\}\([0-9]*\)\(.*\)/\2/')
if [ $kernel_rev -ge 255 ]
then
echo WARNING: Your kernel version indicates a revision number
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 03:07:51PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2007-12-24 10:49:32 +, Colin Watson wrote:
I can't tell for sure from your strace (in future, use -s 1024 so that
buffers passed to system calls aren't truncated to quite such a short
length), but your diagnosis sounds
On Tue, Dec 25, 2007 at 07:40:24PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Colin Watson:
[Please don't remove attributions. Vincent Lefevre wrote this bit.]
[*] 1.0.0.0 isn't even a valid IP address, is it?
Depends on the situation. You wouldn't want to give a host that
address,
Why
will reap it.
What is bob's parent process?
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:16:38PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:02:41PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 09:13:15PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
fp = (FILE *) 0x0
That would happen if popen() fails. The manual page says
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:00:10AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:16:38PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
I determined that the bug is actually in glibc in experimental. The
errno value is set to ENOSYS. Last time I checked, Linux 2.6.27 had
working fork(2) and pipe
it requires that one package be totally removed from
the system temporarily during the upgrade).
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
any zone that's defined using a Link
line.
What do you think?
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
it out?
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20110913145323.ga
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 03:53:23PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 05:01:07PM +, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/localedata/locale-C.diff
Log:
* debian/patches/localedata/locale-C.diff
=C when all they want is for
things like [a-z] to work reasonably.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive
libdb1-compat's Priority: field.
* Is there going to need to be transition code in libc's postinst
similar to that for libdb.so.3? I suspect not, but want to check.
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi,
It should be safe to make libc depend on this now, in order to pull in
libdb.so.2.
--
Colin Watson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
- Forwarded message from Debian Installer [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Debian Installer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Colin Watson [EMAIL
to get current
glibc 2.2.smallnum into testing, by fixing #155904? Are you just going
straight for the pre-2.3 track?
--
Colin Watson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
processing:
/var/cache/apt/archives/libc6-sparc64_2.2.5-11.2_sparc.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
fakeroot in stable still uses /usr/lib/64. Do we need a fix for #151448
in woody-proposed-updates?
--
Colin Watson [[EMAIL PROTECTED
logs an error if getnameinfo() fails and sets
remote_host_name to the empty string. I'm not sure any of those are good
parallels to sshd's use of libc: it merely uses a different subset of
the IPv6 API.
--
Colin Watson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
, and outputting a
loud error message in ssh and trying to gracefully downgrade to AF_INET?
--
Colin Watson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, Colin Watson wrote:
Aha! On the off-chance, I tried this in a chroot with glibc 2.3.1 and it
segfaulted. Ditto with en_US, which I'm guessing Branden's using.
I now believe that this is a bug in glibc. Unfortunately I can't
persuade either gdb or valgrind to give me any line number information
from
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 07:44:40AM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 09:26:31AM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
Is there any compromise we can reach *without* applying hacks that
cover up the fact that glibc doesn't cope with the differently-sized
kernel structure?
Half tongue
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 07:21:01AM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 02:50:29PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
Thanks a lot! Not to rush you, but any luck so far, or can I help? I've
had five duplicates so far, so I have plenty of motivation ...
Sorry, I haven't looked
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 02:12:41AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
Here's the patch. I've backported it such that it applies against glibc
2.1.3-4, since there were some whitespace changes in between. If you
want to take those too for simplicity, I can put together a combined
patch. The crucial
crashes
in apropos and I think also critical bug #167946 in slapd.)
--
Colin Watson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
--
Colin Watson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
of the CVS pull?
That bug's causing a lot of segfaults, at least one of which is
currently critical (#167946).
Thanks guys,
--
Colin Watson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
from the GPL's restrictions on distribution.
--
Colin Watson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 12:04:32PM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 01:49:15PM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
I hate to push, but will the regex fixes go in as part of the CVS pull?
That bug's causing a lot of segfaults, at least one of which is
currently critical (#167946
, not the error or signal name.
So I think it's not bug, it's not wishlist item. I close this bug.
I think it's a valid wishlist item and should be reopened as such, even
if it may be difficult to fix.
Regards,
--
Colin Watson [[EMAIL PROTECTED
that compatibility code will be
removed from man-db. I don't see why the four packages above should get
this extra compatibility code for sarge; it will no longer do any good.
--
Colin Watson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 09:33:50AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
Junichi is suggesting that the postinsts of our four packages should
tolerate receiving $DEBIAN_FRONTEND in lower case, as man-db does.
Make that tolerate receiving $DEBIAN_FRONTEND in something other than
all lower case.
--
Colin
.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 05:50:31AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
At Sat, 1 Feb 2003 17:36:25 +,
Colin Watson wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 09:23:14AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
In man-db, that code's there to tolerate the version of debootstrap in
woody (before you fixed #154794
nowadays.
--
Colin Watson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, and apt has no problem with it.
A Pre-Depends: loop would be a problem, but we don't have that here.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
?
