Package: lintian
Version: 1.23.42
Tags: patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 10:30 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Raphael Geissert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This sounds more like a report against checkbashisms.
I guess it could try to detect these:
See
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 12:12 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
lintian's parsing code certainly sounds better (mainly because
checkbashisms is based on an old version of the lintian code) but, from
a quick look, checkbashisms flags more issues than
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 20:46 +, I wrote:
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 12:12 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
I'd definitely welcome any additional regexes or code to add to lintian.
(And at some point we can figure out how to keep this in sync with less
effort.)
Having had chance to compare the
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.14
# Ugh...
notfound 464026 1.2.42
found 464026 1.3.42
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: lintian
Version: 1.2.42
Tags: patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
As discussed recently, please find attached a patch (against lintian and
devscripts SVN) to checks/scripts that adds the bashism tests that
devscripts's checkbashisms performs but lintian does not.
The only test
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 14:50 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As discussed recently, please find attached a patch (against lintian and
devscripts SVN) to checks/scripts that adds the bashism tests that
devscripts's checkbashisms performs but lintian does
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 16:06 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The first two certainly should be prefixed by something to avoid them
matching strings that happen to end in echo -e. I've updated
checkbashisms to do so for all three.
As far as I can see
Hi,
Thanks for adding the set of bashism checks from checkbashisms to
lintian recently. As a result of the recent bugs that people have been
filing on other packages using checkbashsims output, a few issues have
surfaced - one with a check that originated in the patch, and a couple
that were
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 16:33 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please let me know how you'd prefer to handle these, and any such issues
that arise in future. I'm more than happy to simply provide a list (as
below), send patches to the list or file bugs
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 16:33 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
The first issue is from the checkbashisms side:
'(?!\$)\(\(', # '((' should be '$(('
This will also match constructs such as if ((foo || bar) baz). I've
tightened
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 09:07 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sorry to be a pain, but we've tightened this further in svn to
'(?![\$\(])\(\(.*\)\)'
so as not to match constructs such as
progress_size=$(((100 - $PROGRESS_STATE) / 3
Hi,
Please find attached a patch which updates checks/scripts in line with
recent changes to checkbashisms.
The changes are:
- Fix the $( foo) test to not trigger on $( foo grep bar) and similar
constructs. (i.e. there should only be a single word between and ) in
order to trigger.)
- Add a
On Sun, 2008-02-24 at 14:41 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Hi,
Please find attached a patch which updates checks/scripts in line with
recent changes to checkbashisms.
Oops. A couple of the changes were slightly broken; I've just released
devscripts 2.10.18 to fix them.
Please find attached
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2008-02-24 at 14:41 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Hi,
Please find attached a patch which updates checks/scripts in line
with recent changes to checkbashisms.
Oops. A couple of the changes were slightly broken; I've just released
devscripts 2.10.18 to fix them
Hi,
On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 00:01 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Log:
* lib/Spelling.pm:
+ [RA] Avoid Perl warnings when called with an uninitialized value.
[...]
Modified: trunk/lib/Spelling.pm
===
---
Package: lintian
Version: 1.23.47
Tags: patch
Hi,
script_is_evil_and_wrong fails to catch scripts using ${1:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
as it
expects the optional quote to appear immediately before $@ rather than
before the optional ${1+.
The attached patch fixes this.
Regards,
Adam
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.19
notfound 471333 1.23.47
# Let's use a version that's actually in the archive... :)
found 471333 1.23.46
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I've attached a few patches against current lintian SVN which update
checks/scripts to incorporate some changes that have been made to
checkbashisms recently (there are a few changes I've not included such
as ignoring multi-line quoted text and checking for invalid function
names, as I'd like
Package: lintian
Version: 1.23.46
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
dash (finally) gained support for the shell arithmetic construct $((var
+1)) with the upload of 0.5.4-3 in December 2007 (see #329025).
As lenny contains a version of dash with the support, I've attached a
patch removing the
On Fri, 2008-03-28 at 11:31 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
dash (finally) gained support for the shell arithmetic construct $((var
+1)) with the upload of 0.5.4-3 in December 2007 (see #329025).
As lenny contains a version of dash
On Fri, 2008-03-28 at 11:59 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As far as I can see, it *is* in POSIX, which is what persuaded Herbert
to (albeit slowly) add it to dash.
