On Sun, 1 Sep 2013 17:12:46 + (UTC) Thorsten Glaser wrote:
[...]
Francesco Poli invernomuto at paranoici.org writes:
You asked whether it's still acceptable for Debian main: I answered by
describing what the FTP Masters think
Look, as I said above, that was 2008. Not the recent
On 02/09/13 21:27, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
MJ Ray mjr at phonecoop.coop writes:
whether software follows the DFSG or not, yet the number of subscribers
seems to be generally increasing towards some asymptote
http://lists.debian.org/stats/debian-legal.png
You know that l.d.o is not the only
On 01/09/13 18:12, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
//mirabilos (with backing from other DDs in this group, by private mail)
Well, I'm a DD too, I don't back that sort of disrespectful, sarcastic,
uncollaborative, overlong rant and yes, lurkers support me by email too!
I'll accept that the link to 2008
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 12:33 PM, MJ Ray wrote:
On 01/09/13 18:12, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
//mirabilos (with backing from other DDs in this group, by private mail)
Well, I'm a DD too, I don't back that sort of disrespectful, sarcastic,
uncollaborative, overlong rant and yes, lurkers support me
Paul Wise pabs at debian.org writes:
Likewise. I don't appreciate the disrespectful tone some folks have
displayed in this and other recent threads. I would like to remind
Oh great, and who’s going to deal with trolls then? You’re not
holding Francesco to them, I’m noticing.
I’ve heard that
On 02/09/13 12:14, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Paul Wise pabs at debian.org writes:
Likewise. I don't appreciate the disrespectful tone some folks have
displayed in this and other recent threads. I would like to remind
Oh great, and who’s going to deal with trolls then? You’re not
holding
MJ Ray mjr at phonecoop.coop writes:
Well, we hear things like that every time someone doesn't agree about
In this case I talked with other DDs on IRC.
whether software follows the DFSG or not, yet the number of subscribers
seems to be generally increasing towards some asymptote
On 29/08/13 16:15, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Francesco, [stuff]
Look, there's a command in email software for sending a reply to one
person. Reply to List or Reply to All is not it - if anyone is
going to lecture others on how to improve your communication
behaviour, start by using the correct
MJ Ray writes:
Look, […]
My reply was specifically to this newsgroup,
a long-needed “request” to shut up, and explicitly *not*
soliciting *your* personal(!) opinion on those licences
either. I do not require the “added value”, and this
newsgroup is spammed enough by the likes of you two.
On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 15:15:25 + (UTC) Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Francesco Poli invernomuto at paranoici.org writes:
[...]
So, is AGPLv3 still acceptable for main?
For the record, I personally disagree with their conclusion:
Francesco, I specifically did *not* ask for your personal
Francesco Poli invernomuto at paranoici.org writes:
In the recent discussions, the main concerns were about the switch of a
Yes, I know, but the discussion was raised, so I wanted to make sure.
So, is AGPLv3 still acceptable for main?
For the record, I personally disagree with their
Hi,
there were several threads around AGPL recently, mostly re-stirred due
to Horracle using AGPLv3 for Berkeley DB.
I was unable to follow them totally and remember there being raised at
least two points:
• The inability to provide security support for AGPL software
(embargoed fixes)/
• The
On Aug 27, 2013 8:15 AM, Thorsten Glaser t...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
there were several threads around AGPL recently, mostly re-stirred due
to Horracle using AGPLv3 for Berkeley DB.
I was unable to follow them totally and remember there being raised at
least two points:
• The inability to
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 09:00:10 -0400 Paul R. Tagliamonte wrote:
On Aug 27, 2013 8:15 AM, Thorsten Glaser t...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
there were several threads around AGPL recently, mostly re-stirred due
to Horracle using AGPLv3 for Berkeley DB.
[...]
In the recent discussions, the
14 matches
Mail list logo
