On Nov 27, 2007 7:02 AM, John Halton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HelperLib: Error starting TDI subsystem: java.io.IOException: Unable
to download native library. IP Aliasing/Restoration functionality is
disabled.
speculation
Sounds like it might be trying to download and run some native code,
On Nov 28, 2007 6:19 PM, John Halton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just to clarify one point (Java is all a bit mystifying for me). When
you say the site only has Win32 code, I assume the point is that the
site is trying to make use of a Windows-only native library on my PC,
and doesn't have (or
On Dec 10, 2007 7:14 AM, Moritz Muehlenhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It was reported to the Security Team, that groovy embeds a lot of packages,
several of them security-sensitive:
snip
Since it's in contrib, it's not security-supported, but given the state of
it (outdated,
hardly any
Hi all,
Does anyone know what is holding the Ubuntu icedtea package out of
Debian? Are the licence issues still a problem? I see there is some
packaging in SVN.
I'm watching the Lenny freeze slowly approaching and wondering if
Debian will see OpenJDK/IcedTea packages early enough for all those
On Dec 29, 2007 6:04 PM, Arnaud Vandyck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know how is working on icedtea/openjdk on Debian but AFAIK,
there are a lot of licenses and they must be all analysed.
doko, are you out there? Are your Ubuntu icedtea packages ready for
Debian or do they need more work?
On Jan 7, 2008 2:40 AM, Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I work on icedtea package currently. There are some issues taht I can
hopefully sort out this week.
Could you please take over the RFP then?
http://bugs.debian.org/452750
Also, the Ubuntu packaging is in pkg-java SVN, will you be
Hi all,
What is the status of saxon 8 being in Debian? Without it, Debian
seems to lack the ability to use XSLT 2.0 stylesheets.
The appropriate bugs were last updated quite a while ago: #408842, #350338.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Jan 14, 2008 10:21 AM, Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the status of saxon 8 being in Debian?
s/saxon 8/saxon 9/
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Dec 29, 2007 8:43 AM, Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know what is holding the Ubuntu icedtea package out of
Debian?
I read on IRC that the icedtea package was rejected from NEW, is there
any information about why or progress on the issues that caused it to
be rejected
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Only some trivial things. Missing content in -doc package. Too many
lintian issues. Nothing heavy. Fix package will eb uploaded soon.
Any update on how the new upload is going?
--
bye,
pabs
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 11:06 PM, Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We just had a telco about this and I hope we will have openjdk6 in
Debian in a not too distant future.
Not sure what you mean by telco, but anyway. Doesn't openjdk6 include
the binary blobs, and icedtea6 is the one that
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 9:30 PM, Gianluca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in Ubuntu 8.0.4 I installed Eclipse and I used OpenJdk to compile my
program described here:
OpenJDK is not available in Debian yet.
If I make java-jar MyRecipes.jar on the shell, it works perfectly. But if I
click the
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 1:24 AM, Eric Lavarde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought that Batik 1.7 is not backwards compatible with Batik 1.6 (I
remember vaguely to have issues with this). If I'm right, wouldn't it make
sense to have a batik1.7 package name and keep batik (1.6)?
IMO it wouldn't
http://packages.debian.org/search?suite=sidsearchon=contentskeywords=libjawt.so
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Torsten Werner twer...@debian.org wrote:
2. You cannot binNMU an Architecture: all package but java packages
are usually of Architecture: all.
That may change at some point, there have been rumblings about
throwing away maintainer-built packages (but still
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-ga...@lists.debian.org, debian-java@lists.debian.org
* Package name: quantum-game
Version : 1.33
Upstream Author : Mario Zechner (marzec)
* URL : http://apistudios.com/hosted/marzec/quantum/
* License : GNU
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 8:12 PM, David Goodenough
david.goodeno...@linkchoose.co.uk wrote:
I am trying to debug a problem with an annotation processor, and I need
to look at the source for javac to debug it. Openjdk-6-source only contains
the source for the runtime, and there seem to be no
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 8:58 PM, David Goodenough
david.goodeno...@linkchoose.co.uk wrote:
That does NOT seem to contain the source of the compiler. There should
be a file called TreeMaker.java, and it is not present (at least find can
not find it). There is a directory rt, which contains (as
2010/5/26 Samuel Lucas Vaz de Mello samuelme...@gmail.com:
The tango package is tango-icon-theme or is there any java package?
tango is made up of images, not any programming language. Perhaps you
meant to ask if there is a Java library implementing the FreeDesktop
icon related specs? Not sure
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 5:15 AM, Gabriele Giacone 1o5g4...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately, I'm playing with a similar case: sweethome3d upstream had
to modify sunflow sources (dead upstream).
