Hi Ben,
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 10:45:09AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> I recommend that you always check the list of packages to be removed in
> a dist-upgrade, if you have some packages installed from
> testing/unstable.
yes. :/
> It doesn't exist in stable. Perhaps you
Hi Ben,
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 10:12:01AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-11-23 at 10:04 +0000, Toni Mueller wrote:
> > I agree, but I can only file a bug report against the kernel package.
> > Please find the output of this command attached.
> cryptsetup suppo
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 12:50:19PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 07:41:05PM +, Toni wrote:
> > Severity: critical
>
> Sorry, no. This problem does not break the package for everyone.
>
> > On the console, after dmesg, these three lines repeat ad nauseum:
> >
Hi Ben,
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 12:42:37AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Jan 2019 20:03:49 + Toni wrote:
> > Package: src:linux
> > Version: 4.19.16-1
> > Severity: critical
> > File: linux-image-4.19.0-2-amd64
>
> Is this a new problem with version 4.19.16-1? Or did it
Hi,
I am seeing this problem with
linux-image-4.15.0-0.bpo.2-amd64 4.15.11-1~bpo9+1 amd64 and firmware-iwlwifi
20170823-1~bpo9+1, and with their counterparts from Stable on my
XPS 13 from around 2013.
FWIW, on some networks, I have no trouble connecting, but on others, it just
won't work at
Hi Ben,
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 11:04:07AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Perhaps it depends on whether you reboot or start from power-off?
I can't remember right now, but I think I tried both rebooting and
starting from power-off. The latter would be one of the first things
that come to mind...
Hi Adrian,
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 10:41:57AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Control: reassign -1 src:linux
>
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 06:57:53AM +0800, Toni Mueller wrote:
> > Package: upgrade-reports
> > Severity: important
> > recently, I felt the need to upg
Hi Ben,
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 01:40:30AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-12-10 at 04:03 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Do you still see a failure to set up the RAID ("mdadm: No devices
> > listed in conf file were found") on some machines? Can you send the
> > /etc/mdadm.conf
Hi Ben,
On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 03:15:52PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Never mind, I've seen your later message with a complete log and I will
reply to that.
I haven't heard back from you, but in the meantime reformatted the
machine from i386 (i686) to amd64, but also upgraded to testing, and
Hi Ben,
On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 02:39:06AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
1, Enable an emulated serial port for the VM, with output going to a
file.
I modified the VM to have:
serial type='file'
source path='/var/tmp/vm1-serial.log'/
target port='0'/
/serial
console
Hi Ben,
I tweaked it a bit, and now I get much more telling messages:
[0.00] Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset
[0.00] Initializing cgroup subsys cpu
[0.00] Initializing cgroup subsys cpuacct
[0.00] Linux version 3.16.0-0.bpo.4-686-pae
Hi Ben,
possibly unrelated, but neither the kernels of the Ubuntu installers for
12.04 and 14.04, nor the kernel for Fedora 21 installer, even boot on my
VM. I reckoned that you might be interested, being a kernel hacker.
CentOS 6.5 or OpenBSD 5.6 don't have a problem, though.
Kind regards,
Hi Ben,
I deleted the VM and created a completely new one, though on the same
host, which I currently cannot change.
Installing the linux-image-3.16.0-0.bpo.4-686-pae kernel results in no
way to boot the VM with neither dracut from wheezy nor initramfs-tools
from wheezy-backports.
Please see
Hi,
the problem just re-occurred directly after booting the VM, even
preventing me from logging in. I will raise the severity in a separate
message:
Process 28101 attached - interrupt to quit
ppoll([{fd=15, events=POLLIN|POLLERR|POLLHUP}, {fd=13,
events=POLLIN|POLLERR|POLLHUP}, {fd=24,
severity 771661 grave
thanks
Hi,
I guess the same would apply to #771602, but I would like to not go
the extra five miles to reproduce it there. In any case, a kernel
that maxes out the CPU immediately after start while doing nothing
is not entirely production quality (although I have very
Hi Ben,
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 06:11:09PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Also, this is assigned to linux-image-3.16-0.bpo.3-686-pae but the
screenshot you attached shows that package being newly installed.
Therefore it is not the kernel you were running at the time you first
saw this
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 08:27:36PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote:
this is the dmesg for the other machine which does not boot any of the
3.10 or 3.11 kernels at all, but under 3.2:
today, the other machine (recognizable by the 945 instead of 964 cpu)
refused to boot the 3.11 kernel as well
Hi Jonathan,
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 04:54:50PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Toni Mueller wrote:
(using a patched kernel)
in the meantime, I was able to perform an upgrade, and the tablet
appears to work now: I can use the stylus, including the button that it
has, with the new 0.12 X
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 02:58:52PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Toni Mueller wrote:
it occurred to me that I saw no obvious way to configure the tablet
Don't gnome-control-center, kde-config-tablet, and xinput have support
for tablets?
