Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686-bigmem
Version: 2.6.32-41squeeze2
Severity: important
We received several problem reports from our customers and also
experienced the following bug when running said kernel with >=2 CPUs in
a virtualization environbment (KVM and VMWare ESX). After some time the
VM
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 658662 - patch fixed-upstream
Bug #658662 [linux-2.6] drm/i915: no signal via DisplayPort on Sandy Bridge
since Linux 3.2
Removed tag(s) fixed-upstream and patch.
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
tags 658662 - patch fixed-upstream
quit
Peter Colberg wrote:
> No luck, that patch does *not* fix this problem :-(.
Alas. Thanks for checking.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Arc
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 01:37:23PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> tags 658662 + patch fixed-upstream
> quit
>
> Hi,
>
> Peter Colberg wrote:
>
> > Since upgrading to linux-image-3.2.0-1-amd64, an external display
> > connected via DisplayPort to a Sandy Bridge onboard graphics card
> > stopped
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 08:33 -0700, sarveshwar.ba...@emulex.com wrote:
> Well. I have tried everything possible to avoid updates. But no matter
> which CD I install from I always land up in same version of kernel
> (6.0.4).
'6.0.4' is the distribution version, but presumably you also get the
latest
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 669313 src:linux-2.6 3.2.12-1~bpo60+1
Bug #669313 [linux-image-2.6-686] linux-image-2.6-686: GPU gets hung after some
minutes
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-image-2.6-686' to 'src:linux-2.6'.
No longer marked as found in versions 3.2
> Thanks. Is this a regression? What are you doing when this happens?
Actually it's a bit weird, I don't know what this is. Was just "surfing
the web" and switching between the browser and a terminal. No 3D at all
involved. Now I'm working since 30 minutes, and the problem didn't occur
again...
Package: linux-source-3.2
Version: 3.2.15-1
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
Dear Maintainer,
I believe it is convention to leave a trailing slash off of the nfs export
in /etc/fstab, e.g.:
nfsserver:/srv/ubuntu-32 /mnt/ubuntu-32 nfs
ro,nfsvers=3,soft,intr,tcp,nodev,noatime,nosuid,rsize=32768,ws
Georg F. wrote:
> [ 577.996012] [drm:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer
> elapsed... GPU hung
> [ 577.996019] [drm] capturing error event; look for more information in
> /debug/dri/0/i915_error_state
> [ 580.484021] [drm:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer
> elapsed.
Hi Jonathan,
> Please file a separate bug.
Sorry. I've filed #669313.
Greetings,
Georg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/4c061cdaa918a5d1e9375adf0d
Package: linux-image-2.6-686
Version: 3.2+44~bpo60+1
Severity: important
[ 577.996012] [drm:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer elapsed...
GPU hung
[ 577.996019] [drm] capturing error event; look for more information in
/debug/dri/0/i915_error_state
[ 580.484021] [drm:i915_hangche
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # two more patches for the 2.6.32.y tree
> severity 664461 important
Bug #664461 [linux-2.6] atl1c: AR8152: "transmit queue 0 timed out" after short
time under high load, module has to be reloaded a few times to work again
Bug #613874 [linux-2.6]
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 667799 - moreinfo + fixed-upstream
Bug #667799 [linux-2.6] linux-image-3.2.0-2-amd64: Radeon KMS fails on Radeon
X850XT (R480) graphics card
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
Bug #667799 [linux-2.6] linux-image-3.2.0-2-amd64: Radeon KMS fails on Rade
tags 667799 - moreinfo + fixed-upstream
quit
Mike Brodbelt wrote:
> I have done basic testing. Pulling a kernel source tree for 3.3.y
> and applying the patch results in a new kernel which now boots
> successfully.
Thanks! Passed upstream.
The patch (drm-radeon-kms-fix-dvo-setup-on-some-r4xx-c
Hi Georg,
ge...@riseup.net wrote:
> I've installed yesterday a Dell Dimension 2400 with Debian Squeeze.
