Bug#577981: i have the same problem

2010-05-19 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 04:09:27PM +0100, Pedro R wrote: > > Hi, > > I just noticed this exact same problem with today's update of initramfs-tools. > > My USB audio card now loads before the internal, contrary to my > /etc/modprobe.d/ settings. your modprobe config needs to end with .conf, upst

Bug#582177: initramfs-tools: fails to load ramdisk on boot; DEBUG DATA ATTACHED

2010-05-18 Thread maximilian attems
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 08:39:02PM -0400, crop...@acm.org wrote: > Data as requested. > this looks good, please send me privately borked initramfs and working initramfs, so that I can compare. thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsub

Bug#582177: initramfs-tools: fails to load ramdisk on boot; system with RAID & CRYPTO; udev problems?

2010-05-18 Thread maximilian attems
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 05:29:17PM -0400, C. Cropper wrote: > Package: initramfs-tools > Version: 0.94.4 > Severity: important > Tags: squeeze > > Very recent changes to the initramfs-tools have caused my system to fail to > "load ramdisk" at boot. I have to boot the system with the backup initrd

Bug#580660: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: LVM volumes fail to detect on newer kernels

2010-05-18 Thread maximilian attems
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 09:41:03PM +0200, Frederik Vanrenterghem wrote: > Same problem on my system. > > +++-===-===-== > ii cryptset

uploading 2.6.34

2010-05-18 Thread maximilian attems
upload planed by tomorrow 12 UT. remaining issues, please speakup: * one last run through open config variables (will do later today) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: htt

Bug#581377: initramfs-tools: Multipath does not load correctly at boot time

2010-05-17 Thread maximilian attems
reassign 581377 initramfs-tools forcemerge 337176 581377 stop On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 06:24:12PM -0400, Steve Langasek wrote: > > an error like this: > > ... /lib64/multipath/libcheckdirectio.so cannot open shared object file > > Sorry, i didn't get the full message. > > It semms that multipath is

Bug#578007: initramfs-tools: no lvm in initramfs with 0.94.4

2010-05-17 Thread maximilian attems
tags 578007 moreinfo stop is your /tmp noexec mounted? this bug report currently has zero information on what went wrong, please respond on the followup request to send the output of sh -x mkinitramfs -v -o /tmp/foo for initramfs-tools 0.94.4 thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ker

Bug#582002: [SOLVED] Bug#582002: Modules not loading in the proper order (initramfs-tools: s390 architecture)

2010-05-17 Thread maximilian attems
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 02:17:54PM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote: > On Mon, 17 May 2010 13:33:05 -0400 (EDT), Maximilian Attems wrote: > > > > you can use modprobe config here again see man modprobe.conf and > > the softdep line. > > That did the trick! I changed /etc/

Bug#582002: Modules not loading in the proper order (initramfs-tools: s390 architecture)

2010-05-17 Thread maximilian attems
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 12:33:15PM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote: > Oops! I accidentally sent the e-mail prematurely. Allow me to continue ... > > and (2) it specifies the device driver used for each disk as follows: > >Device Device >Name Driver >-- --

Bug#582002: Modules not loading in the proper order (initramfs-tools: s390 architecture)

2010-05-17 Thread maximilian attems
severity 582002 important stop On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 11:39:29AM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote: > > I run Debian testing (Squeeze) on the s390 architecture. I just performed > an "aptitude update" and "aptitude full-upgrade" sequence, and among the > updates was a new version of initramfs-tools:

Re: uploading 2.6.32-13

2010-05-15 Thread maximilian attems
On Sat, 15 May 2010, maximilian attems wrote: > we have merged latest stable and the hpa fix, > thus no point in delaying this anymore. > HPA fixes evolved upstream, so upload gets delayed until further call till monday 12 UT. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

uploading 2.6.32-13

2010-05-14 Thread maximilian attems
hello, we have merged latest stable and the hpa fix, thus no point in delaying this anymore. remaining issues: * release name (release naming should be handled this time by Ben) if you have any open issue please shout, will upload after 12 UT tomorrow on 15. May. thanks -- maks ps the on

Bug#580124: linux-image-2.6.32-4-amd64: kernel allocation failure in iwl_rx_allocate

2010-05-14 Thread maximilian attems
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 12:05:19AM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > On Friday 14 May 2010 23:00:51 maximilian attems wrote: > > On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 09:15:37PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > > > thanks, not yet boot test, need to finish something. > > >

Bug#581527: closed by maximilian attems (Re: Bug#581527: [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-686 hangs on boot)

