Bug#844035: RFS: hylafax/3:6.0.6-7 [RC] -- Flexible client/server fax software

2016-11-15 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Gianfranco, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote on 2016-11-14 22:20: > otherwise in 15 hours it will reach unstable. Thank you very much for your patience. So I hope the package will go into unstable. --- Have a nice day. Joachim (Germany) pgpqoU9ucEiLf.pgp Description: Digitale Signatur von

Bug#844035: RFS: hylafax/3:6.0.6-7 [RC] -- Flexible client/server fax software

2016-11-13 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Chris, Chris Lamb wrote on 2016-11-12 23:00: > Huh, odd.. Not sure what's going on there, sorry. It seems the address of the ftp-master changed in the last time. I read mails of 'debian-announce' about that: ssh.upload.debian.org ftp.upload.debian.org Please can you check this?

Bug#844035: RFS: hylafax/3:6.0.6-7 [RC] -- Flexible client/server fax software

2016-11-12 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Chris, Chris Lamb wrote on 2016-11-12 09:48: > Uploading to ftp-master (via ftp to ftp.upload.debian.org): > Uploading hylafax_6.0.6-7.dsc: done. > Uploading hylafax_6.0.6.orig.tar.gz: done. > Uploading hylafax_6.0.6-7.debian.tar.xz: done. > Uploading

Bug#844035: RFS: hylafax/3:6.0.6-7 [RC] -- Flexible client/server fax software

2016-11-11 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
n using libtiff v4.0 or newer. * Add some more patches: - 826: Do not send pnmtops dpi value as float value. Closes: #727608 - 827: Make Debian build reproducible. Closes: #790355 * Remove obsolete debian/NEWS file. Regards, Joachim Wiedorn pgpdsFVy8ADTQ.pgp Description: D

Re: xfe is marked for autoremoval from testing

2015-12-18 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello release team, Debian testing autoremoval watch wrote on 2015-12-18 04:39: > > xfe 1.41-3 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2015-12-28 > > It is affected by these RC bugs: > 806579: xfe: FTBFS: configure:14251: error: "ftheader.h not found" since xfe version 1.41-1 the FTBFS bug

Re: Can not register at mentors website

2015-10-05 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Cornelius Kölbel wrote on 2015-10-05 09:51: > But my name is assigned to an email address to which I do not have > access anymore. You should be able to login with your (old) email address! and your password. Then you have access to your user account data and should be able to change your email

Bug#799093: RFS: chrony/1.31.1-2

2015-09-15 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Vincent, > In 1.31.1-1, the NEWS.Debian file wasn’t copied by dh_installchangelogs > to /usr/share/doc/chrony because it seems that tool can’t cope with that > filename. So I renamed it to NEWS, and also removed an unnecessary call to > dh_installchangelogs in d/rules. Consequently,

Bug#793876: RFS: chrony/1.31.1-1

2015-08-20 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Vincent, Vincent Blut wrote on 2015-08-20 18:12: I don’t known why tests have originally been disabled, but I guess it’s because they depend on the clknetsim tool which is not packaged in Debian. Also, if that tool isn’t installed on the system, the test.common script will try to

Bug#793876: RFS: chrony/1.31.1-1

2015-08-20 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Vincent, Vincent Blut wrote on 2015-08-20 18:36: features. By the way, if I want to close these outdated bug reports, what’s the canonical way to do it? I guess I can’t do that from d/changelog? do it in the changelog: e.g. LP: #1313200 --- Have a nice day. Joachim (Germany)

Bug#793876: RFS: chrony/1.31.1-1

2015-08-20 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Vincent, Vincent Blut wrote on 2015-08-20 18:12: I assume that the change of maintainership has the consent of Joachim? Yes, we’ve discussed about this privately some times ago. Still ok Joachim? Yes, that is fully ok. You make a very good job with maintaining chrony! Thank you

Re: wmii-doc

2015-04-11 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello João, João Vanzuita wrote on 2015-04-11 12:52: I want to help maintain a package and started reading about it. This is a good idea. Found wmii-doc marked as orphaned and it looks ok to start, but, wmii is not active since 2012, what do you guys think about it ? I think you should