Since sunflow is hosted at sourceforge.net the project can be taken
over by anyone with an account:
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 3:37 AM, Gabriele Giacone 1o5g4...@gmail.com wrote:
Here [1] a recent upstream comment about status of sunflow open source
version.
deb.li seems to be down at the moment, could you expand that URL?
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 6:49 AM, Damien Raude-Morvan
draz...@drazzib.com wrote:
Is there a way to merge existing team ?
https://launchpad.net/~pkg-java-maintainers
https://launchpad.net/~debian-java
Seems like there isn't an automated way to do that. According to Micah
Gersten from
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Stefane Fermigier s...@nuxeo.com wrote:
Problem is, this is a policy issue, that is specific from the Java world
The issues Debian faces in packaging Java stuff is definitely not
specific to the Java world. Ruby, C, Python, games, all of them have
had or still
http://gbenson.net/?p=257
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/distro-pkg-dev/2011-March/012556.html
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/distro-pkg-dev/2011-March/013044.html
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/distro-pkg-dev/2011-March/013059.html
--
bye,
pabs
Wouldn't it be better to have something that is neither Java-specific
nor Debian-specific?
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
OpenJDK doesn't have any defoma backend so it is highly unlikely that
defoma has anything to do with this.
It appears that paths to fonts are hardcoded in these files:
/etc/java-6-openjdk/fontconfig.*
/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/lib/fontconfig.*
Despite the name these appear to have nothing
This sounds a bit like bug #627121 against gzip, caused by the glibc
memcpy stuff
Try setting this environment variable:
export LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/*/libc/memcpy-syslog-preload.so
Then run your command and check syslog for signs that the bug exists.
--
bye,
pabs
I guess your libc6 is not new enough to have multiarch support.
Which version of libc6 do you have?
Do you have any of these files?
/usr/lib/libc/memcpy-preload.so
/usr/lib/libc/memcpy-syslog-preload.so
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc/memcpy-preload.so
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Niels Thykier wrote:
I personally have both unstable and testing in my sources list and use:
$ cat /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/02aptlocal
APT::Default-Release testing;
I personally prefer pinning for this. I have set it up such that when
I cherry-pick something
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Eric Delcamp wrote:
ok guys, thanks for your answers.
i still feel would be nice to have eclipse on testing without adding
unstable but i'll follow your advices.
If you check the PTS you can find out why:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/e/eclipse.html
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1906673/import-com-sun-image-codec-jpeg
Sounds like your code is buggy, apparently com.sun.* are not supposed
to be used:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/faq-sun-packages-142232.html
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
I'd call this an over-picky interpretation of something that rather
qualifies as a joke rather than a license which can be dealt with in
court (disclaimer: I'm not a lawyer, just try to apply common sense.)
I'd like to answer this kind of
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 08:31:46PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
The definition of evil is subjective and could refer to anything,
including the production of Debian itself.
Sure and a statement like the given one is pure non-sense without any
The Debian Project is not a legal entity so you can't assign copyright
to it. See the replies about SPI/FSF/etc though.
If you are contributing to copyleft projects, it is important to have
diverse copyright holders to prevent converting projects to
proprietary licenses. The package you are
[Not sure if you are subscribed, sorry for the CC if so]
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:38 PM, Felipe FV wrote:
I really would appreciate some help on how things work at Java development
here. Where could I start?
Start at the Java page on the wiki and read some of the links there:
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Markus Karg wrote:
While programming for more than 25 years (more than a decade with Java SE /
EE), I am still a beginner with Debian. So please don’t mind my possibly
stupid question: Looking at all the security fixes that Oracle provides, I
wonder how I can
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Jakub Adam wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for package androidsdk-tools.
Is this different to the android-tools source package? Should there be
some co-ordination between the two?
http://packages.qa.debian.org/a/android-tools.html
--
bye,
pabs
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 6:26 PM, Jakub Adam wrote:
SDK Tools is a set of GUI applications written in Java that aid in Android
application development, e.g. DDMS and Hierarchy Viewer to name the probably
most prominent.
...
The only common part I see is that SDK Tools use android-tools-adb for
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Markus Koschany wrote:
I downloaded the missing sources from upstream's git repository and
created an extra source tarball, so that freemind consists of two
different source tarballs now. I simply removed the old flash file from
the old tarball. The flash
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:21 PM, Markus Koschany wrote:
Gnash is able to handle that too.
You've tested that gnash works with this particular Flash program?
