Package: dpkg
Version: 1.22.0
Severity: normal
Upgrading dpkg stops the dpkg-db-backup.timer, which seems rather
undesirable, as it the timer remains inactive until the next reboot or
until it is started manually:
,
| $ systemctl status dpkg-db-backup.timer
| ● dpkg-db-backup.timer - Daily
Hi Helge,
Am 15.01.2023 um 08:41 schrieb Helge Kreutzmann:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 10:14:24PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> Am 13.01.2023 um 21:50 schrieb Helge Kreutzmann:
>> > As you can see, "linuxinfo_4.1.2.orig.tar.xz.asc" is contained in the
>> > .d
Am 13.01.2023 um 21:50 schrieb Helge Kreutzmann:
> Hello Sven,
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 09:36:47PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> Am 13.01.2023 um 21:16 schrieb Helge Kreutzmann:
>> > Maybe we use the tools differently?
>> >
>> > Since we use source only
Hello Helge,
Am 13.01.2023 um 21:16 schrieb Helge Kreutzmann:
> Hello Sven,
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 09:05:21PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> Am 12.01.2023 um 11:29 schrieb Helge Kreutzmann:
>>
>> > Package: dpkg-dev
>> > Version: 1.21.17
>> > Seve
Hi Helge,
Am 12.01.2023 um 11:29 schrieb Helge Kreutzmann:
> Package: dpkg-dev
> Version: 1.21.17
> Severity: normal
>
> I got a linitian error for my package (linuxinfo) that the upstream
> signature is missing and should be put alongside the .orig.tar.xz
> during the build.
>
> This worked,
On 2022-02-09 00:43 +, Colin Watson wrote:
> Control: reassign -1 dpkg
>
> [For background, the dpkg output from earlier messages in this bug was:
>
>> # apt-get -f install
>> dpkg: Cycle in triggers found:
>> Chain of packages, which triggers might be the culprit:
>>
On 2022-02-08 22:52 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Control: tag -1 moreinfo unreproducible
>
> Hi!
>
> On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 16:16:28 +0200, Piotr Engelking wrote:
>> Package: dselect
>> Version: 1.15.2
>> Severity: minor
>
>> 'dselect select' beeps when the terminal window is resized.
>>
>>
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.21.0
I have just upgraded a two months old sid chroot and noticed that
update-alternatives issued some strange warnings:
,
| Setting up util-linux (2.37.2-4) ...
| update-alternatives: warning: /etc/alternatives/pager has been changed
(manually or by a script);
On 2021-09-23 00:20 +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.20.9
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: Niels Thykier
>
> Hi,
>
> the new remove-on-upgrade logic from #822462 breaks the use-case of
> replacing a conffile by a non-conffile version.
Not only that, it also breaks if
Control: tags -1 - patch
On 2021-01-12 18:46 +0100, наб wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.20.7.1
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> When upgrading the kernel on one of my machines I got hit with
> Preparing to unpack .../linux-image-5.10.0-1-amd64_5.10.5-1_amd64.deb
On 2020-11-26 12:19 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: dpkg-dev
> Version: 1.20.5
>
> as seen in
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=dub=amd64=1.22.0-1;
> stamp=1596920730=0
>
> Running gdc...
> + gdc -Wall -obin/dub -fversion=DubUseCurl -Isource
>
On 2020-11-09 14:20 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.19.7
> Severity: normal
>
> It would be nice to clarify the behavior of
> dpkg-maintscript-helper/dir_to_symlink with regards to created
> symlinks upon purge operation.