2010-05-14 Thread maximilian attems
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 04:58:16PM +0200, Abou Al Montacir wrote: > > closing as user error not to accept the UUID change. newer > > template have > > Sorry, but I'm not sure I've understood this sentence, I did accept the > UUID change, but the grub boot line still have root=/dev/

Bug#580124: linux-image-2.6.32-4-amd64: kernel allocation failure in iwl_rx_allocate

2010-05-14 Thread maximilian attems
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 09:15:37PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > > > thanks, not yet boot test, need to finish something. > > Triggered again after 2 suspend cycles. grr, can you repost the first appearance of it. thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.or

Bug#580124: linux-image-2.6.32-4-amd64: kernel allocation failure in iwl_rx_allocate

2010-05-13 Thread maximilian attems
dropped the fedora iwlwifi patch queue, this time it's just current repo + 2 page Rx patches, checked that they applied: (+) OK bugfix/all/0001-iwlwifi-use-paged-Rx.patch (+) OK bugfix/all/0001-iwlwifi-fix-AMSDU-Rx-after-paged-Rx-patch.patch --> 13 fully applied. please test this linux-im

Bug#580124: linux-image-2.6.32-4-amd64: kernel allocation failure in iwl_rx_allocate

2010-05-12 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 03:37:00AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > I think you've done something wrong in building that kernel. This patch > removes padding of the RX buffers so that they are order-1 rather than > order-2 (or on the 3945, order-0 rather than order-1). I don't see any > way you c

Bug#581353: System badly crashes completely

2010-05-12 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 08:18:51PM +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: > There is nothing related. I reported a bug on 2.6.32-9 because it > happened there. I can't run a newer kernel, i.e. 2.6.32-12, 2.6.32-9 is old and thus unsupported, you are out of luck there. much happened since. with snapshot you

Bug#581353: System badly crashes completely

2010-05-12 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 05:32:49PM +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: > On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 04:50:10PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > > severity 581353 important > > tags 581353 moreinfo > > stop > > > > On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 11:55:42AM +0200, Jan Hauke Rah

Bug#581353: System badly crashes completely

2010-05-12 Thread maximilian attems
severity 581353 important tags 581353 moreinfo stop On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 11:55:42AM +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: > Package: linux-2.6 > Version: 2.6.32-9 > Severity: grave very outdated, please try to reproduce with uptodate 2.6.32-12. thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-req

Bug#580124: linux-image-2.6.32-4-amd64: kernel allocation failure in iwl_rx_allocate

2010-05-11 Thread maximilian attems
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 02:09:06PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > On Tuesday 11 May 2010 12:32:45 Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > Thanks Max. Am currently testing it. Will report results in a day or two. > > The bug got triggered in the very first run. Does not look fixed. dmesg > attached. yes

Bug#580124: linux-image-2.6.32-4-amd64: kernel allocation failure in iwl_rx_allocate

2010-05-10 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, 06 May 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote: > tag 580124 fixed-upstream > thanks > > This should be fixed by the following upstream changes included in Linux > 2.6.33: > > commit 2f301227a1ede57504694e1f64839839f5737cac > Author: Zhu Yi > Date: Fri Oct 9 17:19:45 2009 +0800 > > iwlwifi: us

Bug#580124: linux-image-2.6.32-4-amd64: kernel allocation failure in iwl_rx_allocate

2010-05-09 Thread maximilian attems
On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 10:16:55PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > All these messages (this one and the previous one with iwlwifi) get triggered > only when there is heavy I/O activity. > I don't think this bug is related to iwlwifi. What do you think ? it is, can trigger it easily on x61s,

Bug#580832: lsmod from linux-image-2.6.32-3-powerpc64

2010-05-09 Thread maximilian attems
On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 01:26:44PM +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > maximilian attems wrote: > > > they used to be hardcoded loaded by initramfs. > > > > thought that powerpc plattform code had catched up and > > that udev would just load them. > > >

Bug#580832: lsmod from linux-image-2.6.32-3-powerpc64

2010-05-08 Thread maximilian attems
On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 12:36:21PM +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > > > > > Lsmod output from good kernel below. Main difference is that kernel > > below doesn't have nouveau and does have the windfarm_* modules. > > > > Will try loading windfarm modules in new ke

Bug#580799: linux-image-2.6.32-5-sparc64: Should include pata_cmd64x driver instead of cmd64x