However I have no preferences for flash
As the maintainer of mtasc in Debian my preference is for Flash to
die. mtasc is dead
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 11:55 AM, tony mancill wrote:
My initial thought was that jessie would use OpenJDK 7. However, given
that the jessie freeze is in early November of 2014 [0], and that Oracle
has (tentatively?) announced EOL for Java7 in April of 2015 [1], OpenJDK
8 seems like it might
Interesting quote from Coverity about FOSS implemented in Java:
http://www.newswire.ca/en/story/1339341/coverity-scan-report-finds-open-source-software-quality-outpaces-proprietary-code-for-the-first-time
The Coverity analysis found that developers contributing to open source
Java projects are
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Andrew Schurman wrote:
What kind of artifacts would Java projects consider non-free?
Anything that is under a non-free license or is missing the preferred
form for modification (aka source).
specifically, what are examples of some of the things that you would
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 7:22 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
1. Do nothing. The timezone data will be updated with the quarterly
updates of OpenJDK.
Sounds like OpenJDK has an embedded copy of tzdata? Can we get
upstream to disentangle that, at least for their source releases?
2. Copy the sources
Hi Java folks,
On debian-mentors (both IRC and list) we sometimes get Java packaging
related questions. As there are few people in debian-mentors (IRC/list)
who know about Java, currently we just redirect Java related packaging
questions to debian-java. I was thinking it might be a good idea for
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 5:43 AM, Thomas Zlika wrote:
Would it be possible to know the roadmap for openjdk-8 in Debian?
It is in unstable already but has two RC bugs:
https://bugs.debian.org/760982
https://bugs.debian.org/760984
The second of these is a meta-bug for the list of tasks that need
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
That would be against the rules AFAICR: you're supposed to do your
own TCK runs, and not on behalf of someone else.
How do automated builds factor into that?
I don't think it makes any
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
That would be against the rules AFAICR: you're supposed to do your
own TCK runs, and not on behalf of someone else.
How do automated builds factor into that?
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 6:21 AM, Jonathan Yu wrote:
To my knowledge, Zulu is currently the only OpenJDK 8 binary build available
that is actually fully tested. When I say actually fully tested, I mean
that someone actually states that the specific binary package has passed the
full set of
[The below mail is general, I don't know much about the Java/Eclipse context]
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 4:09 AM, Pascal Rapicault wrote:
- What is the root of the decision to build everything from source?
Debian has promised to our users that every package will come with
source code. The only
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
I take it you didn't convince Mozilla to rewrite Firefox in Java, that's
a sad news for our world domination plan :(
Some other folks are working on that:
https://gngr.info/
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To
On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 10:44 PM, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 07:35:47 -0700, tony mancill wrote:
By the way, it looks like https://www.debian.org/ports/ is somewhat out
of date - e.g. arm64 isn't listed - and refers to reader to a wiki page
(which I find confusing for what
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> On Tue Oct 13 15:13, Milan Antonijevic wrote:
>> I tried writing to the @debian.org address, but it bounced with
>
> Hi, I'm afraid I'm no longer involved with the Debian project. I've copied the
> Debian Java team list, hopefully someone
On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 5:49 AM, Jonathan Yu wrote:
> Other great static code analysis tools (not just for doing call-tree
I'm interested in adding general Java static analysis tools to
check-all-the-things:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/check-all-the-things.git/
So far I have a
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 2:16 AM, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
> Since jar-content.txt Torsten's file is not being updated since a long
> time, I was wondering what's the current recommended way to quickly
> check if a Java library is packaged in Debian.
The future of this sort of thing (mapping between
On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 08:33 +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> jlint doesn't seem actively maintained and we already have findbugs and
> checkstyle in Debian.
I tend to think a diversity of static analysis tools is better than
single tools, since they all inevitably wax and wane in maintenance
over
Hi all,
I noticed that the jlint package was removed. jlint is a static
analysis tool for Java. As such, I think it is an important tool to
have in Debian so that maintainers and upstreams can check code written
in Java for potential bugs and get those fixed upstream.
Is anyone planning to or
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 11:36 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Sorry for the silence but your last message about check-all-the-things
> on this list [1] just invited people to add more TODOs or checks. It
> didn't sound like you were struggling with Findbugs and were asking for
> help on a specific
On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 11:15 PM, Ponomarenko Andrey wrote:
> I've just opened the new API changes tracker for Java libraries:
> http://abi-laboratory.pro/java/tracker/
Is this based on Debian binary packages or upstream?
I wonder if we need a japi.debian.net service providing this for all
On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 4:59 AM, David Goodenough wrote:
> how do we keep both openjdk-7 and openjdk-8 installed on sid?
openjdk-7 has been removed from sid, you should remove it from your system:
https://bugs.debian.org/820703
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 6:32 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> I am starring at debian-devel@l.d.o and debian-java@l.d.o but see no
> discussion about gcj removal. Am I missing something or was this
> something known to everybody (porters mainly).
