Hi,
> I've been following a bit of a breadcrumb trail, and I hope I'm in the right
> place now. kcollectd, a tool for viewing log information, has recently been
> removed from unstable because it lacked a Qt 5 port [1]. I have ported that
> package and I've taken over the upstream (which has been
Package: jabberd2
Version: 2.2.17-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.5
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Hi,
Is someone willing to upload the new version of the package?
It close a bug.
The package is here: git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-xmpp/jabberd2.git
At first you
Hi,
if also possible upload this one. It removes a obsolete dependency
git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-xmpp/jabber-muc.git
Let's see:
-Recommends: jabberd14 | jabberd2
+Recommends: jabberd2
I do not think that such small change requires upload.
Small note: I have fixed tiny typo in
Hi,
Could someone please sponsor xsane for me? It's on of the most popular SANE
frontends, and has been near unmaintained recently.
You may open RFS bug-report for sponsorship-requests pseudo-package [1].
You have received a link to RFS template in email from mentors.debian.net.
[1]
Also it would be a good idea to provide git repo for the package somewhere.
For example, at collab-maint on Alioth.
ok, thanks. I'll put it into a bzr repo once i've adopted it.
You did not catch an idea. I have in mind that some DDs prefer to browse
package changes at VCS repo. (For example,
Hi,
Yes but then lintian will bork patch-system-but-direct-changes-in-diff
because of .pc presence, and the .pc directory will be packed into the source
package. Or should I delete .pc directory before running debuild ?
Maybe .git/info/exclude file is what are you looking for.
Best wishes,
Hi Felix,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package svxlink
...
It builds these binary packages:
qtel - Graphical client for the EchoLink® protocol
qtel-dbg - Graphical client for the EchoLink® protocol (debug symbols)
remotetrx - Remote controller for radio transceivers
Hi Igor,
I've updated Git [1] and uploaded sources to mentors [2]
[1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-open-axiom/pkg-open-axiom.git
[2] https://mentors.debian.net/package/open-axiom
There is new lintian error tags now:
E: open-axiom-databases:
There is new lintian error tags now:
E: open-axiom-databases:
copyright-should-refer-to-common-license-file-for-gpl
(And the same for other packages.)
Fix should be simple:
http://paste.debian.net/plain/70930
(But I have not checked it.)
Fixed and checked! :-)
Uploaded.
Hi,
Some files in the source tree are licensed under GPL-2+ and Expat licenses.
But I have checked only [1] output. Please have in mind that it includes not
full info and all blocks with Copyright: *No copyright* and
License: UNKNOWN should be checked manually.
[1] licensecheck
Hi,
No need to Cc me: I am subscribed to d-m mailing list.
While Alioth is down, there are
http://cgit.osdyson.org/open-axiom.git/
and
https://github.com/ip1981/open-axiom-debian
Great! This helps.
Let's see.
$ uscan --report
Processing watchfile line for package open-axiom...
Newest
Hi Igor,
This is not a full review, but just few quick notes.
I am looking for a sponsor for my package open-axiom
Have you thought about maintaining this package under umbrella of Debian
Science Team [1][2]? Package looks completely suitable for it.
I am not aware if this was already
Hi,
How about bug report #641745? It looks easy fixable.
I still don't think it's a problem of qgit (or any other package providing
this MimeType, such as easytag or gwenview).
Still? I don't see your opinion in bug report. Please send your comment there.
And do not forget to Cc the
I still don't think it's a problem of qgit (or any other package providing
this MimeType, such as easytag or gwenview).
Still? I don't see your opinion in bug report. Please send your comment
there.
And do not forget to Cc the submitter: he will be able to write other
arguments
or he
Hi Andrey,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package qgit
...
Changes since the last upload:
* Fix the binary installaton path with recent Qt (Closes: #724814)
* Drop stgit from Recommends
* Use canonical paths in Vcs-* fields
Your patch looks fine. I may upload your package.
How about
Hi,
Now I moved it to the correct location.
$mv hallo.mo ~/tmp/locale/en/LC_MESSAGES
The problem now is that I can only run it in english!
$ env | grep LANG
$ env | grep LC_
And search in google (or etc.) these environmental variables.
How can I see it in the original form?
Try
Hi Kevin,
The package was not yet uploaded into Debian.
- The package number should be 0.9.13-1
Could I still keep the incrementation, because the earlier versions
are already tagged signed in the public git repository and also
already uploaded to a Ubuntu PPA? (ppa:bortis/musl) So
Hi Thomas,
I am looking for a solution to fix the following bug:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707754
A package I maintain contains a configuration header (vpConfig.h)
which differ depending on the architecture we are (here the dependencies are
not the same on i386 and
Hi Nicolas,
Should I produce 2 different source packages
for main and contrib from the same upstream project?