It does not do anything special. The package
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 libncurses-dev 6.2+20200912-1
Control: retitle -2 dpkg and zsh FTBFS: KEY_EVENT undeclared
Control: severity -1 normal
Control: tags -2 - ftbfs
On 2020-09-18 19:29 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-09-18 at 18:26:34 +0200, Sven Joachim wr
Am 18.09.2020 um 13:43 schrieb Helmut Grohne:
> Source: dpkg
> Version: 1.20.5
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
>
> dpkg FTBFS as of today:
>
> | g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/share/locale\"
> | -DADMINDIR=\"/var/lib/dpkg\" -DLIBDIR=\"/usr/lib/dpkg\"
> |
Package: libdpkg-perl
Version: 1.20.2
Severity: normal
I have seen the following warning when running sbuild-update:
,
| use get_build_env_allowed() instead at /usr/share/perl5/Sbuild/Conf.pm line
1486.
`
Which gave me absolutely no clue: instead _of what_ (looking at
Control: notfound -1 1.20.0
Control: found -1 1.19.7
On 2019-09-05 14:46 -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.20.0
That version does not exist in Debian.
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> The debian/rules file has a manual rule for the 'configure' file, but this
>
Control: merge 844298 -1
Am 09.07.2019 um 15:58 schrieb David Kalnischkies:
> Control: reassign dpkg 1.19.7
>
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 01:52:05AM -0400, Lady Aleena wrote:
>> While I was running apt autoremove, I saw a warning. I did not know it was a
>> warning at first because I could not
On 2019-06-20 18:19 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Package: apt,dselect
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> [ X-Debbugs-Cc'ed -boot@ for debootstrap ]
>
> today I learned that debootstrap as special code to create the file
> /var/lib/dpkg/cmethopt (contents: "apt apt"); this is the function
>
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.19.1
Severity: minor
The latest dpkg upload has added a Breaks on apt (<< 1.7~b) for
--status-fd duplicate removals, but the warnings that could be seen with
earlier apt versions actually came from libapt-pkg, as I have also seen
them in aptitude. Therefore dpkg should
On 2018-03-30 15:02 +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> [adding 894441@ to CC]
>
> Hi Jean-Michel,
>
>> Filled as #894441
>> https://bugs.debian.org/894441
>
> Thanks for this. I was just briefly wondering whether this is related to:
>
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-security/2017/05/msg00011.html
It
On 2018-01-05 14:04 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-01-05 at 10:55:50 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> On 2018-01-05 10:44 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>>
>> > Package: dpkg
>> > Version: 1.19.0.4
>> > Severity: normal
>> >
>> >
On 2018-01-05 10:44 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.19.0.4
> Severity: normal
>
> After switching from rxvt-unicode-256color to rxvt-unicode (see
> #848284), dpkg-query reports a conffile as obsolete:
>
> ,
> | $ dpkg-query -W -f='${Co
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.19.0.4
Severity: normal
After switching from rxvt-unicode-256color to rxvt-unicode (see
#848284), dpkg-query reports a conffile as obsolete:
,
| $ dpkg-query -W -f='${Conffiles}\n' | grep obsolete$
| [...]
| /etc/X11/app-defaults/URxvt
On 2017-08-14 17:26 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.18.24
> Severity: normal
>
> Something strange is happening here: "dpkg --verify" complains about the
> file /usr/share/man/man1/cpp.1.gz (a symlink shipped in the cpp-doc
> package), but
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.18.24
Severity: normal
Something strange is happening here: "dpkg --verify" complains about the
file /usr/share/man/man1/cpp.1.gz (a symlink shipped in the cpp-doc
package), but only if the package containing it is _not_ given on the
commandline.
,
| $ dpkg -S
sage from dpkg-deb, it is desirable to avoid fuzzy
translations, I used the following command to produce the second patch:
perl -i -p -CS -e 's/%d\.%d(.*)(dpkg-deb)/%u.%u$1$2/' po/*.po*
Cheers,
Sven
>From 63de6bb3ee8b08537c20cde29342e65e1ca07992 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sven Joachim &
Source: dpkg
Version: 1.18.24
Severity: minor
In ancient times, dpkg-dev and dselect used to symlink their
/usr/share/doc directory to dpkg. That was not policy compliant (see
#452730), and in dpkg 1.14.15 those symlinks were changed to
directories.