I don't know, as I don't use these things.
*nod* I
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 3.3.4-1~experimental.1
Severity: important
Hi,
I have a problem loading KVM:
# lsmod|grep kvm
kvm 240621 0
# modprobe kvm_intel
FATAL: Error inserting kvm_intel
(/lib/modules/3.3.0-trunk-686-pae/kernel/arch/x86/kvm/kvm-intel.ko): Operation
not
Hi Jonathan,
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 05:04:38PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Toni Mueller wrote:
[21052.623069] kvm: disabled by bios
I assume that's the cause.
hrmpf, didn't see that one. Sorry. :(
Will try with changed BIOS settings tomorrow.
What make and model is this machine
Hi Jonathan,
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 08:59:38AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Toni Mueller wrote:
the machine runs Squeeze and cannot be upgraded right now. So it's
in the meantime, I was able to perform an upgrade, and the tablet
appears to work now: I can use the stylus, including
Hi Jonathan,
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 11:37:15PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
# hardware support
severity 671801 important
tags 671801 + upstream patch moreinfo
found 671801 linux-2.6/3.2.15-1
quit
today, I was able to use the new kernel generated along the ways you
outlined. It's a 3.2.16
Hi,
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 07:46:44AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
What version of xserver-xorg-input-wacom do you have installed? Could
you attach /var/log/Xorg.0.log?
the machine runs Squeeze and cannot be upgraded right now. So it's
ii xserver-xorg-input-wacom
Hi Takashi,
On Thu, 30.06.2011 at 07:59:19 +0200, Takashi Iwai ti...@suse.de wrote:
I guess this must be the new feature, Auto-Mute Mode.
it turns out that you're right - I just had the opportunity to verify
that.
Thanks for the idea.
Kind regards,
--Toni++
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi,
On Wed, 29.06.2011 at 20:45:02 +0200, Toni Mueller supp...@oeko.net wrote:
this first post is for the non-working kernel. The other kernel's
information will follow tomorrow.
this is the same info for the other kernel.
HTH
@Takashi: Thank you for your suggested workaround/change/fix
Hi,
On Wed, 29.06.2011 at 07:21:33 +0200, Takashi Iwai ti...@suse.de wrote:
I'd definitely need alsa-info.sh outputs on both working and
non-working kernels, i.e. on 2.6.38 and 3.0-rc4.
this first post is for the non-working kernel. The other kernel's
information will follow tomorrow.
Kind
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 3.0.0~rc3-1~experimental.1
Severity: important
Hi,
today, while running 'aptitude install' on a package, the machine
crashed hard, requiring me to press the reset button:
Jun 27 10:32:12 spruce kernel: [ 6982.765536] [ cut here
]
Jun 27
Hi Ian,
On Mon, 20.12.2010 at 10:38:46 +, Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk wrote:
This is likely the same underlying issue as 601341 and friends, which is
that the Xen dom0 kernel does not currently fully support DRI/DRM
graphics.
thanks for the heads-up. Uhhh...
Patches which resolve
Hi,
On Mon, 20.12.2010 at 12:42:50 +, Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk wrote:
Squeeze is frozen so there is no chance of moving to 2.6.36 for that, if
that was your question.
thanks, but that wasn't the question. The question was rather, whether
I should be looking at an appropriate
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-29
Severity: normal
Tags: squeeze
Hi,
I wanted to start the GUI, but couldn't. After logging in, I usually say
'startx'. For this computer, which I have just installed, the command
resulted in the screen going blank, immediately followed by a hard reboot.
Hi Ben,
On Sat, 11.12.2010 at 02:06:59 +, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
wrote:
We need to see the *first* oops message. This...
below I have included the first BUG message I could find,
...shows the D and W flags which indicate there were prior BUG and WARN
messages.
but the 'W'
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-27
Severity: important
Hello,
I have a problem when I try to mount a CD image, regardless of whether
it's a physical CD in a drive, or an ISO image on the file system. I've
tried different images, to be sure. This is what I get (one sample):
Dec 10 23:38:48
Hi,
I have the almost latest of 2.6.32-bpo.5-amd64 (2.6.32-21~bpo50+1),
and the problem occured to me several times today.
Oct 4 12:22:23 debian kernel: [1963080.712134] INFO: task sync:18607 blocked
for more than 120 seconds.
