W dniu 07.02.2012 22:06, Bas van den Dikkenberg pisze:
*Van:*Bartosz Feński [mailto:bart...@fenski.pl]
*Verzonden:* dinsdag 7 februari 2012 21:20
*Aan:* Bas van den Dikkenberg
*CC:* Daniel Martí; debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
*Onderwerp:* Re: RFS: burp -- A cross platform network
Anyone ? :)
Am 08.02.12 12:53, schrieb Werner Detter:
Hi everybody
I've received an email from Thomas. He proposed that it would make sense to
have not only one sponsor for my package but maybe two So if one is busy
the other one can do the sponsoring.
Thomas had no time to upload my
Dear ftp-master,
I wonder if the solution below for transitioning ia32-libs to multiarch
would be OK in regards to DAK and testing transition etc. Any technical
problems why we couldn't make an exception for the 3 ia32-libs* packages
for this?
Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org writes:
On Thu,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/10/2012 01:17 AM, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
Dear mentors,
I seek your advice regarding the best practice with using
--as-needed.
The --as--needed flag is automatically added to package builds in
Ubuntu. If you do not want your package to fail
* Stephen M. Webb stephen.w...@bregmasoft.ca, 2012-02-10, 07:12:
I seek your advice regarding the best practice with using --as-needed.
The --as--needed flag is automatically added to package builds in
Ubuntu. If you do not want your package to fail to build from source
(and thus not be
* Dmitry Smirnov only...@member.fsf.org [120210 07:18]:
Because in their eyes I have neither expertise nor reputation I couldn't
convince them that benefits are outweight risks. (--as-needed removes dozen of
packages from Depends)
I've been asked to provide a document or a quote from
retitle 658306 RFS: preload/0.6.4-2 [ITA] -- adaptive readahead daemon
thanks
I've been working further on this package. The changelog now looks as follows:
* New Maintainer (Closes: #646216)
* Switched to 3.0 (quilt) source format.
* Corrected the logrotate location. Thanks to Tobias
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 658306 RFS: preload/0.6.4-2 [ITA] -- adaptive readahead daemon
Bug #658306 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: preload [ITA] -- adaptive readahead
daemon
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: preload/0.6.4-2 [ITA] -- adaptive readahead daemon'
from 'RFS:
Dmitry Smirnov only...@member.fsf.org writes:
I seek your advice regarding the best practice with using --as-needed.
Recently I tried to convince two package maintainers to use --as-needed
in order to reduce overlinking. Surprisingly this time this idea was
opposed with great resistance as
hi fEnIo,
I did complete rebuild of the packages and fixed all of the isues,
Can you please re evaluate the package and when it is oke sponsor it bye
uploading it for me?
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 658835 - confirmed fixed
Bug #658835 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: aspsms-t (try 4) [NEW] -- sms transport
for your xmpp/jabber server
Removed tag(s) confirmed and fixed.
noowner 658204
Bug #658204 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: bibtool [ITA] --
Package: sponsorship-requests
Hi,
I am looking to upload the package u-boot.
dget -u
http://alioth.debian.org/~jrnieder-guest/temp/u-boot/u-boot_2011.12-2.1.dsc
It builds a bootloader (Das U-Boot), some companion tools, and some
transitional packages. The purpose of this upload is to fix
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 658065 + confirmed
Bug #658065 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: atlas-cpp/0.6.2-1 [ITA] -- WorldForge
wire protocol library
Added tag(s) confirmed.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
658065:
tag 658065 + confirmed
thanks
Hi,
Stephen M. Webb stephen.w...@bregmasoft.ca writes:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package atlas-cpp:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/atlas-cpp/atlas-cpp_0.6.2-1.dsc
* There are files licensed under the GFDL in tutorial/example.
The --as-needed flag is a workaround for buggy upstream build systems,
IMO it should not be used unless the relevant build systems will not
be fixed any time soon.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes:
The --as-needed flag is a workaround for buggy upstream build systems,
IMO it should not be used unless the relevant build systems will not be
fixed any time soon.
Which in most cases they won't be. Hell, I'm an upstream maintainer for
one case where *I'm*
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:15:22 Bernhard R. Link wrote:
I personally strongly recommend against using --as-needed unless you
understand very well what it does. It may change the runtime behaviour of a
program without any signs at link time.
Surely it's a powerful thing which should be used with
On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 11:38:23 Paul Wise wrote:
The --as-needed flag is a workaround for buggy upstream build systems,
IMO it should not be used unless the relevant build systems will not
be fixed any time soon.
Seems like a typical case with GNOME project stuff.
Do you know if there are
Russ Allbery rra at debian.org writes:
Daniel Stender daniel at danielstender.com writes:
For the very next of my commits,
1) what URI should I give to the very next commits, and should I just
just disregard the Lintian complain
For right now, I would ignore the complaint and use an
Hello List:
The upstream changelog of my package is in LaTeX format:
as the LaTeX is rough enough to be translated to HTML format by TtH,
I will put the HTML translation within the package.
Given that, what I am supposed to do with the LaTeX changelog source ?
May I put it within the package as
Le Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 05:42:29AM +, Samuel Bronson a écrit :
Russ Allbery rra at debian.org writes:
Daniel Stender daniel at danielstender.com writes:
For the very next of my commits,
1) what URI should I give to the very next commits, and should I just
just disregard the
W dniu 10.02.2012 19:47, Bas van den Dikkenberg pisze:
hi fEnIo,
I did complete rebuild of the packages and fixed all of the isues,
Can you please re evaluate the package and when it is oke sponsor it bye
uploading it for me?
To access further information about this package, please visit the
22 matches
Mail list logo
