
point that I just wasn't able to type a mail there, while throwing one
CPU core to 100%.
Also it was kind
On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 06:46:46PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
> On 1/4/22 15:15, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 02:50:20PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > > I pushed a commit to the skip-a11y-checks branch, please give that a try.
> > > I
> > > need to take a look at other
On 1/4/22 15:15, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 02:50:20PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
Okay, that's funny - appears to be a fatal error due to being run under gdb.
Well, it was also crashing outside of gdb ^^
I pushed a commit to the skip-a11y-checks branch, please give
On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 02:50:20PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
> Okay, that's funny - appears to be a fatal error due to being run under gdb.
Well, it was also crashing outside of gdb ^^
> I pushed a commit to the skip-a11y-checks branch, please give that a try. I
> need to take a look at other
On 1/4/22 11:46, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
[...]
[413:413:0104/174404.300230:FATAL:render_process_host_impl.cc(4227)] Check
failed: host->GetBrowserContext() == browser_context (0x645f47d0 vs.
0x658dcb30) Single-process mode does not support multiple browser contexts.
Okay,
On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 01:47:15PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
> Thanks for testing! Are you doing this under sid?
yes!
> Hm, that's a new one.
>
> Looks like upstream turned those assert crashes into debug statements in
> newer releases. Please try to following patch:
>
>
Thanks for testing! Are you doing this under sid?
On 1/3/22 7:39 AM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
On Sun, Jan 02, 2022 at 06:53:52PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
the v96 branch of https://salsa.debian.org/dilinger/chromium
FWIW, I'm trying to build it myself as well
Here it started chrashing as
On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 01:39:21PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 02, 2022 at 06:53:52PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > > > the v96 branch of https://salsa.debian.org/dilinger/chromium
> >
> > FWIW, I'm trying to build it myself as well
>
> Here it started chrashing as soon as I
On Sun, Jan 02, 2022 at 06:53:52PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > > the v96 branch of https://salsa.debian.org/dilinger/chromium
>
> FWIW, I'm trying to build it myself as well
Here it started chrashing as soon as I tried to open a new tab, and
after that it refuses to load my main profile
On Sun, 2 Jan 2022 15:32:28 -0500
Andres Salomon wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Jan 2022 20:15:01 +0100
> Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jan 01, 2022 at 01:23:09PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > > How should I handle this? NMU to sid, let people try it out, and
> > > then deal with
On Sun, 2 Jan 2022 20:15:01 +0100
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 01, 2022 at 01:23:09PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > How should I handle this? NMU to sid, let people try it out, and
> > then deal with buster/bullseye?
>
> Yeah, let's proceed with unstable first in any case.
>
>
On Sat, Jan 01, 2022 at 01:23:09PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
> How should I handle this? NMU to sid, let people try it out, and then
> deal with buster/bullseye?
Yeah, let's proceed with unstable first in any case.
> Upload everything all at once? I'm also
> going to try building for buster,
On 1/2/22 12:53 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
On Sat, Jan 01, 2022 at 01:23:09PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
I've got 96.0.4664.110 building on both bullseye and sid
Trying it, I see it still build-depends on python-jinja2. That package
is now gone, so it's not actually buildable in sid
On Sun, Jan 02, 2022 at 06:53:51PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Correlated, do you know how long do they plan on keeping using python2?
> That's plainly unsuitable, it really is not going to last much longer in
> debian.
Current state of the Python 3 upstream migration can be found here:
On Sat, Jan 01, 2022 at 01:23:09PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > I've got 96.0.4664.110 building on both bullseye and sid
Trying it, I see it still build-depends on python-jinja2. That package
is now gone, so it's not actually buildable in sid anymore.
Correlated, do you know how long do
On Thu, 23 Dec 2021 01:49:53 -0500
Andres Salomon wrote:
> On 12/13/21 5:31 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 08:11:00PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
> >> On 12/5/21 6:41 AM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> >>> Am Sun, Dec 05, 2021 at 10:53:56AM +0100 schrieb Paul Gevers:
On 12/13/21 5:31 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 08:11:00PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
On 12/5/21 6:41 AM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
Am Sun, Dec 05, 2021 at 10:53:56AM +0100 schrieb Paul Gevers:
Exactly that.
I'd suggest anyone who's interested in seeing Chromium
On Fri, 2021-12-17 at 11:28 +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> Could anyone who's using Chromium on Debian please create a page on
> wiki.debian.org which lists the alternative options to use a current
> Chromium (Flatpak, ungoogled Chromium from elsewhere, snap, whatever
> else there is)?
The
On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 08:11:00PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
> On 12/5/21 6:41 AM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > Am Sun, Dec 05, 2021 at 10:53:56AM +0100 schrieb Paul Gevers:
> > Exactly that.
> >
> > I'd suggest anyone who's interested in seeing Chromium supported to first
> > update it in
On 12/5/21 6:41 AM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
Am Sun, Dec 05, 2021 at 10:53:56AM +0100 schrieb Paul Gevers:
Exactly that.
I'd suggest anyone who's interested in seeing Chromium supported to first
update it in unstable (and then work towards updated in bullseye-security).
I started doing just
Am Sun, Dec 05, 2021 at 10:53:56AM +0100 schrieb Paul Gevers:
> Hi Andres,
>
> On 05-12-2021 03:36, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > So what's happening with chromium in both sid and stable? I saw on
> > d-release that it was removed from testing (#998676 and #998732), with a
> > discussion about ending
> Am Sun, Dec 05, 2021 at 10:53:56AM +0100 schrieb Paul Gevers:
> > The problem really is lack of maintenance. In my opinion, chromium deserves
> > an active *team* to support it in Debian.
[..]
> > We'll not ship it in bookworm unless we see steady uploads
> > in unstable and we see security
Hi Andres,
On 05-12-2021 03:36, Andres Salomon wrote:
So what's happening with chromium in both sid and stable? I saw on
d-release that it was removed from testing (#998676 and #998732), with a
discussion about ending security support for it in stable. I'm willing
to help out with chromium
On Sun, 24 Oct 2021 15:06:50 -0400 Andres Salomon wrote:
> Stable (bullseye) still contains chromium 90, which has had many
> security issues. Testing & unstable contain 93, and stable should really
> be quickly updated via stable-security to at least chromium 93 (as its
> already been packaged
46 matches
Mail list logo
