Author: jeroen
Date: 2006-06-27 12:51:18 +0200 (Tue, 27 Jun 2006)
New Revision: 691
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/control
Log:
Add versioned depends on tar -- older tar versions don't support --wildcards
Modified: trunk/debian/changelog
Package: lintian
Version: 1.23.21
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Hello,
The explanation of deb-created-with-broken-tar says that some versions of
tar are broken. I've added to the message a summary of which (Debian) versions
this concerns.
Furthermore the description has two typos, s/make/makes/,
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 05:46:33PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Since the tar fix requires a change to lintian, I think it's time for
another upload. If anyone has objections, voice them now, or I'll make an
upload tomorrow from what's in Subversion.
I don't like the tar change (I mean the
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 12:54:01PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 05:46:33PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Since the tar fix requires a change to lintian, I think it's time for
another upload. If anyone has objections, voice them now, or I'll make an
upload
Author: jeroen
Date: 2006-06-27 13:23:27 +0200 (Tue, 27 Jun 2006)
New Revision: 692
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/control
Log:
Revert my misinformed commit r691
Modified: trunk/debian/changelog
===
---
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 344269
Bug#344269: lintian: false executable-not-elf-or-script warning with perl magic
header
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug reopened, originator not
reopen 344269
found 344269 1.23.21
retitle 344269 Please reintroduce executable-not-elf-or-script with perl
magic header and change it to an error
thanks
Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 04:30:39PM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote:
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 12:54:01PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 05:46:33PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Since the tar fix requires a change to lintian, I think it's time for
another upload. If anyone has objections,
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
reopen 344269
found 344269 1.23.21
retitle 344269 Please reintroduce executable-not-elf-or-script with perl
magic header and change it to an error
thanks
Did you check to be sure this was really in 1.23.21? After Steve's
response, I already
Thijs Kinkhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: lintian
Version: 1.23.21
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Hello,
The explanation of deb-created-with-broken-tar says that some versions
of tar are broken. I've added to the message a summary of which (Debian)
versions this concerns.
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jun 2006 17:54:53 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#344269: etch release policy: scripts must set
appropriate #! line?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
notfound 344269 1.23.21
Bug#344269: Please reintroduce executable-not-elf-or-script with perl magic
header and change it to an error
Bug marked as not found in version 1.23.21.
(By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.)
stop
Stopping
Author: rra
Date: 2006-06-28 02:56:01 +0200 (Wed, 28 Jun 2006)
New Revision: 694
Added:
releases/1.23.22/
Log:
Tag 1.23.22 release.
Copied: releases/1.23.22 (from rev 693, trunk)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
lintian_1.23.22_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
lintian_1.23.22.dsc
lintian_1.23.22.tar.gz
lintian_1.23.22_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Accepted:
lintian_1.23.22.dsc
to pool/main/l/lintian/lintian_1.23.22.dsc
lintian_1.23.22.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/lintian/lintian_1.23.22.tar.gz
lintian_1.23.22_all.deb
to pool/main/l/lintian/lintian_1.23.22_all.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 366531
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jun 2006 18:02:30 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#374878: fixed in lintian 1.23.22
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Matthias Julius [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: lintian
Version: 1.23.21
Severity: minor
When using the option '-I' lintian says:
N: Informational is deprecated, use -t E,W,I
But, the lintian man page does not mention this option.
Hm... I use lintian -I all the time and haven't
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jun 2006 18:02:30 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#367324: fixed in lintian 1.23.22
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jun 2006 18:02:30 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#368206: fixed in lintian 1.23.22
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jun 2006 18:02:30 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#366531: fixed in lintian 1.23.22
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jun 2006 18:02:30 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#375246: fixed in lintian 1.23.22
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jun 2006 18:02:30 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#372190: fixed in lintian 1.23.22
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jun 2006 18:02:30 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#367534: fixed in lintian 1.23.22
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jun 2006 18:02:30 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#374399: fixed in lintian 1.23.22
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jun 2006 19:25:41 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#375764: lintian: man page doesn't know about option '-t'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
25 matches
Mail list logo
