"Paul Wise" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You probably want a custom regex in the -i option to dpkg-source.
The biggest problem here is I don't want to lose the effect of the
*existing* buildpackage ignore list that 'dpkg-source' uses. I just
want to ignore an *additional* directory.
So it seems
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Ben Finney
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In other words (and thank you for asking questions until I know how to
> ask this): I want an additional directory to be removed from the
> Debian source package, the same way '.bzr/' and '.hg/' and 'CVS/' et
> al are remove
Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In other words (and thank you for asking questions until I know how
> to ask this): I want an additional directory to be removed from the
> Debian source package, the same way '.bzr/' and '.hg/' and 'CVS/' et
> al are removed when building the Debian source
"Paul Wise" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> > No, I want it removed from the Debian '*.diff.gz'. It's part of
> > the upstream source but is akin to VCS data: it should not be
> > present in the Debian '*.diff.gz'.
I misspoke here. '.be/' a dire
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Ben Finney
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Paul Wise" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Sounds like you are removing it from the diff.gz but want it removed
>> from the orig.tar.gz? If so, best ask upstream to not distribute it
>> there in the first place.
>
> No, I wan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> Why are there even two versions of the library? One should be enough.
>>>
>> Hi Paul, libtorrent (for rakshasa) is used by rtorrent (same
"Paul Wise" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Ben Finney
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm trying to remove the entire top-level '.be/' directory from
> > the source package, using this feature of 'dh_clean'. However, in
> > the 'debian/clean' file, neither of '
Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote:
> Cristian Greco wrote:
> [some text missing]
>>> Also, what is the status on renaming the current libtorrent to
>>> libtorrent-rakshasha to avoid confusion?
>> As I know, there have been no further discussion about this.
>
> Hi, I as the maintainer of libtorrent w
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Why are there even two versions of the library? One should be enough.
>>
> Hi Paul, libtorrent (for rakshasa) is used by rtorrent (same upstream),
> rasterbar is used by another clients. Is not the same, does
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Ben Finney
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to remove the entire top-level '.be/' directory from the
> source package, using this feature of 'dh_clean'. However, in the
> 'debian/clean' file, neither of '.be' nor '.be/*' result in removing
> that directory
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Cristian Greco wrote:
>> [some text missing]
Also, what is the status on renaming
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Cristian Greco wrote:
> [some text missing]
>>> Also, what is the status on renaming the current libtorrent to
>>> libtorrent-rakshasha to avoid confusion?
>>
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I recently added support for dh_clean reading debian/clean (see its man
> page)
I'm trying to remove the entire top-level '.be/' directory from the
source package, using this feature of 'dh_clean'. However, in the
'debian/clean' file, neither of '.be' nor '
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ben Finney wrote:
> > I recall recently seeing mention that 'dh_clean' could obey a
> > 'debian/.clean' file as a list of patterns or files to
> > clean.
>
> I recently added support for dh_clean reading debian/clean (see its
> man page)
That's exactly it,
Ben Finney wrote:
> I recall recently seeing mention that 'dh_clean' could obey a
> 'debian/.clean' file as a list of patterns or files to
> clean.
>
> However, I can't find it with search engines; "package.clean" returns
> hits for "package clean", and "dh" returns hits for all the "dh_foo"
> com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cristian Greco wrote:
[some text missing]
>> Also, what is the status on renaming the current libtorrent to
>> libtorrent-rakshasha to avoid confusion?
>
> As I know, there have been no further discussion about this.
Hi, I as the maintainer of libtor
Howdy all,
I recall recently seeing mention that 'dh_clean' could obey a
'debian/.clean' file as a list of patterns or files to
clean.
However, I can't find it with search engines; "package.clean" returns
hits for "package clean", and "dh" returns hits for all the "dh_foo"
commands.
Can someone
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 06:15:09PM -0700, Scott Ritchie wrote:
> Hi, I too would like a libtorrent-rasterbar package. Deluge already
> includes its own version statically, which isn't nice, and a package I
> am making now (the lobby client for the game Spring) needs this library
> as well.