Short answer:
Yes, this is the best solution in such case.
(If there is no any possibility to avoid non-free dependencies.)
Some additional thoughts:
If tarball is quite small, you
Should I produce 2 different source packages
for main and contrib from the same upstream project?
Short answer:
Yes, this is the best solution in such case.
(If there is no any possibility to avoid non-free dependencies.)
That's only if they're _build_ dependencies. Runtime ones are
Hi,
1. repackaging the orig.tar.gz without src/host/lua-5.1.4, adding
a suffix to the version e.g. +dfsg1 (so we end up with
premake4_4.3+dfsg1.orig.tar.gz)
A suffix +dfsg is used in another meaning. Maybe use +ds or +repack instead?
Best wishes,
Boris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi Adrian,
Thanks again for your interest.
do you need a sponsor for lightspeed?
Yes, I need a sponsor for this package, see my RFS (#679439).
I thought we already discussed it (I recall your email about package qpxtool).
Short story:
I prepared a number of QA uploads before Wheezy freeze,
Hi Thibaut,
Just thinking aloud: the problem with the current scheme is that the
game data file will be present twice in the user system: on real FS and
in VFS. That could be avoided only by copying the fonts in
astromenace-data source, so I guess we'll have to live with that. I'm
wondering
Hi Thibaut,
I have updated packages astromenace and astromenace-data. Now all issues
should be solved.
Links for download:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/a/astromenace/astromenace_1.3.1+ds-1.dsc
Hi,
Since no one else here seems to be wondering, I'll just ask myself: Is
there any reason why the package is going to be renamed to premake4,
i.e. appending the major version to the package name?
If this is going to get uploaded as premake4, this is technically not
an adoption of premake
Hi Thibaut,
In the rules file for astromenace data, you list fonts in
/usr/share/fonts/truetype/ttf-liberation/, but the files there are
symlinks to files in /usr/share/fonts/truetype/liberation/. The symlinks
are provided by a compatility package which is not listed in your
Hi Paul,
I saw a lot of your messages related to fonts in Debian, also there was one
or few posts in your blog (I do not remember precisely). So it looks that
your well versed in this matter.
Could you comment our discussion about astromenace-data package? Quotation:
There is a more serious
Hi Ftp Masters,
During packaging astromenace-data package [1][2] I have faced with issue
of adding fonts into game data file. Full log of our discussion you can
find at [3]. In short:
1) astromenace-data is non-free package because of [4].
2) When package astromenace-data is built, system fonts
Hi Markus,
Thanks for notes.
just a comment on the copyright file. You are targeting the data for
non-free but actually the game data is licensed under free licenses,
namely GPL-3+ and CC-BY-SA-3.0. I assume the precompiled 3D models are
the reason why astromenace-data should be in non-free
Hi Thibaut,
Can you explain why you chose to split the source? This forces you to
have astromenace only recommend astromenace-data, which is not good
since you can't play the game without the data.
I have at least three reasons for this:
1) It is more convenient in maintaining. Data files are
Hi again,
However, I have an alternative proposal which would avoid the problem
and should not impose too much hassle on you: ship the entire source in
astromenace-data, build the executable there, use it to package the
data, but do not ship the built executable.
Thank you for the
If you agree with this tricky/artful solution I will prepare updated package
astromenace this evening.
Forget it, I will upload as is after a last round of checks and after I
manage to setup a local repo for use with pbuilder.
I have just updated package at m.d.n [1]. Now it includes
Hi everyone,
Debian Policy (section 12.1) tell us that each program in /usr/bin should has
a manual page. And there is the related warning in Lintian.
But I am interested what is the best practise in case of trivial bash scripts
(which usually set up necessary environment variables and launch
Hi,
Four weeks passed since our discussion. Any progress on this?
Maybe it would be better to postpone additional changes for future uploads.
Best regards,
Boris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hi,
Month passed. Anyone interested?
RFS: http://bugs.debian.org/696385
Regards,
Boris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package gtk2-engines-qtcurve. I have tried
to contact with previous sponsor 3 times, but there are no replies still.
(Last email was sent on 30 October 2012)
Basic information:
Hi,
Since RFS bug reports via sponsorship-requests pseudo-package is widely used
now, is not it the good idea to disable feature Comments on package pages?
If not, then could you fix notifications about new comments? They are not sent
to email now. [1]
Best wishes,
Boris
[1] I faced with it
I think the public discussion is preferable.
