On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 7:30 PM Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> As long as people choose to strip of dependencies to libsystemd from
> packages like util-linux, avoiding a fork would not work with how Debian
> and Debian based distributions are built.
It might be feasible to introduce nosystemd
On Wed 17/Oct/2018 23:06:24 +0200 Russ Allbery wrote:
>> You say "more than adequate". I don't particularly see it as providing a
>> solid system as you don't get restart on failure. Now I can see how
>> people say that this is not a problem as daemons should not crash in the
>> first place.
Bastian Blank - 19.10.18, 12:25:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 11:35:54AM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > So Devuan almost doubles the percentage of sysvinit-core
> > installations.
> Devuan is _not_ Debian. They forked it, with the full knowledge that
> they might have to do all the work to
Holger Levsen - 19.10.18, 12:02:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 11:35:54AM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > A minority? Yes. But a sizable one.
>
> It doesn't matter how many people use it, if noone is willing to
> maintain it. *If* people are maintaining it, it also doesnt matter
> how many
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 11:35:54AM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> A minority? Yes. But a sizable one.
It doesn't matter how many people use it, if noone is willing to maintain
it. *If* people are maintaining it, it also doesnt matter how many people
are using it :)
*Someone* needs to do the
__
I'm using this express-made address because personal addresses aren't
masked enough at this mail public archive. Public archive administrator
should fix this against automated addresses collectors.
El 19/10/18 a les 09:37, Philipp Kern ha escrit:
> On 2018-10-19 08:39, Narcis Garcia
On Fri, 2018-10-19 at 09:37 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 2018-10-19 08:39, Narcis Garcia wrote:
> > El 18/10/18 a les 22:07, Bernd Zeimetz ha escrit:
> > > For my packages I can state that I do not have a single machine
> > > which is not using systemd - and to be honest - I won't waste my
> >
That’s interesting though - could we use GNU shepherd to:
a) support kFreeBSD?
b) automatically translate systemd units to sheep(?) (limited subset might work)
The other alternative is OpenRC - here’s the same question - could we have
systemd units as authoritative definition and have OpenRC
On 2018-10-19 08:39, Narcis Garcia wrote:
El 18/10/18 a les 22:07, Bernd Zeimetz ha escrit:
For my packages I can state that I do not have a single machine which
is
not using systemd - and to be honest - I won't waste my time in
writing/debugging initscripts.
Most of people want to use a GNU
__
I'm using this express-made address because personal addresses aren't
masked enough at this mail public archive. Public archive administrator
should fix this against automated addresses collectors.
El 18/10/18 a les 22:07, Bernd Zeimetz ha escrit:
> For my packages I can state that I do
10 matches
Mail list logo