It is necessary for compatibility until the release of sarge. At that
point, libdb1-compat will be lowered to extra and the dependency on it
will be removed from libc6. See the changelogs, and the bugs fixed by
the introduction of libdb1-compat, for details.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson
to be done and in unstable now, so ...?
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, and outputting a
loud error message in ssh and trying to gracefully downgrade to AF_INET?
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
logs an error if getnameinfo() fails and sets
remote_host_name to the empty string. I'm not sure any of those are good
parallels to sshd's use of libc: it merely uses a different subset of
the IPv6 API.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, Colin Watson wrote:
Aha! On the off-chance, I tried this in a chroot with glibc 2.3.1 and it
segfaulted. Ditto with en_US, which I'm guessing Branden's using.
I now believe that this is a bug in glibc. Unfortunately I can't
persuade either gdb or valgrind to give me any line number information
from
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 05:33:15AM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote:
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 11:51:32AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
Please see http://bugs.debian.org/165603 for context. The summary is
that apropos segfaults inside regexec() when using glibc 2.3.1 in a
locale other than C
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 07:21:01AM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 02:50:29PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
Thanks a lot! Not to rush you, but any luck so far, or can I help? I've
had five duplicates so far, so I have plenty of motivation ...
Sorry, I haven't looked
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 02:12:41AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
Here's the patch. I've backported it such that it applies against glibc
2.1.3-4, since there were some whitespace changes in between. If you
want to take those too for simplicity, I can put together a combined
patch. The crucial
in apropos and I think also critical bug #167946 in slapd.)
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
of the CVS pull?
That bug's causing a lot of segfaults, at least one of which is
currently critical (#167946).
Thanks guys,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the GPL's restrictions on distribution.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 12:04:32PM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 01:49:15PM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
I hate to push, but will the regex fixes go in as part of the CVS pull?
That bug's causing a lot of segfaults, at least one of which is
currently critical (#167946
interface to kernel nfs daemon
zsh: 11416 segmentation fault (core dumped) LANG= LC_ALL= man -k syscall
That was a recent breakage in glibc 2.3.1, and (as far as I can tell)
has nothing to do with the original bug report.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, not the error or signal name.
So I think it's not bug, it's not wishlist item. I close this bug.
I think it's a valid wishlist item and should be reopened as such, even
if it may be difficult to fix.
Regards,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, and apt has no problem with it.
A Pre-Depends: loop would be a problem, but we don't have that here.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
?
It is necessary for compatibility until the release of sarge. At that
point, libdb1-compat will be lowered to extra and the dependency on it
will be removed from libc6. See the changelogs, and the bugs fixed by
the introduction of libdb1-compat, for details.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson
) p hints
$3 = {ai_flags = 0, ai_family = 0, ai_socktype = 1, ai_protocol = 0, ai_addrlen
= 0, ai_addr = 0x0, ai_canonname = 0x0, ai_next = 0x0}
I don't know if 10.7 is supposed to be supported by getaddrinfo(), but
if it is then glibc needs to implement it.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson
to be done and in unstable now, so ...?
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bert meant since NPTL was introduced, perhaps.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-buildpackage didn't check that for you.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to wait for hppa any longer. If we get a fixed hppa glibc
2.3.2 in time, which is being worked on, it'll go into testing.
In the meantime, you can get an appropriate version of locales from,
say,
http://snapshot.debian.net/archive/2003/07/01/debian/pool/main/g/glibc/.
--
Colin Watson
. There are many things that need to be fixed in testing
before then, and having to wait for glibc has already made them a
substantial amount more difficult. More waiting was intolerable.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 09:07:13PM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote:
On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 09:35:25AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
ssh is getting this from getaddrinfo():
[...]
I don't know if 10.7 is supposed to be supported by getaddrinfo(), but
if it is then glibc needs to implement it.
Hi
and this version being broken for other reasons.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
);
+ }
if(int err = regcomp(reg, ^[0-9]+:[A-Za-z,]+:.*$, 0))
cleanup(err);
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 06:22:11PM +0100, Hervé Eychenne wrote:
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 01:47:14AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
Anyway, just wait a bit and it'll be fine, or download the older version
of locales by hand. It's not difficult.
While waiting or downgrading is an option, I simply
including them
directly.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
a _proven_, _stable_and _trustable_ kernel
branch; 2.6 is not one of those, while 2.4 definitely is.
You still can't do NPTL with 2.4 headers, though.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for by ISO C. getopt() is one such. If you remove that flag
you should find that getopt() reappears.
See the documentation of the -ansi flag.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 05:34:38PM +0100, Erwan David wrote:
Le Sat 15/11/2003, Colin Watson disait
You're using -ansi, which causes some header files to disable functions
not called for by ISO C. getopt() is one such. If you remove that flag
you should find that getopt() reappears
.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is not the best
combination.
libc's preinst has some uname checks in place of such conflicts.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-genchanges does this, yes.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
old programs which use libc4 or libc5. The libc6
package has its own dynamic linker that is used for all current
programs.
I'm not sure that libc6 actually needs to generate this file, though.
