On Sunday 30 July 2006 02:07, Stephen Gran wrote:
This one time, at band camp, George Danchev said:
On Sunday 30 July 2006 00:01, Stephen Gran wrote:
--cut--
Lets refer back to the license for a little clarity, perhaps:
7. LICENSEE AGREES THAT THE EXPORT OF GOODS AND/OR TECHNICAL
This one time, at band camp, Walter Landry said:
Stephen Gran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This one time, at band camp, MJ Ray said:
John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] asked:
The BCFG public license (below) seems pretty much like a standard BSD
+ advertising clause license. I can't quite
Hi,
I would appreciate a quick review of the debian/copyright file
of the subcommander package:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/subcommander/
dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/subcommander/subcommander_1.1.0-1.dsc
The license is basically GPL, but the package
Stephen Gran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Walter Landry said:
Stephen Gran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This one time, at band camp, MJ Ray said:
John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] asked:
The BCFG public license (below) seems pretty much like a standard BSD
+
This one time, at band camp, John Goerzen said:
Hi,
The BCFG public license (below) seems pretty much like a standard BSD
+ advertising clause license. I can't quite seem to remember what the
current policy on that sort of license is.
This one time, at band camp, Walter Landry said:
Stephen Gran writes:
Maybe the problem here is that you haven't agreed to follow the DFSG?
Could you please point out where the SC or DFSG forbid any kind of
(statement of) disagreement with their policies? Such a clause is
certainly not in keeping with the rest of the DFSG or with the general
6 matches
Mail list logo