2013-01-15, 14:44, Robert J. Clay wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 5:20 AM, Boris Pek tehnic...@yandex.ru wrote:
Since RFS bug reports via sponsorship-requests pseudo-package is widely used
now, is not it the good idea to disable feature Comments
This means: You do not need to subscribe to a new list if you are a
debian-mentors reader, all relevant (human contributed) content will be
forwarded to that list, but the complete noise^W^W^W^W^Winformation is
available through package-sponsorship-requests@l.d.o only. If you prefer
to get
Anyone interested?
2012-12-17 23:48, Boris Pek wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel-ga...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for a package matanza.
It builds binary package:
matanza - Space ascii war game
To access further
Hi,
IANADD, but here's a list of things that I encountered while testing
out your package.
Thanks a lot for a review.
- Since you use xz compression, please consider adding Pre-Depends:
dpkg (= 1.15.6) to debian/control (i.e. lintian tag
data.tar.xz-member-without-dpkg-pre-depends, which I
Hi,
- Another pedantic issue: there are 2 commas in a row in your
build-depends list for astromenace-data (i.e. debhelper (=
9),,fonts-liberation...).
Fixed.
have astromenace-data recommends/suggests astromenace
Done.
- astromenace-data FTBFS when built twice in a row:
Fixed.
Thanks
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel-ga...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for my packages astromenace and astromenace-data.
Basic information:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/astromenace
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: Fathi Boudra f...@debian.org
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package kde-style-qtcurve. I have tried
to contact with previous sponsor 3 times, but there are no replies still.
(Last email I sent on 30 October 2012)
Basic
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel-ga...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for a package matanza.
It builds binary package:
matanza - Space ascii war game
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:
Hi,
I can do everything using uscan, tar, sed and wget, so I think this is not a
problem.
During the process I need to create a temporary directory. Should I delete it
at the end of get-orig-source? Should I delete it in clean?
Yes, only tarball should be left as a result.
See Debian Policy
Anyone interested?
2012-10-11 17:39, Boris Pek wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package zgv.
It builds one binary package:
zgv - SVGAlib graphics viewer
Direct link for download
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package zgv.
It builds one binary package:
zgv - SVGAlib graphics viewer
Direct link for download:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/z/zgv/zgv_5.9-6.dsc
Hi,
I am still looking for a sponsor for my package leechcraft.
It builds those binary packages:
leechcraft - Full LeechCraft installation
leechcraft-advancednotifications - Advanced Notifications framework for
LeechCraft
leechcraft-aggregator - RSS/Atom feed reader for LeechCraft
Hi,
How can i exclude hurd-i386 from a build
Architecture: linux-any kfreebsd-any
Best wishes,
Boris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Hi,
Unfortunately my sponsor of psi-plus package still has no time for package
psi-plus-i18n (since March month) and I am looking for a sponsor for it:
http://bugs.debian.org/673457
To prevent possible questions: yes, newer translations are available in
upstream repo, but this version
Hi,
Sounds like a good idea. Which (pbuilder or cowbuilder) would you recommend?
I recommend cowbuilder. It's much faster and it less pull a hard drive.
(Last is important for me as I use laptop)
Best wishes,
Boris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Hi,
I'd like to maintain some packages, which are removed in sid now.
(scim-hangul, scim-sunpinyin, scim-pinyin, scim-array).
How should I do? Should I send a WNPP bug report as a usual new
package, or just package it, change the maintainer to me and
upload it to mentors.debian.net to
Hi,
Unfortunately your package ... was rejected because of the following
reason:
You are not uploading to one of those Debian distributions: oldstable stable
unstable experimental stable-backports oldstable-backports
oldstable-backports-sloppy
oldstable-security stable-security
I need to upload updated package with Ubuntu-specific patch. This
package will be uploaded into Ubuntu by avoiding Debian archive.
Wouldn't an Ubuntu PPA be more appropriate for that use case?
Add temporary PPA for this? These files will needed during less than a day in
my case.
How does
Could you suggest any free hosting where I can put source package
files and they will be available using dget?
Unfortunately no, I usually just serve them off my home Internet
connection when I need to do that, but I'm also a sysadmin by trade.
I guess you don't have a personal Web site
Add temporary PPA for this? These files will needed during less than a day
in my case.
I assure you no one will mind having one hang around. PPAs are nice to
have around, even if you don't use them.
I have one that I use for stuff like this, it's not like it's a burden
on the system.
I
Hi,
I'm interested in making a Debian package of my own software Fortuner,
homepage https://github.com/jnumm/fortuner . The software is a
modernization of classic UNIX fortune program. I think it falls under
the games category so I'm writing on pkg-games list, too.