Oct 4 12:22:23 debian kernel: [1963080.712138] echo 0
Hi Moritz,
On Tue, 06.07.2010 at 01:16:18 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@inutil.org
wrote:
tags 579125 moreinfo
thanks
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 04:38:16PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
Package: linux-headers-2.6.32-4-amd64
Version: 2.6.32-11~bpo50+1
Severity: normal
Hi,
I'm
Hi,
the problem only surfaced when the machine did not come up after an
attempt to reboot (shutdown -r now).
Trying to check the affected file system yields tons of these (almost
2000 lines):
# fsck -p /dev/mapper/uv0-srv
fsck 1.41.3 (12-Oct-2008)
/dev/mapper/uv0-srv contains a file system
Hi,
On Mon, 31.05.2010 at 20:27:02 +0200, Toni Mueller supp...@oeko.net wrote:
the problem only surfaced when the machine did not come up after an
attempt to reboot (shutdown -r now).
Trying to check the affected file system yields tons of these (almost
2000 lines):
# fsck -p /dev
Package: linux-headers-2.6.32-4-amd64
Version: 2.6.32-11~bpo50+1
Severity: normal
Hi,
I'd like to use this kernel on an NFS server, but although the
configuration file (/boot/config-2.6.32-bpo.4-amd64) mentions NFS being
a module, I get:
# /etc/init.d/nfs-kernel-server start
Not starting NFS
On Sat, 24.10.2009 at 09:28:22 +0200, Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org wrote:
The buckets are created during module loading. But /etc/sysctl.conf is
evaluated earlier. Aren't you seeing errors about unknown keys during
boot?
I'll have to check that, probably RSN, but in the meantime, I got
On Sat, 24.10.2009 at 09:28:22 +0200, Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org wrote:
The buckets are created during module loading. But /etc/sysctl.conf is
evaluated earlier. Aren't you seeing errors about unknown keys during
boot?
No, I didn't, or at least not in any of the system's logs. But I also
On Sat, 24.10.2009 at 12:48:05 +0200, Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org wrote:
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 12:31:35PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
On Sat, 24.10.2009 at 09:28:22 +0200, Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org
wrote:
Aren't you seeing errors about unknown keys during
boot?
No, I didn't
Hi,
I just wanted to add: Despite my having this:
$ grep track /etc/sysctl.conf
net.ipv4.netfilter.ip_conntrack_max = 485760
I found this after reboot:
$ cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_max
32768
I had to manually set the value:
# sysctl -w
Hi,
On Sat, 24.10.2009 at 01:38:30 +0100, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
wrote:
On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 19:27 +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
$ grep track /etc/sysctl.conf
net.ipv4.netfilter.ip_conntrack_max = 485760
$ cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_max
32768
Perhaps
Hi,
I've now verified that the machine works with 2.6.29 from
lenny-backports. I'd rather move back to a release kernel, however.
Kind regards,
--Toni++
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hi,
On Mon, 17.09.2007 at 20:04:24 -0400, Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm going to reassign this to linux-image. The basic problem seems to be
the loss of responsiveness, which is probably caused by excessive
amounts of large block size IO on the encrypted volume. There's a
Hi Mike,
On Mon, 17.09.2007 at 20:04:24 -0400, Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
there's nothing especially unique in dd that would demolish a computer.
there's still the difference in behaviour between dd and cp, the latter
causing no such problems. With demolish I wanted to say that it
Hi,
On Tue, 16.01.2007 at 16:08:09 +0100, maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
how is linux image 2.6.18 performing?
well... I didn't specifically check (and also forgot about this bug),
but 2.6.18 is reasonably fast, or at least fast enough that I don't
have too many problems with it.
Hello,
I just created a 2.6.17.6 kernel (patch as of yesterday), and tried
again, with much the same results. So, I suspect it's somewhere in the
guts of the 2.6.17 kernel - switching back to 2.6.16 also brings
performance back to acceptable levels (already included in the report).
Should I
Package: linux-image-2.6.17-1-686
Version: 2.6.17-2
Severity: important
Hello,
I have a severe problem running this kernel in that it brings my
computer to a crawl, compared to the 2.6.16-1-686-smp kernel I was
running before, and am running again until this problem is fixed. The
dmesg as
Package: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686-smp
Severity: important
Hello,
I find error messages like the one above (not sure about the actual
value of gfp_mask) on a regular basis in the logs. Sometimes I just find
out hard because the machine simply crashes shortly after. This makes
the machine in
Hi,
On Tue, 03.05.2005 at 17:02:22 +0200, maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, 03 May 2005, Toni Mueller wrote:
On Tue, 03.05.2005 at 12:16:51 +0200, maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd0
oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x1d2
oom-killer: gfp_mask
51 matches
Mail list logo