Bug#782173: RFS: chrony/1.30-2 [RC] -- Set the computer clock from time servers on the Net

2015-04-08 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
for authenticated commands. * debian/control: - Update e-mail address of myself. - Add Vincent Blut as co-maintainer. Regards, Joachim Wiedorn signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#781066: RFS: chrony/1.31-1 - Set the computer clock from time servers on the Net

2015-03-23 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
to mention /etc/adjtime instead of /etc/default/rcS. Closes: #778710 * Remove all patches. * Patch: do not install COPYING file (same file is on system). Regards, Joachim Wiedorn signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Trouble with git import-orig --pristine-tar

2015-03-02 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Andreas, Andreas Tille wrote on 2015-03-02 19:57: git import-orig --pristine-tar ../fastaq_3.2.0.orig.tar.gz I know that you need the upstream version: git-import-orig --upstream-version=1.0 ../paketname-1.0.tar.gz or: git-import-orig --upstream-version=1.0 --filter=debian/*

Re: Recreating a package

2014-10-11 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Leopold, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote on 2014-10-09 12:21: with debuild, it makes a debian clean and after another clean. I don't have any log at the end of the process. Just with fakeroot debian/rules binary, that lets this files on the disk. I haven't checked your debian/rules.

Re: Recreating a package

2014-10-09 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello! Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote on 2014-10-09 10:45: The question is that I don't want to recompile the sources, I just would like to recreate the debs. Here [1] mention a method to do that, but it doesn't work in my case: While compiling with debuild it creates files like this one:

Re: Problem Occurred while creating deb package of libreoffice

2014-09-29 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Ritu, Ritu Panwar wrote on 2014-09-29 11:49: Hi, I am novice in the process of creating deb package .I tried to create deb package for libreoffice for ubuntu 12.04. what i did i got the source Why do you don't use the ready for use packages of libreoffice for Debian (and also Ubuntu). I

Bug#757414: RFS: chrony/1.30-1 - Set the computer clock from time servers on the Net

2014-08-08 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Eriberto, thank you for your reply and your hints. Now I have updated all items as you have written. And finally I have forwarded some patches to upstream and have added a notice into the patch files. The updated package is already on mentors.d.n:

Bug#757414: RFS: chrony/1.30-1 - Set the computer clock from time servers on the Net

2014-08-07 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
to recognize UTC hardware clock. Closes: #680498 * Use logrotate instead of cron script. Closes: #323966 * debian/rules: disable test simulation. Regards, Joachim Wiedorn signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Replace DM email address and move to secure gnupg key

2014-07-22 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello, I want to replace my DM email address. For my new email address I already have created a new secure gnupg key and this new key is already signed by one DD. But now what are the next steps? Must I add another DD sign in the same way as DD - or is one DD sign enough as DM ? And then? I

Bug#737907: RFS: chrony/1.29.1-1 -- Set the computer clock from time servers

2014-02-08 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Paul, at first thank you very much for uploading! Paul Gevers wrote on 2014-02-08 18:08: - Upstream FAQ removed two questions and part of the answer to one question is now part of the answer to another question. I am unsure if this is intended. I haven't checked this point. I will do

Bug#737907: RFS: chrony/1.29.1-1 -- Set the computer clock from time servers

2014-02-06 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
). Regards, Joachim Wiedorn signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#732758: RFS: chrony/1.29-1 [ITA, RC] -- Set the computer clock from time servers

2013-12-21 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
anymore for ucf in postinst script. * Add status action in init script (debian/init). Closes: #652207 * Add debian/install file for installing example of chrony.conf. * Reduce debian/dirs file for use with debhelper 9. -- Joachim Wiedorn ad_deb...@joonet.de Fri, 20 Dec 2013 23:35:25 +0100

Bug#728376: RFS: fox1.6 / 1.6.49-1 (2. try)

2013-11-20 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
level 9. - Add fields to enable Multi-Arch only for runtime package. - Support transition to libtiff5. * Update library paths in install files and rules file. Regards, Joachim Wiedorn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe

Bug#728376: RFS: fox1.6 / 1.6.49-1

2013-10-31 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
(no changes). - Move to debhelper = 9 and compat level 9. - Add fields to enable Multi-Arch only for runtime package. - Support transition to libtiff5. * Update library paths in install files and rules file. Regards, Joachim Wiedorn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ

Re: build own web-gui

2013-10-21 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Pol Hallen, I have found another tool especially for administration of postfix: http://www.linux-magazin.de/Ausgaben/2011/03/Mailserver-Admin/%28offset%29/2 This tool postfixadmin can be installed via Debian: apt-get -u install postfixadmin Have a nice day. Joachim (Germany) -- To

Re: build own web-gui

2013-10-21 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Pol Hallen wrote on 2013-10-20 21:01: I'm apology if this isn't correct list but I didn't found any way... Right, it is not the right list! I need build my own webgui to run bash scripts on my server: All what you need ist webmin. It is not inside debian! Look here:

Re: Git usage: rebase master on custom tag from upstream branch

2013-10-01 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Anton Balashov wrote on 2013-10-01 12:49: How to switch my master on custom tag from upstream branch? I want to start work under a new (or custom) version. How to sync master workspace with commit from upstream? And left the debian dir. Of-course, I can backup debian dir and make a hard

Bug in lilo: ftbfs with GCC-4.8 (#701315)

2013-05-04 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello! ( based on http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=701315 ) I have searched the reason for problems with gcc 4.8. I have found that the new gcc generates other header in some lilo files (first.s and common.s). If I take back the changes because of gcc 4.8 in the two (generated)

Bug#694140: RFS: chrony/1.24-3.1+deb7u1 [RC] for Wheezy

2012-11-24 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
and higher (sys_linux.c) and ignore nonexistent patch level of kernel version (which come with some kernel versions). Backport of upstream patch for version 1.26. Solves: #628919 for version 1.24. Closes: #689012 -- Joachim Wiedorn ad_deb...@joonet.de Fri, 16 Nov 2012 10:01:01

Bug#692923: Bug#689012: Status of chrony

2012-11-23 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Enrico, Enrico Zini wrote on 2012-11-23 22:23: So please do not consider the ball to be in the release team's court: for this to be fixed, the relevant changes need to be backported to 1.24. I am on the way to upload a new chrony version 1.24-3.1+deb7u1 as David Prévot wrote on

Closing a bug report twice (different versions) ?

2012-11-23 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello! What is the right way, if a bugreport were closed with the newest sid version because this bug were fixed in this sid version, but the same bug is not fixed in freezed testing/wheezy version? Example: Found in version testing-version Fixed in version sid-version Done: ...

Bug#692923: Bug #692923 / #689012: Status of chrony

2012-11-16 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Ana, Ana Guerrero wrote on 2012-11-16 14:09: I mailed the current maintainer of chrony back when I did the NMU asking him about the status of the package. I sugested him orphaning the package or filing a RFA bug, but all he said is he would look at the package soon. When he did it was

Bug#692923: RFS: chrony/1.24-3.2 [RC, NMU]

2012-11-15 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Eugene, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote on 2012-11-14 19:08: Just like Timo said, this patch doesn't fix this (RC) problem. Fix would be: either apply the same idea (#if 0) to sys_linux.c or backport the upstream patch [1]. I have thought the problem in sys_linux.c were already solved. I

Bug#692923: RFS: chrony/1.24-3.2 [RC, NMU]

2012-11-11 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello David, David Prévot wrote on 2012-11-10 17:40: Please use 1.24-3.1+deb7u1 as a version number (and eventually directly “wheezy” instead of “testing-proposed-updates”). Since packages meant to testing-proposed-updates should be acknowledged by the release team prior to the upload,

Bug#692923: RFS: chrony/1.24-3.2 [RC, NMU]

2012-11-10 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
version (rtc_linux.c) to run for kernel versions 3.0 and higher. Nowadays all kernel versions have RTC support (solves #642209 for version 1.24). Closes: #642209 -- Joachim Wiedorn ad_deb...@joonet.de Sat, 10 Nov 2012 19:19:19 +0100 Regards, Joachim Wiedorn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Bug#692260: RFS: capi4hylafax/1:01.03.00.99.svn.300-18 [RC] -- Faxing over CAPI 2.0 device

