FWIW, this looks good to me. This is a new upstream release, but it's a
bug-fix only (adding a translation update at the same time seems fine).
Is there a particular reason this should NOT be uploaded?
--
Richard
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
What advantages does this program have over pwgen (which has been around
for a long time and is already package)?
--
Richard
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 01:12 +0200, Alexey Eromenko wrote:
To minimize confusion, I think it might be better to keep only one
version in Debian main -- the one that matches VirtualBox.
It might be worthwhile to have a phpvirtualbox meta package which
Depends: phpvirtualbox-4.1, Recommends:
On Sun, 2012-02-05 at 20:59 +0530, Medhamsh wrote:
I have submitted an ITP for rudecgi parser lib for C++ and uploaded
the package to mentors(#658347). After that found all the components
of http://rudeserver.com to be interesting.
Are you actually using these components in an application? If
Perhaps you should use a cron.d file instead, as the admin could edit
that.
Richard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 02:50 +0200, Harald Jenny wrote:
I'm facing the problem that a package I maintain depends on a library whose
maintainer is either to busy or not interested providing a deb for the new
upstream version which would (hopefully) fix a serious bug in the library.
IANADD,
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 02:36 +0300, Eugene Paskevich wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:11:47 +0300, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
Why did you drop this line from debian/rules?
rm -f config.sub config.guess
I'm not sure why they are there to begin with.
These files are in orig tarball
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 23:04 +0100, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
Abondoning the tarball-in-tarball form of the
orig.tar-file would change the upstream tarball that comes with the
repackaged debian source, without changes to the upstream version
IANADD (and I don't know what you're packaging), but
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 21:18 +0100, Karolina Kalic wrote:
It is a plugin for any libpurple based client and I wrote that in long
description of the package. But, there is no plugin which name starts
with purple-, so it may be difficult to find it. Also, there are
other packages in Debian
On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 01:15 +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
Yes and no. Some icon artists create it in svg and then export to png
and does pixelmanipulations of each size.
What's the source here ?
Theoretical discussions aside, in this case, I'd distribute both. If the
SVG no longer exists, I'd
On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 18:27 +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
* You should probably not depend on pidgin, I guess the plugin
is also useable from finch (the console version).
You would want to depend on libpurple0, but that should be happening
automatically. (I haven't tried building this
On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 22:15 +0100, Michal Čihař wrote:
Dne Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:46:30 -0600
Richard Laager [EMAIL PROTECTED] napsal(a):
Do you think I should file a bug report on the gnome-keyring package in
Debian to see if the maintainer would include this as a patch?
I think
I am looking for a sponsor for my package gnome-keyring-query.
* Package name: gnome-keyring-query
Version : 0.0.0.20070709-3
Upstream Author : Koster
* URL :
http://www.gentoo-wiki.info/HOWTO_Use_gnome-keyring_to_store_SSH_passphrases
* License : Public
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 18:35 +0100, Julien Valroff wrote:
Le vendredi 31 octobre 2008 à 18:24 +0100, Siegfried-Angel a écrit :
If I remember correctly, you can use the following syntax:
python-psyco [i386].
This is only for build-depends. I think that can also be used for
arch:any
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 01:00 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
dbconfig-common is documented fairly well.
I do not agree with this statement. There are dark areas in the doc,
particularly nowhere, it's telling how to get a root user on MySQL, and
some packages might
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 02:40 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Why do you think no app would need it?
I never claimed this.
How about something that does mysql backups, or manages MySQL accounts?
I have made 2 packages that needs that, one of them being
automysqlbackup, and I had to do hackish
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 22:51 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
How can this conflict of interest be solved?
I would start with the assumption that people installing your package
actually want it. Then I'd look at the most common use case in such a
scenario and make that the default answer in debconf.
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 14:02 +0530, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
I have enclosed a sample debian/copyright file for your package.
You might wish to edit it before including it.
This looks like it's supposed to be the machine-readable format, but it
doesn't seem to comply with that spec. The
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 09:52 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 8:22 AM, Stefan Ott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package pidgin-privacy-please.
The upstream website says this requires pidgin itself to be patched,
has the Debian pidgin package
On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 20:19 +0800, Wen-Yen Chuang wrote:
Aleš Koval (author of fpm2) wrote:
FPM2 data file is 100% compatible with his old version. I port FPM2 as
drop-in replacement old FPM in mind.
In this case, why is it necessary to create an fpm2 package at all? Why
not just do a new
I'm not a Debian developer, so take this all with a large grain of salt.
On Sat, 2008-01-05 at 15:03 +0100, Jonas Eschenburg wrote:
1. Some addons' shared libraries have dependencies to other addons.
Do you have an example here? It seems like this is violating the addon
abstraction, though I
On Sun, 2007-12-02 at 00:21 +, Pedro Fragoso wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package libccc.
* Package name: libccc
Version : 0.0.5
Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site]
* License
On Fri, 2007-11-23 at 22:47 +, James Westby wrote:
On Fri, 2007-11-23 at 18:23 -0400, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote:
You need a new changelog for Debian starting from scratch and you could
adapt the copyright (if the license allow it) or just make one new.
I'm not so sure.
Likewise,
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 13:48 -0500, Jordi Gutierrez Hermoso wrote:
On 29/05/07, Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Find out if the SAGE developers changes to octave/etc are useful to
people who use octave/etc without using SAGE, if so, go the first
route.
According to William Stein
this:
-
This package was debianized by Richard Laager [EMAIL PROTECTED] on
Mon, 10 Apr 2006 23:34:33 -0500.
It was downloaded from http://gbonds.sourceforge.net/download/
Copyright Holder: Jim Evins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
License:
This package is free software; you can redistribute
On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 18:24 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
P.S: dbconfig-common is too much Debian specific and it wont be an
available package on other Unix systems like FreeBSD or OSX, so we can't
really use it.
dbconfig-common solves all of this stuff for you. It is the right
solution.
On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 21:19 +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:
OoO En cette matinée pluvieuse du lundi 12 février 2007, vers 10:11,
sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait:
MAX_TMPFILE_LIFETIME=15
Do these files really need to stick around for 15 days?
OK, I have included your snippet of
On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 13:22 +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 00:42:22 -0800, Richard Laager [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 21:19 +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:
OoO En cette matinée pluvieuse du lundi 12 février 2007, vers 10:11,
sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 21:34 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
As for the binary package, that depends on the installed size. For both
phpBB and SquirrelMail we did not split the translation up, because each
translation is quite small sized. How much space would it cost to
install all translations?
On Sat, 2007-02-10 at 23:21 +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:
First off, I'm not a Debian developer. My advice could be wrong, so be
cautious about following it.
I do have a strong interest in seeing Roundcube packaged for Debian.
This is still a beta quality software but I use it happily
On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 19:17 +0100, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 11:39:28 -0600
Richard Laager [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 18:18 +0100, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
My package (pam-keyring) FTBFS on some buildd[1] because 'kill' is
missing. /bin/kill
On Sun, 2007-01-28 at 09:45 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
I'm replying to the reply, since I can't find a copy of the original
message in my MUA. Sorry for the sub-optimal threading.
On Sun, 28 Jan 2007, Andreas wrote:
4. debian/compat
The current debhelper version is 5.x. So if
On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 14:17 +0100, Andreas Moll wrote:
If the scripts are intended to be used on other platforms, how about
moving them out of the debian directory, in the upstream sources?
Well these scripts are in the upstream sources (see debian-upstream dir)
and when I want to create a
On Sat, 2006-12-23 at 02:29 +0100, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
It's a PAM module that unlock the gnome-keyring at login. Useful with
network-manager for example.
I'm not sure where pam-keyring-tool must go (/bin or /usr/bin) since it
is needed by the pam library.
Full informations on the
I hereby
grant both the Debian and Ubuntu teams, and their associated mirrors,
permission to distribute the TeamSpeak Version 2.x, and ONLY Version 2.x,
software package FREE of charge, and without any fee requirements,
for the
sole purpose of facilitating the installation
On Sat, 2006-11-18 at 12:59 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Also, I wanted to have your opinion. Is it ok to use dtc:nogroup, or
should I also generate a group name and use it?
I think the same arguments apply for the group.
Richard
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 16:35 -0500, Kit Peters wrote:
The boxen out in the field run apt-get update ; apt-get dist-upgrade
once a night.
I don't know much about anything, but I do know this is dangerous.
dist-upgrade removes packages as necessary. Sometimes, due to the
archive being partially
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 14:31 +0200, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
* Added --as-needed to LDFLAGS to avoid unnecessary NEEDED entries.
Thanks to Christian 'Greek0' Aichinger.
Is the use of --as-needed encouraged/discouraged in Debian? Is there a
reason this isn't used system-wide? (I'm aware some
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 19:30 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00016.html
In short:
- First try the relibtoolize approach.
I'll start by admitting I don't know much about the autotools.
I took a look at this URL:
On Fri, 2006-10-27 at 11:10 +, Thomas Leonard wrote:
... Thanks for your explanation. ...
http://0install.net/matrix.html
The one thing I found particularly interesting is:
Conflict-free
If program A requires an old version of a library, and program B
requires a new version, A and B can
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 14:39 +, Thomas Leonard wrote:
It builds these binary packages:
zeroinstall-injector - run programs by URL
This probably isn't related to getting your package in Debian, so if
this gets to be a larger discussion, we might need to take it off list,
but...
This looks
On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 13:08 -0200, eduardo.oliva barruzi wrote:
Hi mentor, I joined this list to make some needed work to the project.
If any of you knows something that I can help, please let me know,
cause I really want to join.
I'm not sure what to suggest for Debian specifically, but for
On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 14:08 -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
2. only iff conf.d is not included (may be older config files were
preserved during upgrades or explicitely removed by sysadmin), then it
adds that explicit rule.
I haven't really been following this, so I'm not sure if you're
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package scrdec.
* Package name: scrdec
Version : 1.8-5
Upstream Author : Mr Brownstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL :
http://www.virtualconspiracy.com/index.php?page=scrdec/download
* License : BSD
Section
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package gbonds.
* Package name: gbonds
Version : 2.0.2-6
Upstream Author : Jim Evins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://gbonds.sourceforge.net/download/
* License : GPL
Section : gnome
It builds these
45 matches
Mail list logo