2010-05-08 Thread maximilian attems
On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 07:54:35PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > Package: linux-2.6 > Version: 2.6.32-12 > Severity: serious > > Because of the IDE -> ATA transition for Squeeze the pata_cmd64x driver should > be enabled instead of the (old) cmd64x driver. AFAIK the pata_cmd64x has been > tested and i

Re: Bug#561099: initramfs-tools: determination of "newest kernel" in update-initramfs -u uses improper sorting

2010-05-07 Thread maximilian attems
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 05:38:14PM -0400, Jeffrey B. Green wrote: > > > maximilian attems wrote: > > On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 11:50:39AM -0400, Jeffrey B. Green wrote: > [...snip...] > >> > >> In the end, I agree with Thiemo in that the manpage and the

Re: Bug#561099: initramfs-tools: determination of "newest kernel" in update-initramfs -u uses improper sorting

2010-05-07 Thread maximilian attems
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 11:50:39AM -0400, Jeffrey B. Green wrote: > Allow me this little statement since opening a new bug appears to be > fruitless. > > > > Let me try: "The program's behaviour differs from the description in > > > the manpage." Doesn't sound like a bug to you? > > > > > > Of c

Bug#580660: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: LVM volumes fail to detect on newer kernels

2010-05-07 Thread maximilian attems
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 03:44:04PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > Package: linux-2.6 > Version: 2.6.32-12 > Severity: important > > Since version 2.6.33-2-amd64 I have been unable to boot this system. > The system uses an encrypted filesystem but on boot the kernel fails to > locate the volume group c

Bug#580652: linux-libc-dev 2.6.32-12 breaks KVM and QEMU

2010-05-07 Thread maximilian attems
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 04:05:44PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Package: linux-libc-dev > Version: 2.6.32-12 > Severity: important > > linux-libc-dev version 2.6.32-12 has a backport of "KVM: x86: Add > KVM_GET/SET_VCPU_EVENTS", without the corresponding "KVM: x86: Extend > KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS w

Bug#559041: Problem is still there with linux-image-2.6.32-3-amd64

2010-05-06 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 03:38:05PM +0200, David wrote: > Problem is still there with linux-image-2.6.32-3-amd64 please try newer in unstable. thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

openvz patch updated to v2.6.32-avdeyev

2010-05-05 Thread maximilian attems
linux-2.6 2.6.32-12 contains aboves latest openvz patch. please hammer it out. 2.6.32-12 might reach testing, depending on assesment of http://bugs.debian.org/572618 thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact lis

Bug#580424: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686 breaks framebuffer and X

2010-05-05 Thread maximilian attems
tags 580424 moreinfo stop On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 11:48:23PM +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote: > Package: linux-2.6 > Version: 2.6.32-12 > Severity: normal > > Recent upgrade of kernel linux-image-2.6.32-5-686 broke framebuffer support > on VTs > and limits maximum resolution to 1024x768 while runnin

Re: [kernel] r15627 - in dists/sid/linux-2.6/debian: . config

2010-05-05 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 09:41:18PM +, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Author: jmm > Date: Wed May 5 21:41:16 2010 > New Revision: 15627 > > Log: > Enable tomoyo (Closes: #562486) nack, according to above nobody did the size check. what about abi check, not possibly done!? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

uploading 2.6.33

2010-05-04 Thread maximilian attems
will upload 2.6.33 to experimental tomorrow after 12 UT. phylib has a current trouble to compile, any other outstanding issues? plan is that to be the last 2.6.33 and then move on to 2.6.34 to provide testers with really the latest linux-2.6. thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel

Bug#579336: update-initramfs: recognize (and ignore?) moduleless/ramdiskless kernels.

2010-04-26 Thread maximilian attems
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 03:43:13PM +1000, trentb...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > lol indeed this was a funny minute when I put that in. > > the meaning is that you'd better really have everything built in. > > for eventual MODULES config settings we have now way to know. > > I was thinking you could

Bug#579332: linux-image-2.6.32-3-686: module sn9c102 over gspca_sonixb

2010-04-26 Thread maximilian attems
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:09:07PM -0500, bedorlan wrote: > Package: linux-2.6 > Version: 2.6.32-9 > Severity: normal > Tags: sid > > The webcam genius videocam messenger (ID 0c45:602e Microdia VideoCAM > Messenger) > works with the gspca_sonixb module, not with the sn9c102 module. The image > w

Bug#579336: update-initramfs: recognize (and ignore?) moduleless/ramdiskless kernels.