2012-11-04 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
:01.03.00.99.svn.300-18) unstable; urgency=low * Only suggest package isdnactivecards. Closes: #682135, #691863. -- Joachim Wiedorn ad_deb...@joonet.de Sat, 03 Nov 2012 22:03:33 +0100 Details see in the appended diff file. Regards, Joachim Wiedorn all-changes-18.diff.gz Description

Re: logkeys in Debian

2012-08-09 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Vedran Furač wrote on 2012-08-09 01:57: OK, I'll do as you say. But do you know how does one removes a package from mentors? Dcut? Simple way: Login in mentors and select your package. Then click in the header: delete this package. --- Have a nice day. Joachim (Germany) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Bug#683978: RFS: capi4hylafax/1:01.03.00.99.svn.300-18 (fix two bugs)

2012-08-07 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Bart, Bart Martens wrote on 2012-08-06 18:20: About your package at mentors uploaded there on 2012-08-05 21:18. I read on bug 682135 that you want the fix goes into wheezy, but this package at mentors does not conform to the freeze policy.

Bug#683978: RFS: capi4hylafax/1:01.03.00.99.svn.300-18 (fix two bugs)

2012-08-05 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
file. * Add postinst script to update logfile name and path in config.faxCAPI. -- Joachim Wiedorn ad_deb...@joonet.de Sat, 04 Aug 2012 01:07:15 +0200 Regards, Joachim Wiedorn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble

Re: Backporting a multi-arched package

2012-07-31 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Jakub, thank you for clarifying. --- Have a nice day. Joachim (Germany) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120801001818.17b7e...@jupiter.home

Re: Backporting a multi-arched package

2012-07-25 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Helmut Grohne wrote on 2012-07-25 16:31: On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 08:43:24PM +0200, Joachim Wiedorn wrote: Now you make me wonder. Please explain why this is needed. The original question mentioned that the package in question is Multi-Arch: foreign. I do not see an issue with having Multi

Re: Backporting a multi-arched package

2012-07-24 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Martin, Remove multi-arch support: debian/control: * remove lines with Multi-Arch: * remove lines with Pre-Depends: * Move back to dephelper (= 8) debian/compat: * Move back to 8 debian/rules: * Remove lines which looks like support for multi-arch... debian/*.install: * change all

Re: how to upgrade from sqeeze to wheezy?

2012-07-19 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Игорь Пашев wrote on 2012-07-19 17:48: You can replace your entries with these, and command apt-get update apt-get dist-upgrade Before you do a complete dist-upgrade I recommend to upgrade some essential packages: apt-get install debian-keyring debian-archive-keyring apt-get install apt

RFS: capi4hylafax/1:01.03.00.99.svn.300-17 (adopted; hardenend, 2. try)

2012-06-21 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Wiedorn ad_deb...@joonet.de Sun, 17 Jun 2012 16:36:13 +0200 Regards, Joachim Wiedorn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120621223938.5d830

Creating files in /etc/udev/rules.d/ while install a package

2012-06-18 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello! Is it allowed to create a file into /etc/udev/rules.d/ while installing a package? The point comes out in package capi4hylafax which need an symlink /dev/faxCAPI but until now the admin must create it by hand. --- Have a nice day. Joachim (Germany) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#677433: RFS: capi4hylafax/1:01.03.00.99.svn.300-17 (adopted; hardenend)

2012-06-17 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
for faxsend script. -- Joachim Wiedorn ad_deb...@joonet.de Sun, 17 Jun 2012 16:36:13 +0200 Regards, Joachim Wiedorn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org

Bug#677433: RFS: capi4hylafax/1:01.03.00.99.svn.300-17 (adopted; hardenend)

2012-06-13 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
capi4hylafax.init and move LSB INIT INFO to header. * Fix small typo in manpage c2faxsend.1. * Update all automake/autoconf files (autoreconf). -- Joachim Wiedorn ad_deb...@joonet.de Wed, 13 Jun 2012 23:55:25 +0200 Regards, Joachim Wiedorn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ

Re: How to build GCJ/GDC ?

