Hello, Please consider the following scenarios to help me better understand whether BSD* and MIT code are "compatible".
*I am referring to the 3-clause BSD license: http://opensource.org/osi3.0/licenses/bsd-license.php Scenario ======== Suppose that (1) I have two C source files (mit.c and bsd.c) and that (2) each file is correctly placed under its respective license. Simple case ----------- I put mit.c and bsd.c into a tarball and send it to you. What happens now? Here is what I think: * mit.c remains under the MIT license * bsd.c remains under the BSD license Complex case ------------ Suppose I append bsd.c to the end of mit.c while making sure to clearly differentiate the two sources. For example: echo '/* begin BSD licensed code */' >> mit.c cat bsd.c >> mit.c echo '/* end BSD licensed code */' >> mit.c Next I put mit.c and bsd.c into a tarball and send it to you. What happens now? Here is what I think: * The portions of mit.c that were not copied from bsd.c remain under the MIT license. * The portions of mit.c that were indeed copied from bsd.c remain under the BSD license. * bsd.c remains under the BSD license Remarks ======= The BSD is not compatible with the MIT license because it has an additional condition (i.e. you cannot use copyright holder's names to promote the product) that the MIT license lacks. Nevertheless, I was able to distribute the tarball in both cases because I satisfied the distribution conditions of both licenses. Thanks for your consideration. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
