Hi,
I am trying to sponsor ocrodjvu but if I build it in a recent
sid/chroot here is what I see:
$ lintian -I
/tmp/d/d/ocrodjvu-0.7.16/../build-area/ocrodjvu_0.7.16-1_amd64.changes
E: ocrodjvu: bad-provided-package-name python:any
I: ocrodjvu: spelling-error-in-manpage
Hi,
I was looking for a solution and I saw that ubuntu uses build1 as version's end
name [0].
Is this aproach ok in debian?
Reading documentation I don't find a proper versioning scheme that fits this
problem.
Any help would be appreciated.
Regards
[0]
❦ 16 novembre 2013 01:27 CET, Eriberto eribe...@eriberto.pro.br :
Thanks a lot for your revision and assistance. I think that was a
confusion between n and space keys when reorganizing the Depends
field. Sorry for that.
I already fixed the problem and I put the new package in Mentors:
❦ 16 novembre 2013 11:50 CET, Vincent Bernat ber...@debian.org :
Thanks a lot for your revision and assistance. I think that was a
confusion between n and space keys when reorganizing the Depends
field. Sorry for that.
I already fixed the problem and I put the new package in Mentors:
Hi,
to the maintainer and any sponsor:
** Please do a very, very careful license review! **
We had a very long discussion about this software at debianforum.de
[0][1][2] because the upstream author wanted us to test the software,
but was reluctant to grant us a view at the code all through the
❦ 16 novembre 2013 12:14 CET, Dominik George n...@naturalnet.de :
to the maintainer and any sponsor:
** Please do a very, very careful license review! **
We had a very long discussion about this software at debianforum.de
[0][1][2] because the upstream author wanted us to test the
Well, ffmpeg was dropped by Debian and the replace is libav (#729147).
Vokoscreen supports avconv since 18.0 version. Thus, I used
libav-tools (avconv) as install dependency and tested it. Worked fine.
However, we may have a user using ffmpeg in the future and vokoscreen
will prefer it.
There are
Well, I checked all files and I wrote a long d/copyright and all
licenses are ok. A summary of the situation:
Files: *
Copyright: 2011-2013 Volker Kohaupt vkoha...@freenet.de
License: GPL-2.0
Files: vokoscreen.1
Copyright: 2012 Dominique Lasserre
License: GPL-2.0
Files: libqxt/*
Copyright:
❦ 16 novembre 2013 12:56 CET, Eriberto eribe...@eriberto.pro.br :
Well, ffmpeg was dropped by Debian and the replace is libav (#729147).
Vokoscreen supports avconv since 18.0 version. Thus, I used
libav-tools (avconv) as install dependency and tested it. Worked fine.
However, we may have a
Yeap! Can you upload this version? Then, I will have the package as DM
and fix the problems easier. In parallel, I will talk with the
upstream about the problem. He is conscient of the libav in Debian and
we have a good dialog. See what he wrote me: thanks that you package
vokoscreen to Debian.
The debian/copyright in the package I just downloaded from mentors still
has GPL-2.0+, are you sure this was fixed?
Sorry, the package on mentors was still the old one. ( it wasn't
uploaded because of .upload file, and I somehow forgot to upload it
again after I deleted the .upload file)
Hi,
could anyone upload this package for me ?
Thanks,
Werner Detter
Am 05.11.13 09:26, schrieb Werner Detter:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Subject: RFS - policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-6
Hi everybody,
I've created a new version of my package policyd-weight. This version
just adds a
Your message dated Sat, 16 Nov 2013 11:14:51 -0200
with message-id
CAP+dXJeVD3NpfFghuWM9cS7m7L7aoyrRE+1R4=2k4o1tnhg...@mail.gmail.com
and subject line Re: RFS: vokoscreen/1.8.1-1 [ITP] -- easy to use screencast
creator
has caused the Debian Bug report #729601,
regarding RFS: vokoscreen/1.8.1-1
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package nlopt
* Package name: nlopt
Version : 2.4+dfsg-1
* URL : http://ab-initio.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/NLopt
* License : MIT
Section : math
It
Uploaded. Thanks for contribution.
Anton
2013/11/16 Sergey B Kirpichev skirpic...@gmail.com
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package nlopt
* Package name: nlopt
Version : 2.4+dfsg-1
* URL :
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Neil Wallace rowinggol...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package regexxer
Hi Neil,
I'm willing to sponsor this package. A few comments first.
Lintian isn't happy with your changelog:
W: regexxer:
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 6:18 AM, Jackson Doak nosk...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package python-meld3
Hi Jackson,
The package looks good. I'm going to go ahead and sponsor it. Feel
free to contact me directly if needed for future uploads of this
package.
close 718486
thanks
Sponsored
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1384632572-1367-bts-...@debian.org
I'm already in the python team, i'll see if this is able to be added.
Thanks.
Could you please look at my gthumb package? If someone is willing to
sponsor it, i can try and continue maintaining it.
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio a...@debian.orgwrote:
On Thu, Aug 1,
A doubt: where is the ITP bug???
Thanks!
Regards,
Eriberto
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Hi!
Your package has several warnings and hasn't an ITP number. It cannot
be uploaded.
Regards,
Eriberto
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Hi,
Why you used native for the package? Where is the ITP bug?
Thanks.
Regards,
Eriberto
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On 11/11/2013 11:45 AM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
This work is less useful for Daily developers, since schroot can do what
docker does just fine (e.g. for sbuild, etc), but docker is going to be
a huge win for a cluster of build nodes for debile.
i don't care for it to build packages, i'm
On Sat, 2013-11-16 at 13:40 +0100, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
Sorry, the package on mentors was still the old one. ( it wasn't
uploaded because of .upload file, and I somehow forgot to upload it
again after I deleted the .upload file)
Now I really uploaded the new one with the mentioned
Hi,
How to determine build dependencies?
I was using 'dpkg-depcheck -d ./configure ...', but that seems to have
included much more than necessary.
For example for emacs, using motif instead of gtk3, I get [1], but I
don't think x11proto-randr-dev, libxinerama-dev, libxrandr-dev, libgl1-
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Jose G. López wrote:
I was looking for a solution and I saw that ubuntu uses build1 as version's
end name [0].
That is how they version rebuilds, in Debian we use something
different for that:
https://wiki.debian.org/binNMU
Is this aproach ok in debian?
A
T o n g mlist4sunt...@yahoo.com writes:
How to determine build dependencies?
Well, the best way is to read upstream documentation and possibly the
configure script and figure out what the dependencies are stated to be.
But if you're looking for more of an automatically-determined method, I
27 matches
Mail list logo
