Bug#622842: firmware-brcm80211: not getting an associated point

2011-04-15 Thread maximilian attems
reassign 622842 linux-2.6 stop On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 09:07:30AM +0200, Wenceslao wrote: > Package: firmware-brcm80211 > Version: 0.29 > Severity: important > > module brcm80211 is not getting the associated point of a wifi, although it is > properly detected. With a usb wifi stick (a ralink one

Bug#622118: linux-base: [INTL:sk] Slovak po-debconf translation

2011-04-10 Thread maximilian attems
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011, Slavko wrote: > Package: linux-base > Severity: wishlist > Tags: l10n patch > Version: 3.2 > > sk.po attached this confuses me there is already a sk.po in newer linux-base, is this an update? > regards thank you. -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-req

Bug#622118: linux-base: [INTL:sk] Slovak po-debconf translation

2011-04-10 Thread maximilian attems
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 04:45:39PM +0200, Slavko wrote: > Ahoj, > > Dňa Sun, 10 Apr 2011 15:36:47 +0100 Ben Hutchings > napísal: > > > I don't know what Max is talking about; there has never been an sk.po > > in linux-base or linux-2.6 (which linux-base was split from). there is in the squeeze

Bug#621908: Use new /run/initramfs dir

2011-04-09 Thread maximilian attems
Package: live-boot-initramfs-tools Version: 3.0~a16-1 Severity: normal Please migrate the usage of /dev/.initramfs to /run/initramfs dir. The next initramfs-tools release 0.99 will use /run and no longer have /dev/.initramfs per se. thank you. -- maks -- System Information: Debian Release: wh

Bug#621375: backup_initramfs=yes

2011-04-09 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, 06 Apr 2011, Joey Hess wrote: > I recently suffered 2 weeks of downtime of a machine in a location that > made fixing it hard, caused by a broken initramfs due to bug #621137. > This highlighted to me that there are many things that can go wrong and > break an initramfs when it is refreshe

Re: iniramfs: smal bunch of small changes, getting rid of busybox STANDALONE_SHELL

2011-04-08 Thread maximilian attems
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, Michael Tokarev wrote: > Hello. > > I'm trying to get rid of the ugly hack in busybox, which is > activated by CONFIG_STANDALONE_SHELL in busybox configuration. > > What it does is: when you run its shell, ash, and run a command, > such as dd or ls, and this command is provi

Re: [PATCH 5/5] create links in initramfs to busybox with other names if not already exist

2011-04-08 Thread maximilian attems
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, Michael Tokarev wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev > --- > hooks/zz-busybox |9 + > 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hooks/zz-busybox b/hooks/zz-busybox > index d6dd3f5..1846376 100755 > --- a/hooks/zz-busybox > +++ b/hoo

Re: [PATCH 3/5] don't copy busybox to sh, use link instead

2011-04-08 Thread maximilian attems
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, Michael Tokarev wrote: > mkinitramfs uses cpio --dereference, so it copies each symlink > as its target not as symlink. In order to compensate for that, > use hard link instead. > this is no longer true (see current master). -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-k

Re: [PATCH 4/5] rename hooks/busybox to hooks/zz-busybox to reorder it to be last hook

2011-04-08 Thread maximilian attems
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, Michael Tokarev wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev > --- > hooks/{busybox => zz-busybox} |0 > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > rename hooks/{busybox => zz-busybox} (100%) > this is a hack and you can tel dep, to be last, cryptsetup does it a

Re: [PATCH 2/5] don't warn about md-root need busybox: it doesn't anymore

2011-04-08 Thread maximilian attems
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, Michael Tokarev wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev > --- > hooks/busybox |8 +--- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) thanks merged, with the slightly more verbose desc in mjt/bb branch. will land in master once reviewed. thank you -- maks

Re: Bug#619711: console-setup: breaks copying keymap to initramfs

2011-04-05 Thread maximilian attems
severity 619711 important stop default is KEYMAP=n. On Tue, 29 Mar 2011, Anton Zinoviev wrote: > I had no idea that initramfs-tools does this. I think this was wrong > even with old version of console-setup because in some situations > cached.kmap.gz will not correspond to the actual configur

Bug#620924: Please drop dead usplash code

2011-04-04 Thread maximilian attems
Hello, On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 05:25:16AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > > Hi maks, > > as you are certainly aware, usplash is dead and has been removed from > the archive since quite some time (squeeze does no longer contain it). indeed I asked for its removal. > initramfs-tools still contain

Bug#620814: initramfs-tools: fails to include essential module for other leg of md0

2011-04-04 Thread maximilian attems
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 10:15:21PM +, Arno Schuring wrote: > > So, which one is the preferred location? Will anything break if I just clear > out the conf.d directory? > ladmin@fury:~$ dpkg -S /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/* > dpkg: /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/driver-policy not found. > dpkg: /