2010-04-26 Thread maximilian attems
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 02:47:38PM +1000, Trent W. Buck wrote: > Package: initramfs-tools > Version: 0.94.4 > Severity: wishlist > > Following the kernel handbook, I built a mainline kernel using "make > deb-pkg". ok, fine so far. >This kernel is configured without modules or initrd support. p

Bug#579262: /usr/sbin/mkinitramfs: 141: mktemp: not found

2010-04-26 Thread maximilian attems
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 03:45:40PM +0100, Tom Parker wrote: > On 26/04/10 15:32, maximilian attems wrote: > >coreutils is priority required, your box looks broken. > >please investigate how it came to missing mktemp. > >thanks > > There was an installed copy of coreutil

Bug#579262: /usr/sbin/mkinitramfs: 141: mktemp: not found

2010-04-26 Thread maximilian attems
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 03:32:28PM +0100, Tom Parker wrote: > Package: initramfs-tools > Version: 0.93.4 > Severity: normal > > mkinitramfs needs mktemp, but initramfs-tools doesn't have a dependency > on mktemp or coreutils >=7.4-1. mktemp is no longer a "Priority: > required" package. As a resul

Bug#578005: Please consider backporting KVM_GET/SET_CLOCK to 2.6.32

2010-04-24 Thread maximilian attems
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 11:48:12AM +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote: > Ben Hutchings wrote: > > This is definitely worthwhile but it does involve an ABI bump. So we > > will probably wait for a convenient time to do that. > I saw that you (well, maks) just bumped the ABI to -5. Ping? :) tried 3cfc30

Bug#568207: Bug still exists in latest versions

2010-04-22 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 07:34:48PM -0700, Chuan-kai Lin wrote: > This is a quick report: I just upgraded to xserver-xorg-video-intel > 2:2.11.0-1 and Linux kernel 2.6.34-rc5 on my ThinkPad X30 laptop (830MG > graphics adapter). X works fine if there is no external monitor > attached to the laptop

linux-2.6 ABI bump

2010-04-22 Thread maximilian attems
proposing to completly sync 2.6.32.12 and missing patch of .11 the changes are so big that it seems a waste of time to investigate also -4 is not updated against latest nor in testing. http://charm.itp.tuwien.ac.at/~mattems/linux-2.6_2.6.32-12_amd64.build the bonus would be to open a merge for stu

Bug#578670: Hibernation while using nouveau restores to video noise

2010-04-21 Thread maximilian attems
tags 578670 moreinfo stop On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 01:06:14PM -0400, Chris Howie wrote: > Package: linux-2.6 > > After restoring from hibernation (uswsusp) while using the nouveau > driver, the display is obscured by a pattern of blue noise that > persists across all X sessions and VTs. The displ

Re: [LCFC] templates://linux-2.6/{linux-base.templates,templates/temp.image.plain/templates}

2010-04-19 Thread maximilian attems
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 07:16:05AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote: > Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org): > > > From what you write, it seems that we then need to add something to > > say more firmly that users *really* should let this action be perfomed > > or be prepared to have serio

Bug#578007: initramfs-tools: no lvm in initramfs with 0.94.4

2010-04-15 Thread maximilian attems
> when building my initramfs with initramfs-tools 0.94.4, I end up > without scripts/local-top/lvm, hence an unbootable system. hmm not good, please send output of: sh -x mkinitramfs -v -o /tmp/foo thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "u

Bug#577534: Fw: Bug#577534 closed by maximilian attems (Re: Bug#577534: base: cdrom fails to mount)

2010-04-15 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010, Michael Haag wrote: > Thanks for the feedback. When I checked my kernel, turns out it was > 2.6.32-9, which surprised me. Not sure where that came from or when. In > any case, your suggestion to install 2.6.32-11 worked. CD/DVD detection > is now working. Thanks! it is curren

Bug#521515: alsa-source is affected by this as well?

2010-04-14 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 07:36:06PM +0200, Paolo Saggese wrote: > Hi, > > since kernel 2.6.29 it have become impossible to (re)build the ALSA drivers > from the "alsa-source" package via module-assistant or whatever (there are > specific open bug reports about that). > > Could it be that it depe

Bug#568207: KMS does not work on 82830 CGC

2010-04-13 Thread maximilian attems
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:51:09PM +0200, Jack.R wrote: > Finally get the time to make serious trial with 2.6.32-3-686. > > I get black screen at X server start up if I remove "i915.modeset=0" > from GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT="quiet i915.modeset=0" > in /etc/default/grub > > So I get back to tha

Bug#577534: Fw: Bug#577534 closed by maximilian attems (Re: Bug#577534: base: cdrom fails to mount)

