On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 01:58:04PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> I'm looking at the update process for DLAs on the main website again.
\o/
> In
> #859122, I've mentioned that I have, again, updated the MR to include
> all DLAs up to DLA-1657-1. The www team folks tell me they will review
> tha
I'm looking at the update process for DLAs on the main website again. In
#859122, I've mentioned that I have, again, updated the MR to include
all DLAs up to DLA-1657-1. The www team folks tell me they will review
that this weekend.
But that mass-import process is kind of clunky: every time I need
On 2018-12-19 18:05:36, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On 2018-12-19 11:09:10, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> On 2018-12-19 14:58:29, Holger Levsen wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 09:52:19AM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> I also note #859122 is not marked 'patch'.
fixed.
>>>
>>> :)
>>>
>>
On 2018-12-19 11:09:10, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On 2018-12-19 14:58:29, Holger Levsen wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 09:52:19AM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>>> > I also note #859122 is not marked 'patch'.
>>> fixed.
>>
>> :)
>>
>>> >> I've requested access as an individual, for what that's
On 2018-12-19 14:58:29, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 09:52:19AM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> > I also note #859122 is not marked 'patch'.
>> fixed.
>
> :)
>
>> >> I've requested access as an individual, for what that's worth.
>> > you were given access a week ago, too. \o/
>
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 09:52:19AM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> > I also note #859122 is not marked 'patch'.
> fixed.
:)
> >> I've requested access as an individual, for what that's worth.
> > you were given access a week ago, too. \o/
> yup. I guess I could just merge my own patches now... o
On 2018-12-19 14:44:02, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Antoine,
>
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 10:15:15AM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
[...]
> I also note #859122 is not marked 'patch'.
fixed.
[...]
>> I've requested access as an individual, for what that's worth.
>
> you were given access a week ago
Hi Antoine,
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 10:15:15AM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> >> How does that sound?
> > sounds very good to me. thanks for your work on this so far!
> Right, agreed. :) I guess the script could both parse previous emails
> and future ones quite easily.
yup, that would be cool.
On 2018-11-20 15:30:21, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 07:07:26PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> The process broke down a while back, and reasons don't matter. We need
>> to figure out how to fix this.
>>
>> So I opened #859122 to import the missing DLAs and I've made good
>> pro
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 07:07:26PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> The process broke down a while back, and reasons don't matter. We need
> to figure out how to fix this.
>
> So I opened #859122 to import the missing DLAs and I've made good
> progress.
>
> But I've opened this bug report (#859123
Hi!
Many of you probably already know this website and its precious RSS
feed:
https://www.debian.org/security/
Few of you might already know that DLAs are *supposed* to show up in
there as well, and did for a while. For example, here's a few DLAs in
2014:
https://www.debian.org/security/2014/
11 matches
Mail list logo