2012-06-09 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Игорь Пашев wrote on 2012-06-09 03:01: I just wonder how to build GCJ from the same VCS (as it mentioned via source package page) In Debian are these source packages: Package gcc-4.7 with: XS-Vcs-Browser: http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/gcccvs/branches/sid/gcc-4.7/ XS-Vcs-Svn:

Re: Moving library to Multi-Arch

2012-05-12 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello! Thank you Russ and Vincent for the detailed information. So I will convert only the runtime library package to multi-arch and let the -dev package as it is. --- Have a nice day. Joachim (Germany) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Re: softlink creation in debian package

2012-04-23 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Ansgar Burchardt wrote on 2012-04-23 13:53: On 04/23/2012 11:19 AM, karunakar medamoni wrote: As Bruno already said you can do so with dh_link(1), but note that it is wrong for a package in the official archive to ship files in /var/www. A good way is using postinst script for check the

Re: adding a new file using (d)quilt

2012-04-12 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Gerber van der Graaf wrote on 2012-04-12 12:50: What is the proper way to handle this? The simplest way is to add a static file debian/usersGuide.pdf and add this file to the debian/install file. Work with patch for pdf files is a worse way because pdf is a binary file format. --- Have a nice

Bug#668112: RFS: squidguard/1.4-5 -- filter and redirector plugin for Squid

2012-04-08 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
) * debian/postinst: update; check new log directory for use. * Add some hints into NEWS file. Kind regards, Joachim Wiedorn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http

Re: fastest hack-build-run iteration

2012-02-21 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote on 2012-02-21 09:28: On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 8:40 AM, David Roguin wrote: I'm making some changes to the evolution package and every time I want to test a tiny change I build a deb, install and run it. As you can imagine that takes a lot of time.

Re: fastest hack-build-run iteration

2012-02-21 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
David Roguin nesda...@gmail.com wrote on 2012-02-20 21:40: Hi, I'm making some changes to the evolution package and every time I want to test a tiny change I build a deb, install and run it. As you can imagine that takes a lot of time. That's why I'm asking if there's a faster way to

Re: compressing .debian.tar in xz format automatically

2012-02-19 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Jerome BENOIT g62993...@rezozer.net wrote on 2012-02-19 05:00: Hello List: I would like to compress my .debian.tar tarballs with xz : is there a way to set up that for debuild and pbuilder ? Thanks in advance, Jerome with the newer source format 3.0 there is a way with the file

Re: How to migrate to testing

2012-01-24 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote on 2012-01-24 18:14: Does the test suite involve heavy floating-point computations? Two of our mips buildds, corelli and lucatelli, doesn't have FPU, so it wouldn't be surprising if they couldn't run such a testsuite in a I have seen in some packages that

Re: RFS: dvbackup

2011-11-26 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Dmitry Smirnov only...@member.fsf.org wrote on 2011-11-26 16:23: I don't know how to regenerate man pages. If you have the original manpage, e.g. dvbackup.1 then open it with an editor and search for the string and change it. For the seen warnings hyphen-used-as-minus-sign: - change to \-

Re: RFS: cherrytree (2nd try)

2011-10-21 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Vincent Cheng vincentc1...@gmail.com wrote on 2011-10-20 20:55: cherrytree - hierarchical note taking application I have tested you package: I have created a package for Debian Squeeze (stable) from your source package without any problems. Then I installed and started cherrytree. And I am

Re: RFS: slurm 0.4.0-1

2011-09-08 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Matthias Schmitz matth...@sigxcpu.org wrote on 2011-09-08 13:17: home of the source is already git.debian.org [1]. Or did you think its better to have a downloadable .tgz around? On http://git.debian.org/?p=users/matthias-guest/slurm.git;a=summary you have only the detailed changes of your

