On Fri, 6 Jul 2018 at 08:56 Andreas Tille wrote:
> I admit I've spent so many
> hours into this software compared to other that my motivation to deal
> with this issue is not going beyond restricting it just to amd64 (which
> seems to be the only *tested* platform).
Oh, I just misread the
On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 07:11:42PM +0300, Liubov Chuprikova wrote:
> > I made an effort to build on i386 after declaring of `uint64_msbit`.
> However, it still failed to compile *fasterq-dump *which is a new tool that
> appered in 2.9.1. The error was:
>
>
Dear Andreas,
On Fri, 6 Jul 2018 at 10:04 Liubov Chuprikova
wrote:
>
> Here upstream implemented [1] this function `uint64_msbit` for x86-64 [2]
> and for Windows, presumably. But it was not defined for i386, so there is a
> warning during the build [3]:
>
> warning: implicit declaration of
Dear Andreas,
On Fri, 6 Jul 2018 at 08:56 Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 09:01:21PM +0300, Liubov Chuprikova wrote:
>
> > Is it supposed to build on i386? On the upstream wiki page, compiled
> > binaries are available only for 64-bit architectures. It seems, that they
> > do not
4 matches
Mail list logo
