On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 01:21:36AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
As previously discussed on the list, I've added a new framework for
handling data collection about packages. Currently, the functionality is
fairly limited, but the infrastructure is now in place and we can start
growing it.
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 01:21:36AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Given that this is an infrastructure change, I think this warrants a
version bump, and I'd like to propose that we change the version numbering
of Lintian at the same time. Currently, all we're ever doing is
incrementing the third
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 01:21:36AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
and then memory accesses. However, down the road, this opens the
possibility of doing away with the collect scripts if we want to and just
using this object to hold the same data.
Hey, no touching the lab :)
Gruesse,
--
Frank
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yeah, I have nothing against bumping the 2nd version number. But I still
think that the 3 part version number has its merits, so I'm currently
against dropping the third part. Actually why not drop the 1? we really
seem not intend to increase it any
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 01:21:36AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
and then memory accesses. However, down the road, this opens the
possibility of doing away with the collect scripts if we want to and
just using this object to hold the same data.
Hey,
5 matches
Mail list logo