Oh! Then the comment now makes sense to me, and by all means we should
remove
On Fri, 2008-03-28 at 19:23 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, 2008-03-28 at 11:59 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As far as I can see, it *is* in POSIX, which is what persuaded Herbert
to (albeit slowly) add it to dash.
Oh
Russ Allbery wrote:
Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There have been several further changes to checkbashisms in the past
month, most of which should be suitable for merging in to lintian.
Please let me know whether you'd prefer incremental patches once
those from my earlier message
On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 14:14 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:32:30PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
At the moment, I haven't had a chance to apply any of your patches, so
if it's the same amount of work for you, a unified patch
tags 479318 + patch
thanks
Hi,
On Sun, 2008-05-04 at 11:33 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Here is what I get today, after an upgrade to perl 5.10.x, running
lintian on a *.changes file:
$ lintian ocaml-res_2.2.5-1_i386.changes
Can't use string (1) as an ARRAY ref while strict refs in
On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 20:19 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 14:14 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Easiest would probably be to just give Adam commit rights and let him do
the whole work ;)
That would also work. :) I'd
On Fri, May 16, 2008 23:58, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 12:00:48AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
I had time, but unfortunately not the magic commit bit :-/
I've been forming a list of patches in my head (which I should probably
write down before I forget any
On Tue, 2008-05-20 at 03:15 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 10:51:03AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, May 16, 2008 23:58, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
[...]
Have you generated an account at http://svn.wolffelaar.nl/ ?
I've tried, a few times, but it appears
On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 22:35 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 06:32:42AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, 2008-05-20 at 03:15 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
[...]
Maybe that code should be moved to Alioth at some point...
I did notice that there was an Alioth
Package: lintian
Version: 1.23.49
Hi,
During a discussion on #debian-release, it was confirmed that britney
treats urgencies as case-sensitive - i.e. high != HIGH. lintian's check
for valid urgencies, conversely, is case-insensitive.
The check should be modified to be case-sensitive. As HIGH is
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 14:30 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
During a discussion on #debian-release, it was confirmed that britney
treats urgencies as case-sensitive - i.e. high != HIGH. lintian's check
for valid urgencies, conversely, is case-insensitive
[Apologies if the following is overly verbose; I erred towards
potentially including too much information rather than too little]
Hi,
One of the changes I've made in checkbashisms is to modify the check
for heredoc delimiters to match against a copy of the input line which
has had most
Hi,
This is the first of a series of patches updating checks/scripts
bashisms checks with some changes that have been made to checkbashisms
over the past few months.
Hopefully all the patches are self-explanatory, but please let me know
if there are any questions or issues.
Regards,
Adam
Hi,
This is the second of a series of patches updating checks/scripts
bashisms checks with some changes that have been made to checkbashisms
over the past few months.
This patch assumes (due to the context included in the diff) that the
previous patch has already been applied.
Hopefully all
Hi,
This is the fourth of a series of patches updating checks/scripts
bashisms checks with some changes that have been made to checkbashisms
over the past few months.
It's possible that some hunks of this patch may fail to apply as-is due
to conflicts with earlier patches; if this turns out to
On Sat, 2008-06-14 at 05:05 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 03:08:41PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
@@ -615,6 +631,7 @@
# We've checked for all the things we still want to notice in
# double-quoted strings, so now remove those strings
On Sat, 2008-06-14 at 05:20 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 04:58:02AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 03:08:01PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
This is the first of a series of patches updating checks/scripts
bashisms checks with some
On Sat, 2008-06-14 at 05:08 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 03:09:00PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
+ last if (++$i 55);
+ if
(/(^\s*|\beval\s*[\'\]|(;|)\s*)exec\s*.+\s*.?\$$var.?\s*(--\s*)?.?(\${1:?\+.?)?(\$(\@|\*))?/)
{
I guess that regex could really
tags 486145 + patch
thanks
Hi,
On Sun, 2008-06-15 at 14:32 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
For instance, if bar is a known obsolete package, then the following in
debian/control:
(Build-)Depends: foo | bar
will trigger a Lintian error.
On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 22:55 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 10:47:31AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2008-06-14 at 05:05 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 03:08:41PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
@@ -615,6 +631,7
On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 22:08 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 22:55 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
[...]
Applied with the fix above and the replacement of the duplicated regexes
by variables.
Thanks; fwiw, the regexes aren't (quite) duplicated.