Bug#620814: initramfs-tools: fails to include essential module for other leg of md0

2011-04-04 Thread maximilian attems
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 10:15:21PM +, Arno Schuring wrote: > > > > no, check your box with: > > egrep MODULES -r /etc/initramfs-tools/ > > Great. > > /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf:# MODULES: [ most | netboot | dep | list ] > /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf:MODULES=most > /etc/ini

Bug#620814: initramfs-tools: fails to include essential module for other leg of md0

2011-04-04 Thread maximilian attems
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 12:21:16PM +, Arno Schuring wrote: > > Hi Ben, > > > > During installation, I configured initramfs-tools to determine the > > > required > > > modules automatically, which resulted in a non-booting system (notice that > > > the sil680 module is missing): > > [...] > >

Bug#620216: linux-image-2.6.38-1-686: kernel hangs with XFS

2011-03-31 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 08:25:05AM +0200, Thomas Prokosch wrote: > Since the big XFS refacturing, kernels tend to hang on one particular > machine. It is not a hardware problem, since the very same machine works > flawlessly with the very same configuration, by just using an older > (<=2.6.26) k

Re: [PATCH 1/2] panic(): print name of kernel module before loading it

2011-03-27 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, 02 Mar 2011, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote: > Loading a kernel can crash the system so it is useful that the user > sees which module might be causing trouble. ack on the statement. > Signed-off-by: Timo Juhani Lindfors > > diff --git a/scripts/functions b/scripts/functions > index 57969

Re: [PATCH 4/4] update-initramfs: Remove support for 'do_bootloader' and specific boot loaders

2011-03-27 Thread maximilian attems
On Fri, 04 Mar 2011, Ben Hutchings wrote: > elilo, lilo, and zipl all install post-update hooks for us, so we > don't need call them specifically. Unfortunately, flash-kernel does > not yet, so keep that for a little longer. > > Add 'breaks' relations to the versions of these packages that do no

Re: [PATCH 3/4] update-initramfs: Depend on kernel hook scripts rather than $ramdisk invocation

2011-03-27 Thread maximilian attems
On Fri, 04 Mar 2011, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Official Debian and Ubuntu kernel packages will invoke us directly as > part of the $ramdisk handling inherited from kernel-package. They > will later run our hook script, as will custom packages made with > 'make-kpkg' or the upstream 'make deb-pkg'. >

Re: [PATCH 2/4] kernel hooks: Enable error-exit (sh -e)

2011-03-27 Thread maximilian attems
On Fri, 04 Mar 2011, Ben Hutchings wrote: > We should not continue after a command unexpectedly fails. > > Change the $INITRD test so that failure is not treated as unexpected. > > Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings > --- > kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools |6 -- > kernel/postrm.d/initramfs

Re: [PATCH 1/4] kernel hooks: Treat missing version argument as an error

2011-03-27 Thread maximilian attems
On Fri, 04 Mar 2011, Ben Hutchings wrote: > The version argument is mandatory and we should complain if some package > doesn't pass it rather than quietly failing to do our job. > > However, making package removal fail is generally unhelpful, so > continue to return 0 from the postrm hook. > > S

Bug#619670: initramfs-tools: make robust against libraries only runtime-linkable due to /etc/ld.so.conf*

2011-03-27 Thread maximilian attems
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011, Colin Watson wrote: > > I looked at fixing this by copying in /etc/ld.so.conf* and running > ldconfig, but this turned out to be very difficult due to the way > mkinitramfs symlinks libraries during initramfs creation, and I ended up > giving this up as infeasible for the tim

Bug#617639: [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: After connecting a USB stick, the screen becomes black or blinking sometimes

2011-03-10 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 08:38:25AM +0100, Jonas Baggett wrote: > > Sometimes when I connect a USB stick, I got a black screen or a blinking > screen a little like with a TV when the reception is bad. > When the screen is blinking, I found that I was still able to switch to > virtual terminal and

Bug#617505: linux-image-2.6.37-2-amd64: Radeon R600 driver fails to control fan (i2c)

2011-03-09 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 02:29:47PM +0100, Denis Washington wrote: > Package: linux-2.6 > Version: 2.6.37-2 > Severity: important > Tags: upstream > > With the Free Software driver, the GPU fan of my AMD Radeon HD 4650 always > quickly spins up after a short time of moderate desktop usage and never

Bug#616334: already reported to kernel.org

2011-03-04 Thread maximilian attems
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 03:33:43PM +0100, Thomas Koch wrote: > found this bug reported already: > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29162 thanks marked as forwarded. > also discussed here > http://groups.google.com/group/linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/47b82ab31ae4a056/62b9059817e