There were two threads on -devel and -java:
On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 4:45 AM, Hannu R wrote:
> The default jre is old, version 7. Can it be updated to 8?
The default jre is version 8 in Debian stretch and later:
https://packages.debian.org/stretch/default-jre
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 12:37 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> This one was really tricky, nobody could have anticipated it with our
> current tools. We would need a kind of static analyzer that scans all
> classes in the Debian packages and reports if any type, method of field
> can't be resolved.
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 11:31 PM, tony mancill wrote:
> And I didn't anticipate the run-time breakage. Long-term, I
> think it is worth discussing how best to support Java applications in
> main, since it often feels like we're swimming against the stream trying
> to support system-level JARs
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 12:01 AM, 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan wrote:
> Changing the maintainer to Debian QA Group does not seem incorrect to me.
Unfortunately orphaning packages tends to attract deletionists, so you
have to be vigilant to ensure the package doesn't get removed from
Debian entirely. If
On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 2:24 AM, matecs wrote:
> currently no effort is done from my side to reorganize the stuff in
> a debian friendly way, but if you can could give me hints then i'll
> do my best... currently the following is provided by me:
Have you considered storing your source code in a
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 8:40 AM, George Kontsevich wrote:
> OpenJFX seems to be available in stable and unstable but has been removed
> from testing. I'd like to use it in conjunction with OpenJDK v8, Clojure and
> Leiningen (which recommends v8). I'm rather new to picking apart Debian
> packages
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 9:02 PM, Luca Vercelli wrote:
> account on alioth (luca-vercelli-guest). Does it still work on salsa?
No, they are separate services.
> Is there any written "howto" for using accounts on salsa?
https://wiki.debian.org/Salsa/Doc
https://wiki.debian.org/Salsa
--
bye,
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 1:18 AM, tony mancill wrote:
> I realize that this isn't the right forum, so please redirect
> appropriately for follow-ups, but do you know whether there is any plan
> for a redirect host/service for the alioth repos? The BTS is full of
> links commits in Alioth, so the
On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 4:48 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Thank you Tony. I was leaning toward such a solution, but considering
> that Alioth is going to be killed and the repositories archived and
> moved offline there is no real point disabling the migrated
> repositories. I think I'll just move
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 3:02 AM shirish शिरीष wrote:
> Is there a reason for having a hidden /etc/.java directory ?
According to cruft/cruft-ng, these are created by the java-common package.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 4:22 PM Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> There is the Mercurial tags page [1] but unlike GitHub's tags pages it
> doesn't play nice with uscan because the links are built with the hash
> of the revision and not the value of the tag.
FTR, uscan is now flexible enough that it can
On Thu, 2019-10-03 at 16:12 +0200, Felix Natter wrote:
> I am starting to package libiconloader-java but unfortunately, there
> are no releases or tags in the respository:
> https://github.com/bulenkov/iconloader
You might want to use something like what I did with purple-discord.
It relies on
On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 7:30 PM Mechtilde Stehmann wrote:
> Or what is best practice in such a case?
The best option for fonts is to have the text rendering code, using
fontconfig or similar, dynamically load the right fonts at runtime for
the text being rendered. This way it doesn't matter if
On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 6:45 PM Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> We probably should let maven-debian-helper’s dh module
> abort any building (dh_auto_{build,test}) if run under
> autopkgtests to enforce this.
I'd suggest to start with a lintian warning about this and maybe when
there are fewer packages
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 5:12 PM Antonin Delpeuch (lists) wrote:
> I am looking for a consultant to help package Java software for Debian.
> I wonder if you maintain a directory of developers who would be able to
> work on this as contractors?
>
> I have found this general list:
>
>
On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 6:04 PM Antonin Delpeuch (lists) wrote:
> Very interesting! I like the clarity of this page, that is exactly the
> sort of service we need. Surely there must be many other companies
> offering similar services, no? I am surprised this one was so hard to find.
There are
On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 14:24:51 +0100 Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 25/03/2019 à 14:22, Bastian Blank a écrit :
>
> > Why not experimental?
>
> I'd like to keep building up to date tomcat8 packages until Buster is
> released with tomcat9.
Since tomcat9 was released in buster a long time ago,
is it
On Sat, 2023-08-05 at 14:40 +0200, J.S.C. wrote:
> > I just stumpled upon being unable to find libopenjfx-jni on an 64-bit
> > ARM platform.
This was fixed in libopenjfx-jni 11.0.11+1-3.1 in Debian trixie:
https://bugs.debian.org/1021894
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
79 matches
Mail list logo
