Author: rra
Date: 2008-06-07 09:47:11 +0200 (Sat, 07 Jun 2008)
New Revision: 1358
Added:
trunk/lib/Lintian/Collect.pm
trunk/lib/Lintian/Collect/
trunk/lib/Lintian/Collect/Source.pm
Modified:
trunk/checks/cruft
trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
* checks/cruft:
+ [RA] Use the new
Author: rra
Date: 2008-06-07 09:50:41 +0200 (Sat, 07 Jun 2008)
New Revision: 1359
Added:
trunk/checks/watch-file
trunk/checks/watch-file.desc
trunk/testset/cdbs-test/debian/watch
trunk/testset/cdbs-test_1.orig.tar.gz
trunk/testset/dh7-test/debian/watch
Author: rra
Date: 2008-06-07 10:01:34 +0200 (Sat, 07 Jun 2008)
New Revision: 1360
Modified:
trunk/checks/cruft
trunk/checks/watch-file
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/frontend/lintian
trunk/lib/Checker.pm
Log:
* frontend/lintian:
+ [RA] Create a new Lintian::Collect object for each
Author: rra
Date: 2008-06-07 10:14:30 +0200 (Sat, 07 Jun 2008)
New Revision: 1361
Modified:
trunk/checks/standards-version
trunk/lib/Lintian/Collect/Source.pm
Log:
Add a function to Lintian::Collect::Source to retrieve the source
package changelog as a Parse::DebianChangelog object and use
As previously discussed on the list, I've added a new framework for
handling data collection about packages. Currently, the functionality is
fairly limited, but the infrastructure is now in place and we can start
growing it.
Every check script now gets a third argument, which is a
Author: rra
Date: 2008-06-07 10:44:14 +0200 (Sat, 07 Jun 2008)
New Revision: 1362
Modified:
trunk/checks/binaries
trunk/checks/binaries.desc
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/testset/tags.libbaz
Log:
+ [RA] Remove several-sonames-in-same-package. This is frequently not
an error and
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
package lintian
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: lintian
# Fixed in r1359 by rra
tag 234202 + pending
Bug#234202: add a warning about missing debian/watch file
Tags were: patch
Bug#409104: lintian: Add new informational message - no-watch-file-exists
Author: rra
Date: 2008-06-07 11:00:44 +0200 (Sat, 07 Jun 2008)
New Revision: 1363
Modified:
trunk/checks/common_data.pm
trunk/checks/fields
trunk/checks/fields.desc
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/testset/relations/debian/control
trunk/testset/tags.debug
Log:
+ [RA] Merge
Author: rra
Date: 2008-06-07 11:21:50 +0200 (Sat, 07 Jun 2008)
New Revision: 1364
Added:
trunk/testset/debconf/debian/debconf-test-postinst.postinst
trunk/testset/debconf/debian/debconf-test-postinst.postrm
trunk/testset/debconf/debian/debconf-test-postinst.templates
Modified:
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 01:21:36AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Given that this is an infrastructure change, I think this warrants a
version bump, and I'd like to propose that we change the version numbering
of Lintian at the same time. Currently, all we're ever doing is
incrementing the third
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 01:21:36AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
and then memory accesses. However, down the road, this opens the
possibility of doing away with the collect scripts if we want to and just
using this object to hold the same data.
Hey, no touching the lab :)
Gruesse,
--
Frank
Author: rra
Date: 2008-06-08 05:51:27 +0200 (Sun, 08 Jun 2008)
New Revision: 1365
Modified:
trunk/checks/cruft
trunk/checks/standards-version
trunk/checks/watch-file
trunk/frontend/lintian
trunk/lib/Checker.pm
Log:
Use $info rather than $collect as the name for the Lintian::Collect
Author: rra
Date: 2008-06-08 06:11:56 +0200 (Sun, 08 Jun 2008)
New Revision: 1366
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
Finalize changes for 1.24.0.
Modified: trunk/debian/changelog
===
--- trunk/debian/changelog 2008-06-08
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 01:39:52AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Are we supposed to be able to get a shell as the lintian user using
sudo without entering a password? I really, really hate typing a
password into any sort of remote connection
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yeah, I have nothing against bumping the 2nd version number. But I still
think that the 3 part version number has its merits, so I'm currently
against dropping the third part. Actually why not drop the 1? we really
seem not intend to increase it any
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 01:21:36AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
and then memory accesses. However, down the road, this opens the
possibility of doing away with the collect scripts if we want to and
just using this object to hold the same data.
Hey,
lintian_1.24.0_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
lintian_1.24.0.dsc
lintian_1.24.0.tar.gz
lintian_1.24.0_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Author: rra
Date: 2008-06-08 06:36:35 +0200 (Sun, 08 Jun 2008)
New Revision: 1367
Added:
releases/1.24.0/
Log:
Tag 1.24.0 release.
Copied: releases/1.24.0 (from rev 1366, trunk)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accepted:
lintian_1.24.0.dsc
to pool/main/l/lintian/lintian_1.24.0.dsc
lintian_1.24.0.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/lintian/lintian_1.24.0.tar.gz
lintian_1.24.0_all.deb
to pool/main/l/lintian/lintian_1.24.0_all.deb
Override entries for your package:
lintian_1.24.0.dsc - source devel
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jun 2008 04:47:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#483775: fixed in lintian 1.24.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #483775,
regarding deprecated-chown-usage is prone to several false negatives
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jun 2008 04:47:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#234202: fixed in lintian 1.24.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #234202,
regarding add a warning about missing debian/watch file
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jun 2008 04:47:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#409104: fixed in lintian 1.24.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #409104,
regarding add a warning about missing debian/watch file
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jun 2008 04:47:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#409104: fixed in lintian 1.24.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #409104,
regarding lintian: Add new informational message - no-watch-file-exists
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jun 2008 04:47:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#472499: fixed in lintian 1.24.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #472499,
regarding lintian: please warn about obsolete v1 watch files
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jun 2008 04:47:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#471869: fixed in lintian 1.24.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #471869,
regarding [new check] order of dh_* calls
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jun 2008 04:47:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#483475: fixed in lintian 1.24.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #483475,
regarding still complains about missing targets when dh is used
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jun 2008 04:47:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#476587: fixed in lintian 1.24.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #476587,
regarding lintian: incorrectly raises dbg-package-missing-depends
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jun 2008 04:47:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#473156: fixed in lintian 1.24.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #473156,
regarding [checks/scripts] dash now supports $((cnt+1))
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jun 2008 04:47:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#474052: fixed in lintian 1.24.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #474052,
regarding [checks/manpages]: cannot adjust line, ... issues are not considered
on localized man pages
to be marked
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jun 2008 04:47:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#483384: fixed in lintian 1.24.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #483384,
regarding lintian: False positive on native-package-with-dash-version with 3.0
(quilt) source packages
to be marked
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jun 2008 04:47:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#481787: fixed in lintian 1.24.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #481787,
regarding lintian: check for BTS data directories in package
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jun 2008 04:47:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#234202: fixed in lintian 1.24.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #234202,
regarding lintian: Add new informational message - no-watch-file-exists
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jun 2008 04:47:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#484600: fixed in lintian 1.24.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #484600,
regarding spurious warning of changelog-should-not-mention-nmu
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Patch attached. I can also create a bzr repository if that's helpful.
For the future - yes please. Including a changelog entry.
Will do in the future.
Britney uses it, but its not needed at that point, as p_a will read the
stuff out of the .dak file
34 matches
Mail list logo