Re: RFS: slurm 0.4.0-1

2011-09-07 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Matthias Schmitz matth...@sigxcpu.org wrote on 2011-09-07 16:21: * Package name: slurm Version : 0.4.0-1 * License : GPL-2 Section : net Thanks for updating this package. It seems you have started as upstream by yourself, too - right? It would be very nice

RFS: libsmack (new package, ITP)

2011-08-16 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
/libsmack_1.1.git20110809-1.dsc I would be glad about some feedback about this (first) package for SMACK support. And I would be very glad if someone upload this package for me. Kind regards, Joachim Wiedorn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

Re: RFS: libsmack (new package, ITP)

2011-08-16 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
I would be glad about some feedback about this (first) package for SMACK support. And I would be very glad if someone upload this package for me. Unfortunately I cannot answer the next three weeks. But I will wait for more feedback for better packaging of libsmack (and other smack packages in

Re: RFS: lebiniou, lebiniou-data (3rd try) (new upstream version)

2011-08-07 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
http://pkg-fonts.debian.org/review/ correct link: http://pkg-fonts.alioth.debian.org/review/ --- Have a nice day. Joachim (Germany) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:

Re: RFS: libgeier (updated package)

2011-07-11 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Olaf Dietsche olaf--mail.debian-ment...@olafdietsche.de wrote on 2011-07-11 20:17: So overwrite it. I don't understand that. What do you mean with overwrite it? You create a file debian/libgeier-dev.lintian-overrides with the line: libgeier-dev: no-upstream-changelog and a file

Re: RFS: xnoise (2nd try)

2011-07-08 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Jörn, I have packaged xnoise without any lintian errors/warnings. Very good work. Unfortunately I am not a DD. So you must search further for an sponsor. One tip: Instead of using in debian/rules: override_dh_installman: dh_installman debian/xnoise.1 it is better creating a file

Re: RFS: xnoise

2011-07-06 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
shuerhaaken shuerhaa...@googlemail.com wrote on 2011-07-06 12:54: My motivation for maintaining this package is: I am the developer of this program and I'd like to see it in Debian. In the past I packaged this only for Ubuntu via ppa, but that is not the way it should go. Until now I haven't

Re: RFS: xnoise

2011-07-06 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
shuerhaaken shuerhaa...@googlemail.com wrote on 2011-07-06 12:54: The package appears to be lintian clean. Unfortunately not! Here is my logging (packaging for testing): N: Setting up lab in /tmp/sVt1potpnA ... N: N: Processing changes file xnoise_0.1.25-1_amd64 (version 0.1.25-1) ... N:

RFS: squidguard (updated package, RC bug fix)

2011-05-29 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
: #628279) - Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.2 (no changes). - Update Vcs links to new server anonscm.debian.org. Kind regards Joachim Wiedorn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive

Re: RFS: squidguard (updated package, RC bug fix)

2011-05-29 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Sven Hoexter s...@timegate.de wrote on 2011-05-29 13:41: * Oh another DEP5 format definition, and now one that isn't available. I guess that should evolve into some d.n host instead d.o and without the wsvn in it. Or something else. My confusion grows from package to package. :) Sorry,

Re: RFS: squidguard (updated package, RC bug fix)

2011-05-29 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Sven, thanks for your time. Sven Hoexter s...@timegate.de wrote on 2011-05-29 18:52: * I see no reason for urgency=high here. There are no security fixes and we're not in the middle of the release process. So urgency=low should be used. There is a reason: package libdb4.7 isn't

Re: RFS: squidguard (updated package, RC bug fix)

2011-05-29 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Sven Hoexter s...@timegate.de wrote on 2011-05-29 20:22: Yeah some breakage happens from time to time. I still don't think that's a good reason to shorten the staging periode in unstable, or is this inflicted by this new don't break testing cause it's rolling mantra? As long as it's not

Re: Override paths for the very latest lintian.