The preinst scripts removing the symlinks are
On 2017-04-30 18:47 -0400, Brad Barnett wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.18.23
>
> Newer versions of dpkg have colourized output.
>
> I can see the usage case for this, and I can see the value for some.
>
> However, for others, it is a major detractor.
>
> One of the issues with the recent
Control: forcemerge 134758 -1
On 2017-03-21 12:11 +, Russell Coker wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.18.23
> Severity: normal
>
> # dpkg -S /usr/lib/systemd/libsystemd-shared-232.so
> dpkg-query: no path found matching pattern
> /usr/lib/systemd/libsystemd-shared-232.so
> # dpkg -S
On 2017-02-07 14:41 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-11-23 at 12:23:20 +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>> Package: dpkg-dev
>> Version: 1.18.15
>> Severity: minor
>
>> Run: dpkg-buildpackage -S -d -nc
>>
>> Watch this:
>>
>> tglase@tglase-nb:~/squirrel-sql $ svn st
>> ?
Control: forcemerge 844701 -1
On 2016-12-02 18:30 +, Colin Watson wrote:
> Control: reassign -1 dpkg
>
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 11:45:23PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
>> debconf seems to have a broken version number, failing in maintainer
>> scripts.
>
> And yet 1.5.58~ is clearly a
Control: reassign -1 dpkg-dev
Control: forcemerge 843073 -1
On 2016-11-15 17:22 +, Wookey wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.18.10
> Severity: normal
>
> I built a large package (mythtv) with this recipie:
> git clone https://github.com/MythTV/packaging -b fixes/0.28
> cd packaging/deb
>
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.18.14
The "warning" keyword in dpkg and other programs is displayed in bold
yellow, which is unreadable with a light background.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'experimental')
v (or more precisely libdpkg-perl) as well. Attached
is a patch to forbid the package combinations that you have now and
which don't work.
Cheers,
Sven
>From 8a23c2485c919e273dd95fc0c4988ee193a9707c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sven Joachim <svenj...@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2016
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.18.10
Severity: normal
Installing the safe-rm package in a freshly bootstrapped chroot where
/bin is a symlink to /usr/bin (the merged-/usr feature implemented in
debootstrap 1.0.85) causes dpkg to segfault.
,
| # apt-get install safe-rm
| [...]
| Selecting
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.18.8
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
The dpkg-buildpackage manpage mentions the user configuration file
buildflags.conf rather than buildpackage.conf.
>From 73ef2abc22c21769776ae7dc37911f57fbb8e049 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sven Joachim <svenj...@gmx.de>
Control: severity -1 grave
On 2016-07-04 08:38 +0200, Ferenc Wágner wrote:
> Package: dpkg-dev
> Version: 1.18.8
> Severity: normal
>
> dpkg-buldpackage -B reports:
>
> Can't locate object method "new" via package "Dpkg::Control::Info"
> (perhaps you forgot to load "Dpkg::Control::Info"?) at
>
e man page
> still mentions it.
It is supposed to work, but due to a bad check it doesn't. Here is a
patch that works for me.
Cheers,
Sven
>From de0f3c1aa5495a961f62fa23aeee08bbfe182e80 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sven Joachim <svenj...@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 17:
Control: notfound -1 1.17.27
Control: tags -1 - unreproducible moreinfo
On 2016-06-05 00:49 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Control: severity -1 important
> Control: tags -1 unreproducible moreinfo
>
> Hi!
>
> On Sat, 2016-06-04 at 17:43:41 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> Control: reassign -1
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.18.4
Severity: important
User: d...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: dpkg-shlibdeps
When working on a prospective libtinfo5-udeb package (see #819397) we
discovered that on architectures which build ncurses multilib libraries,
the libtinfo5-udeb packages gains a bogus
On 2015-08-06 04:16 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
Control: tag 794688 pending
Hi!
