Source: eglibc
Version: 2.19-1
Severity: important
User: debian-al...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: alpha
Justification: fails to build from source but built in the past
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-al...@lists.debian.org
eglibc FTBFS on alpha for two reasons, firstly, due to the inclusion of
systemtap
I refreshed this patch with 2.19-1.
Tested on mips64el device, build successfully.
Sphinx
diff -Nru eglibc-2.19/debian/changelog eglibc-2.19/debian/changelog
--- eglibc-2.19/debian/changelog2014-06-04 19:50:40.0 +
+++ eglibc-2.19/debian/changelog2014-06-09
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 11:34:37PM +0800, Yunqiang Su wrote:
Hi, as I asked that guys, they insist on using /usr/lib but not /usr/libo32.
:-(
Who are the guys? What is the argument on using /usr/lib instead of
/usr/libo32?
Then, maybe this patch should be OK.
I don't think it is ok. I don't
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 10:11 PM, Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net wrote:
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 11:34:37PM +0800, Yunqiang Su wrote:
Hi, as I asked that guys, they insist on using /usr/lib but not /usr/libo32.
:-(
Who are the guys? What is the argument on using /usr/lib instead of
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 09:02:04PM +0800, Sphinx Jiang wrote:
I refreshed this patch with 2.19-1.
Tested on mips64el device, build successfully.
Sphinx
I have just merged the non-controversial parts, that is everything but
multlib. I am still opposed to having the o32 libraries in /lib
Author: aurel32
Date: 2014-06-09 14:26:58 + (Mon, 09 Jun 2014)
New Revision: 6139
Added:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/sysdeps/mips64.mk
glibc-package/trunk/debian/sysdeps/mips64el.mk
glibc-package/trunk/debian/sysdeps/mipsn32.mk
glibc-package/trunk/debian/sysdeps/mipsn32el.mk
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 10:19:05PM +0800, Yunqiang Su wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 10:11 PM, Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net wrote:
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 11:34:37PM +0800, Yunqiang Su wrote:
Hi, as I asked that guys, they insist on using /usr/lib but not
/usr/libo32. :-(
Who are
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 10:13:05PM +1200, Michael Cree wrote:
Source: eglibc
Version: 2.19-1
Severity: important
User: debian-al...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: alpha
Justification: fails to build from source but built in the past
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-al...@lists.debian.org
eglibc FTBFS on
reopen 700760
tag 700760 + moreinfo
clone 750996
reassign -1 750996 systemtap-sdt-dev
retitle 750996 systemtap-sdt-dev: breaks eglibc build on alpha
block 700760 by 750996
thanks
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 10:13:05PM +1200, Michael Cree wrote:
Source: eglibc
Version: 2.19-1
Severity: important
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reopen 700760
Bug #700760 {Done: Adam Conrad adcon...@0c3.net} [libc6] libc6: GDB 7.5 would
benefit from a SystemTap SDT probe
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you
Author: aurel32
Date: 2014-06-09 16:06:33 + (Mon, 09 Jun 2014)
New Revision: 6140
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
glibc-package/trunk/debian/control
glibc-package/trunk/debian/control.in/main
glibc-package/trunk/debian/sysdeps/linux.mk
Log:
debian/control.in/main,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
Trying to fix my mess:
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
clone 750996 -1
Bug #750996 [src:eglibc] systemtap-sdt-dev: breaks eglibc build on alpha
Bug 750996 cloned as bug 751026
751026 was not blocked by any bugs.
751026 was
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
unblock 751026 with 700760
Bug #751026 [systemtap-sdt-dev] systemtap-sdt-dev: breaks eglibc build on alpha
751026 was blocked by: 700760
751026 was blocking: 700760
Removed blocking bug(s) of 751026: 700760
thanks
Stopping processing here.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 10:11 PM, Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net wrote:
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 11:34:37PM +0800, Yunqiang Su wrote:
Hi, as I asked that guys, they insist on using /usr/lib but not /usr/libo32.
:-(
Who are the guys? What is the argument on using /usr/lib instead of
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 10:38 PM, Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net wrote:
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 09:02:04PM +0800, Sphinx Jiang wrote:
I refreshed this patch with 2.19-1.
Tested on mips64el device, build successfully.
Sphinx
I have just merged the non-controversial parts, that is
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 05:01:45AM +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 10:11 PM, Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net wrote:
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 11:34:37PM +0800, Yunqiang Su wrote:
Hi, as I asked that guys, they insist on using /usr/lib but not
/usr/libo32. :-(
Who are the
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 05:06:03AM +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 10:38 PM, Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net wrote:
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 09:02:04PM +0800, Sphinx Jiang wrote:
I refreshed this patch with 2.19-1.
Tested on mips64el device, build successfully.
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 11:21:30PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 05:01:45AM +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 10:11 PM, Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 11:34:37PM +0800, Yunqiang Su wrote:
Hi, as I asked that guys,
Author: aurel32
Date: 2014-06-09 21:44:18 + (Mon, 09 Jun 2014)
New Revision: 6141
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
glibc-package/trunk/debian/control
glibc-package/trunk/debian/control.in/libc
Log:
debian/control.in/libc: add a Breaks: check ( 0.9.10-6.1+b1) on s390x,
19 matches
Mail list logo
