Hello,
I am interested in Debian packaging for plastimatch (plastimatch.org). The
procedure is more or less clear, and I have completed the tutorial to create
debian directory, and make source and binary packages.
So far, I have registered on Alioth and requested to join debian-med. It seems
(Oops, forgot to cc to list!)
I would like to add a long description which should be
given in an ITP
and which you can perfectly obtain from the Debian Med
tasks page (which
is currently available only at the testing site[1])
Thanks Andreas!
Finally I got the Alioth ssh keys to work, but
Hi Thorsten,
Finally I got the Alioth ssh keys to work, but I had a
trouble
uploading the directory into debian-med. Any
idea what I did wrong?
from which host did you checkout your repository? If it is
alioth, you need to 'svn switch' to svn.debian.org. On
alioth all repositories
Hi,
The plastimatch binary package now builds without lintian errors.
The source package has two warnings:
W: plastimatch source: changelog-should-mention-nmu
W: plastimatch source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number 1.5.0-1
Could anyone advise how to fix? Is my case NMU or non-NMU?
Hi,
(1) Lintian is now warning-free. I did have a spelling conflict
between DEBFULLNAME and changelog (how did you know that Mathieu?)
(2) Execute permissions fixed in svn.
(3) Regarding 3rd party libraries, I removed the ones which are
either not needed, or debian packages already exist.
Feel free to ask for help if you have no idea about how to
specify those
Build-Depends and how to test the build in a clean pbuilder
environment.
To get some first help you should probably have a look into
the Debian
Med policy[1].
Thank you Andreas. Indeed, I was completely unaware of
Hi,
I got the below build error with pbuilder. I think I can
fix by adding zlib1g-dev dependency to plastimatch.
But couldn't it be more correct that the dependency should
be to libinsighttoolkit3-dev?
Thank you
Greg
cd /tmp/buildd/plastimatch-1.5.0/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/src/plastimatch
Hi,
I have updated plastimatch, to fix problem with insufficient
documentation of copyright. Could this be uploaded again
for review?
Thank you,
Greg Sharp
gregsh...@geocities.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Hi Dominque,
Thank you for reviewing the package.
I don't think this can be re-distributed.
From ./plastimatch-1.5.2/libs/specfun/readme :
All the programs and subroutines contained in this
diskette
are copyrighted. However, we give
permission to the reader who
purchases this
Hi Andreas,
Nevertheless, it would be nice to include
eventually.
It contains a useful function for computing depth dose
curve
for proton beams. The authors specify a
different license on
the web site (below). Would this license be OK
if it can
be verified?
All the
Dear Andreas,
Thank you for your advice.
I have a plastimatch_1.5.15+dfsg-1.orig.tar.gz, but it looks like
a plastimatch_1.5.15+dfsg.orig.tar.gz is wanted. (See below for details.)
The source tarball should not contain the Debian revision number. The
-1 in the end is the Debian package
Hi, I've updated plastimatch version, could I get a new upload?
There was a bug which I've fixed by adding --as-needed flag:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=748155
Yet, I am mystified. When the dependency package
(libinsighttoolkit4.5) was updated, there was no
automatic
On Mon, 19 May 2014 13:12:05 +0200
Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org wrote:
Hi Gregory,
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 02:39:35PM -0700, Gregory Sharp wrote:
Hi, I've updated plastimatch version, could I get a new upload?
There was a bug which I've fixed by adding --as-needed flag:
Since you
I have read and understood the bug report #759971 [1].
Thank you Andreas for responding.
Now I have tried to educate myself on the procedures of binnmu.
Going forward, it seems that my job is to look out for
the resolution of #755539, and then send an email
to debian-release with a binnmu
Hi,
Thanks so much for this!
From: Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu
To: debian-med@lists.debian.org
Cc:
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 8:05 AM
Subject: Re: Please help: failed build of plastimatch 1.5.16+dfsg-2 for
several architectures
Hi Martin,
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at
Hello Martin,
On Sun, 23 Nov 2014 10:23:22 +0100
Martin Steghöfer mar...@steghoefer.eu wrote:
Gregory Sharp wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 01:36:40PM +0100, Martin Steghöfer wrote:
Problem seems resolved to be resolved:
https://bugs.debian.org/768769#47
Thanks. Please make sure
On Mon, 01 Dec 2014 13:20:11 +0100
Martin Steghöfer mar...@steghoefer.eu wrote:
Hi Martin,
Regarding the remaining issues.
There are still problems on 2 platforms, but they seem unrelated:
1. On arm64 it's BD-Uninstallable, which is because of a chain of
uninstallables: gccxml - cableswig -
On Mon, 23 Feb 2015 08:34:30 -0600
Steve M. Robbins st...@sumost.ca wrote:
Thanks, Paul,
On February 23, 2015 09:05:58 AM Paul Novotny wrote:
I have not used mitk or camitk, so I can't answer your question
directly. But I have had luck prototyping applications using itk and vtk
in
Hi,
I've prepared the plastimatch version upgrade in the debian-med subversion.
