Your message dated Thu, 13 Dec 2012 16:20:38 +
with message-id e1tjbwy-00084u...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: minidlna/1.0.25+dfsg-1 -- lightweight
DLNA/UPnP-AV server targeted at embedded systems
has caused the Debian Bug report #682781,
regarding RFS: minidlna/1.0.25+dfsg
Bart Martens wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 03:10:02PM +0200, Benoît Knecht wrote:
I'm not sure what you're proposing I should do.
I sometimes give feedback on a package without proposing a solution.
I understand, but since I didn't see a solution myself, I thought I'd
ask if you had any
Bart Martens wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 05:45:51PM +0200, Benoît Knecht wrote:
Bart Martens wrote:
minidlna-1.0.25+dfsg/debian/copyright :
| Source: http://sourceforge.net/projects/minidlna/files/
| The icons.c file in the original tarball contained binary blobs of
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 03:10:02PM +0200, Benoît Knecht wrote:
I'm not sure what you're proposing I should do.
I sometimes give feedback on a package without proposing a solution.
In this case it is, in my opinion, OK to remove the non-free parts from the
upstream tarball, and to ship
Hi Bart,
Thanks a lot for your prompt reply.
Bart Martens wrote:
minidlna-1.0.25+dfsg/debian/copyright :
| Source: http://sourceforge.net/projects/minidlna/files/
| The icons.c file in the original tarball contained binary blobs of
possibly
| unfree images. It has hence been
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 05:45:51PM +0200, Benoît Knecht wrote:
Bart Martens wrote:
minidlna-1.0.25+dfsg/debian/copyright :
| Source: http://sourceforge.net/projects/minidlna/files/
| The icons.c file in the original tarball contained binary blobs of
possibly
| unfree
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 04:13:53PM +, Bart Martens wrote:
That is about editing the to omit non-free parts, not about adding/replacing
files.
I meant editing the files.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
User: sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: not-for-wheezy, not-fit-for-wheezy
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package minidlna
* Package name: minidlna
Version : 1.0.25+dfsg-1
Upstream Author :
Hi Benoît,
minidlna-1.0.25+dfsg/debian/copyright :
| Source: http://sourceforge.net/projects/minidlna/files/
| The icons.c file in the original tarball contained binary blobs of
possibly
| unfree images. It has hence been replaced in the DFSG tarball by a file
| containing the
Hi Ansgar,
Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
Benoît Knecht benoit.kne...@fsfe.org writes:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/minidlna/minidlna_1.0.24+dfsg-1.dsc
The package was removed due to a bug in the new debexpo version. Could
you upload it again?
Right, I had not
Benoît Knecht wrote:
Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
Benoît Knecht benoit.kne...@fsfe.org writes:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/minidlna/minidlna_1.0.24+dfsg-1.dsc
The package was removed due to a bug in the new debexpo version. Could
you upload it again?
Your message dated Thu, 01 Mar 2012 19:51:37 +0100
with message-id 87fwdsm9xi@deep-thought.43-1.org
and subject line Re: Bug#659894: RFS: minidlna/1.0.24+dfsg-1 -- lightweight
DLNA/UPnP-AV server (new upstream version)
has caused the Debian Bug report #659894,
regarding RFS: minidlna/1.0.24
Benoît Knecht benoit.kne...@fsfe.org writes:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/minidlna/minidlna_1.0.24+dfsg-1.dsc
The package was removed due to a bug in the new debexpo version. Could
you upload it again?
Regards,
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 659894 RFS: minidlna/1.0.24+dfsg-1 -- lightweight DLNA/UPnP-AV server
(new upstream version)
Bug #659894 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: minidlna-1.0.23+dfsg-1 (new upstream
version)
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: minidlna/1.0.24+dfsg-1
retitle 659894 RFS: minidlna/1.0.24+dfsg-1 -- lightweight DLNA/UPnP-AV server
(new upstream version)
thanks
Benoît Knecht wrote:
Benoît Knecht wrote:
* Package name: minidlna
Version : 1.0.23+dfsg-1
Upstream Author : Justin Maggard jmagg...@users.sourceforge.net
Benoît Knecht wrote:
* Package name: minidlna
Version : 1.0.23+dfsg-1
Upstream Author : Justin Maggard jmagg...@users.sourceforge.net
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/minidlna/
* git : git://gitorious.org/debian-pkg/minidlna.git
git-web
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package minidlna.
* Package name: minidlna
Version : 1.0.23+dfsg-1
Upstream Author : Justin Maggard jmagg...@users.sourceforge.net
* URL :
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package minidlna.
