-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vincent Bernat wrote:
Why not 0.71 ?
Done.
Conflicts: fpm ( 0.71)
Replaces: fpm ( 0.71)
Provides: fpm
And you may want to call it transition package instead of
metapackage.
Done.
Description: a password manager - transitional
On Thu, 08 May 2008 21:30:00 +0200 Vincent Bernat wrote:
Missing Homepage field in debian/control. Missing mention of ltmain.sh
license and all other generated files present in upstream in
debian/copyright.
Remove sample mention in debian/rules.
* Added Homepage
* Removed
On Fri, 09 May 2008 07:52:38 +0200 Vincent Bernat wrote:
This adds a link on PTS that a user can easily follow if he wants for
example to find upstream SVN, a forum or a request tracker. This is
easier than to search in debian/copyright by hand.
Done:
* Homepage
* No sample
*
On Thu, 08 May 2008 21:18:20 +0200 Vincent Bernat wrote:
I see no problem with this package. Let's wait tomorrow if someone else
finds something.
You found, I fixed :)
Now with Homepage and without sample in the header.
Now I only see two minor lintian warnings:
$ lintian -I ../gtkvncviewer_0.2.3-1_i386.changes
I: gtkvncviewer source: build-depends-without-arch-dep
python-central
I: gtkvncviewer:
desktop-entry-contains-encoding-key
OoO En ce doux début de matinée du vendredi 09 mai 2008, vers 08:40,
Wen-Yen Chuang [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait:
The updated package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- dget
OoO En cette matinée ensoleillée du vendredi 09 mai 2008, vers 09:11,
Evgeni Golov [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait:
* Added Homepage
* Removed sample
* machine-readable copyright
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/orange/orange_0.3.1-1.dsc
I still don't think I should add generated
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 4:27 PM, Clement Lorteau
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doesn't that mean there's nothing to fix? In this case, yes, I have a
build dependency while my package is architecture independent, but
that's how python-central i think; and yes I have an Encoding key in
my .desktop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vincent Bernat wrote:
I don't know why it has not been spotted earlier by lintian, but there
is the following warning:
I: fpm2: desktop-entry-contains-encoding-key
/usr/share/applications/fpm2.deskto
Done.
I guess your lintian is newer than
OoO En cette fin de matinée radieuse du vendredi 09 mai 2008, vers
11:21, Wen-Yen Chuang [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait:
I guess your lintian is newer than 1.23.48?
No, I have 1.23.48. But I use -viI as args.
Anyway, since Encoding is a deprecated key, I am happy to remove it.
The
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 08:56:55PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
I see the Asio header files are listed in libboost1.35-dev. That package
depends on new, versioned, -dev packages and conflicts with libboost-dev.
I think libtorrent-rasterbar can then build-depends on libboost1.35-dev
and
Hello Thibaut and *
Am 2008-05-05 16:07:35, schrieb Thibaut Paumard:
I was talking of something like
/u/s/d/package-doc/html - /u/s/d/package/html/
where both are created in the -doc package, not
/u/s/d/package-doc - /u/s/d/package/
which is a really bad idea, for the reasons you mention
Am Montag, den 05.05.2008, 14:50 +0200 schrieb Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik:
When there are two packages, packagename (that contains a library) and
packagename-doc (that contains documentation and examples), do the
documentation and examples go in /usr/share/doc/package or
On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 20:19 +0800, Wen-Yen Chuang wrote:
Aleš Koval (author of fpm2) wrote:
FPM2 data file is 100% compatible with his old version. I port FPM2 as
drop-in replacement old FPM in mind.
In this case, why is it necessary to create an fpm2 package at all? Why
not just do a new
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Richard Laager wrote:
In this case, why is it necessary to create an fpm2 package at all? Why
not just do a new fpm package (version 2.x.y) and avoid all the
transitioning? To me, an fpm2 package makes sense only if you intend to
support both
15 matches
Mail list logo