Bug#616334: write to reiserfs blocks/freezes

2011-03-03 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 04:43:34PM +0100, Thomas Koch wrote: > Package: linux-2.6 > Version: 2.6.37-2 > Severity: important > Tags: sid > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Today was the second time my system freezed after updating to Kernel > 2.6.37-[12]. dmesg reports backt

Re: HP G6 hardware kernel boot issue > 2.6.37 cciss/hpsa

2011-03-03 Thread Maximilian Attems
On Wed, 02 Mar 2011, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > Hi Google and maintainers, > > I have a kernel booting problem with kernels above 2.6.37 on Debian > Squeeze, on HP G6 hardware, which have the harddisk controller: > > HP Smart Array P410i Controller / Smart Array G6 controllers > > This pr

Re: Chance for backporting these drivers for squeeze kernel?

2011-03-03 Thread maximilian attems
Please write to debian kernel mailinglist, this otherwise gets melted in an own personal mess of private mails.. On Wed, 02 Mar 2011, Don Rosa wrote: > Thanks for the great work in the debian kernel. > > I think that there are 2 drivers that can be backported to squeeze > kernel (2.6.32) without

Re: [kernel] r16958 - in dists/trunk/linux-2.6/debian: . bin config templates/temp.image.plain

2011-03-01 Thread maximilian attems
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 05:44:45AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > + > +# This has not yet been reviewed > +Template: linux-image-=V/postinst/ignoring-ramdisk > +Type: error > +_Description: Ramdisk configuration must be updated > + Kernel packages will no longer run a specific ramdisk creator. The

Bug#615850: [linux-headers-2.6.37-1-amd64] can not boot the system

2011-02-28 Thread maximilian attems
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 01:52:31PM +0100, Pere Nubiola i Radigales wrote: > Package: linux-headers-2.6.37-1-amd64 > Version: 2.6.37-1 > Severity: critical double wrong, source package is linux-2.6, severity important at best , also use reportbug and not reportbug-ng it properly adds info: reportb

Bug#615831: [PATCH] Load modules for USB keyboard if not keyboard is present at panic

2011-02-28 Thread maximilian attems
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 01:18:04PM +0200, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote: > USB modules are not normally loaded at break=top time but since USB > keyboards are very common we should take the effort to try to load > extra kernel modules at break (=panic) time. This patch closes #615831 > and has been ad

Bug#612633: initramfs-tools: mkinitramfs creates non working initramfs

2011-02-27 Thread maximilian attems
hello, added last week the branch maks/mkinitramfs_cp on top of the initial fix runndinig ldconfig on the initramfs root: http://git.debian.org/?p=kernel/initramfs-tools.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/maks/mkinitramfs_cp a snapshot based on this patch is available: http://charm.itp.tuwien.ac.at/~mat

Bug#613170: linux-image-2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64: OpenVZ-specific NFS implementation error

2011-02-23 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 08:22:35PM +, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > >>> Ola Lundqvist wrote: > >>> Do you know if those patches will appear in the openvz git soon? > > Hi, > > I just noticed two commits relating to this issue (OpenVZ bug #1626) > made it into 2.6.32-openvz git: > > http://git

Bug#614796: linux-image-2.6-686: Display goes into standby but does not not come back

2011-02-23 Thread maximilian attems
{ Please *keep* bug report on Cc, this is not a private mail } On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 06:54:58PM +0100, Jan Christoph Uhde wrote: > On 2011-02-23 17:00, maximilian attems wrote: >>> >> can you check if it is fixed in 2.6.38-rc6, which you'll find >>

Bug#614796: linux-image-2.6-686: Display goes into standby but does not not come back

2011-02-23 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 02:47:18PM +0100, Jan Christoph Uhde wrote: > Package: linux-image-2.6-686 > Version: 2.6.37+30 > Severity: important > Tags: upstream > > Bug is against linux-image-2.6.37-1-686 > I couldn't report against it using reportbug (lazy git) > > Hardware: > 00:02.0 VGA compatib

Bug#614810: linux-image-2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64: CPU limits missing

2011-02-23 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 04:35:09PM +0100, Peter Rohrer wrote: > > Since openvz Kernel 042test006.1, CPU limits are back in the > openvz kernel. The currend debian kernel can limit the cpu usage > of a virtual machine only relative to other virtual machines, > there is no absolute limiting possibl

Bug#611946: Freezes apparently caused by ath9k

2011-02-22 Thread maximilian attems
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:25:51PM +, Tony Houghton wrote: > On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 15:50:25 -0600 > Jonathan Nieder wrote: > > > What is very helpful if you have time is > > > > 1) describe the symptoms on the linux-wireless mailing list > > 2) grab the kernel source: > > > > git clone

Bug#613922: linux: Radeon DRM doesn't initialise properly (firmware fails to load?)