* Package name: minidlna
Version : 1.0.22+dfsg-1
Upstream Author : Justin Maggard jmagg...@users.sourceforge.net
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/minidlna/
* git :
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 09:03:07PM -0300, Fernando Lemos wrote:
Hi,
Just to clarify, I find it concerning that we might be accepting
source uploads that don't come straight from upstream and don't match
what was released upstream. I'm relieved to hear that there is a way
to ensure in your
Hi Benoît,
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 01:39:11AM +0200, Benoît Knecht wrote:
Kilian Krause wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 12:36:51PM +0200, Benoît Knecht wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.21+dfsg-1 of my
package minidlna.
- dget
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Sven Hoexter s...@timegate.de wrote:
We do it all the time. Just 'dpkg -l|grep dfsg' on your local system
and you should find plenty of those modified source tarballs.
What I, as an uploader, do in such cases is a diff between the upstream
provided tarball
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.21+dfsg-1 of my
package minidlna.
It builds this binary package:
minidlna - lightweight DLNA/UPnP-AV server targeted at embedded systems
The package is lintian clean, and has been tested to compile and run
fine on amd64, armel
Salut Benoît,
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 12:36:51PM +0200, Benoît Knecht wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.21+dfsg-1 of my
package minidlna.
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/minidlna/minidlna_1.0.21+dfsg-1.dsc
1. Your upoad uses a tarball that's not
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 11:16:54PM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote:
1. Your upoad uses a tarball that's not identical to upstream's one. Please
consider adding a get-orig-tarball target to debian/rules to verify what
steps are required to generate it.
..that would be get-orig-source of
2011/7/22 Kilian Krause kil...@debian.org:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 12:36:51PM +0200, Benoît Knecht wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.21+dfsg-1 of my
package minidlna.
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/minidlna/minidlna_1.0.21+dfsg-1.dsc
1. Your
Hi Kilian,
Kilian Krause wrote:
Salut Benoît,
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 12:36:51PM +0200, Benoît Knecht wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.21+dfsg-1 of my
package minidlna.
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/minidlna/minidlna_1.0.21+dfsg-1.dsc
Hi Fernando,
Fernando Lemos wrote:
2011/7/22 Kilian Krause kil...@debian.org:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 12:36:51PM +0200, Benoît Knecht wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.21+dfsg-1 of my
package minidlna.
- dget
2011/7/22 Benoît Knecht benoit.kne...@fsfe.org:
Hi Fernando,
Fernando Lemos wrote:
2011/7/22 Kilian Krause kil...@debian.org:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 12:36:51PM +0200, Benoît Knecht wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.21+dfsg-1 of my
package minidlna.
- dget
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Goirand wrote:
Considering that nobody replied to you in 4 days, I reviewed the
package, and uploaded.
Thank you very much, I appreciate it. It FTBFSed on kfreebsd-*
unfortunately, so I'll work on fixing that and will have a new version
ready soon... Stay tuned :)
Cheers,
On 06/30/2011 07:25 PM, Benoît Knecht wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.20+dfsg-1
of my package minidlna.
It builds these binary packages:
minidlna - lightweight DLNA/UPnP-AV server targeted at embedded systems
The package appears to be lintian
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.20+dfsg-1
of my package minidlna.
It builds these binary packages:
minidlna - lightweight DLNA/UPnP-AV server targeted at embedded systems
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 626835,
Michael Tautschnig wrote:
Hi Benoît,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.18-5
of my package minidlna.
[...]
Looks pretty good, and I really like the fact that multiple people seem to be
working on it, makes package maintenance a lot more future-proof :-) Built and
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 02:51:26PM +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
Michael Tautschnig m...@debian.org writes:
Looks pretty good, and I really like the fact that multiple people seem to
be
working on it, makes package maintenance a lot more future-proof :-) Built
and
uploaded!
Just
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.18-5
of my package minidlna.
It builds these binary packages:
minidlna - lightweight DLNA/UPnP-AV server targeted at embedded systems
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 613853, 617722,
Hi Benoît,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.18-5
of my package minidlna.
[...]
Looks pretty good, and I really like the fact that multiple people seem to be
working on it, makes package maintenance a lot more future-proof :-) Built and
uploaded!
Just one thing, though,
Michael Tautschnig m...@debian.org writes:
Looks pretty good, and I really like the fact that multiple people seem to be
working on it, makes package maintenance a lot more future-proof :-) Built and
uploaded!
Just one thing, though, that I don't really like, which you might want to
Hi Benoît,
[...]
Just one question regarding your most recent changes: Why did you remove the
AUTHORS sections from man pages?
