-x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bit-babbler/bit-babbler_0.6~bpo8+1.dsc
Changes since the last upload:
bit-babbler (0.6~bpo8+1) jessie-backports; urgency=medium
* Rebuild for jessie-backports.
-- Nicholas D Steeves Thu, 01 Dec 2016 23:47:57 -0500
bit-babbler (0.6) unstabl
+1) jessie-backports; urgency=medium
* Rebuild for jessie-backports.
-- Nicholas D Steeves Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:04:10 -0500
sndio (1.1.0-3) unstable; urgency=medium
* From Helmut Grohne: "Fix FTCBFS: Pass cross compiler to configure."
Thanks! (Closes: #843055)
* sndiod
Updated package was uploaded to mentors over the weekend.
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 07:25:29PM -0500, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> > 5. There are a lot of Lintian warnings. Please make the package
> > Lintian-clean.
>
> I'm having trouble with "W: elpa-muse: syntax-error-in-debian-news-file
> line 68 "found eof whe
Hi Sean,
Thank you very much for all your help and for this review! Would you
please pull my working copy from here:
git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/pkg-emacsen/pkg/muse-el.git
here:
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-emacsen/pkg/muse-el.git
or consult this:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-emac
; before
reading this bug report. (Closes: #720126)
* Patch README to explain how installed files relate to src:muse-el.
-- Nicholas D Steeves Tue, 18 Oct 2016 20:58:45 -0400
Regards,
Nicholas D Steeves
7.3-1~bpo8+1) jessie-backports; urgency=medium
* Rebuild for jessie-backports.
-- Nicholas D Steeves Sun, 25 Sep 2016 21:47:36 -0400
btrfs-progs (4.7.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstream release.
-- Dimitri John Ledkov Thu, 22 Sep 2016 14:48:05 +0100
btrfs-progs (4.7.2-1
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 02:26:17PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> >Actually, if you've read responses to this bug report:
>
>
> I read them, but the title for the RFS was wrong, we were talking about
> unstable.
>
> The RFS is targeting testing, that is impossible because t
Control: retitle -1 'RFS: btrfs-progs/4.7.2-0.1 [RC NMU]'
Was almost asleep and then realised this; here is the correct link:
dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/btrfs-progs/btrfs-progs_4.7.2-0.1.dsc
Humble regards,
Nicholas
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 07:11:31AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 12:57:32AM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> > Package: sponsorship-requests
> > Severity: grave
> >
> > I am looking for a sponsor for an urgent NMU of "btrfs-progs"
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: grave
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for an urgent NMU of "btrfs-progs". Upstream has
marked this as an "urgent fix" <
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Changelog#btrfs-progs-4.7.2_.28Sep_2016.29
>
Sept 5th I filed bug #836778 notifying
P.S. git://repo.or.cz/muse-el.git is another possible valid source,
and also has gpg-signed releases/tags. I'm unclear whether the github
repo is the master or the mirror.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 09:26:24AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> >> Also, it's now xz compressed, which I anticipated is something
> >> Gianfranco might hassle me about if I didn't enable haha.>
> >
> >If you're not uploading a new upstream version you can't change the
> >tar
Hi Gianfranco,
>
> >I also just uploaded 4.7.1 to Debian mentors.
>
> >Will the deferred queue automatically drop the proposed 4.7.1 bpo in case a
> >major regression prevents the sid package from migrating to testing?
>
>
> no, it won't prevent the drop, this is something I have to remember t
On 29 August 2016 at 17:15, James Cowgill wrote:
> On 29/08/16 21:49, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm adopting muse-el. Right now it's a work-in-progress. The steps I
>> took to fixup this package can be found here:
>>
>> https://gith
Hi Sean,
On 29 August 2016 at 17:35, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:15:08PM +0100, James Cowgill wrote:
>> > Finally, is now the time to fix the
>> > debian-rules-missing-recommended-target warning? I'm saving homepage
>> > and Vcs fields for last.
>>
>> Yes, those t
On 29 August 2016 at 16:49, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm adopting muse-el. Right now it's a work-in-progress. The steps I
> took to fixup this package can be found here:
>
> https://github.com/sten0/muse-el
> clone: https://github.com/sten0/muse-
Hi,
I'm adopting muse-el. Right now it's a work-in-progress. The steps I
took to fixup this package can be found here:
https://github.com/sten0/muse-el
clone: https://github.com/sten0/muse-el.git
I've also uploaded a package, with "-sa" full sources for review here:
https://mentors.debian.net/
trfs-progs (4.7-1~bpo8+1) jessie-backports; urgency=medium
* Rebuild for jessie-backports.
