Andrew Donnellan wrote: > On 4/14/07, Suraj N. Kurapati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The BSD is not compatible with the MIT license because it has an >> additional condition (i.e. you cannot use copyright holder's names >> to promote the product) that the MIT license lacks. > > Um, neither the BSD nor the MIT licenses have a clause saying 'You may > not add additional restrictions.'
Wonderful! Thanks for the clarification. :-) So when I appended bsd.c to mit.c, did the entire mit.c become licensed under both licenses? That is, did the originally-MIT portions of mit.c inherit the extra condition from the BSD license? Thanks for your consideration. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
