Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 04:30:47PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes:
On Sat, 2012-02-11 at 17:33 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org writes:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes:
On Sat, 2012-02-11 at 17:33 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org writes:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 01:00:50PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
just
to
Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org writes:
* Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk [120209 20:45]:
There is a similar issue with linux-image-*-amd64, which I would
definitely like to remove from i386 as soon as possible. We have
metapackages to help with this already, but we still need users to
Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org writes:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 01:00:50PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
just
to have a suiteable kernel would be quite a burden.
The -amd64 kernel in i386 arch is some sort of upgrade tool.
On Sat, 2012-02-11 at 17:33 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org writes:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 01:00:50PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
just
to have a suiteable kernel would be quite a
* Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk [120209 20:45]:
There is a similar issue with linux-image-*-amd64, which I would
definitely like to remove from i386 as soon as possible. We have
metapackages to help with this already, but we still need users to add
amd64 as a foreign architecture before
On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 13:00 +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
* Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk [120209 20:45]:
There is a similar issue with linux-image-*-amd64, which I would
definitely like to remove from i386 as soon as possible. We have
metapackages to help with this already, but we
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 01:00:50PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
From a user's point of view I'd really appreciate if that package could be
kept.
It is a burden for the archive and other infrastructure.
Needing multi-arch enabled (with all the dangers of getting the
wrong packages
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 10:52:55AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 04:43:04PM +0100, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
Le 09/02/12 15:53, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
now that a multiarch dpkg has been uploaded to experimental it looks
like we can finaly get rid of
9 matches
Mail list logo
