Bug#890481: RFS: fcitx-cloudpinyin/0.3.6-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: debian-input-met...@lists.debian.org Dear mentors and debian-input-method members, I am looking for a sponsor for team package "fcitx-cloudpinyin" * Package name: fcitx-cloudpinyin Version : 0.3.6-1 Upstream Author

Bug#890480: RFS: groonga/8.0.0-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "groonga" * Package name: groonga Version : 8.0.0-1 Upstream Author : Groonga Project * Url : http://groonga.org/ * Licenses:

Re: GPLv3 source code with license check for some build configuration, DFSG ok?

This seems to be a good use of the ‘debian-legal’ discussion forum. Can you reply to this thread – note the Cc to ‘debian-legal’, please subscribe there to follow if you like – with a copy of the exact text granting license (“you may such-and-such under conditions so-and-so”). More questions

Re: GPLv3 source code with license check for some build configuration, DFSG ok?

On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 8:29 AM, Thomas Preud'homme wrote: > ultracopier's source code has a license check when built in ultimate mode. What is the difference between ultimate mode and normal modes? -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

GPLv3 source code with license check for some build configuration, DFSG ok?

Hi there, TL;DR: ok to distribute GPLv3 code with license key check for an existing build configuration that does not have that license check? ultracopier's source code has a license check when built in ultimate mode. However the source code is readily available, licensed under GPLv3 and I

Bug#890461: RFS: igmpproxy/0.2.1-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "igmpproxy" * Package name: igmpproxy Version : 0.2.1-1 Upstream Author : Pali Rohár * URL : https://github.com/pali/igmpproxy * License

Bug#890458: RFS: udftools/2.0-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "udftools" * Package name: udftools Version : 2.0-2 Upstream Author : Pali Rohár * URL : https://github.com/pali/udftools * License

Bug#890225: reopening RFS: flake8-polyfill/1.0.2-1

Control: reopen -1 Sorry about the typo. Thanks, Jeremy Bicha

Bug#890225: marked as done (RFS: flake8-polyfill/1.0.2-1)

Your message dated Wed, 14 Feb 2018 21:15:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#890225: fixed in vala 0.39.91-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #890225, regarding RFS: flake8-polyfill/1.0.2-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#890225: Bug #890225 in vala marked as pending

Control: tags -1 -pending Oops, I meant to mark #890255 as pending instead. Sorry about that! Thanks, Jeremy Bicha

Bug#890449: RFS: engauge-digitizer/10.4+ds.1-2

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "engauge-digitizer" * Package name: engauge-digitizer Version : 10.4+ds.1-2 Upstream Author : Mark Mitchell * URL :

Bug#888526: marked as done (RFS: dxf2gcode/20170925-7 [ITP] -- converts 2D drawings to G-code for CNC machines)

Your message dated Wed, 14 Feb 2018 13:33:48 -0700 with message-id and subject line found a sponsor! has caused the Debian Bug report #888526, regarding RFS: dxf2gcode/20170925-7 [ITP] -- converts 2D drawings to G-code for CNC machines to be

Bug#890225: Bug #890225 in vala marked as pending

Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #890225 in vala reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#890437: RFS: fgetty/0.7-3

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fgetty" * Package name : fgetty Version : 0.7-3 Upstream Author : Felix von Leitner * Url : https://www.fefe.de/fgetty * Licenses

Bug#889968: RFS: inotify-tools/3.14-4

Hello, On Wed, Feb 14 2018, Sean Whitton wrote: > If you do this, please upload using `dgit push-source` since Dmitry is > using a dgit-based workflow. > > (you can just run `dgit push-source` and it should do everything for > you) Oh, plus --overwrite since the last upload to unstable was not

Bug#889968: RFS: inotify-tools/3.14-4

Hello Gianfranco, On Wed, Feb 14 2018, kact...@gnu.org wrote: > Hello! Gianfranco, could you please consider building and, probably, > sponsoring this package? We have issue, that it FTBFS on Sean's setup, > but builds on mine and on debomatic. As debomatic admin notified, > debomatic is not

Bug#887659: RFS: urlwatch/2.7-1 [ITA]

Thanks, I'll look into it. Le 13 févr. 2018 06:03, "Paul Wise" a écrit : > On Fri, 2018-02-09 at 07:29 +0100, Maxime Werlen wrote: > > > Thanks for your time reviewing my packages. > > Thanks for adopting urlwatch! > > > I've tried to fix as much issues as I'm capable. > >

Bug#889968: RFS: inotify-tools/3.14-4

> > [2018-02-12 13:07] Sean Whitton > >> > Last version is at bacef877c2f9293f9e1fd624b32d5306d7bc3c27 Maybe, > >> > you could try again? > >> > >> Still FTBFSs. Log attached. > >> > >> I suspect that the debomatic sid chroot is out-of-date. > > > > Stange. Just did

Bug#890382: RFS: libbusiness-isin-perl/0.20-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libbusiness-isin-perl" * Package name: libbusiness-isin-perl Version : 0.20-1 Upstream Author : David Chan * URL :

Bug#890379: RFS: python-jsonrpc/1.10.8-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-jsonrpc" * Package name: python-jsonrpc Version : 1.10.8-1 Upstream Author : Kirill Pavlov * URL : https://github.com/pavlov99/json-rpc *

Bug#890376: RFS: tilde/0.4.0-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tilde" * Package name: tilde Version : 0.4.0-1 Upstream Author : Gertjan Halkes * URL : https://os.ghalkes.nl/tilde.html * License :