Bug #794688 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository. You can
see the changelog below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/dpkg/dpkg.git/diff/?id=629f067
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.18.2
While working on the German translation, I noticed that dpkg documents
the --predep-packages option. However, dpkg does not accept this
option, rather it wants --predep-package (which is more logical since
it outputs information about a single package at most).
--
Control: merge 55364 -1
On 2015-08-05 20:27 +0200, Roderich Schupp wrote:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.18.2
Severity: normal
I did this...
$ dpkg --no-act -i libkactivities-dev_4.13.3-1_amd64.deb
dpkg: could not open log '/var/log/dpkg.log': Permission denied
(Reading database ...
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.18.0
Severity: normal
User: d...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: dpkg-gensymbols
When building ncurses, I noticed quite a few dpkg-gensymbols warnings à la
debian/libfoo/DEBIAN/symbols doesn't match completely debian/libfoo.symbols
after upgrading dpkg-dev to 1.18.0.
On 2014-11-20 16:51 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
On Thu, 2014-11-20 at 11:43:15 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.17.21
Severity: important
User: multiarch-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: multiarch
dpkg fails to configure a second architecture of this package
I'm another person observing the problem, after a routine upgrade
shared-mime-info and xboard ended up in status triggers-pending and
triggers-awaited, respectively.
Attached is the part of dpkg.log from the upgrade, as you can see
shared-mime-info's trigger never got processed.
2014-10-27
On 2014-10-22 19:08 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 18:49:06 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2014-10-22 08:46 +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Mi, 22 oct 14, 08:23:27, Oliver Grimm wrote:
Package: update-alternatives
Version: dpkg
Severity: minor
Tags: l10n
applying
On 2014-04-29 12:27 +0200, Raphael Geissert wrote:
On 29 April 2014 08:11, Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org wrote:
[...]
2. Revert the patch and add versioned depdendencies against the working
patch package. This might require some dist-upgrade tests, though.
3. Fix the patch to
On 2014-04-28 17:49 +0200, Andras Korn wrote:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.17.7
Severity: normal
Hi,
I tried to install dstat on a relatively recent sid system:
What does relatively recent mean?
# apt-get -u install dstat
[...]
The following NEW packages will be installed:
dstat
0
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.17.7
Severity: normal
I have just received a mail from the daily cron job:
,
| /etc/cron.daily/dpkg:
| cp: der Aufruf von stat für „/var/lib/dpkg/arch“ ist nicht möglich: Datei
oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden
`
In English that would be
cp: cannot stat
On 2013-12-05 22:20 +0100, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.17.3
Severity: normal
When building C++ projects using debhelper within an up-to-date sid
cowbuilder these days, i often get the following message during
dh_shlibdeps:
dh_makeshlibs
dh_shlibdeps
On 2013-03-31 14:13 +0200, Nick Black wrote:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.16.10
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
You can seem some initial details here:
https://www.sprezzatech.com/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=710
Hi there. I have two packages, apt and gir1.2-gtk-3.0, either of
which when
On 2013-03-31 15:26 +0200, Nick Black wrote:
Sven Joachim left as an exercise for the reader:
What does apt-cache policy apt print?
[skynet](0) $ apt-cache policy apt
apt:
Installed: 0.9.7.8-SprezzOS1
Candidate: 0.9.7.8-SprezzOS1
Version table:
0.9.7.8-SprezzOS1 0
On 2013-03-31 19:18 +0200, Nick Black wrote:
Sven Joachim left as an exercise for the reader:
Is it possible that the package you installed locally is different from
the one on http://www.sprezzatech.com/apt/, despite having the same
version number? Compare your output with what I get here
On 2013-03-31 20:56 +0200, Nick Black wrote:
Sven Joachim left as an exercise for the reader:
Well, I don't either. If I find time in the next days I may add the
SprezzOS repo to my apt sources in a throwaway chroot to try and
reproduce this problem, unless somebody beats me
On 2013-01-24 19:41 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
(please keep the -l10n-russian list CC'ed)
Quoting Andrey Rahmatullin (w...@wrar.name):
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.16.9
Severity: normal
Tags: l10n
msgid
package could avoid a useless dependency if %s was not linked against %s
(it
On 2013-01-23 12:35 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 03:40:34 +0100, Uwe Storbeck wrote:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.16.9
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
I doubt this is a problem in dpkg, otherwise this should have shown
up early on. From the
On 2013-01-23 19:58 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting Guillem Jover (guil...@debian.org):
I'll check this further and most probably reassign to the other
packages.