2011-02-18 Thread maximilian attems
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 09:23:22PM +1100, Owen Riddy wrote: > Package: linux-2.6 > Version: 2.6.37-1 > Severity: important > File: linux > > > I have a Radeon 3450 grampics card (AMD/ATI) and lived on Squeeze until the > recent release. The card was well supported by the new Open Source graphics

Bug#613501: Workaround available in openvz git

2011-02-18 Thread maximilian attems
security issue. > > Data corruption is not a nice thing I would say... > > // Ola why do you toppost, it is missing all relevant info!? > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 07:18:11PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: > > On Thu, 17 Feb 2011, Vladimir Kuklin wrote: > > > >

Bug#613501: Workaround available in openvz git

2011-02-17 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, 17 Feb 2011, Vladimir Kuklin wrote: > > git commit is here: > > http://git.openvz.org/?p=linux-2.6.32-openvz;a=commit;h=3e89668abca56e6e11e1bbb9cbac1008d3c2357b > > Please, don't forward it again to openvz devs. Just include it into > patchset for 2.6.32-5-openvz kernel update. it is i

Bug#612633: initramfs-tools: mkinitramfs creates non working initramfs

2011-02-16 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:19:10PM +0100, Benedikt Spranger wrote: > libsplashycnf.so.1 (libc6) => /lib/libsplashycnf.so.1 > libsplashy.so.1 (libc6) => /lib/libsplashy.so.1 unrelated to that bug, I'd recommed plymouth. ps untagged moreinfo. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-k

Bug#612633: initramfs-tools: mkinitramfs creates non working initramfs

2011-02-16 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:19:10PM +0100, Benedikt Spranger wrote: > Am Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:58:18 +0100 > schrieb maximilian attems : > > > E) run ldconfig three times: > >(first invocation should tell that no cache around, second should > > built it

Bug#612633: initramfs-tools: mkinitramfs creates non working initramfs

2011-02-16 Thread maximilian attems
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011, Benedikt Spranger wrote: > Am Thu, 10 Feb 2011 21:39:51 + > schrieb maximilian attems : > > > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 07:33:17PM +0100, Benedikt Spranger wrote: > > > Am Thu, 10 Feb 2011 17:48:36 + > > > schrieb maximilian attem

Bug#607041: Bug#590321: vzctl: ip6tables does not work in VE

2011-02-15 Thread maximilian attems
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:02:10PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > > Sorry for the delayed response. (I have been on a business trip). > > Very good to know. Unfortunatly this build did not reach the > stable release. sure the updated git only came out shortly before release. > Maks, do you know

Bug#613170: linux-image-2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64: OpenVZ-specific NFS implementation error

2011-02-13 Thread maximilian attems
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 03:41:40PM +0300, Stanislav Klinkov wrote: > > See OpenVZ bugzilla for details: > http://bugzilla.openvz.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1626 > > Patch #1: > http://1626.bugzilla.openvz.org/attachment.cgi?id=1376 > > Patch #2: > http://1626.bugzilla.openvz.org/attachment.cgi?id=1377

Bug#613170: Processed: forcibly merging 607041 613170

2011-02-13 Thread maximilian attems
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 03:18:10PM +, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > On 13/02/11 13:03, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > >> forcemerge 607041 613170 > > Bug#607041: linux-image-2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64: amd64 ip6tables broken in > > OpenVZ VE > > Bug#613170: linux-image-2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64: Ope

Bug#612911: linux-image-2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64: Deprecated CIFS module

2011-02-11 Thread maximilian attems
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 09:30:12PM +0300, Станислав wrote: > > reassigning for you, the userspace is maybe at fault, the linux image > > is setting the rules. please provide command output for what doesn't work > > with squeeze cifs-utils? (and eventual strace) > > No! The userspace works fine! Th

Bug#612911: linux-image-2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64: Deprecated CIFS module

2011-02-11 Thread maximilian attems
reassign cifs-utils retitle cifs-utils maybe broken on 2.6.32-30 stop On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 04:44:56PM +0300, Stanislav Klinkov wrote: > Package: linux-2.6 > Version: 2.6.32-30 > Severity: important > > The package "linux-image-2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64" is shipped with a deprecated > version > of

Re: Bug#605090: Updated patch

2011-02-10 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:56:45PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > Bastian Blank schrieb: > >> > > As I already pointed out on the first mail, Brad Sprengler has already > >> > > said he wasn't interested in upstreaming stuff. > >> > What Brad wants or don't want is irrelevant here. While the pa

