tags 914271 - pending
thanks
(Unmarking as pending; was accidentally set during a stable backport.)
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 02:14:13PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Having an explicit check for the symbols stuff would be nice, but I
> think it's besides the point. In the same way epochs in upstream
> version are problematic, dashes in upstream versions are too IMO.
Since a few Policy revisions
tags 914271 - pending
tags 914271 + moreinfo
forwarded 914271 https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/merge_requests/72
thanks
Hi Guillem et al.,
> > I then suggest two things:
I've reverted this below, pending further discussion here:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 914271 - pending
Bug #914271 [lintian] lintian: Rationale behind
hyphen-in-upstream-part-of-debian-changelog-version
Removed tag(s) pending.
> tags 914271 + moreinfo
Bug #914271 [lintian] lintian: Rationale behind
On Thu, 2018-11-22 at 13:24:04 +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Quoting Guillem Jover (2018-11-22 13:12:05)
> > > in your original commit you were talking about "some tools".
> > >
> > > This suggests that you know tools that behave wrongly.
> > >
> > > If you share the tools you know of, then
On Wed, 2018-11-21 at 16:44:29 +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Quoting Felix Lechner (2018-11-21 15:52:02)
> > Well, I also agree with Josch's well-articulated argument. A merge
> > request to remove the tag is pending (!72). Thank you for bringing
> > this to our attention!
I think the tag
Hi,
Quoting Guillem Jover (2018-11-22 13:12:05)
> > in your original commit you were talking about "some tools".
> >
> > This suggests that you know tools that behave wrongly.
> >
> > If you share the tools you know of, then we could file bugs.
>
> I think that would be difficult, I'm afraid
> This suggests that you know tools that behave wrongly.
Unfortunately, I cannot help. I remember having issues when
experimenting with less common version numbers, but that may not have
been with dashes. My hope was to build a fence around policy to save a
maintainer from potential headaches
Hi Felix,
Quoting Felix Lechner (2018-11-21 15:52:02)
> Well, I also agree with Josch's well-articulated argument. A merge
> request to remove the tag is pending (!72). Thank you for bringing
> this to our attention!
in your original commit you were talking about "some tools".
This suggests
tags 914271 + pending
thanks
Applied in Git, pending upload. Thanks, Felix.
https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/commit/09d86b2fd208f95a816430e8ce5595b08fe0f3b3
checks/source-changelog.desc | 8
checks/source-changelog.pm | 3 ---
Well, I also agree with Josch's well-articulated argument. A merge
request to remove the tag is pending (!72). Thank you for bringing
this to our attention!
[adding felix.lech...@lease-up.com to CC]
Hi Johannes,
> my package rss-bridge was just tagged with […]
As it wasn't immediately obvious from the bug report-alone
rss-bridge | 2018-07-17-1.2 | buster | source, all
rss-bridge | 2018-07-17-1.2 | sid| source, all
>
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.112
Severity: normal
Hi,
my package rss-bridge was just tagged with
hyphen-in-upstream-part-of-debian-changelog-version. The description
text reads:
N: The upstream version in the debian changelog contains one ore more
N: hyphens. While that is okay according
13 matches
Mail list logo