>
> S
On Sat, 17 May 08 20:40, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du samedi 17 mai 2008, vers 17:57, Armin
> Berres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>
> > Replaces must not come with Conflicts.
> > Consider a package foo which contains a lot of architecture independent
> > files. One day
OoO La nuit ayant déjà recouvert d'encre ce jour du samedi 17 mai 2008,
vers 23:10, Alexander Bürger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>> You should divert the manpage too.
> Oh yes, sorry.
>> ... modifying upstream ...
> Well, as I am also the upstream maintainer it would be strange to add a
> pat
Hi Vincent,
> > ... using dpkg-divert ...
>
> You should divert the manpage too.
Oh yes, sorry.
> ... modifying upstream ...
Well, as I am also the upstream maintainer it would be strange to add a
patch. As I cannot upload to the luaforge website, I just did not want
to bother Otfried because
OoO En cette soirée bien amorcée du samedi 17 mai 2008, vers 22:02,
Alexander Bürger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>> ... diversion for the file is probably the right way to go.
> A new package using dpkg-divert instead of "Replaces:" has been uploaded
> to mentors.debian.net, and I would be h
Hi,
> ... diversion for the file is probably the right way to go.
A new package using dpkg-divert instead of "Replaces:" has been uploaded
to mentors.debian.net, and I would be happy if it could be sponsored.
Kind regards,
Alexander
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
Hi Nico,
> > fig2sxd- convert XFig files to OpenOffice.org format
>
> What is OpenOffice.org format?
As is "elaborated" in the long description, the program produces files
(more or less) compatible with the .sxd format of OpenOffice.org Draw.
Although this description may not be precise, it
Hi Alexander,
* Alexander Bürger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-17 21:34]:
[...]
> fig2sxd- convert XFig files to OpenOffice.org format
What is OpenOffice.org format?
Cheers
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all text in this mail
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fig2sxd".
* Package name: fig2sxd
Version : 0.18-1
Upstream Author : myself
* URL : http://fig2sxd.sf.net
* License : GPL
Section : graphics
It builds these binary packages:
fig2sxd- conver
OoO En ce début de soirée du samedi 17 mai 2008, vers 21:01, "Eugene
V. Lyubimkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>> I did not upload the package, you left the tags in debian/control.
> :(. Fixed, uploaded.
Uploaded. Thanks!
--
# Basic IBM dingbats, some of which will never have a purpose clea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vincent Bernat wrote:
> I did not upload the package, you left the tags in debian/control.
:(. Fixed, uploaded.
- --
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, Ukrainian C++ developer.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Us
OoO Pendant le journal télévisé du samedi 17 mai 2008, vers 20:23,
"Eugene V. Lyubimkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>> Well, this is not really important, but for example, there is no
>> difference between debian-hints and en in default_profiles.
> Do you think is there any sense
OoO Pendant le journal télévisé du samedi 17 mai 2008, vers 20:43, Colin
Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
> You're more or less correct. uuwaf itself provides an abstraction to the
> client handling of the database, allowing an easy method for multiple
> connections to potentially different type
OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du samedi 17 mai 2008, vers 17:57, Armin
Berres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
> Replaces must not come with Conflicts.
> Consider a package foo which contains a lot of architecture independent
> files. One day you decide to split the arch independent files into a new
OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du samedi 17 mai 2008, vers 18:00, Neil
Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>> > The reason is that some other applications we have depend upon the
>> > framework, but don't use the preferences system.
> IMHO a good enough reason for a package split. No other ex
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>I am don't.
Sorry for my english. "I don't".
- --
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, Ukrainian C++ developer.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFILyL0cho
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vincent Bernat wrote:
>>> Why do you ship those files with Debian package and not as upstream?