2010-04-13 Thread maximilian attems
[ this is not private communication dropping mailinglist from CC may easily cause your mail to be ignored, disregarded or trashed ] On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 06:30:12AM -0700, Michael Haag wrote: > @maxmilian > > I assume you mean I am not using a "debian-compiled" kernel image, and > that is tru

Bug#577253: initramfs-tools: Keyboard is not active / detected anymore, so LVM boot passphrase entry is broken

2010-04-12 Thread maximilian attems
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010, Colin Darie wrote: > No I think it's great to use the *real* keymap, but this change could be > confusing because when users are entering the passphrase, they have the > habit to use a qwerty keymap, and as they have no way to see that the keymap > has changed, they might not

Re: [LCFC] templates://linux-2.6/{linux-base.templates,templates/temp.image.plain/templates}

2010-04-12 Thread maximilian attems
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 09:42:45PM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote: > - which will work with both old and new kernel versions. Your system > - configuration can be updated automatically in most cases. > + which will work with both old and new kernel versions. > + . > + The system configuration can

Bug#577561: linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-amd64: this kernel image dont boot. Crash as soos as launched.

2010-04-12 Thread maximilian attems
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 08:05:46PM +0200, jeanseb wrote: > Package: linux-2.6 > Version: 2.6.32-5 > Severity: important outdated install version 2.6.32-11 from unstable linux-image-2.6.32-4-amd64 > -- System Information: > Distributor ID: Ubuntu > Description: Ubuntu 9.10 > Release: 9

Bug#577559: linux-image-2.6.32-3-amd64: Intel 5100 wireless doesn't work on Thinkpad SL500 anymore.

2010-04-12 Thread maximilian attems
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 01:44:51PM -0400, Len Sorensen wrote: > Package: linux-image-2.6.32-3-amd64 > Version: 2.6.32-9 > Severity: important > Tags: squeeze outdated (newer in sid). > The intel 5100 wireless on my thinkpad SL500 no longer works properly. > It works perfectly with 2.6.31, and it

Bug#568367: please reopen this issue

2010-04-12 Thread maximilian attems
reopen 568367 stop On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 08:06:24PM +0200, Alexander Heinz wrote: > This bug report has been closed although it has not been resolved. The > suggested solution (to install usb_modeswitch) does not fix the problem. > > Do you need more information to debug this? What can I do to

Bug#562847: closed by maximilian attems (Bug#519800: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.94)

2010-04-12 Thread maximilian attems
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 01:42:46PM +0400, Vladimir Stavrinov wrote: > On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 03:42:57PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > > OK. I see, but there are nothing what I don't already know at least > related to this discussing. That is simple algorithm: > >

Bug#577253: initramfs-tools: Keyboard is not active / detected anymore, so LVM boot passphrase entry is broken

2010-04-12 Thread maximilian attems
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 12:40:02PM +0200, Colin Darie wrote: > > Furthermore, before my keymap is this prompt was for a qwerty > keyboard, and now this is the right keymap for my keyboard (a french > one). It's great, but I think it might be useful to notify users for > this change for the local k

Re: linux-headers-2.6.33-2-amd64 (2.6.33-1~experimental.3) uninstallable

2010-04-11 Thread maximilian attems
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > The kernel team has made their level of commitment > clear, as is proper. Indeed, I don't expect the kernel team to support > either non-debian sources, nor _any_ third party modules, really. > Which is why I directed the user to make-kpkg, w

Re: linux-headers-2.6.33-2-amd64 (2.6.33-1~experimental.3) uninstallable

2010-04-11 Thread maximilian attems
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 10:13:15AM -0700, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > Seriously, I use nvidia non-free drivers as well. I can affirm > that I can pull from stable, or Linus' tree, and build kernel images > and nvidia modules. My usual sequence of action is to > yes indeed you lost *all

Re: linux-headers-2.6.33-2-amd64 (2.6.33-1~experimental.3) uninstallable

2010-04-11 Thread maximilian attems
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 12:33:42PM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote: > > A rather late reply to a mail I found in the archives... but regarding > the usage claim, I would like to mention that people who use e.g. the > nvidia binary driver do not have much fun with the experimental kernel > images wi

Bug#577253: initramfs-tools: Keyboard is not active / detected anymore, so LVM boot passphrase entry is broken

