Bug#93810: Processed: reassign 95254 coreutils

2003-04-22 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Mon, 21 Apr 2003 16:22:58 -0400, Michael Stone wrote: On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 12:06:47AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: drawbacks. But from IST example, uniqueness of timezone name is not the absolute requirement. I guess your question is derived from timezone should be unique, It would

Bug#93810: Processed: reassign 95254 coreutils

2003-04-21 Thread GOTO Masanori
Hi! At Sat, 19 Apr 2003 23:04:41 -0400, Michael Stone wrote: On Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 11:30:57AM +0900, you wrote: Your prominent is only your feeling or personal opinion, what is the different from the google search. 1. I think you misread. I said may be more prominent--I have no opinion

Bug#93810: Processed: reassign 95254 coreutils

2003-04-21 Thread Michael Stone
On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 12:06:47AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: drawbacks. But from IST example, uniqueness of timezone name is not the absolute requirement. I guess your question is derived from timezone should be unique, It would solve problems, and I have yet to hear a downside. The fact that

Processed: reassign 95254 coreutils

2003-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 95254 coreutils Bug#95254: date is not consistent Bug reassigned from package `libc6' to `coreutils'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian

Re: Processed: reassign 95254 coreutils

2003-04-19 Thread Michael Stone
reassign 95254 libc6 thanks This bug goes to libc6 because the ambiguity is introduced by it, not coreutils. date(1) includes a bison parser, but that only parses the input--the output is generated by strftime. There's no parser in the world that can guess what EST is supposed to mean if it has

Processed: Re: Processed: reassign 95254 coreutils

2003-04-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 95254 libc6 Bug#95254: date is not consistent Bug reassigned from package `coreutils' to `libc6'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian

Bug#95254: Processed: reassign 95254 coreutils

2003-04-19 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Sat, 19 Apr 2003 10:12:23 -0400, Michael Stone wrote: This bug goes to libc6 because the ambiguity is introduced by it, not coreutils. date(1) includes a bison parser, but that only parses the input--the output is generated by strftime. There's no parser in the world that can guess what EST

Bug#93810: Processed: reassign 95254 coreutils

2003-04-19 Thread Michael Stone
Well it's not coreutils bug, and I think it's not glibc bug; see my mail in #93810. I don't agree with your conclusion. AEST and EST may both be used, and EST may even be more prominant in .au. (Of course, the google search results aren't useful because it's unclear which EST the hits refer

Bug#95254: Bug#93810: Processed: reassign 95254 coreutils

2003-04-19 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Sat, 19 Apr 2003 14:03:07 -0400, Michael Stone wrote: Well it's not coreutils bug, and I think it's not glibc bug; see my mail in #93810. I don't agree with your conclusion. AEST and EST may both be used, and EST may even be more prominant in .au. (Of course, the google search results