The comment about its contents in policy is purely informational.
--
Colin Watson
://archive.debian.org/dists/Debian-2.0/main/binary-i386/news/inn_1.7.2-4.deb
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is libc6_2.3.2-3.
Install both simultaneously. E.g., 'dpkg -i libc6_2.3.2-3_i386.deb
libdb1-compat_2.1.3-7_i386.deb', or use a package management frontend
which understands how to do that.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
an error code (1)
It's locales, not locale; but this was already reported as bug
#204958, and has been fixed in version 2.3.2-5.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
have tried without success the different spelling, like
|iso_8859_1 and ||iso-8859-1)|
Try 'LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.ISO-8859-1' instead. You need the language and
country parts there.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 11:07:38PM +0200, Daniel Bonniot wrote:
Colin Watson wrote:
Try 'LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.ISO-8859-1' instead. You need the language and
country parts there.
That works. However I wonder: why do I need to specifiy a language and
country? ISO-8859-1 is ISO-8859-1
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 06:27:01PM +0900, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 02:07:03 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
The LC_CTYPE variable sets the character classification and case
conversion rules. Picking an encoding is just one part of this: things
like case conversion rules
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 12:10:25PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2003-09-10 10:58:10 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 06:27:01PM +0900, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
But case conversion rules should apply to the language of the
corresponding text, which isn't necessarily
Hi,
It's a possibility that the pthread fix in glibc 2.3.2-6 has sorted out
these syslog() bugs too, which both appear to be SMP/threading issues.
Could you please retest with that version?
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
don't think anybody was aware that ssh was affected by this bug. It
certainly works fine for me. Could you debug further, for instance by
running sshd with the -ddd flag?
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
installed), sshd will hang after
accepting but before authenticating a connection.
[...]
[pid 25736] rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, NULL, [RTMIN], 8) = 0
[pid 25736] rt_sigsuspend([]
Hi,
This is bug #205099/#205234.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED
Bert meant since NPTL was introduced, perhaps.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 03:06:24AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
Oddly enough, we aren't idiots: this was deliberate. The release
manager was perfectly aware that hppa was out of sync. However, a
huge amount of other stuff was waiting for glibc
. There are many things that need to be fixed in testing
before then, and having to wait for glibc has already made them a
substantial amount more difficult. More waiting was intolerable.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 09:07:13PM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote:
On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 09:35:25AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
ssh is getting this from getaddrinfo():
[...]
I don't know if 10.7 is supposed to be supported by getaddrinfo(), but
if it is then glibc needs to implement it.
Hi
and this version being broken for other reasons.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
);
+ }
if(int err = regcomp(reg, ^[0-9]+:[A-Za-z,]+:.*$, 0))
cleanup(err);
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for i386 is in incoming and will be available on mirrors
later today.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
architectures regardless of whether the
rest of the source package has been built for them. This saves all the
build daemons having to build identical packages.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
in that directory when you install a new
kernel; it should match the C library.
The linux-kernel-headers package is different from the kernel-headers-*
packages that accompany kernel-images.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
to:
^start of line
[^[:space:]]+one or more non-whitespace characters
$end of line
'[^[:space:]]' is the opposite of '[[:space:]]'.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
in that directory on any system demonstrating
the format.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dotfiles in the current directory)?
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 11:56:57AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 12:22:26PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/epstool-3.02$ grep -r errno .
./src/epstool.c:#include errno.h
./src/epstool.c:fprintf(stderr, Failed to fork, error=%d\n, errno
a _proven_, _stable_and _trustable_ kernel
branch; 2.6 is not one of those, while 2.4 definitely is.
You still can't do NPTL with 2.4 headers, though.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
for by ISO C. getopt() is one such. If you remove that flag
you should find that getopt() reappears.
See the documentation of the -ansi flag.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 05:34:38PM +0100, Erwan David wrote:
Le Sat 15/11/2003, Colin Watson disait
You're using -ansi, which causes some header files to disable functions
not called for by ISO C. getopt() is one such. If you remove that flag
you should find that getopt() reappears
.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is not the best
combination.
libc's preinst has some uname checks in place of such conflicts.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(there are currently no userspace-safe headers describing the
interface exposed by the kernel). See
/usr/share/doc/linux-kernel-headers/README.Debian.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
: a4b3499f4f86d31796017956595f18c2
Description: GNU C Library: Documentation
Contains The GNU C Library Reference manual in info and html format as
well as man pages for libpthread functions. Also included is the complete
GNU C Library ChangeLog.
Task: c-dev
--
Colin Watson
this
after including the header if necessary. */
POSIX does not require OPEN_MAX to be defined as a macro. If such a
macro is not defined, you should use sysconf(_SC_OPEN_MAX) to discover
the current value. See 'info libc General Limits', particularly the
first two paragraphs.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 06:46:50PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 04:59:48PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
Wouldn't it be much easier and less confusing to users to copy the
relevant headers into the packages that need them to build?
Probably. But that's a politics decision
1 - 100 of 170 matches
Mail list logo