2010-04-10 Thread maximilian attems
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010, Colin Darie wrote: > Package: initramfs-tools > Version: 0.94.4 > Severity: normal > Tags: sid > > The generated initrd image after an upgrade to initramfs-tools 0.94.4 (from > 0.93.x) renders my keyboard inactive in the LVM passphrase prompt (nothing > happens when I enter m

Re: Bug #542629: RM: yaird -- ROKM; old, buggy and unmaintained

2010-04-10 Thread maximilian attems
[ adding relevant cc's and dropping others ] thanks torsten for the note. On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 09:43:16PM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote: > > just a note: dracut has been mentioned in this bug report. I've just > accepted its first upload. saw it in NEW, it would have been nice if debian-kernel

Bug#577215: linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-686: X failed to start with error "no screen found"

2010-04-10 Thread maximilian attems
tags 577215 moreinfo stop On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 10:28:53PM +0800, sevenever wrote: > Package: linux-2.6 > Version: 2.6.32-5 > Severity: normal > > linux-image-2.6.31-686 works fine. > If reboot to 2.6.32 X failed to start with error "no screen found" this is a very old 2.6.32 version try newer

Bug#566295: initramfs-tools: Deviation from Documentation/filesystems/nfs/nfsroot.txt WRT multiple net devs

2010-04-10 Thread maximilian attems
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 12:13:52AM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 07:08:47AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > > On Fri, 09 Apr 2010, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > > > i finally got around to testing the proposed patch (after > > > adjusting

Bug#566295: initramfs-tools: Deviation from Documentation/filesystems/nfs/nfsroot.txt WRT multiple net devs

2010-04-09 Thread maximilian attems
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 06:22:47PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: > > could you please review belows patch. > > if you see no objection, I'd just merge it. > > i finally got around to testing the proposed patch (afte

Bug#577149: configure_networking: pxelinux BOOTIF fixes

2010-04-09 Thread maximilian attems
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > > with these patchese applied, it seems to work. at least for the moment. thank you, applied and pushed out! :) also documented in initramfs-tools.8 happy hacking -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org wi

Bug#574598: Bug still in version 2.6.32-11

2010-04-09 Thread maximilian attems
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010, Achim Schaefer wrote: > No I use nouveau since a long time. > I assume you mixed another bug report up with mine. sorry, indeed. > > costumers.:) > You wrote bugzilla.kernel.org not openvz.org-) > > let us know bug nr so that we can track it. > Someone " solved" this bug be

Re: putting it in linux-base

2010-04-09 Thread maximilian attems
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 03:55:38PM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > > On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 14:51 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > Not at present. linux-base currently only deals with a configuration > > change in the official kernel packages, which has no bearing on custom > > configurati

Bug#574598: openvz kernel doesn't work and spams into dmesg: NULL exec env (timr->it_process->ve_task_info.owner_env)

2010-04-09 Thread maximilian attems
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote: > > I installed linux-image-2.6.32-4-openvz-amd64 (version 2.6.32-11) and > found that it has the same problem. It worked more than one round the > clock but then it became spams. Now I wrote this mail from this > kernel and can do any experiments if

Bug#562847: closed by maximilian attems (Bug#519800: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.94)

2010-04-09 Thread maximilian attems
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010, Vladimir Stavrinov wrote: > On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 06:49:17PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > > > indeed those two are not related, beside beeing closed by the same > > upload. > > There is long list of bug numbers in that message, but thi

Bug#545728: still not fixed?

2010-04-08 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 11:50:36PM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 17:50 +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > > you do not *need*, only if you want to use one of it's function. > > that is pretty straight forward shell scripting. > > that is n

Bug#576925: [linux-base] postinst fails on undefined subroutine

2010-04-08 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 10:44:23AM +0200, Rainer Schwarzbach wrote: > Package: linux-base > Version: 2.6.32-11 > Severity: normal > > --- Please enter the report below this line. --- > Installing linux-base (and linux-image-2.6.32-4-686) fails because of > the following error: > > # apt-get -u i

Bug#574598: Bug still in version 2.6.32-11

2010-04-08 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 09:06:01PM +0200, Achim Schaefer wrote: > Hi, > Am Donnerstag, 8. April 2010 01:02:30 schrieb maximilian attems: > > > as your kernel is heavily tainted this voids your support, > Not sure I understand this. > What do you mean by heavily tainted? you

Bug#567435: linux-image-2.6.32-3-686: address space collision with 2.6.32-3-686 stock

2010-04-08 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 03:00:07PM +0300, Giorgos Pallas wrote: > Package: linux-2.6 > Version: 2.6.32-9 > Severity: normal > > > At every boot I get this message: > pci :02:06.0: BAR 6: address space collision on of device > [0xfe6c-0xfe6d] this pci messages got reworked for .34