>>> share/default_profiles/de-debian-hints |1
>>> share/default_profiles/debian-hints|1
>>> share/layouts/de-debian-hints | 10 +
OoO Pendant le repas du samedi 17 mai 2008, vers 19:32, "Eugene
V. Lyubimkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>> Why do you ship those files with Debian package and not as upstream?
>> share/default_profiles/de-debian-hints |1
>> share/default_profiles/debian-hints|1
>> share/la
On 17-May-08, 04:30 (CDT), Vincent Bernat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [This message is about using Replaces without Conflicts]
>
> I am not sure either. As you noted, the policy does not say to not use
> it alone, but this just seems odd to me. Let's hope that someone else
> will enlighten
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vincent Bernat wrote:
> The Homepage field should be put in the source stanza, not the binary
> one.
Done.
> Another set of remarks:
> - add a debian/watch file, this is very useful (even if you are
>upstream, this is useful for other
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vincent Bernat wrote:
> Fine. I won't request to clean changelog any more then.
So, should I revert all changelog entries, starting with early (0.1.x) upstream
versions,
or revert entries starting with 0.3.1.1-1 package?
- --
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka
On Sat, 17 May 08 11:30, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> OoO En cette fin de matinée radieuse du samedi 17 mai 2008, vers 11:17,
> Alexander Bürger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>
> >> When using Conflicts and having files in common with the other package,
> >> you need Replaces as well. Otherwise, durin
On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 16:22 +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> > The reason is that some other applications we have depend upon the
> > framework, but don't use the preferences system.
IMHO a good enough reason for a package split. No other explanation is
necessary in my book.
> Well, I understand
On Saturday 17 May 2008 4:20:17 am Vincent Bernat wrote:
> OoO En cette aube naissante du mercredi 14 mai 2008, vers 07:16, Andres
>
> Mejia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
> > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3.0 of the package
> > "debpool". I think Magnus (co-maintainer) has been ve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Vincent,
Vincent Bernat wrote:
>>> install uuwaf? If they want to configure database themselves,
>>> dbconfig-common will ask them about this.
>
>> The reason is that some other applications we have depend upon the
>> framework, but don
OoO Vers la fin de l'après-midi du samedi 17 mai 2008, vers 16:02,
Vincent Fourmond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
> Vincent Bernat wrote:
>> The valid way to replace a file without conflicting with a package is to
>> use diversion. This is not a solution in your case because you would
>> h
OoO En ce début d'après-midi ensoleillé du samedi 17 mai 2008, vers
15:53, Colin Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>> I don't really understand why you did split the package into two binary
>> packages. Why not just put everything in uuwaf? Why would people only
>> install uuwaf? If
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "uvccapture".
* Package name: uvccapture
Version : 0.4-1
Upstream Author : Gabriel A. Devenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://staticwave.ca/source/uvccapture/
* License : GPL (version 2 or newer)
Sectio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Vincent,
Thanks for your reply.
[uuwaf issues]
> LGPL v4 does not exist ;-) But your debian/copyright is correct. You
> might want to add the path to LGPL license on Debian systems (like you
> did for GPLv2).
Oops, yes. :-). I will update
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.2+dfsg1-1
of my package "poco".
It builds these binary packages:
libpoco5-dev - Development files for POCO - The C++ Portable Components
libpocodata5 - The C++ Portable Components Data library
libpocodatad5 - The C++ Portable Compon
Hi,
0==0
Info for debian-devel: we try to figure out how to package figtoipe.
Before version 6.0pre30-1, a version of figtoipe was included in the ipe
package. Since then, figtoipe is a separate upstream package and also
gone from
On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 14:12 +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> > It works fine in all the browsers I tested, including lynx. There isn't
> > anything wrong with the page itself.
>
> In fact, the sponsor part was hidden by AdBlock Plus plugin because, I
> suppose, of its id.
In which case, IMHO, AdB
Hi Colin!
OoO Peu avant le début de l'après-midi du samedi 17 mai 2008, vers
13:43, Colin Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "uuwaf" (see opus previously).