> Experienced the same problem, upgraded to
>
> - linux-image-686-pae 3.2+44~bpo60+1
> - libdrm-intel1 2.4.26-1~bpo60+1.
>
> However, the problem still occurs.
> Any advice someone?
Please fil
Hi all,
I've installed yesterday a Dell Dimension 2400 with Debian Squeeze.
Experienced the same problem, upgraded to
- linux-image-686-pae 3.2+44~bpo60+1
- libdrm-intel1 2.4.26-1~bpo60+1.
However, the problem still occurs.
Any advice someone?
Thanks,
Georg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia
Jonathan,
> Thanks. What X driver do you use? Do you have an /etc/X11/xorg.conf,
> and if so, with what settings? If you boot without X (e.g., in
> recovery mode) and explicitly run "modprobe nouveau" does it still
> fail? Can you ssh in?
I do have an /etc/X11/xorg.conf, when trying to use th
Russel Winder wrote:
> In all situations to date SSH access via the network connection is
> unaffected. Also the virtual terminals Alt+F2 etc. were available.
Great, thanks. Please attach output from
reportbug --template xserver-xorg-video-nouveau
from a boot that failed to enable gra
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 669270 linux-2.6/3.2.7-1
Bug #669270 [linux-2.6] linux-image-3.2.0-2-amd64: Evolution triggers NFS4
problem
Marked as found in versions linux-2.6/3.2.7-1.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance
Russel Winder wrote:
> I stripped out all the nvidia related packages and set up the nouveau
> driver. It failed to enable any graphics at all. No graphical login, no
> data :-( My card is a Quadro 570 and it seems clear that the Nouveau
> driver doesn't.
Thanks. What X driver do you use? Do
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 669270 -1
Bug #669270 [linux-2.6] linux-image-3.2.0-2-amd64: Evolution triggers NFS4
problem
Bug 669270 cloned as bug 669306
> retitle -1 Quadro 570: nouveau fails to enable any graphics at all
Bug #669306 [linux-2.6] linux-image-3.2.0-2-am
Jonathan,
Thanks for picking up on this quickly, really appreciated.
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 12:41 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi Russel,
[...]
> Thanks for reporting it.
No problem. Well there is, but if I don't report it then I wont get any
help :-)
[...]
>
> Can you reproduce this withou
Thanks. Of course this can be forwarded to the bug log.
So even the kernel that I patched using the script will be replaced by a
regular kernel.
Good.
Axel
On Wed, 18 Apr 2012, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
a...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
after finally understanding how the script is used to ap
Your message dated Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:23:39 -0500
with message-id <20120418202339.GC30625@burratino>
and subject line Re: linux-image-2.6.18-6-xen-686: Kernel crash while touching
files
has caused the Debian Bug report #483692,
regarding linux-image-2.6.18-6-xen-686: Kernel crash while touching f
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 483692 2.6.18.dfsg.1-18etch5
Bug #483692 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.18-6-xen-686: Kernel crash while
touching files
There is no source info for the package 'linux-2.6' at version
'2.6.18.dfsg.1-18etch5' with architecture ''
Unable to m
Your message dated Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:50:30 -0500
with message-id <20120418195030.GA30512@burratino>
and subject line Re: Intel Core i3-2310M (HD 3000) / i915: Black screen at boot
has caused the Debian Bug report #668274,
regarding linux-image-3.2.0-2-amd64: Intel Core i3-2310M (HD 3000) / i915:
Massimo Cetra wrote:
> please notice that they submitted another patch here:
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1283857
Yep, they seem to be dealing now with small details like the
changelog and comments, which is a good sign.
[...]
> The patch i applied yesterday to the debian kern
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 658662 + patch fixed-upstream
Bug #658662 [linux-2.6] drm/i915: no signal via DisplayPort on Sandy Bridge
since Linux 3.2
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream and patch.
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
tags 658662 + patch fixed-upstream
quit
Hi,
Peter Colberg wrote:
> Since upgrading to linux-image-3.2.0-1-amd64, an external display
> connected via DisplayPort to a Sandy Bridge onboard graphics card
> stopped working, and instead turns off reporting “DP no signal”.