And probably lower the bug severity, as IMHO, grave (or any RC
severity) is overflated.
Well, serious might be correct,
On 2012-07-12 07:25 +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:41:59PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
That's not actually an accurate description; dpkg has no way of knowing
which of the packages tcl-dev/stable and tk-tile, if any, ships
/usr/include/tcl as a directory. The dpkg
On 2012-07-11 18:53 +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.16.7
The file /usr/include/tcl is a directory or a symbolic link depending on the
order of installation of the packages tk-tile 0.8.2-2.2 and tcl-dev 8.5.0-2.
See #612264 on that topic.
This can be reproduced quite
retitle 681243 dpkg: warn when different packages have same file as directory
and symlink
merge 406715 681243
thanks
On 2012-07-11 19:07 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2012-07-11 18:53 +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.16.7
The file /usr/include/tcl is a directory
On 2012-07-11 21:18 +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 07:07:49PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2012-07-11 18:53 +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
In my opinion, regardless of the order in which these two packages are
installed, dpkg should fail to install the second package
On 2012-07-11 21:47 +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 07:44:34PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2012-07-11 19:07 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2012-07-11 18:53 +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
In my opinion, regardless of the order in which these two packages are
installed, dpkg
On 2012-07-11 22:57 +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
Please have a look at this scenario :
apt-get -y -t stable install tcl-dev
apt-get -y -t stable install tk-tile
apt-get -y -t unstable install tcl-dev
The first and second commands succeed. The third command fails with this :
On 2012-06-09 18:39 +0200, Michael Gilbert wrote:
package: dpkg
version: 1.16.4.1
severity: important
user: multiarch-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
usertags: multiarch
Hi,
wine is now making use of the 'Multi-Arch: allowed' feature to provide
i386 dependencies for an amd64 virtual
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.16.4
The trigger-related changes in 1.16.4 have a rather nasty side effect.
Running update-menus in maintainer scripts (as done by dh_installmenu,
for instance) no longer processes menu's triggers:
,
| # dpkg --unpack iceape_2.7.5-1_i386.deb
| (Reading database ...
On 2012-04-14 09:17 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit a354992c67411ed10499786012701faa33ed8565
Author: Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org
Date: Sat Apr 14 04:26:52 2012 +0200
dpkg-deb: Add epoch when needed to built package
On 2012-04-08 16:58 +0200, Rogério Brito wrote:
,
| (...)
| dpkg-shlibdeps -Tdebian/mplayer2.subsvars debian/mplayer2/usr/bin/mplayer
| dpkg-shlibdeps: error: no dependency information found for
/lib/libncurses.so.5 (used by debian/mplayer2/usr/bin/mplayer).
`
I am not really
On 2012-02-13 19:46 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 07:27:18PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
popcon actually uses:
dpkg-query --show --showformat='${status} ${package}\n'
and
dpkg -L $pkg
What does that give on your system?
dpkg-query with those options does not output
forcemerge 231089 640852
thanks
On 2011-09-08 00:27 +0200, Peter Flynn wrote:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.16.0~ubuntu7
Severity: minor
Tags: l10n
The message issued at each package installation says:
Selecting previously deselected package packagename
The word deselected should read
On 2011-08-23 15:10 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011, Sven Joachim wrote:
Thanks, this was very helpful indeed. After reading that, the only
pitfall I fell in was that git does not preserve hardlinks, so I needed
to handle that in build-hook/clean-hook targets.