Bug#612633: initramfs-tools: mkinitramfs creates non working initramfs

2011-02-10 Thread maximilian attems
tags 612633 moreinfo stop On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 07:33:17PM +0100, Benedikt Spranger wrote: > Am Thu, 10 Feb 2011 17:48:36 + > schrieb maximilian attems : > > > what does on that box 'ldconfig -p' show? > > I can send the over 1600 lines, but i think it is v

Re: [Debian] Re: [klin...@yandex.ru: Re: 2.6.32-5-openvz: Broken CIFS]

2011-02-10 Thread maximilian attems
[ stripping cc's to ml + involved ] On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 08:16:49PM +0300, Станислав wrote: > 10.02.2011, 19:12, "maximilian attems" : > > have you tested vanilla 2.6.32 from debian, does that work for you? > Sorry, but vanilla kernel does not support OpenVZ features

Bug#612633: initramfs-tools: mkinitramfs creates non working initramfs

2011-02-10 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 05:18:46PM +0100, Benedikt Spranger wrote: > Am Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:52:27 + > schrieb maximilian attems : > > > > Sadly the generated initramfs has the same problem. > > > > which would be what, can we have the error message please

Re: [Debian] Re: [klin...@yandex.ru: Re: 2.6.32-5-openvz: Broken CIFS]

2011-02-10 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 06:28:36PM +0300, Pavel Emelyanov wrote: > On 02/10/2011 06:02 PM, maximilian attems wrote: > > Kir, Pavel > > > > Any word from you concerning missing nfs fixes that are in pointed patch > > but not in the openvz git? > &g

Bug#612633: initramfs-tools: mkinitramfs creates non working initramfs

2011-02-10 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 03:14:25PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 02:30:54PM +0100, Benedikt Spranger wrote: > [...] > > +# make sure that library links are correct and up to date > > +mkdir -p "$DESTDIR"/etc > > +cp -ar /etc/ld.so.conf* "$DESTDIR"/etc > > +ldconfig -r "$DEST

Re: 2.6.32-5-openvz: Broken CIFS

2011-02-10 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 04:55:53PM +0300, Stanislav Klinkov wrote: > 10.02.2011 16:41, maximilian attems wrote: > My assessment concerns only some of kernel features (specifically NFS > implementation in VEs), not the whole kernel itself. But these features > are very important, and di

[klin...@yandex.ru: Re: 2.6.32-5-openvz: Broken CIFS]

2011-02-10 Thread maximilian attems
Kir, Pavel Any word from you concerning missing nfs fixes that are in pointed patch but not in the openvz git? thank you -- maks - Forwarded message from Stanislav Klinkov - Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 16:55:53 +0300 From: Stanislav Klinkov To: maximilian attems CC: Debian Kernel Team

Re: 2.6.32-5-openvz: Broken CIFS

2011-02-10 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:13:09AM +0300, Stanislav Klinkov wrote: > 09.02.2011 18:04, maximilian attems wrote: > > Please test latest images of the openvz patch: > > http://charm.itp.tuwien.ac.at/~mattems/linux-image-2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64_2.6.32-31_amd64.deb > > > &g

Bug#612633: initramfs-tools: mkinitramfs creates non working initramfs

2011-02-10 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 02:30:54PM +0100, Benedikt Spranger wrote: > Am Thu, 10 Feb 2011 11:06:35 + > schrieb maximilian attems : > > > diff --git a/mkinitramfs b/mkinitramfs > > Two minor nits: > 1) $DESTDIR should be set before using it. > 2) "$DESTDIR"

Bug#612633: initramfs-tools: mkinitramfs creates non working initramfs

2011-02-10 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:48:57AM +0100, Benedikt Spranger wrote: > > Just to clarify. The libgcc_s.so.1 is working. The Bug-Report is about > the library search path. mkinitramfs copies libgcc_s.so.1 > from /usr/local/lib to /usr/local/lib in the generated initramfs, which > is not in the librar

Bug#612633: initramfs-tools: mkinitramfs creates non working initramfs

2011-02-09 Thread maximilian attems
[ Again don't drop Cc on bug report ] On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:02:49AM +0100, Benedikt Spranger wrote: > Am Wed, 9 Feb 2011 21:39:00 + > schrieb maximilian attems : > > > You'd better check what you have localy compiled in /usr/local/lib > > and see that

Bug#612633: initramfs-tools: mkinitramfs creates non working initramfs

2011-02-09 Thread maximilian attems
[ Keep the bugreport on Cc, this is *not* a private communication and maybe easily lost there, thank you. ] On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 11:41:58PM +0100, Benedikt Spranger wrote: > # md5sum /sbin/lvm > a61f4ebc4f34d2f973925bd5e06bc269 /sbin/lvm > # ldd /sbin/lvm > linux-gate.so.1 => (0xb7