Should I put this package
Forwarded from debian...@lists.debian.org :
Hi,
Some time ago PTS checked http://mentors.debian.net/ for new source packages
which were waiting for a sponsor. If new version of source package available
an appropriate item was added in todo section on package page.
But now there is no
Hi,
turnserver - server for ICE/STUN/TURN, NAT traversal for SIP and Jabber
Have you asked Debian VoIP Team [1]? They might be interested in this package.
Regards,
Boris
[1] http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/VoIP/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
package sponsorship-requests
user sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org
usertags 679049 - not-fit-for-wheezy + for-wheezy
thanks
Waiting for reply:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/07/msg00308.html
(See also timestamps)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
See also:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/07/msg00680.html
Quotation:
I don't think targetting experimental for unmaintained packages makes sense.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hi,
% debdiff xmhtml1_1.1.7-17_amd64.deb xmhtml1_1.1.7-18_amd64.deb
[The following lists of changes regard files as different if they have
different names, permissions or owners.]
Files in first .deb but not in second
-
-rw-r--r-- root/root
2012-06-29 05:58, Nicholas Breen wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 08:00:06PM +0300, Boris Pek wrote:
Unnecessary package libvisual-0.4-0-i18n was deleted.
Now there are only such changes:
libvisual (0.4.0-5) unstable; urgency=low
Uploaded. Thank you for the QA work.
Hi,
Thanks a lot
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package awffull.
It builds binary package:
awffull - web server log analysis program
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package zgv.
It builds binary package:
zgv - SVGAlib graphics viewer
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package lightspeed.
It builds binary package:
lightspeed - Shows how objects moving at relativistic speeds look like
To access further information about this
Hi,
The upstream authors doesn't have this version available as tarball for
download, I had to create the tarball myself. The main differences
between the 0.1.1 stable version and this git commit is only about the
construct system: I have made some suggestions and they included it in
the
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package exactimage.
It builds those binary packages:
edisplay - fast image manipulation programs (image viewer)
exactimage - fast image manipulation programs
Hi,
Thank you for a reply.
Please use X-Debbugs-Cc instead of regular Cc when filing bugs:
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting#xcc
Yes, I didn't know about it when I sent this RFS, but I already used it in my
recent messages.
* Translation files were moved to new package
Unnecessary package libvisual-0.4-0-i18n was deleted.
Now there are only such changes:
libvisual (0.4.0-5) unstable; urgency=low
* QA upload.
* Added debian/watch.
* Updated debian/control:
- added homepage field
- fixed lintian warning
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package xmhtml.
It builds those binary packages:
xmhtml1 - Motif widget for display HTML 3.2 (library)
xmhtml1-dev - Motif widget for display HTML 3.2 (development
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package qpxtool.
It builds those binary packages:
libqpx-dev - CD/DVD quality checker (development files)
libqpx0 - CD/DVD quality checker (shared libraries)
pxfw
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package sgml-data.
It builds binary package:
sgml-data - common SGML and XML data
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:
Hi,
Thank you for a reply.
I am looking for a sponsor for my package sgml-data.
You say QA upload below, I guess you don't mean to adopt the package,
right?
Yes, right. That phrase is from template on m.d.n.
Thanks for taking care of this package. This upload fixes at least one
RC bug.
Why NMU? First freeze is soft and QA uploads and even upload with
increasing of
version are allowed. Isn't it? But yes, this can be hard for release team.
Because once the freeze is in effect only RC bug fixes are allowed in.
So the changes need to be minimal at that point. My NMU does
Hi,
I’ve taken care of the RC bug for now, so the freeze won’t be a
problem.
Yes, I've got the messages from BTS. You forgot to close bug #606038.
I'll close it.
I’ve not got the time to look at your suggested package,
As usual.
Like this, you two’ve got more time to get the package
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package libcdaudio.
It builds those binary packages:
libcdaudio-dbg - library for controlling a CD-ROM when playing audio CDs
(debug)
libcdaudio-dev - library for controlling a CD-ROM when playing audio
Hi,
Is any problem with scripts on m.d.n.? I uploaded my package about 9 hours ago
via http. And it was not processed yet. Sources are still in the directory for
uploads (tested using dput).
Best regards,
Boris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Processed moment ago. Thanks.
2012-06-21 09:51, Boris Pek wrote:
Hi,
Is any problem with scripts on m.d.n.? I uploaded my package about 9 hours ago
via http. And it was not processed yet. Sources are still in the directory for
uploads (tested using dput).