Bug#556030: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 61s! [java:7582]

2010-04-08 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 02:16:20PM +0100, stephen mulcahy wrote: > Just ran into the same problem on a 2.6.30-2-amd64 system > this is outdated and no longer supported. check if you can reproduce against 2.6.32 linux images and report back, thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-

Bug#576654: suspicious message: "Can't open /scripts/functions" during upgrade

2010-04-08 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 09:43:12AM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > > Not sure, but maybe the culprit is > /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/local-top/cryptroot cryptsetup got NMU'd, fix is in 2:1.1.0-2.1 unless new evidence comes up, i'd close that as a dup for it. thanks for report. --

Bug#562847: closed by maximilian attems (Bug#519800: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.94)

2010-04-08 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 07:48:23PM +0400, Vladimir Stavrinov wrote: > > I don't see how do You fix the bug 562847 and how it is related to bug 519800 indeed those two are not related, beside beeing closed by the same upload. 562847 is closed by "* update-initramfs: Default to not keep .bak back

Bug#545728: still not fixed?

2010-04-08 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 11:41:09AM +, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > reopen 545728 > stop > > Hi. > > I might be wrong, but can it be that this is still not fixed? > > 1) The manpage section "BOOT SCRIPTS / Help functions" does not mention > that you need to source /usr/share/initramfs-to

Bug#536195: initramfs.conf config section missing

2010-04-08 Thread maximilian attems
hello, On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 11:52:09AM +, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > > Hi Maximilian. > > It seems that only parts of the patches here have made it into the recent > upload. > The manpage stuff is in, the parts for initramfs.conf not. the initramfs.conf part is for dropbear #57550

Bug#576700: initramfs-tools: could not resume after suspended by uswsusp

2010-04-07 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 11:51:45AM +0900, VDR dai (deb) wrote: > > % cat /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/resume > RESUME=/dev/disk/by-label/swap > % 0.93 had a bug report about d-i using UUIDi for lvm2 here and in the course of handling it I introduced a bug here, will fix with 0.93.4 thanks for rep

Bug#572858: initramfs-tools: Doesn't resume from hibernation, restarts fresh

2010-04-07 Thread maximilian attems
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010, maximilian attems wrote: > > for your box do as root > echo "resume=/dev/mapper/gaia-swap_1" > /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/resume this was wrong, should have been echo "RESUME=/dev/mapper/gaia-swap_1" > /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/resum

Bug#576700: initramfs-tools: could not resume after suspended by uswsusp

2010-04-07 Thread maximilian attems
thanks for the response. think you put me on the right trace with the diff. could you post find /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d and eventual cat /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/resume -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac

Bug#576677: find's %Y

2010-04-07 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 08:37:18AM +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote: > ma> can't reproduce your failure on x86_64: > Trust me: https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?29460 yep seen and tried mentioned testcases and non triggers, which find do you have installed: dpkg -l findutils -- To UNS

Bug#576859: closed by maximilian attems (Re: Bug#576859: Some Details)

2010-04-07 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 02:00:13AM +0200, Frederik Schwarzer wrote: > > However, I am a bit confused now. Is Debian not supporting running a > kernel without initramfs anymore? Is there anything to read about that > topic? decision happened long ago, you are only starting to feel the pain. no UU

Bug#576677: find's %Y

2010-04-07 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010, jida...@jidanni.org wrote: > Anyway, I have shown %Y is moody and not to be trusted. > I will now step back and hand the baton to others. can't reproduce your failure on x86_64: mount -t tmpfs tmpfs /mnt/ -o size=40m TMPDIR=/mnt/ mkinitramfs -o /tmp/foo -k Working files in

Bug#576654: suspicious message: "Can't open /scripts/functions" during upgrade

2010-04-07 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 01:14:34AM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > On 2010-04-06 15:17, maximilian attems wrote: > > uff had no coffee yet no please scripts/local-top/mdadm > > I didn't have mdadm installed, so there was nothing to patch on > my system. I installed mdadm

Bug#574598: Bug still in version 2.6.32-11

2010-04-07 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 09:13:12PM +0200, Achim Schaefer wrote: > HI, > > I just upgraded to the latest version. > > But I think the bug is still open: > r...@data:~/Dokumente# dmesg | tail > [ 1209.143271] posix_timer_event: NULL exec env (timr->it_process- > >ve_task_info.owner_env) > [ 1210.14