>
> With linux-image-3.1.0-1
Am Dienstag, 17. April 2012 schrieb Jonathan Nieder:
> Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
> >> I did as you adviced. First I installed the kernel version before. which
> >> is 3.2.12-1-amd64, and the package is something with "bpo"v bin its
> >> name. I suppose bpo stand for backport
Hi Russel,
Russel Winder wrote:
> U am using Debian Unstable kept up to date daily. Whenever I try to
> create a new email using Evolution, the kernel reports on all open
> terminals and Evolution becomes totally unresponsive.
[...]
> the determination is that this is an NFS bug, which given the
Teodor MICU wrote:
> This bug should be closed and archived -- it works properly on wheezy.
Thanks for a reminder. If you install a current squeeze kernel (e.g.,
2.6.32-43) on the wheezy system, does it still reproduce modesetting
trouble? Is the radeon firmware installed?
Curious,
Jonathan
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 3.2.15-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
U am using Debian Unstable kept up to date daily. Whenever I try to create a
new email using Evolution, the
kernel reports on all open terminals and Evolution becomes totally
unresponsive. I reported this as an
Evolutio
Well. I have tried everything possible to avoid updates. But no matter which CD
I install from I always land up in same version of kernel (6.0.4). The
alternate way is for me to get linux-kernel source package for the version I
need to use and re-compile the kernel and build the driver against i
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 07:13 -0700, sarveshwar.ba...@emulex.com wrote:
> I installed linux headers in both my installations (one of which I
> installed using 6.0.0 cd and other using 6.0.4 cd) using apt-get
> install and dpkg --list shows same output on both the systems:
> root@debian:~# dpkg --
I installed linux headers in both my installations (one of which I installed
using 6.0.0 cd and other using 6.0.4 cd) using apt-get install and dpkg
--list shows same output on both the systems:
root@debian:~# dpkg --list |grep headers
ii linux-headers-2.6.32-5-686 2.6.32-41squeeze
Your message dated Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:38:11 +0100
with message-id <1334756291.3209.146.camel@deadeye>
and subject line Re: Bug#669212: firmware-realtek: RTL8188CUS chipset gets
installed as rtl8192cu, fails to read EEPROM
has caused the Debian Bug report #669212,
regarding firmware-realtek: RTL81
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 06:32 -0700, sarveshwar.ba...@emulex.com wrote:
> Then, give that 6.0.0, 6.03 and 6.0.4, since uname -a output is the
> same, can I assume that kernel image is the same
No, there are new drivers and bug fixes. Some of the bug fixes will
affect modules.
> and building drive
Then, give that 6.0.0, 6.03 and 6.0.4, since uname -a output is the same, can
I assume that kernel image is the same and building driver for any of these
debian version will give me the same driver binary?
-Original Message-
From: Uwe Kleine-König [mailto:u.kleine-koe...@pengutronix.de
On 17/04/2012 11:03, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
the patch for this problem has been submitted to netdev and is here:
Thanks! Does the patch work against 3.2.y? See [1] for instructions.
Hi Jonathan,
please notice that they submitted another patch here:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ke
Package: firmware-realtek
Version: 0.28+squeeze1
Severity: normal
Wifi Interface Netgear N150 WNA1000M (Realtek RTL8188CUS) gets identified as
rtl8192su. wlan0 does not come up.
dmesg:
rtl8192cu:_rtl92cu_read_adapter_info():<0-0> EEPROM ID(0x0) is invalid!!
rtl8192cu:rtl92cu_init_sw_vars():<0-0>
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 11:56:00PM -0700, sarveshwar.ba...@emulex.com wrote:
> Hi,
> I have tried installing different version of debain kernels from CDs
> in the archive. For ex: I tried Debian 6.0.0, 6.0.3, 6.0.4. After
> installation all installations show /etc/debian_version as 6.0.4 and
> th
42 matches
Mail list logo