Bug#612633: initramfs-tools: mkinitramfs creates non working initramfs

2011-02-09 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 05:29:07PM +0100, Benedikt Spranger wrote: > Package: initramfs-tools > > Version: 0.98.8 > > Severity: grave

Bug#605090: Updated patch

2011-02-09 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On jeu., 2011-01-27 at 00:29 +0100, maximilian attems wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Jan 2011, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > > > > > > > Kernel team, what do you think? Could the patches be merged against > > > tru

Re: 2.6.32-5-openvz: Broken CIFS

2011-02-09 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 04:47:18PM +0300, Stanislav Klinkov wrote: > Hello, Debian Kernel Team. > > I have found a minor inconsistency in the package > "linux-image-2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64", "Squeeze" repository. > The module "cifs.ko" included in mentioned kernel is incompatible with > the "mount.c

Bug#612300: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: USB devices can't wakeup the system

2011-02-07 Thread maximilian attems
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 05:48:25PM +0100, Adam Sloboda wrote: > > The regression was introduced in 2.6.32-29 Right changelog has it: * USB: Retain device power/wakeup setting across reconfiguration; don't enable remote wakeup by default (Closes: #605246) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de

Bug#612300: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: USB devices can't wakeup the system

2011-02-07 Thread maximilian attems
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 05:24:43PM +0100, Adam Sloboda wrote: > At Mon, 7 Feb 2011 16:06:14 +, > maximilian attems wrote: > > > > > > There is no other version in the apt repository, I have nothing to > > > test. I was very lucky to find this package on my

Bug#612300: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: USB devices can't wakeup the system

2011-02-07 Thread maximilian attems
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 04:14:18PM +0100, Adam Sloboda wrote: > At Mon, 7 Feb 2011 14:58:14 +, > maximilian attems wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 03:24:06PM +0100, Adam Sloboda wrote: > > > Package: linux-2.6 > > > Version: 2.6.32-30 > >

Bug#612300: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: USB devices can't wakeup the system

2011-02-07 Thread maximilian attems
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 03:24:06PM +0100, Adam Sloboda wrote: > Package: linux-2.6 > Version: 2.6.32-30 > Severity: important > Tags: upstream > > > After upgrade to squeeze I can't wake up the PC anymore with USB > dongle (remote control) and probably the same thing applies to UPS > backup. It'

Bug#611555: initramfs-tools: Modules needed for btrfs not included in initramfs

2011-01-30 Thread maximilian attems
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 06:22:31PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > Package: initramfs-tools > Version: 0.98.8 > Severity: important > > The btrfs module depends on libcrc32c which requires a crc32c > provider like crc32c, but does not specify it in depends; and > the module is thus not include

Bug#611301: linux-image-2.6.37-trunk-amd64: uswsusp does not work on linux 2.6.37

2011-01-28 Thread maximilian attems
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 05:31:33PM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote: > On 28 January 2011 00:23, maximilian attems wrote: > >> > >> > > does echo mem work?? > > echo disk works (at least powers off) but does not resume. well with that many external modules, yo

Bug#611382: linux-2.6: Provide all packaging instructions in linux-source package

2011-01-28 Thread maximilian attems
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 09:22:54PM +0100, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > Dnia piątek, 28 stycznia 2011 o 18:55:33 Bastian Blank napisał(a): > > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 05:03:12PM +, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > > > This bug report is about first change - adding debian/ directory to > > > linux-sou

Bug#611375: unblock: initramfs-tools/0.98.8

2011-01-28 Thread maximilian attems
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package initramfs-tools It contains 3 important fixes: * ubifs /proc/mount parsing fallback for MODULES=dep * Really detect that /tmp is noexec and thus don't try to precac

Bug#611301: linux-image-2.6.37-trunk-amd64: uswsusp does not work on linux 2.6.37

2011-01-27 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 09:45:18PM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote: > > > On both the Debian experimental package and my package built from > vanilla source uswsusp fails. It would attempt a suspend but never get > to the part when pages are saved to disk. The screens go into suspend > mode and the

Bug#607041: Bug#590321: vzctl: ip6tables does not work in VE

2011-01-27 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 09:10:24PM +, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > > I notice these bugs didn't actually get merged. From the BTS > documentation it seems you must first resassign 590321 to > linux-image-2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64 before you can merge or forcemerge them. reassigned both to linux-2

Bug#605090: Updated patch

2011-01-26 Thread maximilian attems
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > Kernel team, what do you think? Could the patches be merged against > trunk? Config might still need some reviewing but that can be done once > people start testing the packages. What follows is my personal view, in short what I miss most is an a

