Arm ports build machines (was Re: Arch qualification for buster: call for DSA, Security, toolchain concerns)

2018-06-29 Thread Steve McIntyre
/ [2] https://www.cnx-software.com/2017/09/24/gigabyte-synquacer-96boards-enterprise-platform-is-powered-by-socionext-sc2a11-24-core-armv8-soc/) [3] https://www.qualcomm.com/products/qualcomm-centriq-2400-processor [4] https://www.cavium.com/product-thunderx2-arm-processors.html [5] http://open-estua

Bug#783876: Seriously, these binaries should be stripped by default

2016-04-21 Thread Steve McIntyre
ze into 1 CD again. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com "This dress doesn't reverse." -- Alden Spiess

Bug#783876: Seriously, these binaries should be stripped by default

2016-04-21 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 11:31:46PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 11:40:34PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: >> >>The unstripped binaries should be installed by default on porter boxes and >>buildds. Yes, this is a trade-off between (largely my) develope

Bug#783876: Seriously, these binaries should be stripped by default

2016-04-21 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 11:40:34PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: >Control: severity -1 important > >On 21.04.2016 19:28, Steve McIntyre wrote: >>Control: severity -1 serious >>Justification: wasting many megabytes of space and download > >sorry, I don't see this as

Bug#783876: Seriously, these binaries should be stripped by default

2016-04-21 Thread Steve McIntyre
; >so how do the unstripped ones get installed by default on porter boxes? How >are the unstripped ones installed on the buildds by default? By talking to the admins of those boxes, maybe? The setup on those is already heavily scripted, so hopefully shouldn't be too difficult to adapt. -- S

Bug#783876: Seriously, these binaries should be stripped by default

2016-04-21 Thread Steve McIntyre
ols, maybe ship separate alternative unstripped toolchain packages and point to those if people want them? -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com "When C++ is your hammer, everything looks like a thumb." -- Steven M. Haflich

Bug#758964: closed by Matthias Klose d...@debian.org (Bug#758964: fixed in gcc-4.9 4.9.1-13)

2014-09-13 Thread Steve McIntyre
not satisfy its constraints. The ARM gcc guys are working on extending the fix to cover this new case too. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com C++ ate my sanity -- Jon Rabone -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

Bug#758964: gcc-4.9 assembler errors when building md5 code from fbb on arm64

2014-09-05 Thread Steve McIntyre
. Matthias: would you like me to do some testing with that patch as well, or are you already on top of this? -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com Aardvark I dislike C++ to start with. C++11 just seems to be handing rope-creating factories

Bug#657157: Produces NEON code on armhf even when explicitly asked not to

2012-01-24 Thread Steve McIntyre
Package: gcc-4.6 Version: 4:4.6.2-12 Severity: important Hi, Looking at a FTBFS bug on armhf in the pytables package. gcc-4.6 seems to be emitting NEON code even when explicitly told not to: (sid)93sam@harris:~$ gcc -c typeconv.c -march=armv7-a -mfloat-abi=hard -mfpu=vfpv3-d16 -mthumb -o

Bug#625357: jigit: ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror

2011-06-03 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 05:05:27PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Hi Steve, Steve McIntyre wrote: I'll remove the -Werror to stop gcc breaking the build here, but I definitely believe that gcc is doing the wrong thing here. Technically, yes - the variables are set but unused. However

Bug#625357: jigit: ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror

2011-06-03 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 01:16:59PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: severity 625357 normal retitle 625357 gcc -Wunused-but-set-variable should not be implied by -Wall (?) tags 625357 = upstream moreinfo quit Hi again, Steve McIntyre wrote: I'll remove the -Werror to stop gcc breaking the build

Bug#233393: acknowledged by developer (Re: Inefficient packaging of arch independent data in package libgcj4)

2004-04-26 Thread Steve McIntyre
for arch/OS independent files, surely? -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.[EMAIL PROTECTED] Is there anybody out there? pgpJeMz0qag9g.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#233393: Inefficient packaging of arch independent data in package libgcj4

2004-02-17 Thread Steve McIntyre
that there's a problem here but need help to fix it: again, feel free to ask... Thanks, -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.[EMAIL PROTECTED]