Right, I
On 2011-08-21 22:12 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Sun, 21 Aug 2011, Sven Joachim wrote:
Can you also turn your testcase in a patch against pkg-tests.git?
Once I have acquainted myself with the testsuite, probably yes. Might
take a few days, I have other things to to as well.
You
Hi folks,
with this change from dpkg-dev git:
,
| * dpkg-buildpackage no longer exports the compiler flags. Closes: #560070
| Packages must directly call dpkg-buildflags to retrieve them.
`
and the following from debhelper 8.9.4:
,
| * dpkg-buildflags is only used to set
On 2011-08-03 13:11 +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
Excerpts from Jonathan Nieder's message of Wed Aug 03 12:54:12 +0200 2011:
Michal Suchanek wrote:
It's possible to take some random binary which is likely to be native
(eg. /bin/sh), run ldd on it, and parse the output to determine what
On 2011-06-27 18:29 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 15:01:20 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2011-06-27 13:43 +0200, Roger Broadbent wrote:
After a little further investigation, it appears that before upgrade, I
had no
packages that included messages in LC_MESSAGES
On 2011-06-22 19:56 +0200, Daniel Stone wrote:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.16.0.3
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
I have pretty much the entirety of the X stack diverted through
dpkg-divert so I can keep package dependencies, but still run all my own
On 2011-06-22 21:10 +0200, Daniel Stone wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 08:50:40PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
This is bad indeed. However, I am unable to reproduce this behavior.
Could you please send your /var/log/dpkg.log (compress it first) and the
output of dpkg-divert --list
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.16.0.3
Severity: normal
It is useful to write comments in symbols files, but the dpkg-gensymbols
manpage does not document how to do this. From the code in
SymbolFile.pm it can be deduced, but to the naive user it might not be
so obvious that the comment marker must
Author: Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de
Date: Mon May 2 12:14:22 2011 +0200
German dpkg translation update
Update to 1016t.
Change translation of downgrade messages (Closes: #620312).
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 4136af8..bc414e9 100644
--- a/debian
Am 01.05.2011 um 12:29 schrieb Jonas Stein:
So my vote is to switch to durch eine ältere Version ersetzt.
That sounds well.
If it is too long one could think of reducing it to
durch ältere Version ersetzt
but i think Raphaels suggestion is better.
The messages mention the precise
Am 01.04.2011 um 18:57 schrieb Wolfgang Schweer:
On Fr, 01 Apr 2011, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
#: src/archives.c:1369
#, c-format
msgid downgrading %.250s from %.250s to %.250s.
msgstr %.250s wird von %.250s zu %.250s deaktualisiert.
#: src/archives.c:1374
#, c-format
msgid Will not
On 2011-01-25 09:08 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011, Julien Cristau wrote:
In other words, how about something like this patch?
I don't think that's a good idea at this point. A year ago, maybe.
One issue Sven mentioned on irc is that an unknown number of packages
Hi,
I wonder whether the Breaks against the emacs2[12] packages need to be
taken out as well. In a chroot the upgrade process removes emacs and
its dependencies:
,
| # LANG=C apt-get install udev
| Reading package lists... Done
| Building dependency tree
| Reading state
On 2011-01-24 23:38 +0100, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Rather than forcing the removal or upgrade of various info browsers
before dpkg, let dpkg provide the install-info functionality for
another release. Other packages will still depend on install-info
directly so the dependency can be dropped
On 2010-12-02 18:52 +0100, Joey Hess wrote:
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.15.8.6
Severity: normal
File: /usr/bin/dpkg-mergechangelogs
j...@gnu:~/src/taskselgit stash apply
dpkg-mergechangelogs: warning: .merge_file_qmEqOI(l1365): bad key-value
after `;': `urgency=low '
LINE: tasksel
reassign 603906 syslog-ng
thanks
On 2010-11-18 12:18 +0100, Radek Antoniuk wrote:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.15.8.5
Severity: normal
I get from cron:
/etc/cron.daily/logrotate:
start-stop-daemon: unrecognized option '--no-caps'
Try 'start-stop-daemon --help' for more information.
error:
On 2010-10-21 19:14 +0200, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Ken Bloom wrote:
And what mount options are you using? If you're using
defaults, /etc/mtab (and therefore the mount command) won't know what
the default values are, but you can check /proc/mounts which will
include the data= mount option.