Bug#576859: [linux-source-2.6.32] Kernel does not boot

2010-04-07 Thread maximilian attems
tags 576859 moreinfo stop On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 09:24:53PM +0200, Frederik Schwarzer wrote: > Package: linux-source-2.6.32 > Version: 2.6.32-11 > Severity: normal > > --- Please enter the report below this line. --- > After upgrading from 2.6.32-10 to 2.6.32-11 my kernel config does not boot >

Bug#576845: initramfs-tools: Forgets to add mdadm and related scripts

2010-04-07 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 07:30:03PM +0200, GSR wrote: > > Last update to initrd.img left the system unbootable due to lack of > sbin/mdadm and scripts/local-top/mdadm (even scripts/local-top/ is > missing), as checked by manual inspection with zcat -d < > /boot/initrd.img-... | cpio -i. Currently I

Bug#576845: initramfs-tools: Forgets to add mdadm and related scripts

2010-04-07 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 07:30:03PM +0200, GSR wrote: > Package: initramfs-tools > Version: 0.94.1 > Severity: important > Tags: sid > > Last update to initrd.img left the system unbootable due to lack of > sbin/mdadm and scripts/local-top/mdadm (even scripts/local-top/ is > missing), as checked by

Re: Processed (with 3 errors): oss deprecated

2010-04-07 Thread maximilian attems
clone 576844 -1 cdtool severity -1 serious retitle -1 cdtool relies on lng depcrecated and removed oss reopen -1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/

Re: rndis problem

2010-04-07 Thread maximilian attems
please reply to all, this is not a private conversation, thanks. On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 11:50:26AM -0400, Mark Glassberg wrote: > As mentioned, I'm relatively new to Debian. I did, however, email a bug > report with Cc: to the group. > > When I entered: reportbug linux-2.6 > I got: -bash: rep

oss deprecated

2010-04-07 Thread maximilian attems
severity 576844 serious retitle 576844 cdcd relies on lng depcrecated and removed oss clone 576844 cdtool -1 severity -1 serious retitle -1 cdtool relies on lng depcrecated and removed oss -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe"

Re: [Debian] openvz updated

2010-04-07 Thread maximilian attems
hello kir, On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 05:31:12PM +0400, Kir Kolyshkin wrote: > > (1) does 2.6.32-11 and -12 means 2.6.32.11 and 2.6.32.12 > (i.e. -stable releases from greg k-h et al)? not automaticaly, the first is the debian revision. we strip the Makefile part of the stable series it is mor

Re: rndis problem

2010-04-07 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 10:59:56AM -0400, Mark Glassberg wrote: > On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 06:46:14AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > > On Wed, 07 Apr 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 21:22 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > Plea

Bug#576677: Kernel Panic - no init found

2010-04-06 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 01:31:29PM +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote: > I found out where all the missing files went by adding --verbose here: > > # diff -C 1 /usr/sbin/mkinitramfs /tmp > *** /usr/sbin/mkinitramfs 2010-04-05 13:10:29.0 +0800 > --- /tmp/mkinitramfs2010-04-07 13:26:

Bug#576677: Kernel Panic - no init found

2010-04-06 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 12:42:57PM +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote: > Maybe it all has to do with this recent change to /usr/sbin/mkinitramfs: > > 202,206d226 > < # klibc > < ln -s /usr/lib/klibc/bin/* ${DESTDIR}/bin > < ln -s /lib/klibc-*.so ${DESTDIR}/lib > > maybe not. please send me private

Re: rndis problem

2010-04-06 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 21:22 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > Please use 'reply to all'; this is not a private conversation. > > > > On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 04:05:15PM -0400, Mark Glassberg wrote: > > > I installed and tried linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.3-686 a

Bug#576677: Kernel Panic - no init found

2010-04-06 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010, jida...@jidanni.org wrote: > ma> please take an image. > Made with this grub stanza: > menuentry "Debian GNU/Linux, linux 2.6.32-3-686 (single-user mode)" { > set root=(hd0,5) > search --fs-uuid --set efd74e43-e0cb-4aa9-8a1d-d258cd465773 > linux /boot/vml

Bug#576677: Kernel Panic - no init found

2010-04-06 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 12:12:45PM +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote: > # sh -x mkinitramfs -v -o /tmp/foo > bar1 2> bar2 > # bzip2 bar? grr still clueless, please do mkinitramfs -k -o /tmp/foo that keeps temporary build dirs and show find /tmp/mkinitramfs_* -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >