Re: RFH: Getting fastp building on more archs

2021-10-17 Thread Andrius Merkys
Hi Nilesh, On 2021-10-16 11:44, Nilesh Patra wrote: > Hi Andrius, the reason is quoted below (reply from zigo on -python) > >> Hi, >> >> Did you look into the source package? isal is written in assembly >> language... On the same thread Graham reported success in building isal on armhf,

Re: Why is isal limited to just three archs?

2021-10-17 Thread Nilesh Patra
Hi Thomas, On 10/16/21 4:07 PM, Graham Inggs wrote: Hi, Did you look into the source package? isal is written in assembly language... I see at least an erasure_code/ppc64le directory. I did a quick test build in Ubuntu and the package built and passed its tests on armhf, ppc64el and riscv64,

Re: Lagging behind several versions for snakemake - lots of failed tests in latest version

2021-10-17 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
On 15/10/2021 14:46, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi Rebecca and whoever might care. As usual snakemake is troublesome to upgrade. I have injected the latest version into Git but there are lots of failed tests. It would be great if someone could care about this. Kind regards Andreas. I

Re: Lagging behind several versions for snakemake - lots of failed tests in latest version

2021-10-17 Thread Steffen Möller
On 17.10.21 21:39, Nilesh Patra wrote: Hi Steffen, On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 at 01:06, Steffen Möller mailto:steffen_moel...@gmx.de>> wrote: On 17.10.21 21:19, Nilesh Patra wrote: Yeah, snakemake has now moved to pulp 2.0. pulp had another rev-dep on congress which is now removed from

Re: Lagging behind several versions for snakemake - lots of failed tests in latest version

2021-10-17 Thread Nilesh Patra
Hi Steffen, On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 at 01:41, Steffen Möller wrote: > > On 17.10.21 21:39, Nilesh Patra wrote: > > Hi Steffen, > > On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 at 01:06, Steffen Möller > wrote: > >> >> On 17.10.21 21:19, Nilesh Patra wrote: >> >> Yeah, snakemake has now moved to pulp 2.0. pulp had another

Re: Lagging behind several versions for snakemake - lots of failed tests in latest version

2021-10-17 Thread Nilesh Patra
Hi Steffen, On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 at 01:06, Steffen Möller wrote: > > On 17.10.21 21:19, Nilesh Patra wrote: > > Yeah, snakemake has now moved to pulp 2.0. pulp had another rev-dep on > congress which is now removed from archive. > pulp is maintained in openstack, and I sent out an email to zigo

Re: Lagging behind several versions for snakemake - lots of failed tests in latest version

2021-10-17 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, Am Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 02:57:00AM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra: > No worries, I have done so, and pushed my changes to: > https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/python-pulp > I really, _really_ need reviews. The very odd thing here is same content in > postrm and prerm, and no

Re: Lagging behind several versions for snakemake - lots of failed tests in latest version

2021-10-17 Thread Steffen Möller
Hi Nilesh, On 17.10.21 23:27, Nilesh Patra wrote: Hi Steffen, On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 at 01:41, Steffen Möller mailto:steffen_moel...@gmx.de>> wrote: On 17.10.21 21:39, Nilesh Patra wrote: Hi Steffen, On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 at 01:06, Steffen Möller mailto:steffen_moel...@gmx.de>>

Re: Lagging behind several versions for snakemake - lots of failed tests in latest version

2021-10-17 Thread Nilesh Patra
On 10/18/21 12:13 AM, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: On 15/10/2021 14:46, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi Rebecca and whoever might care.  As usual snakemake is troublesome to upgrade. I have injected the latest version into Git but there are lots of failed tests.  It would be great if someone could care

Re: Lagging behind several versions for snakemake - lots of failed tests in latest version

2021-10-17 Thread Steffen Möller
On 17.10.21 21:19, Nilesh Patra wrote: On 10/18/21 12:13 AM, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: On 15/10/2021 14:46, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi Rebecca and whoever might care.  As usual snakemake is troublesome to upgrade. I have injected the latest version into Git but there are lots of failed tests.