#include hallo.h
* Daniel Baumann [Sun, Apr 12 2009, 01:05:59PM]:
Mario Izquierdo (mariodebian) wrote:
Please include CDFS modules in linux-modules-extra-2.6 builds.
first, we require that the maintainer (CC'ed) is showing his consent
with this.
Ok.
second, cdfs-src has to be renamed to
Eduard Bloch wrote:
Renaming the binary package is easier, would that be enough?
i was speaking about the binary package, yes.
please ping when it entered unstable so i'll add/enable it in lme.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:
On Monday 13 April 2009 01:52:27 Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sat, 2009-04-11 at 21:58 +0300, David Baron wrote:
[...]
What happens if you uninstall the firmware? The result should be a
fallback to software rendering.
This is what happens.
Your bug report is for firmware-linux. If you
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 523831 important
Bug#523831: linux-image-2.6.26-2-686: Boot hangs with message 'Loading kernel
modules...'
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 523828 normal
Bug#523828: linux-image-2.6.26-2-486: fails to find modules.pcimap
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
maximilian attems schrieb:
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 09:37:51PM +0200, Beat Bolli wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-2-486
Version: 2.6.26-15
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
During installation of the latest 2.6 kernel I get the following:
Setting up
Hi,
A revised kernel version came in to testing this weekend. I did some
testing (i.e. removing all my stuff from /etc/modules) and can confirm
that the kernel now does set aes_x86_64 as the highest priority on the
amd64 build, so this means this wishlist request has been met and I
recommend the
Your message dated Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:17:36 +0200
with message-id 200904131617.44251.hol...@layer-acht.org
and subject line Re: Bug#503731: Update
has caused the Debian Bug report #503731,
regarding linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64: aes_x86_64 not used by default
to be marked as done.
This means that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 03:40:33PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 09:37:51PM +0200, Beat Bolli wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-2-486
Version: 2.6.26-15
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
During
The current text at http://wiki.debian.org/KernelFirmwareLicensing is:
Debian kernel team identifies the following three types of firmware, currently
found in the Linux kernel:
1. Sourceless binary blobs with no license, no explicit permission to
redistribute, or
an explicit prohibition
FYI: The status of the initramfs-tools source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.93.1
Current version: 0.93.2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 05:53:22PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
The current text at http://wiki.debian.org/KernelFirmwareLicensing is:
Debian kernel team identifies the following three types of firmware,
currently
found in the Linux kernel:
1. Sourceless binary blobs with no license, no
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 11:31 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
[...]
It is the intention of the kernel team to:
This sounds more like a plan instead of a position statement. imo, a
position statement should be more along the lines of what we will
permit and what we won't, as opposed to what we are
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 07:21:02PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 11:31 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
[...]
It is the intention of the kernel team to:
This sounds more like a plan instead of a position statement. imo, a
position statement should be more along the lines
Accepted:
atl2-modules-2.6-486_2.6.29-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-modules-extra-2.6/atl2-modules-2.6-486_2.6.29-1_i386.deb
atl2-modules-2.6-686-bigmem_2.6.29-1_i386.deb
to
pool/main/l/linux-modules-extra-2.6/atl2-modules-2.6-686-bigmem_2.6.29-1_i386.deb
I am starting to think that debian has completely broken support for
compiling out of tree kernel modules as of 2.6.29 now.
It used to be, that if you needed to know if a certain function used one
style or another, then you could do a compile test against the kernel
headers and see if it worked
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-2-s390
Version: 2.6.26-15
Severity: critical
This particular Linux kernel image will not boot on a virtual machine in ESA
mode under z/VM. I have not tried other platforms (LPAR, for example).
Here is the boot log:
--
Booting default (debian)...
[
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 14:52 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
I am starting to think that debian has completely broken support for
compiling out of tree kernel modules as of 2.6.29 now.
It used to be, that if you needed to know if a certain function used one
style or another, then you could do
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 523942 important
Bug#523942: linux-image-2.6.26-2-s390 will not boot!
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 523942 important
Bug#523942: linux-image-2.6.26-2-s390 will not boot!
Severity set to `important' from `important'
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 03:45:33PM -0400, STEPHEN POWELL wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-2-s390
Version: 2.6.26-15
Severity: critical
This particular Linux kernel image will not boot on a virtual machine in ESA
mode under z/VM. I have not tried other platforms (LPAR, for example).
Not
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 09:13:50PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 14:52 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
I am starting to think that debian has completely broken support for
compiling out of tree kernel modules as of 2.6.29 now.
It used to be, that if you needed to know
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 17:55 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 09:13:50PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 14:52 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
I am starting to think that debian has completely broken support for
compiling out of tree kernel modules as
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 523964 linux-2.6
Bug#523964: linux-image-2.6.28-1-486: memory corruption on resuming from
STR/ACPI State 3
Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-2.6.28-1-486'
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.28-1-486' to `linux-2.6'.
--
24 matches
Mail list logo