Bug#611126: Failure on boot during initrd script execution

2011-01-26 Thread maximilian attems
reassign 611126 linux-2.6 stop # linux-2.6 boot panic On Tue, 25 Jan 2011, Pascal BERNARD wrote: > Package: initramfs-tools > Version: 0.98.7 > > I have some kernel panic upon boot, or the init script stops and asks > for root > login. All my partitions are on lvm/md, including / where boot/kern

Bug#506540: /usr/sbin/update-initramfs: update-initramfs miss symlink Possible missing firmware tigon

2011-01-26 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 04:23:24PM +0100, ~ tekmans ~ wrote: > > > > I was installing mdadm, sample output below > > update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-5-686 > W: Possible missing firmware /lib/firmware/tigon/tg3_tso.bin for module tg3 > W: Possible missing firmware /lib/firmwar

Bug#506540: /usr/sbin/update-initramfs: update-initramfs miss symlink Possible missing firmware tigon

2011-01-26 Thread maximilian attems
tags 506540 moreinfo stop On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 02:25:12PM +0100, tekmans wrote: > Package: initramfs-tools > Severity: normal > File: /usr/sbin/update-initramfs > > miss symlink to the original tigon firmware installed during the debian > installation added by usb stick > resolve trouble by a

Bug#611046: misleading message in verbose mode (gzip not found, using gzip)

2011-01-25 Thread maximilian attems
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:02:09AM +0100, Gianluigi Tiesi wrote: > On 25/01/2011 10:26, maximilian attems wrote: >> this is wrong path, please use git as described in >> http://git.debian.org/?p=kernel/initramfs-tools.git;a=blob_plain;f=docs/maintainer-notes.html;hb=HEAD >>

Bug#611046: misleading message in verbose mode (gzip not found, using gzip)

2011-01-25 Thread maximilian attems
tags 611046 pending stop On Tue, 25 Jan 2011, Gianluigi Tiesi wrote: > due to a script assignment misplacement mkinitramfs displays a misleading > message: > > No gzip in /usr/bin:/sbin:/bin, using gzip > > instead of > > No lzma in /usr/bin:/sbin:/bin, using gzip lol indeed. > this makes

Bug#610462: update-initramfs: failed for /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-5-686 (errorcode 127)

2011-01-18 Thread maximilian attems
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 09:22:20PM +0100, steff wrote: > Sorry. > > ~ $ update-initramfs -u > update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-5-686 > update-initramfs: failed for /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-5-686 > hmmm not seen that in a long time. please post output of: mkinitramfs -o /tmp

Bug#610462: update-initramfs: failed for /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-5-686 (errorcode 127)

2011-01-18 Thread maximilian attems
tags 610462 moreinfo stop On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 09:11:43PM +0100, steff wrote: > > The error I'm encountering looks like bug 600453, although I > have a "normal" root and boot partition, and that was closed for > version 0.98.5. I include the relevant > sections of $(mount) and /etc/fstab below

Bug#609964: use blkid to correctly set UUID for RESUME

2011-01-14 Thread maximilian attems
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 02:59:57PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > > > the cost of a command call is very small as it is a shell builtin. > > Well, command will not check for the existence of blkid, but execute blkid, so > in effect it is executed *twice*. > Maybe you want something like "type blki

Bug#609964: use blkid to correctly set UUID for RESUME

2011-01-14 Thread maximilian attems
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 02:47:54PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > On 14.01.2011 14:39, maximilian attems wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 02:21:39PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > > > thanks please take a look at git initramfs-tools, it is in one of > > those maks branches

Bug#609964: use blkid to correctly set UUID for RESUME

2011-01-14 Thread maximilian attems
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 02:21:39PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > Package: initramfs-tools > Version: 0.98.7 > Severity: important > Tags: patch > > Hi, > > while looking at initramfs-tools.preinst code, I noticed that it still > uses vol_id, which is no longer shipped in squeeze. > As a result, U

Re: Bug#609860: pm-utils: pm-hibernate not able to wake-up

2011-01-14 Thread maximilian attems
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011, Michael Biebl wrote: > On 14.01.2011 07:10, Wenceslao González-Viñas wrote: > > Dear Michael, > > > > It works!!! So, the bug should be changed to something that > > initramfs-tools do not detect automatically the resume point ? > > My guess is, that at some point your

Re: [PATCH] kbuild: create linux-headers package in deb-pkg

2011-01-13 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 02:55:26PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote: > On 10.1.2011 18:46, maximilian attems wrote: > >>> +find . -name Makefile -o -name Kconfig\* -o -name \*.pl > /tmp/files$$ > >>> +find arch/x86/include include scripts -type f >> /tmp/files$$ > &

Re: GDM is not starting

2011-01-10 Thread maximilian attems
Politness asks to keep Mailinglist postings on Mailinglist, thank you, also top posting is considered to be rude. On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 02:19:59PM +0530, janani s wrote: > Ya i installed 2.6.37 linux image from > http://packages.debian.org/experimental/kernel/.. It was working properly > not ab

Re: GDM is not starting

2011-01-10 Thread maximilian attems
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 12:29:21PM +0530, janani s wrote: > > I am facing some problems while booting up newly compiled > kernel(2.6.37).. I took the source for 2.6.37 kernel(.tar.gz) from > kernel.org website.. I have took the config file of already existing stable > 2.6.32 kernel and creat

Re: trunk kernel?