The $cat_line
Christoph Martin wrote:
If a maintainer has some packages with his email address in different
case in the maintainer field they end up on different pages on
qa.debian.org. See for example:
[...]
Ony should get the same page independent of the case of the maintainer
email.
Probably this is
On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 20:03 +0200, Jordà Polo wrote:
[My comments may appear a little picky in places - because they are ;-)
That's because I don't have any real issues with the content though]
Severity represents how grave is the problem that can be detected using
a particular check.
s/is
Hi,
I was just having a quick look at the new web pages (which are very
cool :-) and spotted what appears to be an off-by-one or similar issue
in the tags report.
Part of the report includes:
derivations (binary)
suggests: tetex-bin
devscripts (binary)
suggests:
On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 23:32 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Hi,
I was just having a quick look at the new web pages (which are very
cool :-) and spotted what appears to be an off-by-one or similar issue
in the tags report.
In case it wasn't obvious and as I forgot to include
On Thu, 2008-06-19 at 00:57 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Please include an example URL in future reports, though.
I realised my omission as soon as I'd sent the message :-( I did follow
up with an example but presumably you were fixing it by that time. :)
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Sat, 2008-06-14 at 05:20 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 03:09:18PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
--- checks/scripts.orig 2008-06-13 14:51:32.0 +0100
+++ checks/scripts 2008-06-13 15:00:57.0 +0100
@@ -542,6 +542,11 @@
if ($cat_string
On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 18:24 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
As I suspected, the original patch didn't apply cleanly on top of the
three earlier patches; I've attached an updated patch against lintian
trunk which uses qr.
and, predictably, immediately spotted a small typo I'd made when
updating
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit b75cbcef5c417b9a540ecf259f443eac9b272b58
Author: Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri Jun 20 20:19:54 2008 +0100
[ADB] Update bashism regexes to add new checks, improve performance and
reduce false positives.
diff
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit 778fd4f6e143b0db00b6c1282b66c4e93db88cfe
Author: Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri Jun 20 20:22:59 2008 +0100
Merge the two checks/scripts stanzas
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 53bec99
On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 21:03 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 06:45:46PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 18:24 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
As I suspected, the original patch didn't apply cleanly on top of the
three earlier patches; I've attached
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit bfd01f31b0e8a17c021f5720fb086bb9cd486cec
Author: Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri Jun 20 23:42:28 2008 +0100
Update repository information to point at the new git repository
and update the online GPL2 link
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit 8ff2a9eb06ac0b60a11e837e8633f18611ac
Author: Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri Jun 20 23:51:40 2008 +0100
Ensure that menu-method files use !include menu.h (Closes: #184104)
diff --git a/checks/menus b/checks
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit 2af70f12d11bfa3ad6c673a4f8c9d113893d1775
Author: Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat Jun 21 12:41:48 2008 +0100
Fix reference to Menu System manual
diff --git a/checks/menus.desc b/checks/menus.desc
index 14eaec4
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit 8a8b3a321e13fc12428578211209138a2b5304c3
Merge: 2af70f12d11bfa3ad6c673a4f8c9d113893d1775
be0eff50bb2c24471599bb77b0fc7d3a4883212f
Author: Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat Jun 21 12:42:18 2008 +0100
Merge branch
On Sat, 2008-06-07 at 22:40 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
[...]
With this patch applied, I think that these bugs are now moot, but I
wanted to check before closing them. Is there any further work required
in britney to treat urgencies as case-insensitive, or does the change in
the log file
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit 45af6c4acd2b862b4248675ab42ec4d0dcb35be8
Author: Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue Jun 24 22:41:05 2008 +0100
Check info files are removed and allow install-info --remove-exactly
Allow install-info --remove
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit fd2167940cf3988dd29bf038bea584acd8e8c8d9
Author: Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue Jun 24 22:45:38 2008 +0100
Fix header for checks/menus{,.desc} block
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 0a580be
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-03-14 at 20:08 -0800, Matt Taggart wrote:
binutils and gdb now have support for putting debugging info into a separate
file. So you build things debugable and you get a separate file with all the
debugging info and a normal binary that contains a pointer to this info. This
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 18:01 +, Russ Allbery wrote:
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit d2bda16c93c7b619ee593ae3908ca579b8600c50
Author: Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu Jun 26 10:53:48 2008 -0700
Lower info-documents-not-removed to warning
Hi,
Whilst looking at #452216 and #461575 (both related to dpkg symbols
files), I tried to build the libbaz testset package; the build fails
with:
===
gcc -o libbaz1.so.1.0.3b -shared baz.o extra.o -lc
/usr/bin/ld: baz.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against `a local symbol' can
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 15:20 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Whilst looking at #452216 and #461575 (both related to dpkg symbols
files), I tried to build the libbaz testset package; the build fails
with:
[...]
The Lintian test suite currently can't
Hi,
I've been working on implementing support for syntax checking of symbols
files (as generated by dpkg-gensymbols). As part of that development
I've introduced a number of new tags, a brief description of which is
included below.
Any comments / suggestions / objections to the naming, severity,
On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 09:22 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
E: pkg-has-symbols-control-file-but-no-actual-shared-libs
Minor nit: dropping -actual will make the tag shorter and I don't think
it changes the meaning.
E: shlib-missing-in-symbols-control
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit 7f71195c6cad53edbc36f98afc68484086f0c298
Author: Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri Jun 27 20:32:51 2008 +0100
Enhance symbol checking support
+ Implement syntax and sanity checking for symbols files
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit f84e17b77e6f18a71f9edbfbe6c5eee93f251d8a
Author: Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri Jun 27 20:42:53 2008 +0100
Remove reference to moving to alioth and importing CVS history (both now
done)
diff --git a/private
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.30
# Fixed in commit 7f71195c6cad53edbc36f98afc68484086f0c298
tags 452216 pending
tags 461575 pending
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 19:45 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit f84e17b77e6f18a71f9edbfbe6c5eee93f251d8a
Author: Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri Jun 27 20:42:53 2008 +0100
Remove reference to moving to alioth
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit dca7991eb3d6e570d3b9ca763c856051e4fea401
Author: Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat Jun 28 17:38:18 2008 +0100
Add missing use Dep
* checks/changelog-file:
+ [ADB] Add missing use Dep. Thanks
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.30
# Fixed in commit dca7991eb3d6e570d3b9ca763c856051e4fea401
tags 488397 pending
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 08:09 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
I think it would be good for lintian to promote the use of __Choices over
_Choices in debconf templates. This feature is present since po-debconf
exists so, indeed, no compatibility problems.
The feature is well documented in
On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 23:14 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
One thing I wasn't entirely clear on from a quick look at Tags.pm - are
experimental tags intended to be declared as Type: experimental or as
a normal tag with an Experimental: yes field? The comments
describing %tags appear to suggest
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit 924aad805f027f92a0530e1e20478bb4a5120345
Author: Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue Jul 1 19:12:20 2008 +0100
(Re-)Add support for experimental tags
* doc/lintian.sgml
+ [ADB] Add reference to new
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit 3cd9db4d8ec7b0c3d77b76950f31ee775a5ce6ce
Author: Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue Jul 1 19:27:51 2008 +0100
Suggest replacing _Choices in debconf templates files with __Choices
* checks/debconf{,.desc
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.30
# Fixed in commit 3cd9db4d8ec7b0c3d77b76950f31ee775a5ce6ce
tags 481152 pending
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit aa5102aebd9abb1c0aedface23e72ec9640f2c1e
Author: Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue Jul 1 20:00:32 2008 +0100
Ensure the last package's information is displayed even if there is no
extra data associated
On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 19:01 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit aa5102aebd9abb1c0aedface23e72ec9640f2c1e
Author: Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue Jul 1 20:00:32 2008 +0100
Ensure the last package's information
On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 04:33 +, Russ Allbery wrote:
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit 8e894c3c810691e0a4274616d4e251b5471fb758
Author: Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue Jul 1 21:32:47 2008 -0700
Add test suite tag entries for new symbols tests
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit f42e60ba5b14a2c690a478fd82728684bc40d626
Author: Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed Jul 2 07:01:42 2008 +0100
Remove completed TODO entry for reintroducing experimental tags
diff --git a/private/TODO b/private/TODO
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit dbc67c6df98ec988a87a704fef0c00a6afa1817b
Author: Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed Jul 2 07:08:24 2008 +0100
Don't ignore testset/runtests
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 9ca4b75..1d3d3b9 100644
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit 99b9e364614d773daee351cc96873508fdc087aa
Author: Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed Jul 2 07:09:14 2008 +0100
Add experimental tag support to testset/runtests
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit 951769accce10003b174855e6acad6c83d32f2a4
Author: Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed Jul 2 07:17:11 2008 +0100
Update debconf tags file to include the new experimental _Choices tag
diff --git a/testset/tags.debconf b
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit 7e9168b4cab2acc9b1bf1bc904231bbe7fc601a1
Author: Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed Jul 2 19:19:34 2008 +0100
Check copyright files for lines 80 characters
* checks/copyright-file{,.desc}:
+ [ADB
On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 13:09 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
What's the correct way for a non-native Debian package to indicate that
there's no useful upstream and watch file processing should not be done
for that package?
I'd been assuming that it was adding a watch file that contained only
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit ad09f133a313d2ba70328a6a5127edbea1d4b356
Author: Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu Jul 3 23:10:23 2008 +0100
Check for embedded copies of Javascript libraries which are already
packaged.
* checks/files
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.33
# Fixed in commit ad09f133a313d2ba70328a6a5127edbea1d4b356
#
# * checks/files{,.desc}:
#+ [ADB] Warn if the package contains embedded copies of separately
# packaged Javascript libraries. Patch by Chris Lamb. (Closes:
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 14:53 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
On 04-Jul-2008, Ben Finney wrote:
$ lintian -I hello_2.2-2.dsc I: hello source:
debian-watch-file-is-missing
W: hello source: debian-rules-ignores-make-clean-error line 31
W: hello source: ancient-standards-version 3.7.2 (current is
Ben Finney wrote, Friday, July 04, 2008:
On 04-Jul-2008, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Did you intend the check to be performed against binary packages,
source packages, or both?
Primarily source packages, but both would also be good.
In which case, as Russ mentioned, lintian has the capability
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit c4b87525b17351ee215a0df5f731d7d1f5a1e388
Author: Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri Jul 4 21:06:35 2008 +0100
Add then to the list of expressions which can precede a bashism
diff --git a/checks/scripts b/checks
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit 083946ba13e52aa74e7b4a43de503228a6648dab
Author: Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri Jul 4 21:40:05 2008 +0100
Add {diff,source}-contains-bts-control-dir
* checks/cruft{,.desc}:
+ [ADB] Check
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit be997b71bb1c30353d0e62694cc6f8e2cb5015de
Author: Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri Jul 4 21:46:11 2008 +0100
Fix test-has-inconsistent-type for experimental tags
diff --git a/testset/runtests b/testset/runtests
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.33
# Fixed in commit 083946ba13e52aa74e7b4a43de503228a6648dab
#
#* checks/cruft{,.desc}:
# + [ADB] Check for BTS control directories in source packages and diffs
#in addition to the existing binary package checks.
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit a8d2233cbc940d0311a68aaf9d49ae0976003906
Author: Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat Jul 5 14:39:39 2008 +0100
Fix template-uses-unsplit-choices for single binary packages
Add debfiles/templates to the list
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit a01056f32e0ad99e9717e8f6dd20a8994b3a5327
Author: Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat Jul 5 14:44:16 2008 +0100
Add a missing period to the description of template-uses-unsplit-choices
diff --git a/checks/debconf.desc
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit 59c84b7c6cdbf90588c2c1ca9c9aa73363444b1f
Author: Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat Jul 5 14:56:58 2008 +0100
Fix an off-by-one in the single binary source detection
Also simplify building of the list
Hi,
On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 07:03 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
1) Checking if a declared template is still used
Sometimes, maintainers rewrite maintainer scripts and remove the use a
a given debconf template but do not think about dropping it from
debian/*templates. It therefore clutters
On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 16:05 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 07:03 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
1) Checking if a declared template is still used
[...]
As far as I can see, such a test does not currently exist. It would be
fairly simple to add, assuming
On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 17:02 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 16:05 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 07:03 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
1) Checking if a declared template is still used
[...]
As far as I can see, such a test does
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit 3cd1fed4e5c0f8e112975934c8b429bf727b537e
Author: Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat Jul 5 20:19:14 2008 +0100
Fix maintainer script names in info-documents-not-removed
diff --git a/checks/infofiles.desc b/checks
On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 15:07 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
As far as I can see, such a test does not currently exist. It would be
fairly simple to add, assuming that the following methodology would make
sense (on a per-binary package basis):
for each of config, preinst
1 - 100 of 899 matches
Mail list logo
