On Tuesday 05 June 2007 00:47, maximilian attems wrote:
the svn commits should also go to -maint.
That's even worse. You can SVN commits by subscribing to the PTS if you
want them (at least if you've set it up correctly). I certainly don't
want to see kernel commits.
pgpj0ULjzmUmI.pgp
On Tuesday 05 June 2007 02:54, dann frazier wrote:
Note that you'll probably lose me as someone who occasionally helps
reply to bugs as I doubt I'll want to be subscribed to two separate
kernel lists. I suspect this will be true for others as well.
why? I mean, what's the overhead of
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 12:13:30PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Tuesday 05 June 2007 00:47, maximilian attems wrote:
the svn commits should also go to -maint.
That's even worse. You can SVN commits by subscribing to the PTS if you
want them (at least if you've set it up correctly). I
heya,
can the Maintainer field be changed to the newly added -maint
list address so that ususal discussion end in debian-kernel.
i just read fedora-kernel and it was nice to follow and
easy to read - as not flooded by all bug reports.
what where the args against it appart from pure inertia?
i'd
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 11:23:16PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
heya,
can the Maintainer field be changed to the newly added -maint
list address so that ususal discussion end in debian-kernel.
i just read fedora-kernel and it was nice to follow and
easy to read - as not flooded by all
On Monday 04 June 2007 23:42, maximilian attems wrote:
what where the args against it appart from pure inertia?
Note that you'll probably lose me as someone who occasionally helps reply
to bugs as I doubt I'll want to be subscribed to two separate kernel
lists. I suspect this will be true for
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 12:13:19AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 04 June 2007 23:42, maximilian attems wrote:
what where the args against it appart from pure inertia?
Note that you'll probably lose me as someone who occasionally helps reply
to bugs as I doubt I'll want to be subscribed
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 12:13:19AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 04 June 2007 23:42, maximilian attems wrote:
what where the args against it appart from pure inertia?
Note that you'll probably lose me as someone who occasionally helps reply
to bugs as I doubt I'll want to be
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 12:13:19AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 04 June 2007 23:42, maximilian attems wrote:
what where the args against it appart from pure inertia?
Note that you'll probably lose me as someone who occasionally helps reply
to bugs as I doubt I'll want to be
9 matches
Mail list logo