I just followed a recommendation from man-pages(7):
Use of an AUTHORS section is strongly discouraged. Generally, it is
better not to clutter every
Hi Michael,
Michael Tautschnig wrote:
Package looks fine, thanks a lot! I have just uploaded your package, but it
will
have to wait in NEW until ftp-masters find the time to review the package.
Please bear in mind that we are in freeze and ftp-masters are likely busy with
other work in
Hi Benoît,
Benoît Knecht wrote:
For now, I'm waiting for upstream to address the licensing issue, so I
won't upload a new version until then. But I'm still fixing things
locally and if anyone notices other issues with the package, please do
point them out. I'm hoping my next upload will
Benoît Knecht wrote:
For now, I'm waiting for upstream to address the licensing issue, so I
won't upload a new version until then. But I'm still fixing things
locally and if anyone notices other issues with the package, please do
point them out. I'm hoping my next upload will be the one :)
So
Hi Michael,
Once again, thanks for your careful review, I greatly appreciate it.
Michael Tautschnig wrote:
I've spotted a two more minor issues which you might want to correct
nevertheless as we'll have to wait for the license-header fix anyway
to make this code distributable.
- Once you
Hi Benoît,
[...]
I just uploaded a new version (1.0.18-3) [1] that addresses all the
issues you've pointed out to me (except the missing license headers,
I'll ask upstream about that).
I hope I didn't miss anything, but please let me know if there are any
problems left.
I've spotted
Hi Michael,
Sorry for the delay, but I've been awfully busy over the week end.
Michael Tautschnig wrote:
It seems like a clever thing to do in {pre,post}inst: there's no need to
create a default minidlna user:group if something else is already set in
the default file; I'm just unsure if it
Hi Benoît,
[...]
I've now uploaded a corrected version (minidlna-1.0.18-2), and forwarded
the relevant patches upstream. You can find it at
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/minidlna.
I'm still looking for a sponsor, so don't hesitate if any of you is
interested.
I've
Hi Michael,
Thanks a lot for reviewing my package.
Michael Tautschnig wrote:
I've reviewed your package, and found the following issues, which should be
corrected:
- Copyright information in source files is very incomplete. Some of them even
lack any information. Please run licensecheck
Hi again,
Hi Michael,
Thanks a lot for reviewing my package.
You're welcome!
Michael Tautschnig wrote:
I've reviewed your package, and found the following issues, which should be
corrected:
- Copyright information in source files is very incomplete. Some of them
even
lack
Michael Tautschnig wrote:
- You ship a defaults file, which allows to customize $USER and $GROUP,
but your
scripts don't take this into account.
Are you sure about that one? In minidlna.init, I only assign default
values to $USER and $GROUP if they are empty (which won't be the
[...]
It seems like a clever thing to do in {pre,post}inst: there's no need to
create a default minidlna user:group if something else is already set in
the default file; I'm just unsure if it should create the user:group
found in the default file if they do not exist already (if they do not
Hi,
Fernando Lemos wrote:
I'm not a DD or a DM, but here's my (very superficial) review, as I'm
mildly interested in this package.
* It seems that you are missing Build-Depends on libavcodec-dev and
libavutil-dev.
* lintian -I is mosly clean, except for:
I: minidlna:
Hi,
Thanks a lot for your comments, I really appreciate you taking the time.
Fernando Lemos wrote:
I'm not a DD or a DM, but here's my (very superficial) review, as I'm
mildly interested in this package.
* It seems that you are missing Build-Depends on libavcodec-dev and
libavutil-dev.
Hi,
Paul Gevers wrote:
As you target embedded systems, maybe you should contact the emdebian
project [1] to see if you can more easily find a sponsor there. If you
try, but don't find one therer, please don't hesitate to return to this
list.
Thanks for your advice. I would think people at
Hi,
2010/10/15 Benoît Knecht benoit.kne...@fsfe.org:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package minidlna.
I'm not a DD or a DM, but here's my (very superficial) review, as I'm
mildly interested in this package.
* It seems that you are missing Build-Depends on libavcodec-dev and
Hi,
[I cc'd you just in case you are not subscribed to this list.]
http://www.emdebian.org/support.html
On 10/15/10 10:23, Benoît Knecht wrote:
minidlna - lightweight DLNA/UPnP-AV server targeted at embedded systems
As you target embedded systems, maybe you should contact the emdebian
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package minidlna.
* Package name: minidlna
Version : 1.0.18-1
Upstream Author : Justin Maggard jmagg...@users.sourceforge.net
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/minidlna/
* License : GPL-2 and BSD
Section
54 matches
Mail list logo