2011-04-27 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Mats Erik Andersson mats.anders...@gisladisker.se wrote on 2011-04-27 23:59: I notice to my surprise that lintian_2.5.0~rc2 has changed the paths used in contructing warnings or errors when reporting on init scripts. Previously I could write an override using /etc/init.d/downtimed

Re: creating new package without archive file (e.g. tar.gz)

2011-04-12 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
The Fungi fu...@yuggoth.org wrote on 2011-04-12 17:40: While admittedly more recognizable for users of Western calendars, an 8-digit ISO 8601esque datestamp is fairly low-density. With only a couple more digits, you can have epoch seconds as your version timestamp (as upstream, I actually

creating new package without archive file (e.g. tar.gz)

2011-04-11 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello, I plan to create a Debian package of a new software which only have a git repository, but no archive file. How should I create such a Debian package? Is it enough to copy the git repo from the internet, remove .git/, rename the main directory of the sources (package-version) and run

RFS: lilo (updated package, RC bug fix)

2011-03-20 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
typos and phrases in manpage of lilo.conf. (Closes: #258472) Kind regards Joachim Wiedorn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110320161820.2e7d8

Re: Git Package Versioning

2011-03-20 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Julien Valroff jul...@debian.org wrote on 2011-03-20 21:48: The best I have found is to use something like: latest_upstream_release+gitMMDD.githash Please be aware, that + is not the optimal connector. Try dpkg --compare-versions and see: a) 1.2.0 is less than 1.2.0+git2011 b)

Re: nested ifeq in debian/rules (makefile)

2011-03-02 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Richard Ulrich ri...@paraeasy.ch wrote on 2011-03-02 22:13: ifeq ( $(shell [ -e /etc/dpkg/origins/default ]; printf $$?), 0) ifeq ( $(shell dpkg-vendor --derives-from Ubuntu echo yes), yes) @echo ubuntu maverick else @echo debian squeeze endif else

Re: RFS: openteacher

2011-02-19 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Arvind S Raj sraj.arv...@gmail.com wrote on 2011-02-19 09:59: Okay. Added python-qt4-dev to build-depends. A query at this point-would ${python:Depends} work for build-depends as well? Is it recommended to use it instead? IMHO it cannot work as build-depends, because the build dependencies

Re: RFS: openteacher

2011-02-19 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Arvind S Raj sraj.arv...@gmail.com wrote on 2011-02-19 15:18: Good to know! I've made the changes requested-added python-qt4-dev to build-depends and the manpages file and the section field in openteacher.1 has been updated. Do take a look and let me know any more changes that can be

Re: RFS: openteacher

2011-02-18 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Arvind S Raj sraj.arv...@gmail.com wrote on 2011-02-18 19:07: On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 10:23 PM, Joachim Wiedorn ad_deb...@joonet.dewrote: Apologies-we had university exams so couldn't reply for over the past week. No problem. * You need some more dependencies in debian/control: as build

Re: RFS: openteacher

2011-02-09 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello, I have tried compiling/packaging under Debian Squeeze with the following results: * file debian/manpages only have a LIST of filenames of manpages. * the manpage should have the name debian/openteacher.1 and inside this file the SECTION field should overwritten with 1. * You need some

Re: RFS: lilo (updated package)

2011-01-22 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net wrote on 2011-01-22 02:56: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:23.1-1 of my package lilo. Some notes: - This package goes into unstable, ready for squeeze+1. Right, but until Squeeze is out I will upload to unstable without prior

RFS: lilo (updated package)

2011-01-19 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
systems, too (without changes). Kind regards Joachim Wiedorn --- Here is the changelog of these package: lilo (1:23.1-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release. (Closes: #339778) * Upstream bugfixes: - Option 'append' works with acpi=off. (Closes: #428390) - Working

Re: common source package for use in Debian and Ubuntu

2011-01-18 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org wrote on 2011-01-18 09:03: On Tue, 18 Jan 2011, Joachim Wiedorn wrote: Now my questions: 1. is this a good way for switching contol file? It must switch the maintainer lines because Ubuntu has another policy. No. Ubuntu doesn't change

common source package for use in Debian and Ubuntu

2011-01-17 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello! as suggested in this bug report for lilo: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602824 and introduced with: http://raphaelhertzog.com/2010/11/05/managing-distribution-specific-patches-with-a-common-source-package/ I want to realize the idea of a debian directory usable for

Re: RFS: readaloud

2010-12-29 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
jos...@photosessionsltd.com wrote on 2010-12-29 10:07: * Package name: readaloud Version : 1.2.0-1 This seems to be the new version. But the link to mentors.d.n you have used is old. Please use an up-to-date template which can be easily created by you 'readaloud' site on

Re: RFS: Gummi - GTK+ based LaTeX editor with live preview pane

2010-12-27 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org wrote on 2010-12-19 23:55: Please upload to mentors with the same version number and I will sponsor it. I found the updated package of gummi in mentors.d.n. I think this package is now ready for sponsoring, isn't it? Have a nice day, Joachim (Germany)

Re: RFS: Gummi - GTK+ based LaTeX editor with live preview pane

2010-12-20 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Laszlo Boszormenyi g...@debian.hu wrote on 2010-12-20 00:40: s/he wants. The problem for which I won't upload it is that the source tree is not clean. See debian/patches/debian-changes-0.5.5-1 . Add this into debian/rules: override_dh_clean:

Re: RFS: Gummi - GTK+ based LaTeX editor with live preview pane

2010-12-20 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Daniel, I have made a updated the german translation for gummi (v0.6.0) (see homepage of gummi / ticket for translation) which also run very well with 0.5.5. See attachment. Have a nice day, Joachim (Germany) 01_german-update.patch.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data

Re: RFS: lilo (updated package) (new Maintainer)

2010-12-12 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Niels, Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net wrote on 2010-12-12 16:05: I had a quick look at your package, though there are things I may have missed. Thanks for your review. Too much copy paste from the RFS template :) The binary package has 11 warnings (it also triggers a number of less

Re: RFS: lilo (updated package) (new Maintainer)

2010-12-12 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Niels, Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net wrote on 2010-12-12 17:18: Uploaded, thanks for your contribution to Debian. :) Thank you very much! Now I hope to the release team. For the next non-Squeeze upload you may want to consider using the 3.0 (quilt) format, since it supports binary

RFS: lilo (updated package) (new Maintainer)

2010-12-11 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
. - Add package conflicts to grub-pc and grub-legacy. - Remove conflicts to manpages. - Bump to Standards-Version 3.9.1 (without changes). Kind regards Joachim Wiedorn signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: clipit

2010-11-11 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Benoît Knecht benoit.kne...@fsfe.org wrote on 2010-11-11 20:44: [...] The only problems (at least as far as I can tell) left right now are that autogen.sh asks for user input when running (this is because of gettext) This is indeed an issue, the build process should not require user

Re: Four days

2010-10-04 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello, Michal Čihař ni...@debian.org wrote on 2010-10-04 18:14: Lack of interested mentors is indeed an issue. Nobody has unlimited time and chooses what attracts him. For me it usually means things I know and test or which I find interesting after reading RFS email. I will mention another

RFS: xfe (updated package with some fixes) (2nd try)

2010-10-01 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
xfpack. (Closes: #593215) Kind regards Joachim Wiedorn signature.asc Description: PGP signature

RFS: xfe (updated package)

2010-09-19 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
xfpack. (Closes: #593215) Kind regards Joachim Wiedorn signature.asc Description: PGP signature

RFS: squidguard (updated package, fix for IA64)

2010-06-25 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
/squidguard_1.4-2.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Joachim Wiedorn signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: squidguard (updated package, ...) / libwww stuff

2010-06-19 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello, Christoph Egger christ...@debian.org wrote on 2010-06-19 15:08: debian/copyright seems to miss the whole libwww stuff I'll keep a copy of this package around so if that's fixed uploading should be doable in no time just checking the diff. I'm not understand: what is libwww stuff? Is

Re: RFS: squidguard (updated package, ...) / libwww stuff

2010-06-19 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello, Kartik Mistry kartik.mis...@gmail.com wrote on 2010-06-19 23:01: Yep. You missed as I noted in separate mail and me too! ./src/HTParse.c: UNKNOWN [Copyright: 1994-2000 World Wide Web Consortium, (Massachusetts Institute of / of W3C is fully / 1995 CERN. This product includes

  1   2   >