Please let me know if anything else I can/should be doing.
Note: uscan still fails due to bug in tar #748244.
Greg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Dear Andreas,
Thank you for looking at the package.
On Fri, 1 May 2015 23:50:37 +0200
Andreas Tille andr...@fam-tille.de wrote:
Hi Gregory,
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 05:17:15PM -0400, Gregory Sharp wrote:
I've prepared the plastimatch version upgrade in the debian-med
subversion. Please
Hi Andreas,
On Thu, 14 May 2015 18:58:34 +0200
Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
Cool! Thanks for these interesting changes! It was not clear to me
whether it also fixes bug #778066 and thus I did not closed it.
#778066 is not fixed.
Unfortunately, the update did not go as well
Dear Andreas,
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 07:27:12PM -0400, Gregory Sharp wrote:
Could you please explain your motivation to do the package that way?
This was not intentional, therefore an error. Thank you for finding!
I believe that I could fix by modifying the rules file.
I
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 22:01:36 -0500
Steve M. Robbins st...@sumost.ca wrote:
Hi,
Previously on debian-med, I proposed that ITK v3 be dropped from the
archive [1]. The only respondent agreed with that. So I filed for removal
[2] and received notice that several packages still depend on ITK
Hi,
A new update for plastimatch is complete, in my opinion
is ready for sponsoring. The following issues were fixed
and tested:
- build problem on arm64, mips, etc resolved
- gcc 5 issues resolved
- remove obsolete copyrights
- lintian warnings resolved
Thank you,
Greg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 17:54:27 -0600
"Steve M. Robbins" <st...@sumost.ca> wrote:
> On November 18, 2015 01:59:32 PM Gregory Sharp wrote:
> > [ ... ]
>
> My recollection is that the dependency resolver used by pbuilder is
> different than that of the offi
Hi Andreas,
> For the next upstream version you might like to fix this:
>
> I: plastimatch: spelling-error-in-binary usr/lib/libplmbase.so.1.7
> Verticies Vertices I: plastimatch: spelling-error-in-binary
> usr/lib/libplmbase.so.1.7 transfrom transform I: plastimatch:
> spelling-error-in-binary
Hi,
The plastimatch package in salsa was updated to the latest upstream
release. May I please request upload?
Thank you,
Greg
Hi all,I have uploaded the new plastimatch version into Salsa.
Also the failing test case is now fixed.Thank you,Greg
I've pushed to salsa the new plastimatch upstream version and it is ready for
upload.
Thank you Andreas and Antoni for fixing the ITK issue earlier this year!
Greg Sharp
gregsh...@geocities.com
.
Am Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 07:19:14PM + schrieb Gregory Sharp:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> On Tuesday, June 14, 2022, 03:00:27 PM EDT, Andreas Tille
> wrote:
>
> Am Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 03:27:10PM +0000 schrieb Gregory Sharp:
>
> > > How best to p
I pushed a new fix to salsa and tested. Dictionary now works as expected.
Greg Sharp
gregsh...@geocities.com
On Thursday, June 16, 2022, 10:55:35 AM EDT, Gregory Sharp
wrote:
Hi Mathieu,
There are some files put into /usr/share/dcmtk, but other files are put into
/usr/share
just adding Mathieu Malaterre explicitly in from. Mathieu, you have
> started the separate locations of the dic files. It would help a lot if
> you could comment on this thread.
>
> Kind regards
> Andreas.
>
> Am Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 11:28:29PM + schrieb Gregory Sharp:
Hi again,
I have reverted the autopkgtest files and uploaded.
Regarding Nilesh's suggestion of moving those upstream, it sounds like a good
plan. The upstream tests use dynamically generated synthetic data, so it could
eliminate the need for storing large binary files. We can do the same for
:
Hi Greg,
Gregory Sharp, on 2022-11-17:
> Just a ping. This is still ready for review and upload. Please let me know if
> I missed something.
Your mail provider seems to have filtered out [1], so I retry
with my debian.org address (in case I broke something with my
emlwks999.eu on
Hi all,
Just a ping. This is still ready for review and upload. Please let me know if I
missed something.
Thanks!
Greg Sharp
gregsh...@geocities.com
On Thursday, November 3, 2022, 03:14:53 PM EDT, Gregory Sharp
wrote:
Happy Thursday everyone.
I have updated plastimatch
Happy Thursday everyone.
I have updated plastimatch for the new upstream version, and it is ready for
review and upload.
Thank you,
Greg Sharp
gregsh...@geocities.com
36 matches
Mail list logo