> * Package name: uuwaf
> Version : 1.0.1-2
> Upstream Author : Colin Turn
OoO Peu avant le début de l'après-midi du samedi 17 mai 2008, vers
13:05, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>> There must be a problem with this page. It does not have any content.
> It's fine - check your browser settings and refresh the page (or just go
> to the page itself: htt
Hello,
2008/5/17 Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 07:33:28PM +0800, LI Daobing (李道兵) wrote:
>> Dear mentors,
>>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.1-1
>> of my package "chmsee".
>>
>> It builds these binary packages:
>> chmsee - A chm file viewer wr
Dear Mentors,
I am still looking for a sponsor for my packages opus, and its
dependency uuwaf, aimed at supporting work based learning at
universities and colleges etc.
I enclose the basic details again, with links to the original messages.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2008/05/msg00117
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 07:33:28PM +0800, LI Daobing (李道兵) wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.1-1
> of my package "chmsee".
>
> It builds these binary packages:
> chmsee - A chm file viewer written in GTK+
>
> this is a new upstream release, in this
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.1-1
of my package "chmsee".
It builds these binary packages:
chmsee - A chm file viewer written in GTK+
this is a new upstream release, in this release, two problems have been fixed:
1. replace openssl with gcrypt, fix the imco
On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 12:44 +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> OoO Pendant le temps de midi du samedi 17 mai 2008, vers 12:06, Neil
> Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>
> >> Your debian version should be 0.3.1.1-1 (not -3) since this is the first
> >> one for 0.3.1.1 upstream version.
>
> > V
OoO Pendant le temps de midi du samedi 17 mai 2008, vers 12:06, Neil
Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>> Your debian version should be 0.3.1.1-1 (not -3) since this is the first
>> one for 0.3.1.1 upstream version.
> Vincent - just a note, other sponsors have different preferences and it
On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 10:54 +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> OoO En cette nuit nuageuse du jeudi 15 mai 2008, vers 00:03, "Eugene
> V. Lyubimkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>
> >> You should keep the changelog with only one entry (Initial release)
> >> since this is a new package for Debi
OoO En cette fin de matinée radieuse du samedi 17 mai 2008, vers 11:17,
Alexander Bürger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>> When using Conflicts and having files in common with the other package,
>> you need Replaces as well. Otherwise, during upgrade, the user may see
>> error messages about you
Salut Vincent,
> Is your package useful for someone that has ipe (<< 6.0pre30-1)? As I
> understand, those versions already have figtoipe. Therefore, your
> package is useless. This is why you Conflict with this package.
No, the old packages had a version of figtoipe that was unable to
OoO Vers la fin de l'après-midi du vendredi 16 mai 2008, vers 16:45,
Alexander Bürger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>> > I do not understand Replaces/Conflicts very well.
>>
>> You should. ;-)
>>
>> Conflicts avoids that your package is installed along with another
>> package. Replaces a
OoO En cette nuit nuageuse du jeudi 15 mai 2008, vers 00:03, "Eugene
V. Lyubimkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>> You should keep the changelog with only one entry (Initial release)
>> since this is a new package for Debian. You should also file an ITP and
>> close it.
> Done.
Your debi
OoO En cette nuit nuageuse du jeudi 15 mai 2008, vers 00:00, Evgeni
Golov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>> I am not sure either. Maybe there is an exception. You can ask on
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> As you have seen, I've posted to debian-legal with no reply (except of
> yours). It seems t
OoO En ce début de soirée du mercredi 14 mai 2008, vers 21:27, Clement
Lorteau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
> Thank you for the review. I followed your recommendations and uploaded
> the new package to debian.mentors.net. See my comments below.
You can use "test_files/*" for debian/nautilus-c
OoO En cette aube naissante du mercredi 14 mai 2008, vers 07:16, Andres
Mejia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3.0 of the package
> "debpool".
> I think Magnus (co-maintainer) has been very busy so I'm looking for a
> sponsor at mentors.debian.net
65 matches
Mail list logo