-- Nicholas D Steeves Fri, 26 Aug 2016 19:19:01 -0400
btrfs-progs (4.7-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstream release.
-- Dimitri John Ledkov Thu, 11 Aug 2016 12:52:07 +0100
btrfs-progs (4.6.
On 2 August 2016 at 18:11, Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
> in any case, I would prefer to see it fixed in unstable.
> BTW such errors are normal when using backports, so fixing a single package
> is worse than no fix at all (specially when the fix is "problematic")
>
> I would prefer to do a no-cha
mitri.led...@surgut.co.uk
...
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 11:32:32 +0100
...
Message-ID:
Subject: Re: Problem with btrfs-progs package
From: Dimitri John Ledkov
To: Uher Marek
Cc: Nicholas D Steeves , debian-backpo...@lists.debian.org
Thank you :-)
Nicholas
) jessie-backports; urgency=medium
* Rebuild for jessie-backports.
-- Nicholas D Steeves Tue, 26 Jul 2016 16:58:05 -0400
btrfs-progs (4.6.1-1) unstable; urgency=high
[ Dimitri John Ledkov ]
* New upstream release
* Update debian/copyright as package is mostly GPL-2 only, not GPL-2
Hi Adam,
On 8 July 2016 at 08:58, Adam Borowski wrote:
> Might be RC but certainly isn't urgent. I don't see Nicholas pointing any
> of the upstream changes as immediately important (and I _do_ read
> linux-bt...@vger.kernel.org); debian/copyright changes are hardly ever
> time-sentitive too.
F
understood that smaller, more atomic and easily reversible incremental
changes over time were preferred, because that would make it easier
for you to revert ones you didn't like:
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 00:20:44 +0100
Message-ID:
Subject: Re: Bug#818687: RFS: btrfs-progs/4.4.1-1.1 [NMU]
From: Dimit
oconf* stuff, send|receive stuff,
subsystem a stuff, subsystem b stuff?
> Another thing, you might consider to change
> Files: debian/*
> Copyright: 2007-2012, Daniel Baumann
>
> License: GPL-2+
>
> Files: debian/watch
> Copyright: 2016, Nicholas D Steeves
> License: GP
Hi Adam,
Thank you for taking the time to help me along the way and to produce
higher quality work.
On 5 July 2016 at 22:12, Adam Borowski wrote:
>
>> * Fix serious errors in debian/copyright. This is not a GPL2+ package.
>> Cme was used to generate a machine-readable copyright file, then
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for this update of "btrfs-progs". I have
chosen to update to v4.5.3, because this version does not trigger a
bug when combined with linux-4.6.x as discussed in the following
email:
https://www.spinics.net/lis
l/main/b/bit-babbler/bit-babbler_0.5~bpo8+1.dsc
Regards,
Nicholas D Steeves
y, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/diskscan/diskscan_0.19-1~bpo8+1.dsc
Changes since the last upload:
* Rebuild for jessie-backports. (Closes: #824812)
Regards,
Nicholas D Steeves
On 9 May 2016 at 13:18, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>>Per https://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals , I filed Bug #823848
>>"as an RC bug on the package".
>
> I have reassigned it to ftpmasters, I don't think there is need to wait for
> the maintainer opinion, this is a binary without source.
T
On 9 May 2016 at 04:31, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>>Waiting for his reply.
>
>
> this seems the most important bit, I would appreciate you opening a bug
> report against
> the package (severity:important), explaining why you want a version in
> experimental,
> leaving xnox the time to answer
Hi Gianfranco
On 6 May 2016 at 04:32, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>
> Hi, it would be nice to avoid having a possible and problematic version even
> in experimental.
> Specially because it might be source of data-losses to the end users.
>
I agree, however, upstream's official recommendation is
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "btrfs-progs". I've read
upstream reports of regressions in the 4.5.x series that were solved
by downgrading to 4.4.x, so I believe that it is most appropriate to
upload to experimental at this
Thank you Gianfranco!
Nicholas
On 3 May 2016 at 06:20, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi, signed and uploaded!
>
> cheers,
>
> G.
>
>
>
>
>
> Il Lunedì 2 Maggio 2016 23:42, Nicholas D Steeves ha
> scritto:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity:
visit the
following URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/btrfs-progs
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/btrfs-progs/btrfs-progs_4.4.1-1.1~bpo8+1.dsc
Regards,
Nicholas D Steeves
Hi,
If a package's changelog is published on a wiki, is it still necessary
and/or desirable to ship a changelog with the Debian package? If yes,
is something like the following the best solution:
curl https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Changelog | html2text |
sed '0,/(announcement)/d;/By ve
Hi Gianfranco,
Here is a link to the latest version, which uses triggers instead of
postinst and postrm. I think it's ready to upload, but please double
check :-)
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/btrfs-progs/btrfs-progs_4.4.1-1.1.dsc
Cheers,
Nicholas
Hi Dimitri,
On 22 April 2016 at 19:20, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> I haven't looked closely, but i have a lot dubious emails about btrfs package.
> (a) i do not maintain backports, anybody is free to do those
> (b) all of my packages are lowNMU, meaning I trust any/all DDs to do
> sensible thing
On 21 April 2016 at 03:53, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Policy §10.4 says that /bin/sh script need to follow SUSv3 + some
> extensions. Both "hash" and "command -v" are optional in SUSv3 (but they are
> mandatory in SUSv4), so in theory you shouldn't use them. In practice,
> however, "command -v" is probab
On 21 April 2016 at 08:33, Christian Seiler wrote:
> Hi Gianfranco,
>
> On 04/21/2016 09:48 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>>> activate update-initramfs
>> do you think it is worth adding to the current NMU or it is better to leave
>> it for
>> a future upload?
>
> I'm not sure if you meant to
s -u
fi
diff -ur ./debian/changelog ../btrfs-progs-4.4.1-static_path/debian/changelog
--- ./debian/changelog 2016-04-20 19:18:09.337997103 -0400
+++ ../btrfs-progs-4.4.1-static_path/debian/changelog 2016-04-20
19:22:16.621669102 -0400
@@ -6,7 +6,6 @@
* Update standards versi
On 15 April 2016 at 09:25, Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
> also some issues might be fixed in a later release
>
> http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/btrfs-progs/4.4.1-1.1/lintian
>
> I: btrfs-progs source: duplicate-short-description btrfs-tools btrfs-tools-dbg
> I: btrfs-progs
On 8 April 2016 at 17:43, Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
>>Given that both of these will be broken if this package isn't
>>uploaded, is now the time to upload it?
>
> I didn't understand this sentence.
It turns out debian-cd can list both btrfs-tools and btrfs-progs to
handle the transition, howeve
Moreinfo removed, because Sledge on #debian-installer directed me to
what I needed to patch in debian-cd.
-- Nicholas
I've filed a bug and submitted a patch for debian-cd and have
contacted the maintainers of partman-btrfs links to the updated
package on mentors and to a github repo, because jcristau on
#debian-installer said he preferred pulling from a git repo. How long
should I wait before filing an RFS bug ag
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages]
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my backport of "smartmontools"
Package name: smartmontools
Version: 6.4+svn4214-1~bpo8+1
Section: utils
It builds these binary packages:
smartmonto
On 5 April 2016 at 13:52, Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
> so, please remove the moreinfo tag once you have a feedback from -boot team.
Will do. 'hope they rsvp soon!
> also a reverse-dependency needs fixing here
> https://codesearch.debian.net/results/btrfs-tools-udeb/page_0
> partman-btrfs
Fix
Fixed @ same URL. Lots of beginner mistakes, plus carelessness wrt to
Standards Version :-$ Whoops! Thank you for your patience.
On 5 April 2016 at 13:07, Gianfranco Costamagna
> BTW I'm not sure about the udeb package rename, there is no upgrade path
> there, maybe you can get in touch with
>
On 4 April 2016 at 09:20, Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
> I did a preliminary review on pkg-multimedia mail list [1] (where Nicholas
> applied for the team join)
>
>
> please address the issues I raised, and remove the moreinfo tag once done,
> and I'll do another spin.
>
>
> [1]
> https://lists
to btrfs-progs (Closes: #780081)
Kind Regards,
Nicholas D Steeves
301 - 350 of 350 matches
Mail list logo
