On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 21:49:50 +0100 Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Suraj N. Kurapati
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
[...]
> >So when I appended bsd.c to mit.c, did the entire mit.c become
> >licensed under both licenses? That is, did the originally-MIT
> >portions of m
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Suraj N. Kurapati
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Andrew Donnellan wrote:
On 4/14/07, Suraj N. Kurapati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The BSD is not compatible with the MIT license because it has an
additional condition (i.e. you cannot use copyright holder's names
to pr
Joe Smith wrote:
> "Suraj N. Kurapati" wrote:
>> So when I appended bsd.c to mit.c, did the entire mit.c become
>> licensed under both licenses? That is, did the originally-MIT
>> portions of mit.c inherit the extra condition from the BSD
>> license?
>
> That is an easy way to view it. Technica
On 4/14/07, Suraj N. Kurapati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it possible to extract the originally-MIT portions from the file
and act upon them only according to the MIT license?
Yes, because if you can extract the exact portions that are MIT
licensed there's no way you could tell the difference
Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> On 4/14/07, Suraj N. Kurapati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> So when I appended bsd.c to mit.c, did the entire mit.c become
>> licensed under both licenses? That is, did the originally-MIT
>> portions of mit.c inherit the extra condition from the BSD license?
>
> The comb
On 4/14/07, Suraj N. Kurapati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wonderful! Thanks for the clarification. :-)
So when I appended bsd.c to mit.c, did the entire mit.c become
licensed under both licenses? That is, did the originally-MIT
portions of mit.c inherit the extra condition from the BSD license?
"Suraj N. Kurapati" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andrew Donnellan wrote:
On 4/14/07, Suraj N. Kurapati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The BSD is not compatible with the MIT license because it has an
additional condition (i.e. you cannot use copyright holder's names
Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> On 4/14/07, Suraj N. Kurapati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The BSD is not compatible with the MIT license because it has an
>> additional condition (i.e. you cannot use copyright holder's names
>> to promote the product) that the MIT license lacks.
>
> Um, neither the BS
On 4/14/07, Suraj N. Kurapati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Remarks
===
The BSD is not compatible with the MIT license because it has an
additional condition (i.e. you cannot use copyright holder's names
to promote the product) that the MIT license lacks.
Um, neither the BSD nor the MIT licen
Hello,
Please consider the following scenarios to help me better understand
whether BSD* and MIT code are "compatible".
*I am referring to the 3-clause BSD license:
http://opensource.org/osi3.0/licenses/bsd-license.php
Scenario
Suppose that (1) I have two C source files (mit.c and
10 matches
Mail list logo