Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
package lintian
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: lintian
# Fixed in r606 by rra
tag 242789 + pending
Bug#242789: lintian: check if dh_clean is used in debian/rules clean without a
debhelper dependency in Build-Depends
Tags were: patch
Tags added:
Your message dated Tue, 04 Apr 2006 00:15:49 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line This bug appears to be fixed in texinfo
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Author: rra
Date: 2006-04-04 10:19:21 +0200 (Tue, 04 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 607
Modified:
trunk/checks/fields
trunk/checks/fields.desc
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/testset/tags.relations
Log:
+ [RA] Check for conflicting with dependencies and build-conflicting
with build
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
package lintian
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: lintian
# Fixed in r607 by rra
tag 122760 + pending
Bug#122760: [checks/fields] Check for weird Conflicts/Depends relations
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Author: rra
Date: 2006-04-04 11:50:54 +0200 (Tue, 04 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 608
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/lib/Dep.pm
trunk/testset/relations/debian/control
trunk/testset/tags.relations
Log:
* lib/Dep.pm:
+ [RA] Add initial support for analyzing architecture information
Package: lintian
Severity: wishlist
There are many -dev packages which do not declare dependency on
necessary -dev packages.
It might be nice to issue warnings on lib*-dev packages which
have Depends: line with no lib*-dev dependencies against
those which are in Build-Depends.
Package: lintian
Version: 1.23.16
Severity: minor
An example run:
# echo W: foo source: package-uses-deprecated-debhelper-compat-version 1 |
lintian-info
W: edb source: package-uses-deprecated-debhelper-compat-version 1
N:
N: The debhelper compatibility version used by this
Author: rra
Date: 2006-04-04 20:37:01 +0200 (Tue, 04 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 609
Modified:
trunk/checks/debhelper.desc
trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
* checks/debhelper.desc:
+ [RA] When explaining the warning about deprecated debhelper
compatibility versions, mention that debhelper
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
package lintian
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: lintian
# Fixed in r609 by rra
tag 360711 + pending
Bug#360711: lintian: [lintian-info] improve diagnostics of
package-uses-deprecated-debhelper-compat-version
There were no tags set.
Tags added:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15
package lintian
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: lintian
tags 347169 pending
Bug#347169: [new check] warn about using X meta packages in dependencies
Tags were: patch
Tags added:
Jari Aalto [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The problem is that neither debian/compat exists or DH_COMPAT is defined
int debian/rules.
Which means that debhelper uses its default compatibility level of 1,
which is deprecated. That's what the warning is trying to tell you in
this case. One should
Author: rra
Date: 2006-04-04 21:23:20 +0200 (Tue, 04 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 610
Modified:
trunk/checks/debhelper.desc
trunk/checks/fields.desc
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/lib/Read_taginfo.pm
Log:
+ [RA] Move simple man page references from Info into Ref.
* lib/Read_taginfo.pm:
+
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
package lintian
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: lintian
# Fixed in r611 by rra
tag 357636 + pending
Bug#357636: shlib-without-PT_GNU_STACK-section check not valid for all arches?
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing
Author: rra
Date: 2006-04-04 23:17:22 +0200 (Tue, 04 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 612
Modified:
trunk/checks/changelog-file
Log:
Minor tweaks to keep XEmacs from warning about malformed local variables
every time it opens this file.
Modified: trunk/checks/changelog-file
Author: rra
Date: 2006-04-04 23:42:11 +0200 (Tue, 04 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 613
Modified:
trunk/checks/nmu
trunk/checks/nmu.desc
trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
* checks/nmu{.desc,}:
+ [RA] Warn if debian/changelog in a native source package is a
symlink and skip checks rather than
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
package lintian
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: lintian
# Fixed in r613 by rra
tag 257650 + pending
Bug#257650: [collection/debfiles,checks/changelog] should cope with changelog
beeing a symlink
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
thanks
Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 05:52:36PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
You provided a patch to lintian to check for executable stack that was
integrated in 1.23.13. We got a bug report indicating that it may not
be valid on all architectures. Could you take a
Your message dated Tue, 04 Apr 2006 14:47:16 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Never mind, unused overrides is already an I: tag
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 11:56:59PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
lintian.debian.org still use lintian 1.23.12.
Is it possible to upgrade it to 1.23.15 ?
Currently running for 1.23.16 (just uploaded). Will take a few days to
complete, iirc.
How
Author: rra
Date: 2006-04-05 00:33:46 +0200 (Wed, 05 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 614
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
Add a name for the next release.
Modified: trunk/debian/changelog
===
--- trunk/debian/changelog
lintian is a wonderfully relaxing thing to work on while on vacation in
the beautiful Pacific Northwest. :)
There are now quite a few fixes accumulated in Subversion (20 bug fixes,
85 lines of changelog) but probably no reason to upload before the last
upload makes it into testing. The only bug
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 03:43:53PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
lintian is a wonderfully relaxing thing to work on while on vacation in
the beautiful Pacific Northwest. :)
Didn't you get the memo? Vacation != work!! :)
There are now quite a few fixes accumulated in Subversion (20 bug fixes,
Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It crapped out near the end, the whole things is quite fragile anyway,
so instead I've been playing today with some totally alternative
approach of having a site like lintian.d.o, but then for potentially
unlimited amount of type of checks,
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 04:07:24PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It crapped out near the end, the whole things is quite fragile anyway,
so instead I've been playing today with some totally alternative
approach of having a site like lintian.d.o,
Hi,
There are many -dev packages which do not declare dependency on
necessary -dev packages.
It might be nice to issue warnings on lib*-dev packages which
have Depends: line with no lib*-dev dependencies against
those which are in Build-Depends.
Thinking about this for a bit, I
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 04:07:24PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'll announce to -qa later tonight a bit about the status of this, it's
work in progress, but it's long overdue.
Done now, see http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2006/04/msg00022.html
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
package lintian
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: lintian
# Fixed in r615 by rra
tag 294926 + pending
Bug#294926: Should alert on debian/rules (et al?) being symlink
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
tag 311786 + pending
Bug#311786: lintian
27 matches
Mail list logo