2011-01-07 Thread maximilian attems
hello, On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 10:57:53AM +0330, Nima Azarbayjany wrote: > > Can someone explain to me what is a trunk kernel? Are they safe to > install? I would like to have the newly added 2.6.37 kernel in > experimental in my Squeeze box. Is that a wise thing to do? Are there > any r

Bug#608865: initramfs-tools: requested additional information

2011-01-05 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 02:44:47PM +0100, martin.ger...@dser.de wrote: > /dev/mapper/buildServer--1-tmp on /tmp type ext3 (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev) wondering why this snippet does not trigger: DESTDIR="$(mktemp -d ${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/mkinitramfs_XX)" || exit 1 chmod 755 "${DESTDIR}" # do not execut

Bug#608865: initramfs-tools: postinst fails if /tmp is mounted noexec

2011-01-04 Thread maximilian attems
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 08:30:27AM +0100, Martin Gerdes wrote: > > > Installing initramfs-tools version 0.98.7 on squeeze (=debian testing) I get > the following error messages: > > /usr/sbin/mkinitramfs: 296: > /tmp/mkinitramfs_6qmV4K/scripts/init-top/all_generic_ide: Permission denied > /usr

Bug#608339: initramfs-tools: MODULES=dep fails when / is ubifs (reopen)

2010-12-31 Thread maximilian attems
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 01:28:41PM +, Alexander Clouter wrote: > Don't trust it enough for the 'mount |' try too? ;) > > Works for me, many thanks. well, trying a minimal change targetting squeeze. cool pushed out as maks/dep_fallback branch, waiting review will land in master and squeeze.

Re: How to compile experimental kernels?

2010-12-31 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 04:26:33PM -0800, Willy Gommel wrote: > I have run into a problem. > > It seems that the newest (experimental) kernels will not respond to "Make" in > the usual way, Invariably, I am told that "ngcc is not found", How it comes > up > with "ngcc" is indeed part of my prob

Bug#608339: initramfs-tools: MODULES=dep fails when / is ubifs (reopen)

2010-12-30 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 12:29:16AM +, Alexander Clouter wrote: > Package: initramfs-tools > Severity: normal > > Similar to #582858, however for me it still does not work. hehe, I see. > When I set MODULES=dep, root cannot be found as the root mountpoint > device does not start with '^/dev/

Bug#608229: linux-image-2.6-openvz-amd64: ip6tables state match support

2010-12-28 Thread maximilian attems
forcemerge 580507 608229 stop On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 11:43:41PM +0100, David Mlady wrote: > Package: linux-image-2.6-openvz-amd64 > Version: 2.6.32+28 > Severity: normal > Tags: ipv6 > > Hello, > I have problem with ip6table and state match support. I'm using Squeeze and > this issue is only wi

Bug#607772: bnx2: Can't load firmware file from initrd on bootup

2010-12-21 Thread maximilian attems
reassign 607772 udev done 607772 153-1 stop On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 12:36:48PM +1300, Ben Hall wrote: > Package: firmware-bnx2 > Version: 0.27 > Severity: normal > > > The bnx2 firmware is not loaded from initrd on bootup. well the story is more complicated, actually bnx2 is loaded *before* a f

Bug#607631: unblock: initramfs-tools/0.98.7

2010-12-20 Thread maximilian attems
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package initramfs-tools It contains 2 fixes for specific MODULES=dep root initramfs generation: * AOE device root=/dev/etherd/e0.1p1 * partitioned md raid root=/dev/md1p3 Wh

Re: Please decide how kernel ABI should be managed

2010-12-19 Thread maximilian attems
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 08:19:22PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 07:30:58PM +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote: > > I am hereby asking the tech-ctte to decide how the kernel ABI should > > be managed. > > Hi Julien, from the bug log it's pretty clear that there was no > possib

Bug#607565: initramfs-tools: initramfs fails to assemble Intel RAID array

2010-12-19 Thread maximilian attems
reassign 607565 mdadm stop On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 08:47:28PM +0100, Rainmaker wrote: > Package: initramfs-tools > Version: 0.98.6 > Severity: grave > Tags: patch > Justification: renders package unusable No, not booting on a specific setup is bad, but doesn't render it unusable for the big X nr

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >