. In the metadata there is a
Properties: field that the users can fill with every text he want, copyright and
license included. It can be see with imagemagic and the identify -verbose
command.
Please add a check for this.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key
5.1.1alpha+20120614-2
-- no debconf information
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 4096R/B9444540 http://goo.gl/I8TMB
more about me: http://mapreri.org
Launchpad User: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri
Ubuntu Wiki page
the current run is probably going to hit the timeout, and it's
already stuck at the very same step of the last timeout.
I don't really know how do you run during the tests, but one case of
such failure is due to some program waiting for input (just
wild-guessing)
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key
the .dsc, .orig, etc and a $pkg-$ver directory,
as created by dpkg).
I wonder if just using
$file =~ m/_build_/
instaead of
$file =~ m/_build_buildd/
is sane enough.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540
compressed in the original source, or not.
This is already took care, since #762105, in version 2.5.33.
The tag is emitted only if the timestamp is after the changelog.
You did not say which package gives you this false positive.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B
useful at all for nobody.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian Q
pad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
From 9ac5395e1f5173993ce7b870a21b0da699068180 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mattia Rizzolo <mat...@mapreri.org>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 11:40:14 +
Subject: [PATCH] checks/files.pm: also
area.
This got fixed just some hours ago :)
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/lintian/lintian.git/commit/?id=1d6b8a0a24c4bc477fd188964484f9480b76bce2
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 11:42:56AM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Yes, please add /build and /tmp/buildd to this check, where the actual
> builds happen inside the chroots.
>
> Patch attached.
Ok, that one was a bit broken.
I also moved the check a bit up and checked for the dire
the line length alone is
> probably not sufficient to reliably identify minified JS.
> Any comments?
Same thing for inkscape, though my line is 266 characters (>256) (I
argue 256 is a really low number for such a check, and I wonder why
Sascha report says another number).
--
regards,
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.39.1
Tags: patch
See attached. Thanks.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https
y 5 packages only in the whole archive use B-D-A, but none uses
B-C-A.
No need to say, I'd like to use it, and split B-D into B-D-I+B-D-A
everywhere I can.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: ht
.
At least, that's what my AM told me back then ^^
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri
d14a5cd4d3b38898c
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian
ar.gz.md5 checksums.
MD5 is useless and is nearly as good nothing for integrity checking.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
La
lmangle you can use pgpmode=auto if uscan is clever
enough for this case)
does this solve your issue?
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org :
provide different results than it would on, for example, January 1st
> 2017.
>
> Clearly, checking for dates >= 2100 might be considered be pretty safe. :)
Why not just comparing it with the latest changelog entry instead?
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key:
does not apply to lintian unless hardening-check goes
> away as well or is moved to a different package.
Yes, the whole package is going away.
I know you have already fixed it in the git repository, please close
this bug when a release happens, so the issue can be tracked properly.
--
regards,
Package: lintian
Version 2.5.52
Severity: wishlist
dh-systemd is a transitional package in stretch, pointing to a new
enough debhelper. Please emit a warning about an explicit
build-dependency on it.
See also https://bugs.debian.org/871312
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
Control: tag -1 + patch
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 09:31:24AM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> dh-systemd is a transitional package in stretch, pointing to a new
> enough debhelper. Please emit a warning about an explicit
> build-dependency on it.
>
> See also https://bugs.debian.or
nd LTS would matter).
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
De
fig helper that is run for all
debhelper compat level.
Also, dropping that `--with autotools_dev` switch will cast away all the
lintian warnings.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org
Package: lintian
Starting with debian policy 4.0.1 the "extra" priority is deprecated in
favour of "optional".
https://browse.dgit.debian.org/debian-policy.git/commit/?id=4b3e61ac3fa06d8b82433e09a76f42a4f8859306
Please warn about the former.
--
regards,
for deborphan.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https
to it.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org
0.92.2-1/debian/upstream/signing-key.asc/
(that's
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/reproducible/misc.git/tree/dump-gpg-keys.sh)
IOW: Guillem: I second merging that sig→asc converter into dpkg-source!
:)
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04
o look for a
> control file in the debian/tests directory.
Already reported yesterday.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user:
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.52
See https://bugs.debian.org/875962
I believe lintian should warn about these (and ISTR there is a already
a tag for those kind of files).
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540
/lintian.debian.org/tags/debian-rules-parses-dpkg-parsechangelog.html
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapr
b/python2.7/dist-packages/tests/test_transport.py
python-oauth2client: /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/tests/test_util.py
Both of them gained said an RC bug by anbe about it, and indeed I also
believe both of them installs those files by error.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
I see what you mean.
Point taken :)
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 8:43 PM Chris Lamb wrote:
> Hi Mattia,
>
> > Dunno if this is the case, but would be possible to at least keep it for
> > some cases
> […]
>
> Whilst this is certainly possible I just can't shake the feeling that
>
t for
some cases where the amount of fpos would be way lower? I'm thinking
about checking on machine-parsable d/copyright, and only for the
Copyright fields, and even there only the first chars of the field.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D
On Wed, 30 Aug 2017, 11:20 a.m. Chris Lamb wrote:
> Hey Mattia,
>
> > if it checked also debian/control
> > in source packages.
>
> I'm assuming you meant "debian/changelog in source packages" … ? :)
>
Oh well Of course :)
(as other data files
are), so I manually updated it, please correct me if I'm wrong.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user
an were warning about nodejs uses in script
> (and in particular in debian/tests/).
You already reported it 4 days ago :)
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: h
"
> being completely unrecognised whilst #873096 is about explicitly pointing
> out that nodejs is depecrated and you should move to node
Ah, sorry, thanks for explaining it. I didn't undestand it from the
original message.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE
# /usr/lib/site-python
> if ($fname =~ m,^usr/lib/site-python/\S,) {
> tag 'file-in-usr-lib-site-python', $file;
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540
model-dpkg-perl, most probably. Therefore
elevating cme's implementation.
Summing up: I don't think it's a practise ready to be nudged by lintian
yet.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me:
the source upload, not during the binary only
uploads from buildds)
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https
r.debian.org/news/865454
* Replace FIXME markers with TODO markers. Silly lintian ...
I do not want to see more of them, please let's try to stay real, even
if I personally would like to see more cleaness around.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52
I'm
sure that this bug was triggered by some sort of discussion on IRC
proposing the same…
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad u
Package: lintian
Severity: wishlist
please warn if somebody tries to do a "Team upload" (i.e. that string is
in the changelog) but the person in the changelog trailer is among the
Maintainer/Uploaders.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52
1-2/debian/control/#L36
A python2 package using ${python3:Depends} and therefore ending up with
no dependencies at all.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://m
it!)
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 11:32:25AM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> package-uses-experimental-debhelper-compat-version still triggers for
> 11, but debhelper version 11 was released the other day
> (https://tracker.debian.org/news/894669) and is now considered stable.
> Please stop w
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: retitle -2 lintian: please bump recommended debhelper compat to 11
Control: severity -2 wishlist
Control: tag -1 patch
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 11:32:25AM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> package-uses-experimental-debhelper-compat-version still triggers for
&
of dh_python[23], which was apparently already
done at some point in the past.
I recommend to just revert this commit and manually close the bug as
"done at some point in the past already".
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE
arning— would be very
annoying.
Graham: what is your reasoning for pushing toward what feels like a
deprecation of --dbgsym-migration? I've never heard any deprecation
plan from Niels, and surely a versioned Breaks+Replaces in dbgsyms are
not causing any issues.
--
regards,
cted tags of
the new tests, so I don't see how you felt like it was a duplicate.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user:
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.85
SSIA.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/deve
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 06:46:43PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> (Still, "SSIA" comes across as a little... lazy! :p)
No doubt, that's me and being lazy was the goal :P
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540
ntian should check for this
nonetheless: another debhelper bug may pop up in the future, and there
are packages building dbgsyms without using the facilities provided by
debhelper.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .
l is private ("403" and 404 are handled the same way by
gitlab).
Chris: those urls should not contain '.git' :)
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org
uld use the same filter
debian-control-has-obsolete-dbg-package is using (that doesn't warn
about this package because it "knows" that it's not a debug package).
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
dh_auto_build -- update-gmo -C po
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Clearly that override is wrong, please have
typo-in-debhelper-override-target warn about that (I must suppose there
are similar chance to have people try to override dh_
ected, I recommend getting in touch
with them before any action is taken. And if anything is done, dch's
default should be changed a well.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: h
e it's the same for Chris (whom is
involved in both lintian and diffoscope).
I don't know whether any of the other rdepds rely on its output so much,
if there are the same treatment would apply for them as well.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18
e failure
message would be quite unhelpful.
It might be just me that I'm an happy user of sensible-utils and would
rather see it a more widespread usage :)
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about m
hink in most cases (including your own example you made up
for the testsuite!) that file probably should be in /usr/share/doc/pkg/,
what about recommending to put it in the debian/package.docs file
instead?
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FC
tbug unable to report bugs.
> +Ref: #740944
Guess it should be "a Bugs" :)
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
kages (I don't know if lintian already has a definition
of those, but I'd define them as "priority extra/optional, section
oldlibs, any('dummy transitional', 'transitional package') in the long
description").
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A
e limited to those kind of sources).
Please emit a severity:wishlist tag about that useless dh-addon (ISTR
(but should be confirmed) that once the `--with quilt` is removed there
is already a tag warning about the usekess build-dep).
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE
mprovements is an example of
> requiring prerequisite work of volunteers that is not needed for
> co-ordinating with other volunteers. So we should not require it.
Agree, we should not require it. But I believe we should definitely
(more or less strongly) recommend it.
--
regards,
many fpos I can think of.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page:
's correctly handled, and dak accepts them since last week.
>
> https://anonscm.debian.org/git/lintian/lintian.git/commit/?id=2f1efb44994b066c22a985c09a853fc9583aacf8
Please revert this commit and close this bug as no action needed
anymore.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizz
riting nonsense :)
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa
and somebody from the relevant group of people (Helmut, Josch, Guillem
comes to my mind) ACKs it.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
La
e considered a valid use case, but if
that's so can I instead suggest to just add a lintian override in that
package (with a comment)?.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https:/
stsuite, as this one is
*also* calling dh_auto_test, but it should still handle
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck by hand.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
d nothing.
The only "safe" cases of command that are fine to run in an
override_dh_auto_test are : and echo (if not redirected to a file).
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
t /-docs-.+$/ or something more clever (to cover for the lang
codes).
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~ma
hypothetical, not as a real case.
I'll let you choose if it's something to add to the check or not
(probably not indeed).
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 09:01:48PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Since 1.18.something dpkg can handle unpacking of 1.18.15, and since
> dpkg 1.19.0 it also creates them. yes it was a issue back then but now
> it's correctly handled, and dak accepts them since last week.
don't forget, the tag could also be marked as experimental, which is
thought exactly to help out developing of the tags with high chances of
fpos.
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 4:48 AM Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Mon 2018-02-05 04:38:14 +0530, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > tags 889592 +
tag as well?
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA
l?
>
> Sure, please file a wishlist bug :)
Aye!
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://laun
for nocheck).
* Lower its certanty from possible to wild-guess
* Mark the tag as Experimental:yes
TIA
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org
ep') {
Maybe also add '-arch' ?
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian Q
?
If I read it correctly this is proposing to drop all S_D_E assignments
from d/rules, instead of e.g. proposing to replace them with
include /u/s/d/pkg-info.mk
export S_D_E# if needed
(and if wanted a dependency on dpkg-dev (>= 1.18.8))
--
regards,
Mattia R
the to have verb, not should nor must. It's a fact,
that date is plain wrong, period :)
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https
maintainer should make an effort to keep up and check for Policy
compliance at each package update.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Laun
it then there
probably is a good reason, it's not like some random person would ever
be able to find such an un-advertised field…
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me
be!?) while discussing a detail from DEP-14.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
3-libxml2-dbg: library-in-debug-or-profile-should-not-be-stripped
usr/lib/debug/.build-id/81/856a797c537c2f1ad0cff65a70d03e7ddb2956.debug
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more
build of python.
Interestingly, I do not get that tag for the python3 version...
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https
txt$,o
instead.
I.e. it needs to ignore license.txt and license.rst.txt, there is no
mention of files named license.rst.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapre
%
> rename from t/tests/files-extra-license/debian/_sources/license.rst.txt
> rename to t/tests/files-extra-license/debian/_sources/license.txt
This one was right as it was :)
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540
ntained-in-debian.org-infrastracture or
somesuch. Then, if it's not maintained in git it would trigger the
above.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org
eel free to rename the tag, perhaps making it start with 'vcs-' to
match other tags also checking the VCS fields.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org
Agreed.
Just bear with it for some weeks for few packages...
On Mon, 26 Feb 2018, 6:10 p.m. Raphael Hertzog, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 26 Feb 2018, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > Currently, there's debhelper 11~bpo9+1 in Stretch. However, mostly
> everyone
> > build-depends on
ucible-builds/Week-of-Mon-20180723/010464.html
I'll test diffoscope and if you don't hear from me (in the form of bug
reports), everything is fine ^^
BTW, for diffoscope a test build using the new version of file is enough
of a test (in case you want to just do it yourself :)).
--
regards,
tian maintainers because I don't think they ever
thought of that file as a public API, so they might want to be aware of
this new reverse-dependency.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about
intian shouldn't complain about 3.5 just yet, unless dh_python3
starts emitting dependencies on >= 3.5 by itself for some reason.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://ma
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: tag -2 - pending
Control: retitle -2 lintian: introduce a inexistent-file-in-dep5-copyright
Control: severity -2 wishlist
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 11:15:16AM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> 1) split the check in something like inexistent-file-in-dep5-copyri
rchive, please add them here).
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian Q
for
this one, so it should stop emitting
unused-file-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright and move to
inexistent-file-in-dep5-copyright instead.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more abo
ag. Renaming the tag
would cause all those overrides to be for naught, so please don't do it.
ISTR there was a facility in lintian somewhere (was it ever merged into
master?) to support for renamed tags, if it does exist, that would cover
my concerns.
--
regards,
Mattia R
it simple: this last paragraph should eming **only one tag**
saying the file doesn't match any file from the source package.
> Terrible names, I know, but just to make the clarifications easier!
"entry-coverd-by-another-entry" is probably wrong on many level,
starting by anything else a
: (line 42)
Now, they are all fpos, as that's just a heading containing the name of
an existing program, and the lines after explains what's happened to
them.
I suggest to ignore lines ending with ':' for this tag.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18
1 - 100 of 204 matches
Mail list logo