Best regards,
Boris
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Hi,
(Please Cc me in replies, I am not subscribed to debian-qa mailing list)
I am looking for a sponsor for my package libvisual.
It builds those binary packages:
libvisual-0.4-0 - Audio visualization framework
libvisual-0.4-0-i18n - Audio
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package sgml-data.
It builds binary package:
sgml-data - common SGML and XML data
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:
retitle 673457 RFS: psi-plus-i18n/0.15.5338.4-1 [ITP] -- translation files for
Psi+
thanks
Package was updated to new release. Current direct link for download:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/psi-plus-i18n/psi-plus-i18n_0.15.5338.4-1.dsc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi,
Thank you for a reply.
Why don't you upload it into Debian Science instead ? (and set the
maintainer to Debian Science ?
This is QA upload. I won't be the maintainer of this package.
I just want to improve its quality while it has no maintainer.
See
This is QA upload. I won't be the maintainer of this package.
I just want to improve its quality while it has no maintainer.
Well, you should ask to the QA team then, no ?
Hmm, you are right. Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Hi,
(Please Cc me in replies, I am not subscribed to debian-qa mailing list)
I am looking for a sponsor for my package unadf.
It builds binary package:
unadf - Extract files from an Amiga Disk File dump (.adf)
To access further information
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Hi,
(Please Cc me in replies, I am not subscribed to debian-science mailing list)
I am looking for a sponsor for the package libquantum.
It builds those binary packages:
libquantum-dev - library for the simulation of a quantum computer
Hi,
Thank you for a reply.
117 files changed, 7945 insertions(+), 1683 deletions(-)
Yes, two years passed since previous stable release of uHub.
Please ask on mentors or your former sponsor.
Unfortunately my regular sponsor (Dmitry E. Oboukhov) currently is busy.
Package is waiting for
Hi,
Now package builds fine on kfreebsd-* and hurd-i386:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=kde-gtk-configsuite=experimental
And it should be no problems with linux-based environments on other supported
architectures. So I have updated the package:
kde-gtk-config (3:2.0-3)
Hi,
(Please Cc me in replies, I am not subscribed to the debian-s390 mailing list)
I am still looking for a sponsor for my package uhub [1]. Almost a month
passed without any reply.
This version of package should fix FTBFS on s390 and s390x. Which is now
important as I see in
Hi,
More than 2 weeks passed without any reply.
Is here any interested in translations for Debian?
Package is very simple. It will not require a lot of time for check.
Best regards,
Boris
2012-05-18 22:40, Boris Pek wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors
Hi,
Yes, but for nearly all packages, they are in the source of the package
themselves. So even if the translations are in a separate binary
package, the source is still the same as the main package. So, did you
consider including it in your psi-plus package?
Yes, most of sources comes with
Hi,
Sorry, but no. I just tested and it doesn't work.
With the attached .gtkrc-2.0-kde as created by the current src:kcm-gtk, when
entering the dialog of src:kde-gtk-config, the dialogs don't show Raleigh
nor DejaVu Sans 9, but oxygen-gtk and Bitstream Charter 12 (and Emacs
for the GTK3
Hi,
Sorry, but no. I just tested and it doesn't work.
With the attached .gtkrc-2.0-kde as created by the current src:kcm-gtk, when
entering the dialog of src:kde-gtk-config, the dialogs don't show Raleigh
nor DejaVu Sans 9, but oxygen-gtk and Bitstream Charter 12 (and Emacs
for the GTK3
Hi,
Thank you for a reply.
2) Handling of the transition
I just tested with a clean user: the current kde-config-gtk-style creates one
.gtkrc-2.0-kde while your new kde-config-gtk-style creates one .gtkrc-2.0-kde4
that is a symlink to .gtkrc-2.0 . You should probably cope with
Package was updated to new release. Current direct link for download:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/uhub/uhub_0.4.0-1.dsc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Package was updated to new release. Current direct link for download:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/eiskaltdcpp/eiskaltdcpp_2.2.7-1.dsc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Package was updated to new release. Current direct link for download:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/leechcraft/leechcraft_0.5.70+dfsg-1.dsc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
to check that program builds fine
on s390 and s390x before this release.
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Best regards,
Boris
2012-05-09 21:44, Boris Pek wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
My regular sponsor is very busy now. And I
Hi,
Week passed without any reply.
And I am still looking for a sponsor for the package.
Best regards,
Boris
2012-05-15 11:29, Boris Pek wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
My regular sponsor is very busy now. And I am looking for a sponsor for my
1 - 100 of 178 matches
Mail list logo