On 2010-10-21 02:05 +0200, Chanoch (Ken) Bloom wrote:
The version you're using in Bug #588254 is the first version of dpkg()
that uses sync(). What I'd like to establish is whether Linus and
friends have fixed fsync() so that it's significantly faster than
sync(). It sounded like that was
On 2010-09-29 12:05 +0200, Clytie Siddall wrote:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.15.8.5
Tags: l10n patch
Severity: wishlist
The updated Vietnamese translation for the program file:
translated and submitted by:
Clytie Siddall
Vietnamese Free-Software Translation Team
Some queries:
1.
nothing, and returns a success status.
So foo.dpkg-tmp is left on the system and needs to be unlinked. The
attached patch seems to work for me.
From 1ccac648e7f3a25f20e619beecd1c91f5684a28f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 20:40:59 +0200
Subject
severity 590854 grave
thanks
On 2010-07-29 19:05 +0200, Dietz Proepper wrote:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.15.8
Severity: important
Hi,
with current dpkg I have a strage problem - during install of some
packages i.e. fakeroot or heirloom-mailx, update-alternatives
starts to write very large
reassign 544884 apt
forcemerge 353290 544884
thanks
On 2010-07-27 13:15 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
reassign 544884 dpkg
thanks
afaics the error message comes from dpkg. I can't see anything wrong
with the libgcc1 package and cannot reproduce this myself.
On 03.09.2009 16:17, Brice
On 2010-03-30 09:31 +0200, Trent W. Buck wrote:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.15.5.6
Severity: important
Sometimes files in /var/lib/dpkg/info aren't created when
(re)installing packages with aptitude.
I became concerned that postinstall scripts weren't being run: first
/usr/bin/crontab
On 2010-02-16 00:32 +0100, Zlatko Calusic wrote:
Package: dselect
Version: 1.15.5.6
Severity: normal
Although NOTHING depends on libunwind7 and libunwind7-dev, as soon as
I run update in dselect, those two packages are silently marked for
installation.
That is because these packages are
On 2009-12-28 07:48 +0100, Cameron Horsburgh wrote:
came...@jupiter:~/Downloads$ ls -l /usr/bin/dpkg
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 371824 Dec 23 03:26 /usr/bin/dpkg
came...@jupiter:~/Downloads$ sudo dpkg -i dpkg_1.15.5.5_i386.deb
[sudo] password for cameron:
(Reading database ... 290683 files and
On 2009-12-02 19:00 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 08:53:57 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2009-11-22 20:53 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
http://git.debian.org/?p=dpkg/dpkg.git;a=commitdiff;h=b909dc4
Thanks for improving the messages, but I wonder whether
On 2009-11-22 20:53 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
tag 408525 pending
thanks
Hello,
Bug #408525 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository. You can
see the changelog below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
http://git.debian.org/?p=dpkg/dpkg.git;a=commitdiff;h=b909dc4
On 2009-11-11 22:46 +0100, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.15.4
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Hello.
I had next packages installed on my system: perl-base, perl,
perl-modules, perl-doc (all from current unstable, 5.10.1-7).
-8-
sudo
Could you upload your packages somewhere? I would like to reproduce the
problem.
Cheers,
Sven
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-bugs-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On 2009-09-14 10:38 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.15.4
Severity: wishlist
Please export DPKG_MAINTSCRIPT_NAME in the environment of maintainer
scripts, it should contain the name of the maintainer script (prerm,
postrm, preinst, postinst, config) that is currently
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
